Chromium Code Reviews
[email protected] (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(758)

Issue 9160020: Wires up disabling visibility animations for aura, and explicitly (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 11 months ago by sky
Modified:
8 years, 11 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews, dhollowa+watch_chromium.org, sadrul, tfarina, ben+watch_chromium.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Wires up disabling visibility animations for aura, and explicitly disables animations for browser tests as other wise code that gets bounds and does calculates based on that ends up with the wrong thing. BUG=111086 TEST=none [email protected],[email protected] [email protected] Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=118940

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 5
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+18 lines, -1 line) Patch
M ash/wm/window_animations.cc View 2 chunks +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M chrome/test/base/in_process_browser_test.cc View 2 chunks +9 lines, -0 lines 3 comments Download
M ui/aura/client/aura_constants.h View 1 chunk +4 lines, -0 lines 1 comment Download
M ui/aura/client/aura_constants.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M ui/views/widget/native_widget_aura.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 1 comment Download

Messages

Total messages: 9 (0 generated)
sky
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-24 01:42:56 UTC) #1
sky
First email bounced to Pawel. Attempt 2.
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-24 01:44:36 UTC) #2
sky
A better fix may be to make Window::bounds() return the target bounds. That fix is ...
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-24 01:46:03 UTC) #3
Ben Goodger (Google)
The thing I don't understand is we never actually animate bounds... http://codereview.chromium.org/9160020/diff/1/chrome/test/base/in_process_browser_test.cc File chrome/test/base/in_process_browser_test.cc (right): ...
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-24 04:39:13 UTC) #4
Ben Goodger (Google)
Scott explained the various use cases, and it turns out this is in fact the ...
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-24 16:37:04 UTC) #5
sky
Pawel, since this fixes tests I'm going to TBR it. I'm happy to change if ...
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-24 17:07:18 UTC) #6
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/[email protected]/9160020/1
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-24 17:07:32 UTC) #7
Paweł Hajdan Jr.
LGTM with a comment. http://codereview.chromium.org/9160020/diff/1/chrome/test/base/in_process_browser_test.cc File chrome/test/base/in_process_browser_test.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/9160020/diff/1/chrome/test/base/in_process_browser_test.cc#newcode258 chrome/test/base/in_process_browser_test.cc:258: views::Widget* widget = views::Widget::GetWidgetForNativeView( This ...
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-24 19:02:51 UTC) #8
commit-bot: I haz the power
8 years, 11 months ago (2012-01-24 20:03:21 UTC) #9
Try job failure for 9160020-1 (retry) on win_rel for step "base_unittests".
It's a second try, previously, step "base_unittests" failed.
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/buildstatus?builder=win_rel&nu...

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698