Scribd
Upload
10 views

Criteria For Summary: Appendix A

The document contains criteria for evaluating summaries, reflection logs, and classroom presentations. For summaries, it lists relevance, conciseness, and application of ideas as criteria. For reflection logs, it lists clarity of ideas, ability to reflect feelings, and ability to define own learning. For classroom presentations, it provides a detailed rubric assessing content, organization, delivery, audience involvement, and ability to answer questions. Scores range from 1 to 4 with 4 being excellent and 1 being poor.

Uploaded by

Mrs Rehan
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views

Criteria For Summary: Appendix A

The document contains criteria for evaluating summaries, reflection logs, and classroom presentations. For summaries, it lists relevance, conciseness, and application of ideas as criteria. For reflection logs, it lists clarity of ideas, ability to reflect feelings, and ability to define own learning. For classroom presentations, it provides a detailed rubric assessing content, organization, delivery, audience involvement, and ability to answer questions. Scores range from 1 to 4 with 4 being excellent and 1 being poor.

Uploaded by

Mrs Rehan
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Appendix A

Criteria for summary

Never

Occasionally

Often

Very often

Not applicable

How relevant and concise is written

Own learning or application of idea

Appendix B

Criteria for reflection log

Never

Occasionally

Often

Very often

Not applicable

Clarity of idea and expression Ability to reflect feelings Able to define own learning

Criteria for evaluation the classroom presentation


4 = Excellent 3 = Good Content Topic is clearly introduce Exhibits knowledge of content Uses accurate, up to date recourses Encourage asking questions Answers questions accurately Utilize appropriate technology Information were organized, student were able to grab the main concept Organization Conducts relevant pre- assessment States purpose clearly Present material in a well- organized, logical flow Presents at appropriate level for group Visual materials are visible, well organized and appropriate Utilize time effectively Delivery Use appropriate Language, clear and understandable Presentation was interested Maintain eye contact Audience involvement Assessment for audience understanding Involvements for student Listen and deal with the question effectively Comment 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 = Fair 1 = Poor

Evaluator name: ____________________________. Evaluators signature: ________________________. Students name: _____________________________. Students signature: ___________________________. Date: ____________________ Date: ____________________

http://www.framingham.edu/faculty/jschwartz/nutn486/forms/oralpresentation.htm

You might also like