Explore 1.5M+ audiobooks & ebooks free for days

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI
Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI
Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI
Ebook268 pages3 hours

Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

AN INSTANT NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER

From Wharton professor and author of the popular One Useful Thing Substack newsletter Ethan Mollick comes the definitive playbook for working, learning, and living in the new age of AI


Something new entered our world in November 2022 — the first general purpose AI that could pass for a human and do the kinds of creative, innovative work that only humans could do previously. Wharton professor Ethan Mollick immediately understood what ChatGPT meant: after millions of years on our own, humans had developed a kind of co-intelligence that could augment, or even replace, human thinking. Through his writing, speaking, and teaching, Mollick has become one of the most prominent and provocative explainers of AI, focusing on the practical aspects of how these new tools for thought can transform our world. 

In Co-Intelligence, Mollick urges us to engage with AI as co-worker, co-teacher, and coach. He assesses its profound impact on business and education, using dozens of real-time examples of AI in action. Co-Intelligence shows what it means to think and work together with smart machines, and why it's imperative that we master that skill. 

Mollick challenges us to utilize AI's enormous power without losing our identity, to learn from it without being misled, and to harness its gifts to create a better human future. Wide ranging, hugely thought-provoking, optimistic, and lucid, Co-Intelligence reveals the promise and power of this new era.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherPenguin Publishing Group
Release dateApr 2, 2024
ISBN9780593716724

Related to Co-Intelligence

Related ebooks

Industries For You

View More

Reviews for Co-Intelligence

Rating: 3.6463413170731704 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

41 ratings4 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Mar 10, 2025

    Probably not a bad starting place, if you've been studiously avoiding all discussion of generative AI. That said, if you've read more than a couple articles about the benefits and dangers, there's not a lot that's new here. My experience was that most of the first third of the book felt like a rehash of things I'd already read in the news and on blogs, and the conclusion felt a little bit like "well, things sure are gonna be different."

    That said, I think there were a couple of things in the section on creativity which were interesting. I'm still thinking about Mollick's assertion that one of the functions of a letter of recommendation is that someone burned their time to write it, as a sign of how much they like the applicant. I'm not sure I accept it entirely, but it's a fascinating lens on human creative activity. It may have been more true when the old-boys'-network approach to hiring had fewer bureaucratic checks, but I think it's worth noting that it treats recommendations as creative activity, so the idea applies very widely. How much of the "touch of the human" (as opposed to anything mass produced) is about recognizing time invested?

    In the jobs section, I thought Mollick's construction of tasks, systems, and jobs could be very useful, maybe the most useful thought tool in the book. I like his assertion that the biggest economic benefits will accrue to those companies who approach AI democratically, working with employees to determine the best way to use AI in pursuit of more interesting jobs and better products or services. I don't *believe* it, or more accurately I don't believe that corporate culture can survive getting scooped up by larger companies and venture capital, but I sure do like the dream.

    A format note: I listened to the audiobook, which Mollick narates himself. I liked the human touch of his accent, even if it meant he didn't enunciate as clearly or speak as slowly as a professional voice actor would. On the other hand, it was sometimes clear that a take or recording session had gone on too long; he didn't have the skill of presenting a consistent level of personal energy across the whole text. I bring this up because, in the last year or so, I've listened to 3 audiobooks written by authors whose speaking voices I know well, and been frustrated at points when the voice actor made choices which I believe are at odds with how the author meant a passage. This was useful in reminding me what professionals bring to the table. (Though it still makes me wonder about the use of AI voice clones...)
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Mar 7, 2025

    As others have noted, this is a very, very pro-AI book, which is not bad in and of itself, but the author hand-waves over a lot of potential problems with AI and completely - as it not even bring it into the discussion - ignores the environmental impacts of AI. Read with a critical eye.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Feb 6, 2025

    If you don't know much about AI and LLMs and want a good overview, then this book will be of interest. If you have been reading about AI and LLMs and perhaps playing with them for a while, there will be very little new materials for you to get from this book. Definitely don't buy it because it's already slightly outdated and the info it presents is readily available elsewhere.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    May 17, 2024

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a hot topic on today’s news pages. Some fear that AI will take over the world and replace it in some dystopian society. Others take its evolution in stride. What’s becoming clear is that life will change in a revolutionary way. Ethan Mollick agrees and also points to opportunities individuals can take to use AI to create a better life and a better workplace.

    Mollick has used AI to teach business schools at the prestigious Wharton School of Business. He shares many of his observations from using AI in classroom assignments. For instance, he’s seen that after learning about AI, students ask less questions in class because they are more comfortable asking a bot instead of raising their hand. He’s also seen the quality of assignments improve as students learn to collaborate with AI technology.

    “Co-intelligence” aptly describes Mollick’s general approach. The winners in the AI game, he says, are going to be those who make the most of AI to enhance their personal expertise. Human expertise will continue to be crucial – even more crucial – but must somehow learn to work with AI supplemental role. Educationally, he compares AI to the use of calculators in the classroom decades ago. As with mathematics, students still need to learn how things work, but they must also learn how to maximize AI’s assistance in those tasks.

    As a software developer, I am fascinated by the ways that programming can enhance human life. Good computational assistance can reduce the tedious tasks of life and enhance life’s quality. But computers and AI can also be wrongly used narrowly to cut down costs – replacing, rather than aiding, human effort. Mollick is not blind to these effects and wants to push us in a healthier direction. Of course, we must take his bait.

    Anyone interested in building a better social future with AI will find this book intriguing. While, as the title alludes, life does play a role in this book, Mollick’s business professor persona shines strongly. Work has a predominant place in most of our lives, and AI has creatively disrupted and will continue to disrupt this space. Only attentive effort will build a better future for us. Although I don’t embrace the dystopian view of AI’s future, it certainly is a possibility without focused effort. I’m grateful that Mollick gave me some nuggets to ponder as I build my own future.

Book preview

Co-Intelligence - Ethan Mollick

Cover for Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI, Author, Ethan MollickBook Title, Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI, Author, Ethan Mollick, Imprint, Portfolio

Portfolio / Penguin

An imprint of Penguin Random House LLC

penguinrandomhouse.com

Copyright © 2024 by Ethan Mollick

Penguin Random House supports copyright. Copyright fuels creativity, encourages diverse voices, promotes free speech, and creates a vibrant culture. Thank you for buying an authorized edition of this book and for complying with copyright laws by not reproducing, scanning, or distributing any part of it in any form without permission. You are supporting writers and allowing Penguin Random House to continue to publish books for every reader.

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA

Names: Mollick, Ethan, 1975– author.

Title: Co-intelligence: living and working with AI / Ethan Mollick.

Other titles: Cointelligence

Description: [New York]: Portfolio/Penguin, [2024] | Includes bibliographical references.

Identifiers: LCCN 2023049476 (print) | LCCN 2023049477 (ebook) | ISBN 9780593716717 (hardcover) | ISBN 9780593852507 (international edition) | ISBN 9780593716724 (ebook)

Subjects: LCSH: Expert systems (Computer science)—Social aspects. | Artificial intelligence—Social aspects. | Artificial intelligence—Educational applications. | Labor—Effect of technological innovations on. | Education—Effect of technological innovations on.

Classification: LCC QA76.76.E95 M655 2024 (print) | LCC QA76.76.E95 (ebook) | DDC 303.48/34—dc23/eng/20240209

LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2023049476

LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2023049477

Cover design: Brian Lemus

Cover art: Detail of The Fall, 1479 by Hugo van der Goes (oil on panel) / Photo © Gordon Roberton Photography Archive/Bridgeman Images

Book design by Chris Welch

All AI-generated images and text are clearly noted.

While the author has made every effort to provide accurate internet addresses at the time of publication, neither the publisher nor the author assumes any responsibility for errors or for changes that occur after publication. Further, the publisher does not have any control over and does not assume any responsibility for author or third-party websites or their content.

pid_prh_6.3_148337315_c0_r0

To Lilach Mollick

Contents

Introduction: THREE SLEEPLESS NIGHTS

PART I

1. CREATING ALIEN MINDS

2. ALIGNING THE ALIEN

3. FOUR RULES FOR CO-INTELLIGENCE

PART II

4. AI AS A PERSON

5. AI AS A CREATIVE

6. AI AS A COWORKER

7. AI AS A TUTOR

8. AI AS A COACH

9. AI AS OUR FUTURE

Epilogue: AI AS US

Acknowledgments

Notes

_148337315_

Introduction

THREE SLEEPLESS NIGHTS

I believe the cost of getting to know AI—really getting to know AI—is at least three sleepless nights.

After a few hours of using generative AI systems, there will come a moment when you realize that Large Language Models (LLMs), the new form of AI that powers services like ChatGPT, don’t act like you expect a computer to act. Instead, they act more like a person. It dawns on you that you are interacting with something new, something alien, and that things are about to change. You stay up, equal parts excited and nervous, wondering: What will my job be like? What job will my kids be able to do? Is this thing thinking? You go back to your computer in the middle of the night and make seemingly impossible requests, only to see the AI fulfill them. You realize the world has changed in fundamental ways and that nobody can really tell you what the future will look like.

Though I am not a computer scientist, I am an academic studying innovation who has long been involved in work on the applications of AI, especially for learning. Over the years, AI has promised much more than it has delivered. For decades, AI research has always seemed to be on the edge of a massive breakthrough, but most practical uses, from self-driving cars to personalized tutoring, always advanced grindingly slowly. During this time, I kept experimenting with AI tools, including OpenAI’s GPT models, figuring out ways to incorporate them into my work, and assigning my students to use AI in class. So my sleepless nights came early, just after the release of ChatGPT in November 2022.

After only a couple of hours, it was clear that something huge had shifted between previous iterations of GPT and this new one. Four days after the AI was launched, I decided to demonstrate this new tool to my undergraduate entrepreneurship class. Barely anyone had heard of it. In front of my students, I put on a show, demonstrating how AI can help generate ideas, write business plans, turn those business plans into poems (not that there is a lot of demand for that), and generally fill the role of company cofounder. By the end of the class, one of my students, Kirill Naumov, had created a working demo for his entrepreneurship project—a Harry Potter–inspired moving picture frame that reacted to people walking near it—using a code library he had never used before, in less than half the time it would otherwise have taken. He had venture capital scouts reaching out to him by the end of the next day.

Within two days of introducing students to AI, several told me they used ChatGPT to explain confusing concepts to them like they were ten years old. They stopped raising their hands as much—why expose themselves in class when they could just ask the AI later? And every essay was suddenly written with perfect grammar (though references were often wrong and the final paragraph tended to start with In conclusion—a telltale sign of early ChatGPT writing, since fixed). But the students weren’t just excited, they were nervous. They wanted to know the future.

Some of them asked me what it means for their preferred careers (Should I become a radiologist if AI can do a lot of the work? Will writing marketing copy still be a good job five years from now?). Others asked when this technological development would stop, or if it would stop. Someone even asked if Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), the hypothetical machine that would be smarter than a human, might arrive before graduation.

I didn’t have any answers then (though I have a few more now), yet I recognized that I wasn’t immune to these changes. So I decided to get hands-on and put the AI through its paces. Much of my work over the past five years has been building simulations that teach business skills. It has taken tremendous investment from my university, and the efforts of a dozen talented people, to build these elaborate digital experiences. After thousands of hours, the games were great: using thousands of lines of code, we could do elaborate learning simulations that helped teach skills like negotiation. But I decided to type something into ChatGPT:

You will be my negotiation teacher. You will simulate a detailed scenario in which I have to engage in a negotiation. You will fill the role of one party, I will fill the role of the other. You will ask for my response in each step of the scenario and wait until you receive it. After getting my response, you will give me details of what the other party does and says. You will grade my response and give me detailed feedback about what to do better using the science of negotiation. You will give me a harder scenario if I do well, and an easier one if I fail.

ChatGPT wrote back:

Sure, I’d be happy to help you practice negotiations through a simulation exercise! Let’s start with a simple scenario. You are a salesperson trying to sell 100 pens to a customer. The pens are usually $1, but the customer is trying to negotiate the price down. The customer starts by offering to buy the pens for $0.50 each. How do you respond?

And it proceeded to take me through an entire simulation that, while not perfect, did 80 percent of what took our team months to do. Based on just a paragraph-long prompt from me!

My sleepless nights began.

And to be honest, they haven’t ended. Every week, it seems like AI serves up a new miracle—or a new concerning development. I soon found myself arguing with a chatbot that accused me of being unethical when I asked it to help me write computer code. I discovered that I could create beautiful images by giving the right words to a machine. I could code in Python, a language I never learned. I discovered that a machine could do large amounts of my job . . . and maybe lots of other people’s jobs. I discovered something remarkably close to an alien co-intelligence, one that can interact well with humans, without being human or, indeed, sentient. I think we will all have our three sleepless nights soon.

And sleep-deprived as I now am, I keep going back to my students’ questions: What does this technology mean for the future of work and education? Things are happening so quickly that it is hard to be sure, but we can begin to see its outlines.

AI is what those of us who study technology call a General Purpose Technology (ironically, also abbreviated GPT). These advances are once-in-a-generation technologies, like steam power or the internet, that touch every industry and every aspect of life. And, in some ways, generative AI might even be bigger.

General Purpose Technologies typically have slow adoption, as they require many other technologies to work well. The internet is a great example. While it was born as ARPANET in the late 1960s, it took nearly three decades to achieve general use in the 1990s, with the invention of the web browser, the development of affordable computers, and the growing infrastructure to support high-speed internet. It was fifty years before smartphones enabled the rise of social media. And many companies have not even fully embraced the internet: making a business digital is still a hot topic of discussion at business school, especially as many banks still use mainframe computers. And previous General Purpose Technologies have similarly taken many decades from development until they were useful. Consider computers, another transformative technology. Early computers improved quickly, thanks to Moore’s Law, the long-standing trend that the capability of computers doubles every two years. But it still took decades for computers to start appearing at businesses and schools because, even with their fast rate of increasing ability, they were starting from a very primitive beginning. Yet Large Language Models proved incredibly capable within a few years of their invention. They’ve also been adopted by consumers very quickly; ChatGPT reached 100 million users faster than any previous product in history, driven by the fact that it was free to access, available to individuals, and incredibly useful.

They are also getting better. The size of these models is increasing by an order of magnitude a year, or even more, so their capability is also improving. Even though that progress will likely slow, it is happening at a pace that dwarfs any other major technology, and LLMs are just one of a set of potential machine learning technologies powering the new wave of AI. Even if AI development were to stop as I was finishing this sentence, it would still transform our lives.

Finally, as great as previous General Purpose Technologies were, their impact on work and education may actually be less than the impact of AI. Where previous technological revolutions often targeted more mechanical and repetitive work, AI works, in many ways, as a co-intelligence. It augments, or potentially replaces, human thinking to dramatic results. Early studies of the effects of AI have found it can often lead to a 20 to 80 percent improvement in productivity across a wide variety of job types, from coding to marketing. By contrast, when steam power, that most fundamental of General Purpose Technologies, the one that created the Industrial Revolution, was put into a factory, it improved productivity by 18 to 22 percent. And despite decades of looking, economists have had difficulty showing a real long-term productivity impact of computers and the internet over the past twenty years.

Plus, General Purpose Technologies aren’t just about work; they touch every aspect of our lives. They change how we teach, entertain ourselves, interact with other people, and even our sense of self. Schools are in an uproar over the future of writing, based on the first generation of AIs, and AI tutors may finally radically change how we educate students. AI-driven entertainment allows for stories to be personalized to us and is sending shock waves through Hollywood. And AI-driven misinformation is already flowing through social networks in ways that are difficult to detect and deal with. Things are about to get very strange; in fact, if you know where to look, they are already getting strange.

And all of this ignores the larger issue, the alien in the room. We have created something that has convinced many smart people that it is, in some way, the spark of a new form of intelligence. An AI that has blown through both the Turing Test (Can a computer fool a human into thinking it is human?) and the Lovelace Test (Can a computer fool a human on creative tasks?) within a month of its invention, an AI that aces our hardest exams, from the bar exam to the neurosurgery qualifying test. An AI that maxes out our best measures for human creativity and our best tests for sentience. Even weirder, it is not entirely clear why the AI can do all these things, even though we built the system and understand how it technically works.

No one really knows where this is all heading, including me. Yet, despite not having definitive answers, I think I can be a useful guide. I have found myself to be an influential voice on the implications of AI, particularly through my newsletter, One Useful Thing, even though I am not a computer scientist myself. Indeed, I think that one of my advantages in understanding AI is that, as a professor at Wharton, I have long studied and written about how technologies are used. As a result, my coauthors and I have published some of the first research on AI in education and in business, and we have been experimenting with practical uses of AI in ways that major AI companies have cited as examples. I regularly speak with organizations, companies, and government agencies, as well as with many AI experts, to understand the world we are making. I also attempt to keep up with the flood of research in the field, much of it in the form of scientific working papers that have not yet gone through the long process of peer review but still offer valuable data about this new phenomenon (I will be citing a lot of this early work in the book to help fill in the picture of where we are headed, but it is important to realize that the field is evolving rapidly). Based on all these conversations and papers, I can assure you that there is nobody who has the complete picture of what AI means, and even the people making and using these systems do not understand their full implications.

So I want to try to take you on a tour of AI as a new thing in the world, a co-intelligence, with all the ambiguity that the term implies. We have invented technologies, from axes to helicopters, that boost our physical capabilities; and others, like spreadsheets, that automate complex tasks; but we have never built a generally applicable technology that can boost our intelligence. Now humans have access to a tool that can emulate how we think and write, acting as a co-intelligence to improve (or replace) our work. But many of the companies developing AI are going further, hoping to create a sentient machine, a truly new form of co-intelligence that would coexist with us on Earth. To get a handle on what this means, we need to start from the beginning, with a very basic question: What is AI?

So we are going to start there, discussing the technology of Large Language Models. That will give us a basis for thinking about how we, as humans, can best work with these systems. After that, we can dive into how AI can change our lives by acting as a coworker, a teacher, an expert, and even a companion. Finally, we can turn to what this might mean for us, and what it means to think together with an alien mind.

PART I

1 CREATING ALIEN MINDS

Talking about AI can be confusing, in part because AI has meant so many different things and they all tend to get muddled together. Siri telling you a joke on command. The Terminator crushing a skull. Algorithms predicting credit scores.

We’ve long had a fascination with machines that can think. In 1770, the invention of the first mechanical chess computer stunned those who saw it—a chessboard set upon an elaborate cabinet, with its chess pieces manipulated by a robot dressed as an Ottoman wizard. It toured the world from 1770 to 1838. The machine, also known as the Mechanical Turk, beat Ben Franklin and Napoleon in chess matches and led Edgar Allan Poe

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1