Methodologies for Seismic Safety Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Installations
By IAEA
()
About this ebook
Other titles in Methodologies for Seismic Safety Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Installations Series (26)
Ageing Management for Nuclear Power Plants: International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned (IGALL) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAssessment of Defence in Depth for Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadiation Protection and Safety in Veterinary Medicine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgeing Management for Nuclear Power Plants: International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned (IGALL) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign and Conduct of Indoor Radon Surveys Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Nuclear Safety Knowledge: National Approaches and Experience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMedical Management of Radiation Injuries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodologies for Seismic Safety Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPeriodic Safety Review for Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOccupational Radiation Protection in the Uranium Mining and Processing Industry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRegulatory Oversight of Ageing Management and Long Term Operation Programme of Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSafety Analysis and Licensing Documentation for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSafe Use of Smart Devices in Systems Important to Safety in Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplication of Probabilistic Methods for the Safety Assessment and the Reliable Operation of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPatient Radiation Exposure Monitoring in Medical Imaging Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRegulatory Control of Exposure Due to Radionuclides in Building Materials and Construction Materials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExposure due to Radionuclides in Food Other than During a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency: Part 1: Technical Material Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMulti-unit Probabilistic Safety Assessment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadiation Protection in Dental Radiology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgeing Management for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLicensing Process for the Construction, Commissioning and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAssessment of High Wind and External Flooding (Excluding Tsunami) Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUse of Periodic Safety Review for Long Term Operation of Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplicability of IAEA Safety Standards to Non-Water Cooled Reactors and Small Modular Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Read more from Iaea
Integrated Assessment of Climate, Land, Energy and Water Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Expert Group on Nuclear Liability (INLEX): A Collective View on the First Two Decades Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClimate Change and Nuclear Power 2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Non-Invasive Cardiovascular Imaging: A Guide for the Practitioner Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComprehensive Audits of Radiotherapy Practices: A Tool for Quality Improvement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuidance On Setting Up a Comprehensive Cancer Centre Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdapting the Energy Sector to Climate Change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Methodologies for Seismic Safety Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Installations
Titles in the series (26)
Ageing Management for Nuclear Power Plants: International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned (IGALL) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAssessment of Defence in Depth for Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadiation Protection and Safety in Veterinary Medicine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgeing Management for Nuclear Power Plants: International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned (IGALL) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign and Conduct of Indoor Radon Surveys Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Nuclear Safety Knowledge: National Approaches and Experience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMedical Management of Radiation Injuries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodologies for Seismic Safety Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPeriodic Safety Review for Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOccupational Radiation Protection in the Uranium Mining and Processing Industry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRegulatory Oversight of Ageing Management and Long Term Operation Programme of Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSafety Analysis and Licensing Documentation for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSafe Use of Smart Devices in Systems Important to Safety in Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplication of Probabilistic Methods for the Safety Assessment and the Reliable Operation of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPatient Radiation Exposure Monitoring in Medical Imaging Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRegulatory Control of Exposure Due to Radionuclides in Building Materials and Construction Materials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExposure due to Radionuclides in Food Other than During a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency: Part 1: Technical Material Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMulti-unit Probabilistic Safety Assessment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadiation Protection in Dental Radiology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgeing Management for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLicensing Process for the Construction, Commissioning and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAssessment of High Wind and External Flooding (Excluding Tsunami) Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUse of Periodic Safety Review for Long Term Operation of Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplicability of IAEA Safety Standards to Non-Water Cooled Reactors and Small Modular Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Format and Content of the Safety Analysis Report for Nuclear Power Plants: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeismic Design for Nuclear Installations: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplication of Probabilistic Methods for the Safety Assessment and the Reliable Operation of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEstablishing the Safety Infrastructure for a Nuclear Power Programme: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Siting Activities for Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStorage of Spent Nuclear Fuel: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPeriodic Safety Review for Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpecific Considerations in the Assessment of the Status of the National Nuclear Infrastructure for a New Research Reactor Programme Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCriticality Safety in the Handling of Fissile Material Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadiation Protection and Radioactive Waste Management in the Design and Operation of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign Extension Conditions and the Concept of Practical Elimination in the Design of Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign of the Reactor Core for Nuclear Power Plants: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMulti-unit Probabilistic Safety Assessment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign of Nuclear Installations Against External Events Excluding Earthquakes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaintenance, Testing, Surveillance and Inspection in Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEquipment Qualification for Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Integrated Geophysical and Geotechnical Assessment of Hazards Around The Abu Serga Church Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHazards Associated with Human Induced External Events in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAssessment of High Wind and External Flooding (Excluding Tsunami) Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOperational Limits and Conditions and Operating Procedures for Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRecruitment, Qualification and Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeadership, Management and Culture for Safety in Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodologies for Assessing Pipe Failure Rates in Advanced Water Cooled Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpecific Considerations and Guidance for the Establishment of Ionizing Radiation Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEvaluation of Seismic Safety for Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplication of Wireless Technologies in Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAssessment of Defence in Depth for Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Power Resources For You
The Homeowner's DIY Guide to Electrical Wiring Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Electrical Machines: Lecture Notes for Electrical Machines Course Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElectronics All-in-One For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Do Electric Motors Work? Physics Books for Kids | Children's Physics Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJourneyman Electrician Exam Prep Mastery 2025-2026 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDIY Lithium Battery Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Solar Power Demystified: The Beginners Guide To Solar Power, Energy Independence And Lower Bills Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Photovoltaic Design and Installation For Dummies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Idaho Falls: The Untold Story of America's First Nuclear Accident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Way Home: Tales from a life without technology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Alternative Fuels for Sustainable Combustion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnergy: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Design of Rotating Electrical Machines Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Power Electronics: Lecture Notes of Power Electronics Course Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElectric Power Transmission: Lecture Notes of Electric Power Transmission Course Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ultimate Solar Power Design Guide Less Theory More Practice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Isaac Asimov Archives Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Renewable Energy Made Easy: Free Energy from Solar, Wind, Hydropower, and Other Alternative Energy Sources Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nuclear War Survival Skills Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGasifiers Wood Gasification & Off Grid Power Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Electric Power Principles: Sources, Conversion, Distribution and Use Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeed, Velocity and Acceleration - Physics Book Grade 2 | Children's Physics Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Wind Turbine Recipe Book 2014 English Units Edtion Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Grid: The Fraying Wires Between Americans and Our Energy Future Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Handbook on Battery Energy Storage System Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Introduction to Power System Protection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Methodologies for Seismic Safety Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Installations
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Methodologies for Seismic Safety Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Installations - IAEA
METHODOLOGIES FOR
SEISMIC SAFETY EVALUATION OF
EXISTING NUCLEAR
INSTALLATIONS
SAFETY REPORTS SERIES No. 103
METHODOLOGIES FOR
SEISMIC SAFETY EVALUATION OF
EXISTING NUCLEAR
INSTALLATIONS
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
VIENNA, 2020
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
All IAEA scientific and technical publications are protected by the terms of the Universal Copyright Convention as adopted in 1952 (Berne) and as revised in 1972 (Paris). The copyright has since been extended by the World Intellectual Property Organization (Geneva) to include electronic and virtual intellectual property. Permission to use whole or parts of texts contained in IAEA publications in printed or electronic form must be obtained and is usually subject to royalty agreements. Proposals for non-commercial reproductions and translations are welcomed and considered on a case-by-case basis. Enquiries should be addressed to the IAEA Publishing Section at:
Marketing and Sales Unit, Publishing Section
International Atomic Energy Agency
Vienna International Centre
PO Box 100
1400 Vienna, Austria
fax: +43 1 26007 22529
tel.: +43 1 2600 22417
email: [email protected]
www.iaea.org/publications
© IAEA, 2020
Printed by the IAEA in Austria
August 2020
STI/PUB/1893
IAEA Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Names: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Title: Methodologies for seismic safety evaluation of existing nuclear installations / International Atomic Energy Agency.
Description: Vienna : International Atomic Energy Agency, 2020. | Series: IAEA safety reports series, ISSN 1020–6450 ; no. 103 | Includes bibliographical references.
Identifiers: IAEAL 20-01334 | ISBN 978–92–0–107219–1 (paperback : alk. paper) | ISBN 978–92–0–105320–6 (pdf)
Subjects: LCSH: Nuclear power plants — Safety measures. | Nuclear power plants — Earthquake effects. | Earthquake hazard analysis | Nuclear facilities.
Classification: UDC 621.039.58: 550.34 | STI/PUB/1893
FOREWORD
This publication provides guidance on the implementation of IAEA Safety Standard Series No. NS-G-2.13, Evaluation of Seismic Safety for Existing Nuclear Installations, and explores methodologies validated by international practices. Seismic evaluation programmes have been conducted for a number of nuclear installations worldwide. One such example is the seismic re-evaluation of nuclear power plants in Eastern Europe. These re-evaluations were carried out on the basis of guidelines that were reviewed by the IAEA and that are now incorporated into this Safety Report. This publication also includes lessons identified based on the IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety, in response to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant triggered by the Great East Japan Earthquake, which occurred on 11 March 2011.
The IAEA is grateful to all those who contributed to the drafting and review of this publication, in particular the contributions of J.J. Johnson and J.D. Stevenson (United States of America). The IAEA officer responsible for this publication was O. Coman of the Division of Nuclear Installation Safety.
EDITORIAL NOTE
Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this publication, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use.
This publication does not address questions of responsibility, legal or otherwise, for acts or omissions on the part of any person.
Guidance provided here, describing good practices, represents expert opinion but does not constitute recommendations made on the basis of a consensus of Member States.
The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries.
The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA.
The IAEA has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third party Internet web sites referred to in this book and does not guarantee that any content on such web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
The authoritative versions of the publications are the hard copies issued and available as PDFs on www.iaea.org/publications.To create the versions for e-readers, certain changes have been made, including the movement of some figures and tables.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
1.2. Objective
1.3. Scope
1.4. Structure
2. FORMULATION OF THE PROGRAMME FOR SEISMIC SAFETY EVALUATION OF EXISTING Nuclear INSTALLATIONS
2.1. Perspective
2.2. Selection of methodology
3. DATA COLLECTION AND INVESTIGATIONs
3.1. General
3.2. Hazard classification of installations and structures, systems and components
3.3. Seismic design basis data
3.4. Data collection and documents
4. ASSESSMENT OF SEISMIC HAZARDS
4.1. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis
4.2. Review level earthquake
4.3. Bases for development of the review level earthquake
5. SEISMIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT
5.1. Seismic margin assessment
5.2. Seismic probabilistic safety analysis
5.3. PSA based seismic safety assessment
5.4. Off-site seismic induced effects
6. MODERATE AND LOW HAZARD INSTALLATIONS
6.1. Categorization
6.2. Selection of methodology
6.3. Review level earthquake
6.4. Selection of SSCs to be evaluated
6.5. SSC evaluation and walkdown
6.6. Seismic margin assessment
6.7. Seismic instrumentation
7. CONSIDERATIONS FOR UPGRADING
7.1. Structure and substructure upgrades
7.2. Mechanical and electrical distribution systems and mechanical components upgrades
7.3. Electrical and instrumentation and control components
8. MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR SEISMIC SAFETY EVALUATION
8.1. General
8.2. Peer review
8.3. Configuration control
8.4. Quality assurance
Appendix I: EXAMPLES OF SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORIES AND SITE FOUNDATION CLASSIFICATION
Appendix II: SUGGESTED DAMPING VALUES AND INELASTIC ENERGY ABS ORPTION FACTORS
Appendix III: BACKGROUND AND TERMINOLOGY FOR THE INELASTIC ENERGY ABS ORPTION FACTORS
Appendix IV: HYBRID METHOD FOR FRAGILI TY CALCULATIONS
Appendix V: TYPICAL WALKDOWN FORMS
REFERENCES
DEFINITIONS
ABBREVIATIONS
CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEW
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
This Safety Report complements the guidance in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. NS-G-2.13, Evaluation of Seismic Safety for Existing Nuclear Installations [1], based on the IAEA experience feedback and involvement in seismic re-evaluations of nuclear power plants in Eastern Europe and lessons identified from the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.
Worldwide experience shows that an assessment of the seismic capacity of an existing operating facility can be necessary for a number of reasons, including the evidence of a greater seismic hazard at the site than expected before or a poor anti-seismic design in all or in part of the facility.
Post-construction evaluation programmes evaluate the current capability of the plant (i.e. the plant ‘as-is’) to withstand the seismic concern and identify any necessary upgrades or changes in operating procedures. Seismic qualification is distinguished from seismic evaluation primarily in that seismic qualification is intended to be performed at the design stage of a plant, whereas seismic evaluation is intended to be applied after a plant has been constructed and is operating or at the end of the design stage.
Seismic evaluation of existing nuclear installations differs from the practices applicable to the design of nuclear installations. The most prominent among these differences are:
(a) Plant condition: Paragraph 1.6 of NS-G-2.13 [ 1 ] states that the seismic safety evaluation of existing installations strongly depends on the actual condition of the installation at the time the assessment is performed. This key condition is denoted the ‘as-is’ condition, indicating that an earthquake, when it occurs, affects the installation in its actual condition, and the response and capacity of the installation will depend on its actual physical and operating configuration. The as-is condition of the installation is the baseline for any seismic safety evaluation programme. The as-is condition includes the ‘as-built’, ‘as-operated’ and ‘as-maintained’ conditions of the installation, and its condition of ageing at the time of the assessment.
(b) Evaluation criteria: The criteria used in the evaluation are different from those used in the design. Design tends to use the applicable loads to size the SSC to meet the limits set in the design code, while in evaluation the aim is to establish the capacity of the SSC in the ‘as-is’ condition and use it in the overall seismic evaluation of the installation. In doing this, experience from exposure to past seismic events, testing and analytical estimates of capacity are all utilized as sources of information. Thus, the process uses a significant level of expert judgement. The role played by the feedback of such experience, the associated practice of plant walkdowns and the qualification by experts are part of the evaluation methodologies discussed in this publication.
(c) Safety evaluation applicability: Seismic safety evaluations are used to assess the capacities of an installation when subject to beyond design basis seismic events. Seismic safety evaluation methodologies include probabilistic, deterministic and a combination of deterministic and probabilistic approaches.
A significant number of existing nuclear installations worldwide have undergone a seismic safety evaluation since the 1990s. Consequently, there is sufficient background experience supporting the seismic safety assessment methodologies presented in NS-G-2.13 [1] and detailed here. Seismic evaluation in the context of identification of vulnerabilities of nuclear power plants against external hazards is also addressed in Ref. [2].
1.2. Objective
This publication provides detailed guidance on conducting seismic safety evaluation programmes for existing nuclear installations in a manner consistent with NS-G-2.13 [1]. This publication can be used as a tool by regulatory organizations or other organizations responsible for the conduct of a seismic safety evaluation programme and provides a clear definition of the following:
— The objectives of the seismic evaluation programme;
— The phases, tasks and priorities in accordance with specific plant conditions;
— The common and integrated technical framework for establishing the acceptance criteria and its use in the seismic safety evaluation process.
1.3. Scope
The scope of this publication covers the seismic safety evaluation programmes to be performed on existing nuclear installations in order to ensure that the required fundamental safety functions are available, with particular application to the safe shutdown of reactors. Nuclear installations include: (i) land based, stationary nuclear power plants and research reactors; and (ii) nuclear fuel cycle facilities, including enrichment plants, processing plants, independent spent fuel storage facilities and reprocessing plants.
Seismic safety evaluation programmes need to be developed as described in NS-G-2.13 [1] and in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, such as the requirement for periodic safety review (see IAEA Safety Standards Series No. NS-G-1.6, Seismic Design and Qualification for Nuclear