SQL vs NoSQL: understanding the storage choice

If you've ever had to choose between SQL and NoSQL databases, you know it might be confusing. But what really makes one better than the other? Or is it even something about "better" at all?


SQL: Structured and reliable

SQL databases are the reliable choice that businesses use to manage structured data. Think of SQL as an organized librarian who keeps every book (piece of data) in the right place so it's easy to find. The structure is strict, like a library with fixed shelves (schemas).

Key strengths:

  1. SQL databases follow ACID rules to keep the data accurate and safe. This makes them an interesting option for things like banking or shopping systems, where no kind of inconsistency is acceptable. Let's take a look at them right below:

  • Atomicity: Ensures that all parts of a transaction are completed. If one part fails, the entire transaction is rolled back.

  • Consistency: Guarantees that a transaction brings the database from one valid state to another, maintaining data integrity.

  • Isolation: Concurrent transaction don't interfere with each other, even when executed simultaneously.

  • Durability: Once a transaction is committed, is stays committed, even in case of system failures.

2. Complex queries: You can easily connect and analyze data from different tables, using multiple JOINs and sub-queries.

3. Mature ecosystems: Tools like PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQL Server have been around for years and are well-supported.

However, rigid schemas can make it hard to adapt when your data needs change.


NoSQL: Flexible and fast

NoSQL databases were created to handle the limits of SQL databases. It's designed for big data sets, focusing on flexibility and speed.

Most known NoSQL database types:

  • Document stores (MongoDB): Store data in a flexible format like JSON.

  • Key-Value stores (Redis, DynamoDB): Work like giant dictionaries for quick lookups.

Key strengths:

  1. Flexibility: Add or change data field without downtime.

  2. Scalability: Handle heavy loads of data by adding more servers instead of upgrading one (horizontal scaling).

  3. Speed: Built for fast performance with modern data needs.

But yet, NoSQL isn't perfect. It doesn't always guarantee consistency and can be harder to learn for some tasks.


SQL vs NoSQL: Which one should you go for?

Use SQL when:

  • Your data is structured and has clear relationships.

  • Transactions must have atomicity, consistency, isolation and durability.

Use NoSQL when:

  • Your data changes a lot or doesn't have a fixed structure.

  • You're working with a large or fast-growing databases (social media, etc).

Yet, you can combine both in certain situations:

Many modern applications do it. A banking platform might use SQL for investments and online transactions while using NoSQL for the daily valuation of each asset and financial indexes (once these NoSQL values are created, they often don't need to be changed anymore).


Final Thoughts

Choosing between SQL and NoSQL isn't a one-time decision. It's like picking the right tool for the right job. If you need precision and consistency (ACID...), go with SQL. If you're going to storage large amounts of data and need flexibility, NoSQL is a great choice.

Antonio Junior

Senior Software Engineer | Python | Java | Langchain

6mo

Great Article! Really liked the analogies you used. I totally agree that combining both SQL and NoSQL while respecting the designed use cases of both is the go to strategy! It feels so bad when their usage is misplaced, most of the times you wont have the time to refactor and it becomes a huge debt

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore topics