Skepticism: The Ultimate Guide to Thinking More Critically and Intelligently
By Gary Dankock
()
About this ebook
Book 1: Skepticism is a philosophical movement that has been in existence for centuries. And even though some may call it old and outdated, studying this concept can bring enlightenment to the soul. Sometimes, being skeptical is erroneously connected to simply being negative. But this assumption is far from the truth.
In this guide, you will learn how the skepticism movement has evolved over the past few centuries, what it is today, how it makes complete sense and how it differs from cynicism. These things are explained in a handful of pages, but the information you can get out of this, is well worth your time.
Book 2: Today, we will take a look at the skeptical movement and ponder its significance, development, and application. This movement is worldwide and has been acknowledged by prominent scholars and theorists.
We will also explore the concepts of criticism, parapsychology, the role of science in skepticism, and the subtle art of being positive while being skeptical. Skepticism helps us think critically and question statements and claims, which helps us get closer to the truth. If this is something you’d like to get better at, then I encourage you to take a look at this book.
Book 3: Skepticism has been criticized, ironically, and optimism has been glorified beyond all reason. There are sub-cults in the self-help industry that will judge anyone who questions the claims of gurus, and there are many people who are afraid to doubt the things they are told. Today, we need more skepticism in science and psychology. We need people who don’t take claims as truth when they have not been fully proven.
So, in an answer to the question: Why skepticism? I say, because it can help us think clearly, be more realistic, and have better results in life. In this guide, we will focus on just that. We will also touch on why skepticism isn’t always the same as pessimism or cynicism, and how we should rewire our brains to think more independently and intelligently.
Join these thought processes today by reading or listening to this book.
Read more from Gary Dankock
Skepticism: How to be a Skeptic and Intelligent, Critical Thinker Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSkepticism: Why There Needs to Be More Skeptical Thinking in Psychology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSkepticism: Positive Thinking, Parapsychology, and Critical Thinking Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSkepticism: The Meaning and Theories of a Crucial Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSkepticism: The Philosophy and Movement of Doubting the General Narrative Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Skepticism
Related ebooks
Poor White Trash No More: From Sharecropper to Country Squire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemons of Federal Misconduct: A Chicago Memoir! (A Christian Nonfiction Novel): Theme: Ephesians 6:12 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Antidote: Healing America From the Poison of Hate, Blame, and Victimhood Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Downfall of China or CCP 3.0? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen People Unite Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Democratic Party of Failure Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCia Privileged Access Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLyft Confidential: Rideshare Stories Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Spies in Congress: Inside the Democrats' Covered-Up Cyber Scandal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNietzsche is Dead: Proof of God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTed Grant Writings: Volume One – Trotskyism and the Second World War (1938-1942) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMexican Cliques in Construction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDebacle: Obama's War on Jobs and Growth and What We Can Do Now to Regain Our Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWho is Destroying America? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 03 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe People Amendments Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Worth of a Man Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Cowley Fathers in Philadelphia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWho is Hillary Clinton? Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Paying the Price: The Untold Story of the Iranian Resistance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Negro in Federal Employment: The Quest for Equal Opportunity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Partisanship, Cyberbullying, & Suicidal Thoughts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings13th Amendment Freedom Week Manual Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sordid Hypocrisy of to Protect and to Serve: Police Brutality, Corruption and Oppression in America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImmigration Wars: Forging an American Solution Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Moment of Truth: How Our Government's Addiction to Spending and Power Will Destroy Everything that Makes America Great Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWho Art Thou, Lord?: The Good News Jesus Preached Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why Buddhism is True: The Science and Philosophy of Meditation and Enlightenment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Think Like a Roman Emperor: The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lessons of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Focus on What Matters: A Collection of Stoic Letters on Living Well Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Think Critically: Question, Analyze, Reflect, Debate. Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Letters from a Stoic: All Three Volumes Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Subtle Art of Being Alone: Why Embracing Solitude Beats Embracing Loneliness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Kama Sutra of Vatsyayana (Illustrated) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Mindful Year: Daily Meditations: Reduce Stress, Manage Anxiety, and Find Happiness in Everyday Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Socratic Method: A Practitioner's Handbook Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hold a Cockroach: A book for those who are free and don't know it Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5THE EMERALD TABLETS OF THOTH THE ATLANTEAN Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Skepticism
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Skepticism - Gary Dankock
Chapter 1: Skepticism in Philosophy
Skepticism, also spelled scepticism, in Western philosophy, the mindset of questioning knowledge claims stated in various areas. Skeptics have challenged the adequacy or reliability of these claims by asking what concepts they are based upon or what they actually establish. They have doubted whether some of those claims truly are, as declared, or always true, and they have challenged the purported logical premises of accepted assumptions. In everyday life, practically everyone is skeptical about some knowledge claims; but philosophical skeptics have doubted the possibility of any knowledge beyond that of the contents of straight felt experience. The original Greek meaning of skeptikos was an inquirer,
a person who was disappointed and still searching for truth.
From ancient times onward skeptics have developed arguments to weaken the contentions of dogmatic theorists, researchers, and theologians. The skeptical arguments and their work against different forms of dogmatism have played a crucial role in forming both the issues and the solutions offered in the course of Western philosophy. As age-old philosophy and science developed, doubts occurred about numerous basic, commonly accepted beliefs about the world. In ancient times, skeptics challenged the claims of Plato and Aristotle and their followers, as well as those of the Stoics; and at the time of the Renaissance comparable challenges were raised against the claims of Scholasticism and Calvinism. In the 17th century, skeptics assaulted Cartesianism (the system established by the French philosopher and mathematician René Descartes) together with other theories that attempted to validate the scientific revolution initiated by Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo. Somewhat later, a doubtful offensive was leveled against the Enlightenment theorist Immanuel Kant and then against the philosophical idealist Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and his followers. Each challenge caused new efforts to deal with the skeptical troubles. Skepticism, especially since the Knowledge, has come to mean shock-- mainly spiritual shock-- and the skeptic has typically been likened to the town atheist.
Senses And Applications
Skepticism developed with regard to different disciplines in which people claimed to have knowledge. It was questioned, for instance, whether one could acquire any certain knowledge in metaphysics (the philosophical study of the standard nature, structure, or aspects of reality) or in the sciences. In old times a primary form of skepticism was health skepticism, which questioned whether one could know with certainty either the causes or treatments of illnesses. In the area of principles, doubts were raised about accepting different mores and customs and about saying any unbiased basis for making judgments of value. Skeptics of religion have questioned the teachings of different customs. Particular approaches, like those of Kant and his Scottish contemporary David Hume, have seemed to show that no knowledge can be acquired past the world of experience and that one can't find the real causes of experienced phenomena. Any effort to do so, as Kant argued, leads to antinomies,
or inconsistent knowledge claims. A dominant form of skepticism (the subject of this short article) concerns knowledge in general, questioning whether anything actually can be known with complete or sufficient certainty. This type is called epistemological skepticism.
The various kinds of epistemological skepticism can be separated in regard to the parts in which doubts are raised-- that is, whether the doubts are directed towards reason, toward the senses, or to knowledge of things-in-themselves
(things as they truly are, rather than as they appear to human observers). Forms of skepticism can also be distinguished in regard to the inspiration of the skeptic-- whether he's difficult views for ideological reasons or for practical or practical ones in order to get certain psychological goals. Amongst the chief ideological intentions have been religious or antireligious concerns. Some skeptics have challenged knowledge claims so that they could be changed by religious claims that would have to be accepted on the basis of faith. Others have challenged spiritual knowledge claims so as to conquer some orthodoxy. Sort of skepticism can also be distinguished in terms of how restricted or how thoroughgoing they are-- whether they apply only to certain parts and to certain types of knowledge claims or whether they are more general and universal.
Ancient Skepticism
In the West, skeptical philosophical mindsets began to appear in age-old Greece about the fifth century BCE. The Eleatic philosophers (those connected with the Greek city of Elea in Italy) rejected the existence of plurality and change, envisaging reality as a static One, and they denied that reality could be described in regard to the classifications of normal experience. Yet, Heracleitus and his pupil Cratylus thought that the world was in such a state of flux that no long-term, unchangeable truth about it could be found; and Xenophanes, a wandering poet and philosopher, questioned whether people could differentiate true from incorrect knowledge.
A more industrialized form of skepticism appeared in some of the views attributed to Socrates and in the views of certain Sophists (itinerant and normally mercenary teachers of philosophy, rhetoric, and other subjects). Socrates, as represented in the early conversations of his pupil Plato, was always questioning the knowledge claims of others; in the Apology, he famously admits that all that he actually knows is that he knows nothing. Socrates' adversary, the Sophist Protagoras, contended that man is the procedure of all things,
a thesis that has been taken to suggest a kind of skeptical relativism: no views are ultimately or objectively true, but each is solely a single person's viewpoint. Another Sophist, Gorgias, advanced the skeptical-nihilist thesis that absolutely nothing exists; and, if something did exist, it could not be understood; and, if it could be understood, it could not be communicated.
The putative dad of Greek skepticism, however, was Pyrrhon of Elis (c. 360-- c. 272 BCE), who carried out the unusual effort of attempting to live his skepticism. He stayed away from committing himself to any views about what the world was truly like and acted only according to appearances. In this way he sought joy, or at least mental peace.
The first school of skeptical philosophy developed in the Academy, the school established by Plato, in the 3rd century BCE and was therefore called Academic
skepticism. Beginning with the skeptical doctrines of Socrates, its leaders, Arcesilaus and Carneades, set forth a