The Operating Principle of the Universe: This and That in a Loving Relationship Is Something Else

Copyright © 2010 by Thomas M. Mandel.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner.

This book was printed in the United States of America.

To order additional copies of this book, contact:

Xlibris Corporation

1-888-795-4274

www.Xlibris.com

[email protected]

69836

Contents

PROLOGUE

INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER ONE

CHAPTER TWO

CHAPTER THREE

CHAPTER FOUR

CHAPTER FIVE

CHAPTER SIX

CHAPTER SEVEN

THE BLUEPRINT OF LIFE

CONCLUSIONS

AFTERTHOUGHTS

ADDITIONAL READING

BOOK TITLES OF SIGNIFICANT PUBLICATIONS INSIDE THIS BOOK

REFERENCES

GLOSSARY

HELPERS

"We need to discover if there are general principles

that govern the development of complexity in general

which can be applied in a variety of different situations

without becoming embroiled in their peculiarities… .

Perhaps there exist a whole set of basic rules

about the development of complexity

reduce to some of our simple laws of nature

in situations where the level of complexity is essentially nil."

The question of the existence of a "secret of the universe’

amounts to discovering whether there is some deep principle

from which all other knowledge

of the physical uni-verse follows."

John Barrow

PROLOGUE

Below please find a series of diagrams that show overtly the major difference between Identity and Action words, between nouns and verbs. In short, horizontal lines depict identity while vertical lines depict actions. It is these identifications that seem to make a big difference between the old and the new. Look at any dictionary—what words are verbs?

What is new in fig. 1 is the emphasis on process rather that identity. Here are looking at a structure without any identifiers. It is possible to list many if not all situations in this form and therefore take the first step toward the finding the second step. Once this relationship is found it is a simple matter to find their relationship to each other.

Here we can label the diagrams and thus show the different aspects.

As an example of how this works let us look a drawing of the German philosopher Hegel’s drawing of his triad—Thesis>Antithesis>Synthesis. Obviously something seems to be missing. It has been said the Hegel’s model is the foundation of Western Philosophy.

Here we can see how the diagram tells us that there is something missing from Hegel’s Triad, where is the relationship? Here then is the key to what my mathematics has discovered.

The diagrams cam be interconnected in many ways. Here we have a literature example in which the writing found in the marks of black and white are taken as a message by the reader and thus becomes information,

By placing the diagrams in certain ways one can map unusual occurances—for example the early Greek philosophies. Each node is the work of a particular philosopher. Thales of Melietus was the first to imagine that the earth was made of a stuff And notice How empedocleus(?) invented fire" which denotes a relationship… Here is where the four elements came to light

Here we have two groups back to back

We then would end up with a black box.

INTRODUCTION

This is a story about my discovery of how the universe as a whole works, presented here in the simplest, but not too simple, context/manner. It works as a minimal system. Systems theory is not new. It is unknown by the public. Most scholarly works about systems theory seem to follow the more complex explanation, yet this complex explanation has much difficulty explaining the simple results. Furthermore, if the so-called secret of the universe were complex, then any complex creation could be superceded by throwing one more stick on the pile.

What is needed and presented here is a scheme that is at once very simple, yet not too simple, It was that new context/viewpoint/simplicity that allowed me to transcend present day philosophy of science and go beyond to achieve a new and more complete picture of what the universe does and how it does it. In short, that philosophy is a philosophy of action. We have become accustomed to giving an object an identity, but that only works in our minds. It is necessary that we identify objects by what they do.

There are an infinite number of objects in our Universe, and to discover what they are has so far exceeded our capacity to learn. There are, however, only a few ways these objects can work. We will learn less and know much more…

After many years of research, I have found numerous ways of saying the same thing. I give credit to Ludwig von Bertalanffy, whom I discovered 22 years after my first discovery and four months after he passed away, as the first to approach the subject in a scientific way, and a few years later to Jonas Salk who was able to discuss the principles, in my opinion, in an more accurate way. This does not discount the previous few who also approached the subject in a meaningful way.

My inventions are those meaningful diagrams to work with this simple principle, diagrams devised by me long before I found much later the others looking for the same thing…

I cannot claim any first rights toward the claimant of any inventors right for the principle itself. It may be true that I discovered it by myself. But after all it was noticed by the Chinese five thousand years ago. It may not have been described in any great detail as far as how it might work, but the detail was found in what would happen. Because this detail did pop up throughout the history of science, it wasn’t hidden or treated as a secret. However, because the detail was almost always expressed in the language of the speaker, and because these speakers came from all corners of the world, they were always stated differently. And, later, subsequently thought of as being very different. And because there were so many different versions of this principle they were almost always thought of as being different. But if the general of each old the principles were identified and then compared to the others, the similarity of all of them could be seen.

CHAPTER ONE

A Hidden Surprise

It all started after I had an experience with a very large black box-like exhibit I bumped into at Chicago’s Museum of Science and Industry near lake Michigan. While a great deal of intuitive knowledge was