TITLE III, PART A STRENGTHENING

INSTITUTIONS PROGRAM

Pre-application Technical Assistance

Workshop
Title III Strengthening Institutions Program
Team A
Dr. Maria Carrington, Team Leader, 202-502-7548
Ms. Maxcine Garner, Program Assistant, 202-502-7573

PROGRAM OFFICERS

Ms. Allison Brown, 202-502-7611

Ms. Imogene Byers, 202-502-7672
Mr. Don Crews, 202-502-7574
Ms. Kelley Harris, 202-219-7083
Ms. Carolyn Johnson, 202-502-7659
Ms. Karen W. Johnson, 202-502-7642
Ms. Deborah Newkirk, 202-502-7591
Ms. Ellen Sealey, 202-502-7580
Mr. Mark Somerville, 202-502-7593
Fax: 202-502-7861
Program Web site: http://www.ed.gov/programs/iduestitle3a/index.html
 AGENDA

2. Title III, Part A – Authority and Purpose

3. Eligibility Requirements
4. Types of Grants
5. Selection Criteria
6. Program Specific Allowable Activities
7. Structure of the Application
8. Grants.gov
 Title III, Part A Programs
Strengthening Institutions Program (SIP)

American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges and

Universities (TCCU) Program

Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving

Institutions (ANNH) Programs
 AUTHORITY
Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended
Part A, Strengthening Institutions Programs
34 CFR Part 607-Strengthening Institutions
Program
EDGAR
34 CFR Parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 85 & 86
PURPOSE OF TITLE III, PART A
The purpose of the Title III, Part A
Programs is to provide grants to eligible
institutions of higher education to enable
them to improve their academic programs,
institutional management, and fiscal
stability, in order to increase their self-
sufficiency and strengthen their capacity to
make a substantial contribution to the
higher education resources of the Nation.
 ELIGIBILITY PROCESS
• Institutions of higher education (IHE) must first
become designated as eligible to participate in the
Title III and Title V programs.
• Official Notice published in the Federal Register
on December 16, 2005.
• Closing dates for receipt of applications are
February 24 and June 15, 2006.
Web Site: http://webprod.cbmiweb.com/title3and5/
 ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
• To be eligible for a SIP grant, an institution must,
among other requirements –

- Be accredited or pre-accredited by a nationally

recognized accrediting agency or association;
- Have a high enrollment of needy students; and
- Have Educational and General (E&G)
expenditures per FTE equivalent undergraduate
student that are low in comparison with the
average E&G expenditures of similar institutions.
 PROGRAM SPECIFIC ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS
• To be eligible for a TCCU grant:
– Institutions of higher education must be designated as a an
American Indian Tribally Controlled College or University
and identified in the Educational Land Grant Status Act of
1994
• To be eligible for an ANNH grant, an institution must
have:
- an enrollment of at least 20% Alaskan Native
students; or
- an enrollment of at least 10% Native Hawaiian
students
 CHANGES TO ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS

• Fall 2003 head count figures

• 2003 low-income guide

• Base year for E&G expenditures is 2003-2004
• Eligibility status valid for five consecutive years
•TCCUs MUST apply for eligibility designation
 Types of Grants

Individual Development Grants (5 Years)

Cooperative Arrangement Development
Grants (5 Years)
Construction/Renovation (1 year) TCCU
applicants only
Renovation (1 year) ANNH applicants only
 INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT GRANTS

Support efforts designed to resolve institutional problems

identified in an applicant institution’s Comprehensive
Development Plan (CDP)

-- Design specific strategies

-- Carry out one or more activities
-- Activities can be unrelated
-- Identify the expected outputs and outcomes of each
activity
-- Wait out period
(Except Tribal, Native Hawaiian and Alaskan Native)
 COOPERATIVE ARRANGEMENTS

--- Arrangements that develop and share

technological resources to enhance the partners’
ability to serve the needs of low-income communities
and/or minority populations, especially in rural areas.
--- Arrangements involving institutional partners
from more than one university or college system.
 CONSTRUCTION and
RENOVATION GRANTS

• One-year construction grants are available

for TCCU applicants only. Construction is
considered developing new structures.
• One year renovation grants are available for
ANNH applicants only. Renovation is
repairs and remodeling of existing
structures.
 SELECTION CRITERIA
THE SEVEN EVALUATION AREAS

1. COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

(CDP)
2. ACTIVITY OBJECTIVES
3. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
4. KEY PERSONNEL
5. PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
6. EVALUATION PLAN
7. BUDGET
 FORMAT FOR RESPONDING TO
THE SELECTION CRITERIA
• Develop the Comprehensive Development
Plan (CDP)
• For EACH activity, respond to criteria “b
through g.”
NOTE: Distribute the costs for administering
the grant in the budget of
each proposed ACTIVITY(estimate the costs of each
activity)
Quality of the Comprehensive Development Plan
(CDP)
--- Are the institutional strengths, weaknesses, and problems
clearly and comprehensively analyzed and did the analysis involve
the institution’s major constituencies?
1. Identify strengths, problems/weaknesses as related to academic programs, fiscal
stability, and institutional management using results from for example, recent long
range planning process, recent accreditation review.
2. Analyze those problems to be addressed with proposed Title III activities. Show
analysis with data, reports, evaluations, and studies.
3. Questions to be answered with description and analysis of problems/weaknesses:
i. is the problem one existing at my institution or of a national scope?
ii. what is the cause of the problem/weakness?
iii. has enough analysis been conducted to suggest a probable solution?
-- do not identify problems/weaknesses with words such as “lack of” or “need
for.” These words do not necessarily justify a problem or weakness.
4. Describe in detail those involved in making the assessment, e.g., faculty, staff,
students, community, industry, etc.
Institutional Goals

• Are the goals realistic and well thought-out?

1. Focus only on those goals that are to be specifically addressed with
Title III funds over the five-year period.

2. Provide detailed comprehensive analyses of those goals and how they

are to be addressed through the proposed activities.
Institutional Objectives

• Are the objectives measurable and related to the institutional

goals, and will they contribute to the institution’s growth and
self-sufficiency?

1. Focus on objectives related to proposed activities.

2. Provide measurable objectives, e.g. “increase the percent of students
returning for the second semester from 45% to 51%”
3. Provide a timeframe for achieving objectives
4. Clearly discuss how objectives will contribute to growth and self-sufficiency,
if achieved.
Institutionalization Plan

--- Is there a clear plan to institutionalize

project achievements?

Describe realistic methods for institutionalization of the activities during

and after grant period, e.g., personnel costs, proposed endowments,
equipment costs, operational costs, costs for upgrades, etc.
 ACTIVITY OBJECTIVES (for each activity)

• Quality of activity objectives

--- Objectives realistic/measurable
1. Provide short narrative to introduce activity
2. Describe realistic objectives with performance indicators
3. Define in measurable terms.

--- Objectives related to CDP

1. Be sure objectives are directly related to the CDP and institutional goals
2. Avoid process objectives. Words such as “to provide,” “to develop,” or “to
establish” usually describe a task or process, not an outcome.
 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY(for each
activity)

• Quality of implementation strategy

--- Is the strategy comprehensive?
1. Describe clearly, comprehensively, and sequentially who will do what,
and how the objective will be met
2. Describe methods to be used to perform tasks and expected results
--- Is rationale for the implementation strategy clear and supported by research
for each activity?
1. Give detail information on why method of implementation was chosen
2. Be specific as to why the method is the most effective
3. Cite relevant studies to support chosen method
--- Are the activity timetables realistic?
1. Provide realistic timeframes based on objectives to be completed,
personnel assigned, and participation of others. Describe all.
 KEY PERSONNEL (for each activity)

• Quality of key personnel (as related to activity

objectives)
--- Experience and training
1. Provide information on the experience of persons currently employed. (You may provide a
resume, but it will be counted in the page limit.)
2. Provide job qualifications for persons to be hired.
3. Identify those persons YOU consider KEY to the project. All personnel may not be KEY
to the project.

---Time commitment
1. Indicate time commitment for all key personnel in the narrative as well as in the
budget narrative.
2. Ensure time commitment is realistic relative to duties to be performed.
 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN (for each activity)

Quality of project management plan

--- Are the procedures for managing the project likely to ensure
effective and efficient project implementation?
1. Be specific in describing procedures to monitor and manage the project
2. Specifics on procedures to be used by project director for providing
information on project to key administrators to facilitate integration of
project activities with on-going institutional activities
--- Are key personnel afforded sufficient authority to conduct the
project effectively including access to the president or CEO?
1. Provide information showing the line of authority
2. Address the project director’s authority over activity directors and
activity directors over subordinates
3. Address the relationship between the project director and the president
(designee), etc.
 EVALUATION PLAN (for each activity)

 Collect baseline data before the start of project as a basis for measuring activity
 Plan should produce a valid assessment of implementation strategies
 Should result in annual, quantifiable evidence of attainment of objectives activities as
well as goals outlined in the CDP
 Evaluator should be independent, but not necessarily external, and should assist in the
initial preparation of the plan
• Quality of evaluation plan
--- Data elements/data collection
- identify data elements to be collected
- identify procedures for collecting data
- provide procedures for analyzing data, using both formative (output) and
summative (outcome) data
--- Data analyses
- provide detailed information on the plan: who, what, when, how, etc.
- describe baseline indicators of progress to be used
Formative - provide data (feedback) in order to improve
implementation of the activity
VS.

Summative - provide data (qualitative or quantitative) on

the results of implementing the activity
 THE BUDGET
Are the costs necessary and reasonable?
• The budget includes: The budget is used by the
--- Summary budget reader throughout the
review of the application.
for each activity
The budget is used by the
--- Detailed budget for program office to review
each activity allowable and reasonable
--- Overall summary costs. Funds can be
budget for the reduced.
project
 Common Problems
• Unsubstantiated statements of fact
• Inconsistencies between the narrative and the
budget
• Unrealistic budgeting of salaries for key
personnel
• Not addressing all components within one
criterion
• Making assumptions
 Allowable and Unallowable
Activities (Sec.607.10(b)(c))
Allowable and unallowable activities are listed
in the application booklet under Statute and
Regulations:
--- Sections 311( c); 316( c); and Section 317 (c)
--- 607.10 (Title III, Part A Programs)
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL
 STRUCTURE OF APPLICATION
 Formatting

 Grants.gov
 Formatting
• Include a Table of Contents
• Narrative section limited to
Individual Development Grants 50 pages
Construction and Renovation Grants 35 pages
Cooperative Arrangement Development Grants 70
pages
– Page limit does not apply to:
• Application Face Sheet
• Table of Contents
• ED Abstract Narrative Form
• Budget Narrative Attachment Form
• Assurances, Certifications, and Survey
Forms
 Formatting
• Double space all text in the
application except titles,
headings, footnotes,
quotations, references,
captions, and all text in
charts, tables and graphs.
• Use font size 12.
 Exceptions for Electronic
Submission
You may qualify for an electronic submission
waiver if:
-You do not have access to the Internet; or
-You do not have the capacity to upload large
documents to the Grants.gov system; AND
-No later than two weeks before the application
deadline date (14 calendar days), you—
-Mail or fax a written statement to the
Department that, based on the two reasons for
an exception, prevent you from using the
Internet.
 Exceptions for Electronic
Submission
Submit all requests for a waiver of the
electronic submission to:
Dr. Maria Carrington
U.S. Department of Education
1990 K Street, N.W., Room 6033
Washington, DC 20006-8513
Fax: 202-502-7861
 MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
BY WORKSHOP ATTENDEES

A. Can I apply for more than one five-year development grant?

B. No, you can submit only one application during a funding cycle.
C. Is a current Title V, HSI grantee eligible to apply for and receive a Title III,
Part A grant?
D. You may not receive a grant under any Title III, Part A program. Further, a
current HSI grantee may not give up its grant in order to receive a grant
under any Title III, Part A program.
E. What are some of the activities allowed under a development grant project?
F. Refer to the Web link listed under allowable activities.
G. How many of the allowable activities may we propose to carry out?
H. You may propose to carry out one or several activities. If you decide to
carry out more than one, they may be unrelated, may begin and end on
different dates, and they may vary in duration.
 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
(continued)
A. Are there mandatory page limits?
B. Yes. The mandatory page limits are as follows:
Fifty (50) pages for individual development grant applications under the
SIP, TCCU, and ANNH programs;
Seventy (70) pages for cooperative development grant applications; and
Thirty-five (35) pages for construction (under TCCU) and renovation
(under ANNH) grant applications.
NOTE: AN APPLICATION THAT EXCEEDS THE MANDATORY
PAGE LIMIT WILL BE REJECTED.
G. Exactly what pages will be included in the page count?
H. Refer and adhere to the specific instructions provided for each type of grant
application that is published in the official notice in the Federal Register.
 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
(continued)
A. Are there specific font types and sizes that must be used?
B. Yes. See the official notice published in the Federal Register.

D. Are we required to submit an electronic application?

E. Yes. All applications MUST be submitted electronically using Grants.gov.
The Web site address is: http://www.grants.gov

G. How do we address costs associated with Project Management?

H. Costs associated with Project Management should be distributed among the
proposed activities.

J. What is meant by “operational?”

A. Operational for the Title III, Part A grant refers to costs associated with the
daily operations of the institution.
 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
(continued)
A. What is considered as office furniture?
B. Office furniture is identified as desks, file cabinets, etc., specifically
purchased to furnish any office outside of the project director’s office.
Desks, chairs, etc., for academic space, such as computer labs, learning
centers, etc., are not included in the definition of office furniture for this
program.

NOTE: Refer to the program application booklet for more frequently asked
questions as well as questions specific to the Endowment Building Activity.
 ARE THERE ANY
QUESTIONS?

PLEASE CONTACT THE

STAFF PERSON ASSIGNED
TO YOUR SPECIFIC STATE
FROM THE ATTACHED
DIRECTORY