Volume I, Section 3 – COD

Overview

Common Origination and Disbursement:

The Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) System was implemented in April 2002 by
the Office of Federal Student Aid (FSA). The COD System is FSA’s first step toward achieving
two of the organization’s enterprise wide goals: to increase customer satisfaction and to reduce
costs by modernizing business processes. COD re-engineered the process of delivering and
reporting Federal Pell Grants and Direct Loans from two processes into one Common
Origination and Disbursement Process.

Note: Beginning on July 1, 2006, the COD System begins a phased implementation of two new
Federal Grant programs, and a new Direct PLUS Loan for graduate student borrowers as
provided by the Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2005 (the HERA). The HERA
introduces the Academic Competitiveness Grant (ACG), the National Science and Mathematics
Access to Retain Talent (SMART) Grant, and the PLUS loan for graduate and professional
student borrowers (Grad PLUS). In regards to Grad PLUS, the HERA provision does not create
a new loan program, but, rather introduces a new type of borrower – an eligible graduate or
professional student – to borrow under the existing Direct PLUS Loan Program. The COD
System processes Grad PLUS for the 2005-2006 award year and forward, and processes the two
new Grant programs for the 2006-2007 award year and forward.

The implementation of Grad PLUS, and the ACG and National SMART Programs is occurring in
five phases beginning on July 1, 2006 and lasting through April 2007. The July 1st
implementation enables Grad PLUS student borrowers to submit both a paper and electronic
PLUS Master Promissory Note, and enables schools to confirm paper and electronic MPN

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 1

Volume I: Getting Started
acceptance, initiate credit checks, and/or receive credit decisions for Grad PLUS borrowers using
the COD Web site. The July 29th implementation provides initial funding for schools
participating in the ACG and National SMART Programs. These schools also receive an ESOA
report when Current Funding Level (CFL) changes occur. The August 12th implementation
enables schools to submit award and disbursement information to the COD System for Grad
PLUS borrowers. The December 16th implementation enables schools to submit award and
disbursement information to the COD System for the ACG and National SMART Programs.
Finally, the April 2007 implementation provides some ACG and National SMART reports, and
introduces a new Direct Loan discharge type for Identity theft, and changes to Direct Loan
origination fees and loan limits.

The COD Technical Reference will be updated through this phased implementation to convey
processing specific information to COD System users as it becomes available. Please see Volume
I, Section 2 – Overview of Changes for a detailed description of the HERA updates incorporated
into this July 2006 release of the COD Technical Reference.

COD provides a common process and an integrated system that enables efficient delivery of Title
IV Funds. COD allows for:

• Common Processing:

o One process and record for submitting origination and disbursement data

o Edits that are common across the Pell Grant, ACG, National SMART, and Direct
Loan programs

o Data tags that are common across the Pell Grant, ACG, National SMART and
Direct Loan programs, and are (approaching) a cross-industry standard for data
definitions

o Elimination of duplicate data reporting for Pell Grants, ACG, National SMART,
and Direct Loans

• Streamlined edits to reduce turnaround time for exception processing

• Expanded online capability to make corrections/changes, to process “emergency”

requests, and to check transmission status

In general, the COD Process is a simplified process for requesting, reporting, and reconciling
Title IV funds.

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 2

Volume I: Getting Started
All schools participating in Title IV Federal Student Aid using the Common Origination and
Disbursement (COD) System to process Federal Direct Loans, Pell Grants are Full Participants.

Full Participation:
A Full Participant uses the Common Record in XML format to submit Pell Grant, ACG, National
SMART and/or Direct Loan origination and disbursement data to the COD System.

COD Full Participants may submit data to the COD system in award year 2006-2007 in two
ways:
• Batch processing of Common Record documents over the Student Aid Internet Gateway
(SAIG).

• Entry of Common Record data using the COD web site.

NOTE: The COD web site uses a “cookie” to help visitors use the web site interactively.
A cookie is a small file that a web site transfers to the user’s computer hard disk, usually
for the purpose of tracking the user while he or she is connected to that site.

The cookie on this site does not collect any information about the user, only about the
user’s browser session. The cookie makes it easier for users to use the dynamic features
on these web pages, without having to provide the same information over and over again
as the user moves from one page to another, essentially confirming that a valid log-in was
performed each time the user moves to another page. If a user has his or her computer set
to block all cookies, the cookie is not created at log-in. As a result, the COD web site
cannot validate when the user moves from one web page to another. If the COD web site
cannot validate the user, the user’s session is terminated and the user is forced to log in
again. To avoid this situation, all users must set their Internet browser Privacy settings
for cookies to “high” or less.

For more information about COD Web privacy, please go to:

https://cod.ed.gov/cod/Privacy.

Full Participants should refer to the 2006-2007 COD Technical Reference, Volume II - Common
Record Full Participant Technical Reference for record layouts and processes.

COD Customer Service

The COD School Relations Center integrates customer service for the Direct Loan, Pell Grant,
ACG and National SMART Programs.

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 3

Volume I: Getting Started
All schools should use the numbers or email address listed below for assistance:

• For Pell Grant assistance – for award years 1999-2000 through 2006-2007

o 1-800-474-7268

o [email protected]

• For ACG and National SMART assistance – for award years 2006-2007 and forward

o 1-800-474-7268

o [email protected]

• For Direct Loan assistance – for award years 2001-2002 and earlier

o [email protected]

• For Direct Loan assistance – for award years 2002-2003 through 2006-2007

o 1-800-848-0978

o [email protected]

• Transmit all batch files to the SAIG mailbox to be forwarded to COD to be processed

• Perform on-line PLUS Credit Checks for all program years on the COD web site at:

www.cod.ed.gov

• Perform on-line Grad PLUS Credit Checks for the 2005-2006 program year and forward
on the COD web site at:

www.cod.ed.gov

• Mail all Promissory Notes to:

US Department of Education
P.O. Box 5692
Montgomery, AL 36103-5692

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 4

Volume I: Getting Started
 • Send Promissory Notes overnight to:
US Department of Education
201 TechnaCenter Drive
Montgomery, AL 36117

• Return Refunds of Cash for Direct Loans to:

COD School Relations Center
P.O. Box 9001
Niagara Falls, NY 14302
Note: Schools must specify the award year and their school code.

• Return Refunds of Cash for Pell, ACG and National SMART to:

Funds should be returned using the Electronic Refund function in GAPS.

The Electronic Refund function can be accessed from the GAPS ‘Main
Menu”
As an alternative, the Department will continue to accept refund checks at
the following address:

US Department of Education
P.O. Box 979053
St. Louis, MO 63197-9000

• Request Direct Loan Publications by contacting ED Pubs at:

Web: www.FSApubs.org
Telephone: 800/394-7084
E-mail: [email protected]
Fax: 301/470-1244

• Submit Master Promissory Notes (MPNs) printed by the school for COD test and review
only to:
US Department of Education
P.O. Box 5691
Montgomery, AL 36103

NOTE: All documents and shipping packages should be clearly marked “For Testing
Only”.

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 5

Volume I: Getting Started
COD Overview for Full Participants
The Common Origination and Disbursement Process for Full Participants utilizes one single
record across programs for both origination and disbursement. Full Participants use a Common
Record, one that uses common data elements, definitions, edits, and structure for Pell Grants,
ACG, National SMART and Direct Loans. Although the record has the same layout for all
programs, not all data elements are required for each transmission. This record layout relies on a
technology called the eXtensible Markup Language, or XML.

Prior to the introduction of HERA, the Common Record only supported the submission of Pell
Grant and Direct Loan aid data. However, the flexible nature of the Common Record format
makes it easily adaptable for future use throughout the financial aid community. Now, the
Common Record supports the submission of Pell Grant, ACG, National SMART and Direct Loan
data. Furthermore, if desired by program administrators, the Common Record could eventually
even support the submission of state grants, FFEL, alternative loans, etc.

The Common Record was developed in partnership with members of the National Council of
Higher Education Loan Programs (NCHELP) and the Postsecondary Electronic Standards
Council (PESC). This collaborative effort enables the Common Record to bring consistency and
standardization to the transmission of student financial aid data. The Common Record also
provides a structure to allow for the addition of FFEL data if desired. Thus, the inherent
processing efficiencies of the COD process will also be available to FFEL schools as the FFEL
trading partners adopt this format.

What is XML?
XML stands for eXtensible Markup Language. XML is a recommendation by the World Wide
Web Consortium (W3C) for how to represent structured information in a text-based format.
XML is a markup language whose roots originate in HTML and SGML. Like HTML, XML
consists of elements that are defined by tags. A start tag containing a name precedes element
data. An end tag follows it. While HTML tags have a specific meaning and generally describe
how the text between them should look, XML uses tags only to delimit pieces of data and leaves
the interpretation of the data completely to the application. The tags identify data elements and
provide metadata, or meaning, for the information that appears between the tags.

The textual and self-describing nature of XML makes its platform independent and very flexible
in terms of content. It is an open standard for storing, publishing, and exchanging any kind of
information between any number of disparate systems. As long as two parties agree on and
adhere to a common data structure, they can transfer information to each other without any
knowledge of the other party’s operating system, database type or programming language. XML

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 6

Volume I: Getting Started
can be used in conjunction with HTML to store data within standard web pages. It can also be
used to store data in files and to pull information from disparate, incompatible databases.

One of the objectives behind the design of the COD Process and System was to provide FSA and
our partnering student aid schools greater flexibility in record processing, i.e., opportunities for
multiple data cross-walks. The COD Process could serve as a technological foundation for
future FSA integration initiatives. Given these objectives, XML was the logical choice for the
Common Record’s format and structure. XML offers the flexibility to design records, known as
XML documents, particular to an audience or community. It allows increased access to and reuse
of information. It supports validation [edits] by checking structural validity and flagging errors.
It also enables systems to share information and users to see different views of available data.

XML 101
XML technology allows a common data packet structure to be used between two disparate
systems. It is a markup language that defines data structure. An XML document is the vehicle
through which data is transmitted. It can be thought of as a batch.

XML documents are comprised of markup and content. Markup defines the content. For
example, Last Name is the markup describing Jones.

<LastName>Jones</LastName>

<LastName> is a start tag. Note the presence of brackets. Last Name is an element. Jones is the
data, or XML content. </LastName> is an end tag.

Elements can be either complex or simple. A complex element is a grouping of attributes or

other elements. The Common Record is a logical grouping of complex elements. In the
following example, the Complex Element is bolded.

Complex Element:

o <Name>

• <FirstName>Heidi</FirstName>

• <LastName>Smith</LastName>

o </Name>

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 7

Volume I: Getting Started
 A simple element refers to the value that is contained within tags. In the following
example, a Simple Element is bolded.

Simple Element:

o <Name>

• <FirstName>Heidi</FirstName>

• <LastName>Smith</LastName>

o </Name>

Fixed-Format Files vs. XML Documents

Fixed-format files have been used as vehicles through which data can be exported and imported
to business applications. Fixed-format files contain a sequence of fields that is in machine-
readable language. An example of a comma-separated fixed-format file follows:

Sally, A, Smith, 299999999, 1979-02-03, IN, DL222222, false, P, 417 Halper Road, Fort
Wayne, IN, 46807, Allen, USA, 2197999999, [email protected], 1, 221784902

In the above comma-separated fixed-format file, it is difficult to understand what the data means.
There is also no way to validate the document to make sure that the data is represented in a
format that can be read by the receiving application.

XML is a language that is not only machine readable, but also human readable. It also has a
mechanism to ensure the validity of the document format through the use of XML Schemas. As a
result, business applications are rapidly moving toward the use of XML to exchange data. The
following example demonstrates that XML not only represents data in a human readable text
format, but also provides meaning to the data through the use of tags. This is how a Student
record would be represented in XML:

<Student SSN="299999999">
<Identifiers>
<DriversLicense>
<DriversLicenseState>IN</DriversLicenseState>
<DriversLicenseNumber>DL222222</DriversLicenseNumber>
</DriversLicense>
</Identifiers>
<BirthDate>1979-02-03</BirthDate>
<Name>
<FirstName>Sally</NameFirst>
<MiddleInitial>A</MiddleInitial>

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 8

Volume I: Getting Started
 <LastName>Smith</LastName>
</Name>
<Contacts>
<Address>
<AddressFormatIndicator>false</AddressFormatIndicator>
<AddressTypeCode>P</AddressTypeCode>
<AddressLine>417 Hapler Road</AddressLine>
<AddressCity>Fort Wayne</AddressCity>
<AddressStateProvinceCode>IN</AddressStateProvinceCode>
<AddressPostalCode>46807</AddressPostalCode>
<AddressCounty>Allen</AddressCounty>
<AddressCountryCode>USA</AddressCountryCode>
</Address>
<PhoneNumber>2197999999</PhoneNumber>
<EmailAddress>[email protected]</EmailAddress>
</Contacts>
<CitizenshipStatusCode>1</CitizenshipStatusCode>
<NoteMessage>PID=221784902</NoteMessage>

Common Record Structure

The XML document called the Common Record is composed of different information modules,
referred to as complex elements or blocks. Data fields within the blocks emphasize similarities
across programs and contain information such as: document or batch information, school or
entity information, person information, award or origination information, disbursement
information, and the response status of the record.

A general rule regarding sequence of data within blocks, and within complex elements: the start
and end data tags and their content must be presented on the XML document within the block’s
tags or the complex element tags to which they belong. The sequence of the data within that
block or element is dictated by the sequence of the data tags presented in the XML Common
Record Schema. For example, if a complex element has ten simple elements within it, those ten
elements must occur in the same sequence as depicted in the XML Common Record Schema.

The Common Record is organized into the following structure:

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 9

Volume I: Getting Started
 Quick Reference Block Description
Block Name Block Description
1 Document Information The Document Information Block contains
information that was previously associated with
a batch. It contains a date/time stamp,
document validation information, summary-
level document information, as well as the
source of the document. This block occurs
once per XML Document or submission.
2 Entity Information The Entity Information Block contains
information about the reporting and attending
school. This block occurs once per reporting
entity or school within the XML Document or
submission.
3 Person Information The Person Block contains student or PLUS
parent borrower information. This block occurs
once per person, except for Grad PLUS where
there will be two person blocks with identical
identifiers.
4 Award Information The Award Information Block contains Direct
Loan, Pell Grant, ACG and National SMART
award information, similar to origination data
submitted in the fixed-length record layouts. As
other partners use the Common Record to
transport data, this will be the location of those
awards. This block occurs once per award per
person.
5 Disbursement Information The Disbursement Information Block contains
Direct Loan, Pell Grant, ACG and National
SMART disbursement information. This block
occurs once per disbursement.
6 Response A Response block is nested within each block.
The Response block is returned by COD to the
submitting entity upon processing the Common
Record. The Response block contains
information about processing edits and
document status.

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 10

Volume I: Getting Started
Below is a pictorial representation of the Common Record layout. It illustrates how the Common
Record is comprised of information modules or blocks.

The Common Record Document Structure

<Common Record>

<Entity>

<
<Person>

<Award>

<Disbursement>
</Disbursement>

</Award>
</Person>

</Entity>
</Common Record>

These information modules or blocks may be reused many times in the same record in order to
transmit data for multiple awards and multiple disbursements for one or multiple students by one
or multiple Attended Schools.

For participating schools, software developers, and third-party servicers, the transition to XML
may initially require an investment of resources to build the Common Record. However,
reformatting in subsequent years will take considerably less time and effort than currently
required for updating fixed-format files.

XML Schema
An XML Schema specifies the rules surrounding the logical structure of an XML document. It is
a language that describes the allowed content of documents. It defines the elements present in
the document and the order in which they appear, as well as any attributes that may be associated
with an element.

NEW: After December 16, 2006, the COD system uses Version 2.0e of the Common Record
XML schema for the 2006-2007 Award Year and forward. It is provided in a format that can be
downloaded for printing or importing to another application.

NOTE: The Common Record XML Schema Version 2.0e includes a DL Graduate PLUS Block.
This block is reserved for future use and will not be used for 2005-2006, 2006-2007 or 2007-
2008 award year processing. As such, schools should not use the DL Graduate PLUS Block for

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 11

Volume I: Getting Started
2005-2006, 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 Direct PLUS Loans made to eligible graduate and
professional students.

To support the open standards proven effective in the development of the Common Record, FSA
is making the XML Schema for the Common Record available electronically to all interested
parties. Whether a school, a software provider, or a third-party servicer is using it for product
development to support COD or any student financial resource trading partner is interested in
incorporating the Common Record into their products and services, the schema is available on
the web at: http://ifap.ed.gov/cod/0607CODXMLSchema.html.

XML Resources
Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a growing standard for e-commerce, data transmissions
and structured documents using the Internet. Many industry groups are developing schemas and
data dictionaries for this purpose. As a result, there is extensive information available about
XML and the initiatives specific to the higher education community. Many institutions are
already using XML for their own Internet initiatives, including self-service applications for
students, faculty, and staff; data exchanges both within and outside the school; and even data
coordination or backup with data warehouse projects.

Available resources about XML include courses at many institutions and local or Internet
bookstores. The Web is also a resource, including the sites mentioned below. The first three are
international standards bodies, and the last is specifically for the schema and data dictionary for
higher education.

• http://www.w3.org

• http://www.ebXML.org

• http://www.oasis-open.org

• http://www.PESC.org

The following web addresses were shared at the Higher Education Washington, Inc. conference
in September 2001. This updated list was provided by the Office of FSA CIO:

• IBM’s Introduction to XML: www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/

• Sun’s XML & Java Technologies: http://java.sun.com/xml

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 12

Volume I: Getting Started
 • The XML Industry Portal: www.xml.org

• XML Related Software: www.xmlsoftware.com/

• Web Reference: Exploring XML: www.webreference.com/xml/

• XML Information: html.about.com/cs/xmlinformation

• O’Reilly XML.com: www.xml.com

• The XML FAQ: www.ucc.ie/xml

Literature is constantly being updated as new technologies develop and mature. Therefore, it is
recommended that time be spent exploring these resources.

Common Record Process

This walkthrough of the Common Record Process applies to Full Participants. This section
addresses at a high level the processing of the Common Record from the institution perspective.

The COD Process is comprised of the following steps:

1. Common Record Submission

2. Common Record Receipt
3. Common Record Processing
4. Common Record Editing
5. Response Notification

Note: This overview of the COD Process will not cover the entire cycle for a school. There are
items that take place prior to the submission of records (i.e. packaging) that are not explained in
this document.

1. Common Record Submission

The COD Process begins when a Full Participant school submits a Common Record. The
Common Record is submitted by Full Participants in one of two ways:
• Batch Submission via SAIG

• Online Submission via the COD web site

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 13

Volume I: Getting Started
Batch Submission
All Common Records sent in batch mode are submitted to COD’s Student Aid Internet Gateway
(SAIG) mailbox. The Enterprise Application Integration Bus (EAI Bus) performs periodic
sweeps of COD’s SAIG mailbox and transmits the Common Record data to the COD System.

Online Submission
A COD Full Participant can enter data online via the COD web site. The COD web site creates a
Common Record document for data entered online and sends it directly to the COD System.

2. Common Record Receipt

After the COD System receives the Common Record, the COD System generates a receipt. The
receipt is transmitted from the COD System to the source entity in the same manner that the
Common Record was submitted. For example,
• For Common Records received by the COD System via batch processing, the receipt is
transmitted to the EAI Bus. The EAI Bus routes the receipt to the SAIG Destination
Mailbox indicated in the SAIG Transmission Header and Trailer.

• For Common Record data entered via the COD web site, the receipt is returned to the
COD web site.

For examples of Common Record receipts received via SAIG, please refer to Volume VI,
Section 6 of this Technical Reference.

3. Common Record Processing

After the COD System transmits a receipt, the COD System classifies the record to determine
how it is to be processed. The types of records are:
• New Record

• Update Record

New Record
A New Record establishes a new person, award or disbursement on the COD System. There are
three types of new records:

• New Person w/ New Award – If the SSN contained in the student identifier does not
match any previously submitted to the COD System, then the record is considered a New
Student. A student cannot be established on the COD database without establishing an
award for the student. Therefore, any New Student Record must contain a New Award

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 14

Volume I: Getting Started
 Record. For Pell Grant, ACG, National SMART and Direct Loan
Subsidized/Unsubsidized, the Student Identifier submitted by a school to establish the
student on COD is matched to data from the Central Processing System (CPS).

o For Pell Grants, ACG and National SMART, the current SSN, current Date of
Birth, and first two characters of the current Last Name are matched with CPS
data.

o For Direct Loans, the current SSN and current Date of Birth are matched with
CPS data.

• New Award – If the student identifier matches an SSN already established on the COD
System, then the system checks (Financial Award Type, Financial Award Year, Attended
Entity ID, Reporting Entity ID, and Financial Award ID [for Direct Loans, ACG and
National SMART]) to determine if the award is already on file. If not, then the record is
considered a New Award.

• New Disbursement – If the person and award already exist on the COD System, then the
system checks the disbursement number submitted for the award. If it is not already on
file, then the system logs the disbursement as a new disbursement. There are two types
of disbursement records:

o Actual Disbursement - Actual Disbursement Records contain a Disbursement

Release Indicator = “True”. The Disbursement Release Indicator is a tag on the
Common Record that signals to the COD System that the disbursement
information is an actual disbursement. It either makes funds available to a school,
or substantiates cash already made available to the school. These records affect
the Current Funding Level (CFL) calculation for the school. This can be thought
of as the actual disbursement record in the old fixed-length record process.

o Anticipated Disbursement – Anticipated Disbursement Records contain a

Disbursement Release Indicator = “False” or omitted. These disbursements are
not considered Actual Disbursements; therefore, they do not substantiate
drawdowns. These records do not affect the CFL calculation for the school.

Update Record
An Update Record performs a change to information or elements that were previously
established on the COD System by a New Record. There are two types of Update Records:

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 15

Volume I: Getting Started
 • Update Record - An Update Record performs a change to a non-monetary data element
that was previously established by a New Record or is used to change disbursement
amounts and dates that occur prior to substantiating drawdowns.

• Release Record - A Release Record can be submitted to the COD System with a
Disbursement Release Indicator = “True” for a disbursement record previously submitted
as an Anticipated Disbursement Record. Data elements can be changed via the COD web
site or by resubmission of a Common Record.

4. Common Record Editing

Once the Common Record is received and has been classified, the COD System performs a
series of valid format and content edits to determine if the file is suitable for further processing.

The COD System performs three types of edits:

• Correction – For Pell Grant data, if the Full Participant school selects this option, the
system automatically corrects the data and sends a response to the entity that submitted
the record indicating that a correction took place, the element corrected, the original
value, and the corrected value. The default option in the COD System for all schools is
set to ‘correct’. If a school wants to have COD reject data instead of correcting it, then it
must contact the COD School Relations Center to request that FSA make this change.

Note: The COD System does not correct Direct Loan, ACG and National
SMART data.

• Warning – The COD System sends a response to the entity that submitted the record
indicating a warning, the warning code and the relevant element. The record continues to
be processed by the COD System.

• Reject – The COD System sends a response to the entity that submitted the record
indicating the reject code, the reject reason(s) and the relevant element(s). The record
requires action from the school to continue processing.

Where possible, COD uses information from CPS as a basis for these edits. COD receives the
Abbreviated Applicant file from CPS on a daily basis. This file is used to:
• Confirm a valid ISIR is on file (if applicable) and,

• Pull student-level information required for Common Record processing.

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 16

Volume I: Getting Started
The COD System performs edits on the Document, Entity, Person, Award and Disbursement
levels of the Common Record data. Data that passes edits is accepted and continues to be
processed while data that does not pass edits is rejected. The COD System stores rejected data
and associated reject reasons. Rejected data is held for corrective action to be taken by the
school. Data can be corrected via Common Record re-submission or via the COD web site. The
COD System then returns a response record notifying the school of the edit results.

Note: The Common Record can be re-sent in its entirety or sent with just the key identifiers,
minimum data elements required for processing, and those data elements that have changed.

5. Response Documents
For all Common Records received and processed by the COD System, the COD System returns a
Response document indicating the status of the Common Record processing, including any
rejected data elements and the reason for the rejection. If the Common Record was accepted,
then the Response document indicates that the record was accepted.

The COD System sends one Response document for each Common Record document submitted.
For Common Records that are transmitted via the SAIG, the COD System sends Response
documents to the school’s SAIG mailbox. For Common Record data entered into the COD web
site, schools have an option to receive a Response document either via the COD web site or via
their SAIG mailbox.

For Responses received via the SAIG mailbox, schools also have the option to receive a Full or a
Standard Response to Common Records processed by the COD System. A Full Response
contains all the original tags sent by the school and the rejected data elements and reason codes.
A Standard Response contains only the rejected data elements and reason codes.

For further information regarding record layouts and processes, Full Participants should refer to
the 2006-2007 COD Technical Reference, Volume II – Common Record Full Participant
Technical Reference. For examples of COD Response Documents, please refer to Volume VI,
Section 6 of this Technical Reference. If you use a combination of EDExpress and another
system, please refer to Volume III – Direct Loan and Pell Grant Combination System for record
layouts, processes, and edits pertinent to working in a combination system.

July 2006 (2006-2007) COD Technical Reference Page I – 3 - 17

Volume I: Getting Started