Epidemiological Investigation On OHS Concerns
Epidemiological Investigation On OHS Concerns
Objectives
To understand the purpose and accept the importance of occupational epidemiology in determining causes, measuring risks and establishing priorities for intervention and evaluation To define Epidemiology and its application to Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) To discuss Epidemiologic Historical Perspectives in relation to OHS
by: Gallego, Misena and Rubayat OH 206: Workplace Surveys Master of Occupational Health College of Public Health University of the Philippines Manila
Objectives
To discuss the Stages of Occupational Epidemiologic Investigation To discuss the different phases of occupational epidemiologic investigation i ti ti To be able to describe the main types of study design used in occupational epidemiology To be able to illustrate the application of the above with examples
Objectives
To explain different sampling techniques to use in the studies To discuss methods in obtaining data in epidemiological studies To discuss the basic considerations in the design of epidemiological investigations To discuss various sources of occupational epidemiological data
Objectives
To institute control measures base on the result of the study To discuss occupational epidemiological monitoring and surveillance ill To identify the problems in Occupational Epidemiology To discuss the applications of Occupational Epidemiology Summary
Definition
Epidemiology study of the frequency, distribution and determinants of diseases and other health related conditions in human populations, and the application of this study to the promotion of health, and to the p , prevention and control of health problems. Occupational Epidemiology study of the effects of workplace exposures on the frequency and distribution of diseases and injuries in the population.
1/4/2013
Levels ofApplication
Surveillance todescribe theoccurrenceofillness and provide warningsignals ofunrecognized occupational hazards Generation andTesting ofHypothesis G ti d T ti fH th i todetermine harm caused byexposure and quantify its effect Evaluation ofIntervention Tomeasure changesinthehealth status ofa populationovertime
Historical Perspective
1700 : Bernardino Ramazzini Health is dependent on identifiable natural external factors. 1775 : Pott reported possible connection between cancer and occupation 1822 : A t P i surmised arsenic f Ayrton-Paris i d i fumes as causal agent for scrotal cancers 1874 : Von Volkmann reported skin tumors in paraffin workers 1876 : Bell suggested shale oil as responsible for cutaneous cancer.
Historical Perspective
1879 : Harting and Hesse observed lung cancer among Schneeberg miners 1952 : Doll lung cancer among gas workers 1954 : Case and Hosker studied bladder cancer in dye workers
PHASES
1. Diagnostic Phase presence of disease is confirmed 2 Inter-related Avenues of Diagnostic Phase: a) Intensive follow-up - a detailed, multifaceted study of all seemingly relevant aspects of a t d f ll i l l t t f disease even in a population unit. Example: Outbreak Investigation
PHASES
1. Diagnostic Phase presence of disease is confirmed 2 Inter-related Avenues of Diagnostic Phase: b) Surveillance - opposite of intensive follow-up; a disease accounting process i di ti i.e. a b d overall, broad, ll organized approach to the collection, collation analysis, expression and dissemination of data about diseases in populations. Examples: Death certificates, Cancer Registries, Hospital Records, Bureau of Labor Statistics, etc
1/4/2013
PHASES
Exposure Assessment critical step in identifying workplace hazards through epidemiological investigation. Important factors to consider:
a. b. c. d. e. f. Inventory of potentially toxic agents Presence and concentrations Routes of entry Time course of exposure and cumulative duration Engineering and personal controls Host and other considerations
PHASES
Summary Worklife Exposure Measures
Exposure measure Cumulative exposure index (CEI) Mean grade (MG) Highest grade ever (HG) Formula (grade x time exposed) Units grade and time
(grade x time exposed)/total grade time exposed highest grade to which exposed for days grade
Time-weighted average (grade x time exposed)/total grade (TWA) grade time employed Total time exposed (TTE) time exposed time
PHASES PHASES
2. Descriptive Phase - describes the population at risk and the distribution of the disease, both in time and space, within these populations; allows generation of a series of initial hypotheses. 3. Investigative Phase involves the implementation of a series of field studies to test the initial hypotheses.
Deaths, all causes
(hypothetical case)
10 12 5 3 100 5 10 persons
Deaths, disease of interest Persons in population Years observed Y b d Incidence Annual incidence rate Point prevalence (at end of year 5) Period prevalence (five-year period) Annual death rate Annual mortality rate
PHASES
4. Experimental Phase performed under controlled conditions to test the hypotheses in more detail, should the result of phase 3 prove promising. 5. Analytical Phase - the results produced by the above investigations are analyzed.; often enables the epidemiologist to determine whether any vital bits of information about the disease process are missing.
PHASES
Biological markers assess target organ exposures, determining susceptibility and establish early disease. Its uses were: a. exposure assessment b. disentangle causative role of chemical b di t l ti l f h i l agent/substances in multiple exposures c. Estimation of burden of exposure d. Investigation of pathogenic mechanisms e. Study individual susceptibility f. Classify exposure/ disease accurately
1/4/2013
PHASES
6. Intervention Phase - appropriate methods for the control of the disease are examined either under experimental conditions or in the field. Interventions in the disease process are effected by manipulating existing determinants or introducing new ones.
PHASES
7. Decision-making Phase - a knowledge of the epidemiology of the disease is used to explore the various options available for its control; often involves the modeling of the effects. Cost benefit analysis of the control measures may be done in combination with other models, in terms of increased productivity.
PHASES
8. Monitoring Phase - takes place during the implementation of the control measures to ensure that these measures are being properly applied, are having the desired effect on reducing disease incidence, incidence and that developments that are likely to jeopardize the success of the control programs are quickly detected.
1/4/2013
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
Random Sampling - every unit in the population being sampled has exactly the same probability of being selected for the sample Multi-Stage Sampling - involves sampling a g p g p g population in different stages, with the sample unit being different at each stage Systematic Sampling - involves sampling a population systematically i.e. if a 1/n sample is required, every nth unit in that population is sampled. Ex. If a 10%(1/10) sample is required, every 10th unit in the population is sampled.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
Purposive Selection - involves the deliberate selection of certain sample units for some reason or other. The reason may often be that they are regarded as being "typical" of the population being sampled. Stratification - involves treating the population to be sampled as a series of defined subpopulations or strata.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
Paired Samples - variations in the sample groups due to host and management characteristics can sometimes be overcome by pairing individuals in the different sample groups according to common characteristics (age, sex, location) and then analyzing the paired samples; often greatly increases the precision of the study Sampling with and without replacement
1/4/2013
SAMPLE SIZES
Sample sizes for estimating disease prevalence in large populations - To what degree of accuracy do we require the results? - What sampling method have we used? - What is the size of the smallest subgroup in the population for which we require accurate answers? - What is the actual variability in the population surveyed of the variable we wish to measure?
SAMPLE SIZES
Sample sizes needed to detect the presence of a disease in a population concerns with the minimum sample size required to find at least one worker with the disease
1/4/2013
1/4/2013
1/4/2013
1/4/2013
Summary
Epidemiological investigation of occupational health and safety concerns is a vital aspect of clinical epidemiology and occupational hygiene s ce p o des esse a a d p ac ca since it provides essential and practical information o a o to be aware of the causes and determinants of work-related ill health and injury, which thereby help in establishing necessary control measures or actions to take to reduce those risks and to evaluate the interventions for the benefit of the workers and of the community at large.
References
Agius, Raymond. (2006). Occupational Epidemiology. Retrieved December 20, 2012, from http://www.agius.com/hew/resource/occepi.htm. College of Veterinary Medicine, Nursing and Allied Health. (n.d). Epidemiology. USA: Tusekgee University. Retrieved December 30, 2012, from http://www.onemedicine.tuskegee.edu/Epidemiology/chap5_3.htm. Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations (n d) The Nations. (n.d). epidemiological approach in investigating disease problems. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics in Africa. Retrieved December 20, 2012, from http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/ILRI/x5436E /x5436e06.htm. Hansen, Eva S., et.al. (2007), Time trends in cancer risk and pesticide exposure, a long-term follow-up of Danish gardeners. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, Vol. 33, No. 6. Denmark: Proquest Central, pages 465-469.
References
ILO. (n.d). Epidemiology. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 3rd ed. Retrieved November 24, 2012, from http://www.ilo.org /safework_bookshelf/english?d&nd=170000102&nh=0. MacMahon, B. and Trichopoulos, D. (1996). Strategies of Epidemiology. Epidemiology Principles and Methods, 2nd ed. Boston: Little Brown, pages 65-84. Thomsen, Catherine, MPH, et.al. (2007). Indicators for Occupational Health Surveillance. CDC: MMWR Recommendations and Reports. Retrieved December 12, 2012, from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/ preview/mmwrhtml/rr5601a1.htm. Wikipedia. (n.d). Case control study diagram. Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved December 29, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case-control_study.
10
1/4/2013
11