Menu
▾
▴
docutils-users — General discussions, questions, help requests.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(59) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(65) |
May
(163) |
Jun
(169) |
Jul
(137) |
Aug
(77) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(68) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(42) |
May
(86) |
Jun
(82) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(62) |
Nov
(131) |
Dec
(43) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(56) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(165) |
May
(106) |
Jun
(97) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(150) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(115) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(67) |
May
(89) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(116) |
Aug
(65) |
Sep
(58) |
Oct
(103) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(52) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(92) |
Feb
(60) |
Mar
(124) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(69) |
Jun
(79) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(57) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(82) |
Sep
(58) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(86) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(33) |
Mar
(84) |
Apr
(90) |
May
(109) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(93) |
Oct
(86) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(62) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(57) |
Mar
(62) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(152) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(29) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(117) |
Nov
(60) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(41) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
(39) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
|
Dec
(10) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(18) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
(21) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(9) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(4) |
|
2
(3) |
3
(7) |
4
(1) |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
(3) |
10
|
11
(3) |
12
|
13
(4) |
14
|
15
(1) |
|
16
|
17
(2) |
18
(1) |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
(1) |
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Cory D. <cd...@st...> - 2005-01-31 14:56:37
|
Hi All, >From my point of view it would be great to be able to use bibtex .bib files for latex and html generation with docutils. Has anyone succeeded in doing this? Cheers, Cory. -- )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Cory Davis Meteorology School of GeoSciences University of Edinburgh King's Buildings EDINBURGH EH9 3JZ ph: +44(0)131 6505092 fax +44(0)131 6505780 cd...@st... co...@me... http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/contacts/homes/cdavis )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) |
|
From: Jens J. M. <je...@fy...> - 2005-01-26 12:57:21
|
If I use a role with a long name often, then it would be nice if I could=20 write simply `hrmpf` instead of :role-with-a-long-name:`hrmpf` all the ti= me. Is it possible to specify which role to use as default for interpreted te= xt? Jens J=C3=B8rgen |
|
From: Lele G. <le...@na...> - 2005-01-18 11:31:02
|
Hi all, I took the time to restructure the italian translations of docutils material, and updated it as well. Now it follows the same layout of master repository, to make it simpler to drop in new translated docs. The documents themselves are stored in a Subversion repository, and there's a post-commit rule that eventually rebuild static HTML pages from touched sources, something very similar to what happens on the 'docs' subdirectory of the SF.net project site. I'm willing to add accounts for anybody interested. http://docit.bice.dyndns.org/static/ReST/ hth, ciao, lele. PS: see also http://docit.bice.dyndns.org/ for more details --=20 nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivr=C3=B2 di quello che ho pensato ieri real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincer=C3=B2 ad aver paura di chi mi copia. email: le...@se... | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929. |
|
From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2005-01-17 17:21:24
|
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Beni Cherniavsky apparently wrote: >> There is a lot of information that >> is associate to the Author more than it is general to the document, so >> maybe there should be a way to associate the various fields somehow. > Probably but I can't think of a convenient syntax. Alternating > author/contact/organization/address fields will do for now. And possibly 'position'? Cheers, Alan Isaac |
|
From: Felix W. <Fel...@gm...> - 2005-01-17 17:07:27
|
David Goodger wrote:
> Look at the other parts available:
>
> ['body', 'subtitle', 'title', 'fragment', 'footer', 'header',
> 'stylesheet', 'meta', 'whole', 'docinfo']
>
> You can assemble the entire document or whatever portion you want from
> all the other parts.
Not easily, because the doctitle-h1 is only in 'whole' ('title' contains
no tags, just the title itself). So you have to generate quite some
HTML code yourself if you want to construct the stuff between <body> and
</body>. That's bad, given that using the HTML body is probably quite a
common thing.
IMO the easiest solution would be to make 'body' the body of the output
format. Or should we rather add a function which returns the body of a
HTML document? That would require some code, though.
--
When replying to my email address, please ensure
that the mail header contains 'Felix Wiemann'.
http://www.ososo.de/
|
|
From: Beni C. <cb...@us...> - 2005-01-15 22:12:40
|
Morten Lied Johansen wrote:
> Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
>
>> Oh, that's easy. The LaTeX writer should be fixed to place the
>> contact info into the titlepage as well. I'm writing a patch. What
>> is the best way to format it? info latex gives:
>>
>> The `\author' command declares the author(s), where `names' is a list
>> of authors separated by `\and' commands. Use `\\' to separate lines
>> within a single author's entry - for example, to give the author's
>> institution or address.
>>
>> So, should I simply format this::
>>
>> :Author: Foo
>> :Contact: fo...@ex...
>> :Author: Bar
>> :Contact: ba...@ex...
>>
>> as::
>>
>> \author{foo \\ fo...@ex... \and bar \\ ba...@ex...}
>>
>> ?
Implemented in CVS for organization,contact,address. Try it out.
> Seems like a good solution to me, maybe place the email inside <> or ()
> as that seems to be a common way of formatting it.
A contact is not always an email (it could be a phone number). And I'm not
sure how well it will look combined with an organization and an address (which
both probably shouldn't have any markers like <>). So I didn't add any such
markers. Easy to implement if there is concensus.
> Alan mentions this in another mail. There is a lot of information that
> is associate to the Author more than it is general to the document, so
> maybe there should be a way to associate the various fields somehow.
>
Probably but I can't think of a convenient syntax. Alternating
author/contact/organization/address fields will do for now.
--
Beni Cherniavsky <cb...@us...>, who can only read email on weekends.
|
|
From: Felix W. <Fel...@gm...> - 2005-01-13 20:21:00
|
Vicki Brown wrote:
> Shouldn't vlb\@ironport.com therefore _not_ be converted into a
> mailto?
Yeah, probably.
The following patch fixes that.
Index: docutils/parsers/rst/states.py
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/docutils/docutils/docutils/parsers/rst/states.py,v
retrieving revision 1.87
diff -u -r1.87 states.py
--- docutils/parsers/rst/states.py 26 Nov 2004 09:27:55 -0000 1.87
+++ docutils/parsers/rst/states.py 13 Jan 2005 20:07:39 -0000
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@
emailc = r"""[-_!~*'{|}/#?^`&=+$%a-zA-Z0-9\x00]"""
email_pattern = r"""
%(emailc)s+(?:\.%(emailc)s+)* # name
- @ # at
+ (?<!\x00)@ # at
%(emailc)s+(?:\.%(emailc)s*)* # host
%(uri_end)s # final URI char
"""
Alternatively, grab a snapshot from
<http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docutils-snapshot.tgz>.
--
When replying to my email address, please ensure
that the mail header contains 'Felix Wiemann'.
http://www.ososo.de/
|
|
From: David G. <go...@py...> - 2005-01-13 20:18:10
|
[David Goodger] > done (in CVS). Felix beat me to the checkin... with a nearly identical solution :-) -- David Goodger <http://python.net/~goodger> |
|
From: David G. <go...@py...> - 2005-01-13 20:15:13
|
[Vicki Brown] > As I interpret this: > > A backslash followed by any character (except whitespace > characters) escapes that character. The escaped character > represents the character itself, and is prevented from playing a > role in any markup interpretation. ... > > in combination with this: > > Two forms of URI are recognized: > ... > 2. Standalone email addresses, which are treated as if they > were absolute URIs with a "mailto:" scheme. Example: > > so...@so... > > Shouldn't vlb\@ironport.com therefore _not_ be converted into a > mailto? I suppose you're right. It's easy to fix, and I can't think of any reason not to, so... done (in CVS). -- David Goodger <http://python.net/~goodger> |
|
From: Vicki B. <vl...@ir...> - 2005-01-13 19:26:35
|
As I interpret this:
A backslash followed by any character (except whitespace
characters) escapes that character. The escaped character represents
the character itself, and is prevented from playing a role in any
markup interpretation.
...
in combination with this:
Two forms of URI are recognized:
...
2. Standalone email addresses, which are treated as if they were
absolute URIs with a "mailto:" scheme. Example:
so...@so...
Shouldn't vlb\@ironport.com therefore _not_ be converted into a mailto?
--
Vicki Brown <vl...@ir...>
IronPort Systems Internal Technical Documentation
www.ironport.com - The Leader in Email Security
San Bruno, CA 94066 USA
|
|
From: Morten L. J. <mor...@if...> - 2005-01-11 22:31:38
|
Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
> Morten Lied Johansen wrote:
[snip]
>> This looks out-of-place, as the context in which it was placed has
>> been removed (moved to the titlepage). Are there any solutions for
>> this other than removing the field itself and including the email
>> in the authors field?
>>
> Oh, that's easy. The LaTeX writer should be fixed to place the
> contact info into the titlepage as well. I'm writing a patch. What
> is the best way to format it? info latex gives:
>
> The `\author' command declares the author(s), where `names' is a list
> of authors separated by `\and' commands. Use `\\' to separate lines
> within a single author's entry - for example, to give the author's
> institution or address.
>
> So, should I simply format this::
>
> :Author: Foo :Contact: fo...@ex... :Author: Bar :Contact:
> ba...@ex...
>
> as::
>
> \author{foo \\ fo...@ex... \and bar \\ ba...@ex...}
>
> ?
Seems like a good solution to me, maybe place the email inside <> or ()
as that seems to be a common way of formatting it.
> Are there any more fields that should be placed on the titlepage?
> Organization seems like one. Address - if given, should probably go
> with the author as well.
Alan mentions this in another mail. There is a lot of information that
is associate to the Author more than it is general to the document, so
maybe there should be a way to associate the various fields somehow.
> BTW, there is no way presently to associate contact, address and
> other fields with particular authors. It seems that just attaching
> to the last seen author is simplest. What if something like this is
> given::
>
> :Contact: qu...@ex...
> :Author: Foo
> :Author: Bar
>
> What does it mean? How should it be formatted?
Not a clue... I think this would need a more complex handling of the
bibliographic fields for it to always make sense. Until that happens,
there will be lots and lots of ambigious examples.
--
Morten
|
|
From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2005-01-11 20:44:01
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Morten Lied Johansen apparently wrote: > I have at the top of my RST source the following bibliographic fields: > :Author: Morten Lied Johansen > :Contact: mor...@if... > :Date: $Date: 2005-01-11 02:21:42 +0100 (Tue, 11 Jan 2005) $ > When I use rst2latex.py, I need to specifiy --use-latex-docinfo to get > my name on the titlepage where it belongs. The problem is that latex > picks up Author and Date, but not Contact Might the author field deserve certain subfields? Contact info is one example, position is another. These are attributes of the author, not of the document. Related to this, it seems useful to be able to create an author element for each author, rather than having to list them as Authors. fwiw, Alan Isaac |
|
From: Morten L. J. <mor...@if...> - 2005-01-11 12:35:57
|
I have at the top of my RST source the following bibliographic fields: :Author: Morten Lied Johansen :Contact: mor...@if... :Date: $Date: 2005-01-11 02:21:42 +0100 (Tue, 11 Jan 2005) $ When I use rst2latex.py, I need to specifiy --use-latex-docinfo to get my name on the titlepage where it belongs. The problem is that latex picks up Author and Date, but not Contact, which leaves a single line on the first page after the titlepage where it simply says: Contact: mor...@if... This looks out-of-place, as the context in which it was placed has been removed (moved to the titlepage). Are there any solutions for this other than removing the field itself and including the email in the authors field? -- Morten My computer said that "Insert disk #3" but I couldn't get more than one disk fit in at a time! |
|
From: <vik...@t-...> - 2005-01-09 22:02:48
|
Hi David You wrote: > [Viktor Ransmayr] > >> I've just installed docutils-0.3.7 on Win XP Pro and Python 2.3. >> >> Running the script "alltests.py" in tools reported 14 failures. >> >> What is the expected procedure to report this. - Simply send >> the output-log ? > > > Yes, that would be helpful. Best is to open a bug report on > SourceForge. But first, please read > http://docutils.sourceforge.net/BUGS.html. Thanks for the quick feedback. - I read the document, checked the bugreports and opened a new one with the id 1099120. Regards, Viktor Ransmayr |
|
From: David G. <go...@py...> - 2005-01-09 21:31:13
|
[Viktor Ransmayr] > I've just installed docutils-0.3.7 on Win XP Pro and Python 2.3. > > Running the script "alltests.py" in tools reported 14 failures. > > What is the expected procedure to report this. - Simply send > the output-log ? Yes, that would be helpful. Best is to open a bug report on SourceForge. But first, please read http://docutils.sourceforge.net/BUGS.html. -- David Goodger <http://python.net/~goodger> |
|
From: <vik...@t-...> - 2005-01-09 20:55:29
|
Hello everyone,
I've just installed docutils-0.3.7 on Win XP Pro and Python 2.3.
Running the script "alltests.py" in tools reported 14 failures.
What is the expected procedure to report this. - Simply send
the output-log ?
I'm asking, since I have seen a few reports in the mailing-list
archive without any meaningful response (at least to me).
Kind regards,
Viktor Ransmayr
|
|
From: Roman S. <rn...@on...> - 2005-01-04 20:54:00
|
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Martin Blais wrote: >hi guys > >i saw that there is a copy of Strunk and White's The Elements of Style >(a classic on writing) here: >http://orwell.ru/library/others/style/index.htm > >is there a program to convert reasonably clean HTML to docutils rst? >it would be so excellent to have a rst copy of this wonderful little text... Mozilla browser saves text closely to what RST understands. However, manual corrections are required anyway. >cheers, Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi -- rn...@on... =\= My AI powered by GNU/Linux RedHat 7.3 |
|
From: Felix W. <Fel...@gm...> - 2005-01-03 23:11:43
|
Martin Blais wrote: > is there a program to convert reasonably clean HTML to docutils rst? No, I'm sorry there is currently neither a HTML parser nor a reST writer, so that's not possible. -- When replying to my email address, please ensure that the mail header contains 'Felix Wiemann'. http://www.ososo.de/ |
|
From: Martin B. <mar...@gm...> - 2005-01-03 22:49:02
|
hi guys i saw that there is a copy of Strunk and White's The Elements of Style (a classic on writing) here: http://orwell.ru/library/others/style/index.htm is there a program to convert reasonably clean HTML to docutils rst? it would be so excellent to have a rst copy of this wonderful little text... cheers, |
|
From: Cosmin S. <csa...@pa...> - 2005-01-03 15:52:35
|
Hello, I would like to report some failures when using the alltest.py script. The output of the script with the failures is in the attached file. I'm running MacOSX 10.3.7, Python 2.3 (GCC3.3 - Apple). Hope this report will be useful. Cosmin -- Cosmin SAVEANU _________________________ Genetique des Interactions Macromoleculaires Departement de Structure et Dynamique des Genomes Batiment Fernbach (Biotechnologies) Institut PASTEUR (URA 2171-CNRS) 25 rue du Docteur ROUX, 75015 PARIS tel. 0033/(0)1-40-61-34-39 fax. 0033/(0)1-45-68-87-90 csa...@pa... _________________________ |
|
From: Jens J. M. <je...@fy...> - 2005-01-03 14:03:58
|
Alan G Isaac wrote: >>Alan G Isaac wrote: >> >>>Are numbered split equations to be supported? And >>>related to this, is it reasonable for the LaTeX writer >>>to require the amsmath package? (I vote 'yes'.) >=20 >=20 > On Sat, 01 Jan 2005, Felix Wiemann apparently wrote: >=20 >>Sure. If it's needed (i.e. useful) and it's contained in >>teTeX, it can safely be required, IMO. >=20 >=20 > That is great, since eqnarray has well publicized problems. > Using a split environment inside the equation (or equation*, > depending on how numbering is resolved) environment > might be the nice way to handle split equations. OK, I am now using a split environment inside an equation* environment -=20 no numbers. Jens J=F8rgen |
|
From: Jens J. M. <je...@fy...> - 2005-01-03 14:03:46
|
Alan G Isaac wrote: > On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Jens Jorgen Mortensen apparently wrote: >=20 >>there are currently only two >>greek letters: alpha and epsilon. I haven't had time to add them all. >=20 >=20 > Here is the core set, properly formatted. > Alan Isaac Thanks! That saved me a lot of work ;-) Jens J=F8rgen |
|
From: Jens J. M. <je...@fy...> - 2005-01-03 14:03:32
|
Felix Wiemann wrote: > You don't have CVS write access, do you? If you'd like to use CVS for > working on the math support, please send me your SourceForge.net user > name and I'll enable write access for you and send you links to all > relevant documents (how to use SF.net CVS etc.). I don't have CVS write access. I don't know what is the best approach.=20 CVS-branch or wait for plugin support? > Thank you. >=20 > * The MathML rendering is terrible here, but that's because I don't hav= e > the necessary fonts installed on my system. I currently don't have > time to learn how fonts work on X11, but I expect to get it working i= n > a week or two. I look forward to that! My MathML rendering is also not perfect. > * The resulting XHTML file isn't valid, because it's using "math:*" > elements. I don't know how to fix that though. I also don't know how to fix that - there must be someone on this list=20 that knows how to do it? Jens J=F8rgen |
|
From: Brian B. <ex...@gm...> - 2005-01-03 07:19:13
|
Felix Wiemann wrote:
>>>>from docutils import examples
>>>>examples.html_parts('Title\n=====\n\nParagraph 1.')['body']
>
> u'<p>Paragraph 1.</p>\n'
>
>
> That's not what you'd expect from "body". It's rather "fragment" (which
> has the same output). Is that a bug?
You just want pass this setting to publish_parts or html_parts:
doctitle_xform: 0
--
Brian Beck
Adventurer of the First Order
|
|
From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2005-01-02 13:43:23
|
> Alan G Isaac wrote: >> Are numbered split equations to be supported? And >> related to this, is it reasonable for the LaTeX writer >> to require the amsmath package? (I vote 'yes'.) On Sat, 01 Jan 2005, Felix Wiemann apparently wrote: > Sure. If it's needed (i.e. useful) and it's contained in > teTeX, it can safely be required, IMO. That is great, since eqnarray has well publicized problems. Using a split environment inside the equation (or equation*, depending on how numbering is resolved) environment might be the nice way to handle split equations. fwiw, Alan Isaac |
