Scribd
Upload
132 views

TOTAL: - /25: Category 4 3 2 1 Presentation

The document provides a rubric for evaluating multimedia projects with categories for presentation, content, organization, originality, and mechanics. It rates elements in each category on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being the highest score. Criteria for higher ratings include smooth delivery, inclusion of essential knowledge and details with few factual errors, logical organization, creative ideas, and fewer than 4 spelling or grammatical mistakes. Lower ratings are given for areas like delivery not holding audience attention, minimal or factually incorrect content, lack of clear organization, mostly using other people's ideas without credit, and more than 4 errors.

Uploaded by

hilderbrandh
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
132 views

TOTAL: - /25: Category 4 3 2 1 Presentation

The document provides a rubric for evaluating multimedia projects with categories for presentation, content, organization, originality, and mechanics. It rates elements in each category on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being the highest score. Criteria for higher ratings include smooth delivery, inclusion of essential knowledge and details with few factual errors, logical organization, creative ideas, and fewer than 4 spelling or grammatical mistakes. Lower ratings are given for areas like delivery not holding audience attention, minimal or factually incorrect content, lack of clear organization, mostly using other people's ideas without credit, and more than 4 errors.

Uploaded by

hilderbrandh
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

MULTIMEDIA PROJECT : EDU 505 TEACHER NAME: HALI HILDERBRAND STUDENT NAME:__________________________________________

CATEGORY Presentation

4 Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.

3 Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.

Content

Covers topic indepth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.

2 Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time. Includes essential information about the topic but there are 12 factual errors. Content is logically organized for the most part.

1 Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost.

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors.

Organization

There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.

Originality

Mechanics

No misspellings or grammatical errors.

Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors.

Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors.

Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar.

TOTAL: ____/25

You might also like