BGS Models
BGS Models
This Course is: an intro to Business Politics vs. Democracy a course in Political Economy
Why the Cases It is imperative to find ways for students to learn how to perform democracy because Democracy requires Practice
Chapter 1
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Once had more than a 90% market share of the American oil market The values of its founder, John D. Rockefeller, defined the company culture In 1972 Standard Oil of New Jersey changed its name to Exxon, and in 1999 it merged with Mobil, to form ExxonMobil
1-3
1-4
1-7
1-9
Four Models of the BGS Relationship: The Market Capitalism Model (continued)
The market capitalism model depicts business as operating within a market environment, responding primarily to powerful economic forces. The market acts as a buffer between business and nonmarket forces. History and nature of markets Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations Capitalism Managerial capitalism
1-10
Four Models of the BGS Relationship: The Market Capitalism Model (continued)
Important assumptions of the market capitalism model: Government interference in economic life is slight (laissez-faire). Individuals can own private property and freely risk investments. Consumers are informed about products and prices and make rational decisions. Moral restraint accompanies the self-interested behavior of business. Basic institutions such as banking and laws exist to ease commerce. There are many producers and consumers in competitive markets.
1-11
Four Models of the BGS Relationship The Market Capitalism Model (continued)
Critiques of the Market Capitalism Model: Increased prosperity comes at the cost of increased inequality. Results in base values being energized and virtue being eroded. The BGS relationship according to the Market Capitalism Model: Government regulation should be limited. Markets discipline private economic activity to promote social welfare. The proper measure of corporate performance is profit. The ethical duty of management is to promote the interests of shareholders.
1-12
1-13
1-15
The Canadian-born, Berkeley-trained John Kenneth Galbraith has been considered by many as the "Last American Institutionalist". As a result, Galbraith has remained something of a renegade in modern economics - and his work has been nothing if not provocative. In the 1950s, he presented economics with two tracts that needled the mainstream: one developing a theory of price control (which arose out of his wartime experience in the Office of Price Administration) which he argued for as an anti-inflation policy (1952); the second, American Capitalism (1952), which argued that American post-war success arose not out of "getting the prices right" in an orthodox sense, but rather of "getting the prices wrong" and allowing industrial concentration to develop. It is a formula for growth because it enables technical innovation which might otherwise not been done. However, it can only be regarded as successful provided there is a "countervailing power" against potential abuse in the form of trade unions, supplier and consumer organizations and government regulation. Many have since argued the formula for East Asian success later in the century was based precisely on this combination of oligopolistic power and "countervailing" institutions.
Four Models of the BGS Relationship The Countervailing Forces Model (continued)
Countervailing forces model conclusions: Business is deeply integrated into an open society and must respond to many forces, both economic and noneconomic. Business is a major initiator of change in society through its interaction with government, its production and marketing activities, and its use of new technologies. Broad public support of business depends on its adjustment to multiple social, political, and economic forces. BGS relationships continuously evolve as changes take place in the main ideas, institutions, and processes of society.
1-16
1-17
1-18
1-19
1-20