First Certificate in English

Examination Report June 2004 Syllabus 0101

CONTENTS Page Website Reference Introduction Paper 1 - Reading Paper 2 - Writing Paper 3 - Use of English Paper 4 - Listening Paper 5 - Speaking Feedback Form 1 2 4 8 14 18 25 32

UCLES 2004 0101

WEBSITE REFERENCE This report can be accessed through the Cambridge ESOL Website at:

www.CambridgeESOL.org

UCLES 2004

0101

INTRODUCTION This report is intended to provide a general view of how candidates performed on each paper in the June 2004 session, and to offer guidance on the preparation of candidates. The overall pass rate for Syllabus 0101 was 50.57% The following table gives details of the percentage of candidates at each grade. 0101 PERCENTAGE 3.95 10.03 36.59 9.74 39.68

GRADE A B C D E

Grading

Grading took place during July 2004 (approximately six weeks after the examination). The five FCE papers total 200 marks, after weighting. Papers 1-5 are each weighted to 40 marks. The candidates overall FCE grade is based on the total score gained by the candidate in all five papers. Candidates do not pass or fail in a particular paper, but rather in the examination as a whole. The overall grades (A, B, C, D and E) are set according to the following information: statistics on the candidature statistics on the overall candidate performance statistics on individual questions, for those parts of the examination for which this is appropriate (Papers 1, 3 and 4) the advice of the Principal Examiners, based on the performance of candidates, and on the recommendation of examiners where this is relevant (Papers 2 and 5) comparison with statistics from previous years examination performance and candidature.

Results are reported as three passing grades (A, B and C) and two failing grades (D and E). The minimum successful performance which a candidate typically requires in order to achieve a grade C corresponds to about 60% of the total marks. Every candidate is provided with a Statement of Results which includes a graphical display of the candidates performance in each component. These are shown against the scale Exceptional Good Borderline Weak and indicate the candidates relative performance in each paper.

Special Consideration

Special Consideration can be given to candidates affected by adverse circumstances immediately before or during an examination. Examples of acceptable reasons for giving Special Consideration include illness and bereavement. All applications for Special Consideration must be made through the local Centre as soon as possible after the examination affected.

UCLES 2004

0101

Irregular Conduct

The cases of candidates who are suspected of copying, collusion or breaking the examination regulations in some other way will be considered by the Cambridge ESOL Malpractice Committee. Results may be withheld because further investigation is needed or because of infringement of the regulations.

Notification of Results

Candidates Statements of Results are issued through their local Centre approximately two months after the examination has been taken. Certificates are issued about six weeks after the issue of Statements of Results. Requests for a check on results may be made through the local Centre within one month of the issue of Statements of Results. Cambridge ESOL produces the following documents which may be of use in preparing candidates for FCE: Regulations (produced annually, for information on dates, etc.) FCE Handbook (for detailed information on the examination and sample materials) Examination Report (produced after each administration) Past Paper Pack (available approximately 10 weeks after each examination session, including question papers for Papers 1-4, sample Speaking test materials, answer keys, tape/CD, and Paper 2 mark schemes and sample scripts).

Users of this Examination Report may find it useful to refer simultaneously to the relevant Past Paper Pack. This, together with further copies of this report, is available from the Centre through which candidates entered, or can be purchased using the order form online at www.CambridgeESOL.org If you do not have access to the Internet, you can obtain an order form from: Cambridge ESOL Information 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom Tel: Fax: e-mail: website: +44 1223 553355 +44 1223 553068 [email protected] www.CambridgeESOL.org

Feedback on this report is very welcome and should be sent to the Reports Co-ordinator, Cambridge ESOL, at the above address. Please use the feedback form at the end of this report.

UCLES 2004 0101

PAPER 1 READING Part 1 Task Type and Focus Multiple matching Main focus: main points Number of Questions 7 Task Format A text preceded by multiplematching questions. Candidates must match prompts to elements in the text. 2 Multiple choice Main focus: detail, opinion, gist, deducing meaning Gapped text Main focus: text structure 8 A text followed by four-option multiple-choice questions.

A text from which paragraphs or sentences have been removed and placed in jumbled order after the text. Candidates must decide from where in the text the paragraphs or sentences have been removed. As Part 1.

Multiple matching, Multiple choice Main focus: specific information, detail

13

Marking

Candidates record their answers on a separate answer sheet, which is scanned by computer. Questions in Parts 1, 2 and 3 carry two marks each. Questions in Part 4 carry one mark each. The total score is adjusted to give a mark out of 40.

Candidate Performance

In general, candidates coped reasonably well with the four task formats of the paper. Statistical evidence showed that the questions in all four parts provided a reliable assessment of candidates relative ability levels. Part 1, Questions 1-7: Summer Job Abroad This headings task, focusing on the understanding of the main points in the text, was handled well by most candidates. Candidates performed best on Question 7, as most were able to match option B, Career plans, with a real option for me in the future (Im hoping to go back next year to work on a newspaper). Some of the weaker candidates chose other options such as A or H. Both headings Harder than it seems and A sense of real achievement imply that the writer has already gained experience in the area described in the paragraph. That cannot be the case in Question 7, which concerns the future. Question 4 proved to be the most challenging. The stronger candidates rightly selected option G, associating Greater independence with the teenagers have so much more to do and the lack of restrictions. Weaker candidates were fairly evenly spread across the range of options, with quite a large proportion opting for C A good choice. This is not an appropriate heading as Eve Williams is not describing which country she chose she does this in the second paragraph. Instead,

UCLES 2004 0101

the main point of the paragraph is the difference between British and German teenagers. Others chose option E, Just as expected. This does not fit the paragraph either as Eve says she was surprised by the lack of restrictions.

Part 2, Questions 8-15: Bringing up Rupert This four-option multiple-choice task focused mainly on detailed comprehension but also included a lexical question Question 12. Stronger candidates used the context, Ruperts mother saying Will you stop doing that, please, to select option A criticising his behaviour as the meaning of the phrase ticking him off. Weaker candidates were evenly spread over all four options. Candidates coped particularly well with Question 9, linking option D, She appreciated what he did, with Peter did everything magnificently. Quite a number of the weaker candidates, however, chose option A instead She resented his closeness to Rupert. This may have been because of the phrase, Hes still very close to his father. However, if they had read the second half of the sentence and I was thrilled that Peter wanted to be so involved they would have realised that she was not resentful. Question 14 proved to be the most challenging. A large proportion of the weaker candidates chose options B, C and D instead of option A. Options C and D are incorrect as Ruperts mother did not encourage him to be a model. On the contrary, it concerned her, and modelling was not Ruperts childhood ambition because in his heart he wanted to be an actor. Option B It took time to develop is also ruled out, as his modelling career was over very quickly in a year and a half. Finally, option A It ended when he was offered an acting job is correct. It is clearly signalled by the time word once but once his agent got him his first part on the stage he never looked back.

Part 3, Questions 16-22: An Artist at Work This gapped-paragraph task, focusing on text structure, proved to be the most challenging task on the paper. Questions 20 and 21, in particular, caused candidates some difficulty. A number of the weaker candidates were attracted by options B and G in Question 20. Option B is ruled out by the use of the pronoun we and the reference to aeroplanes which makes this paragraph fit in Question 19. Option G says that David is never self-important about animals. This does not lead on to the danger element in the next paragraph, while the correct option, H, ends with he has only had one scary moment. Option H begins with a reference to his trip which leads back through the previous three paragraphs which describe his trip to Kenya. Thus paragraph H fits appropriately with both the paragraph before and the one that follows it, something which it is important for candidates to check. The correct answer to Question 21 is D, which describes what happened when David was filmed painting elephants in Africa. Very few of the weaker candidates chose this option. Answers were fairly evenly spread over the whole range of options with the largest number of candidates going for H. But there the reference to a newspaper article does not fit in with the television channel at the end of the previous paragraph. Candidates were most successful with Question 22 (correct option E) as they successfully linked he set up the David Shepherd Conservation Foundation with Davids statement We are a small organisation. Part 4, Questions 23-35: Women in Pop Music This multiple-matching task, which focused on candidates ability to retrieve specific information from the texts, proved to be the part of the paper in which candidates performed best. Candidates coped very well with the last two questions (34 and 35). The stronger candidates were able to match the offer of a temporary position in the questions with I was then asked to join a group who said they wanted me until they found a proper bass player in section B and one day one of his members hurt his hand and couldnt play so they

UCLES 2004 0101

asked me to play instead in section C. A considerable number of the weaker candidates, however, chose A. This is possibly because they misunderstood the phrase just helping out, believing it to refer to a temporary position. In fact, as she says, it means that she was not actually playing an instrument but doing other jobs. Question 32 proved to be the most demanding. Which musician says she enjoys making decisions? had to be matched with but now its very satisfying choosing who to play with and being in control in section D. Some candidates were attracted by section C, probably because the word enjoy appears there. However, this musician does not mention that she enjoys making decisions. Instead she says, I enjoy being the only girl. Candidates should not choose an option solely on the strength of an identical or similar word. The sense of the question as a whole must be replicated in the text.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CANDIDATE PREPARATION

Teachers and students should note that no single FCE 1 paper includes all possible tasks or question types. The FCE Handbook lists all the task types which may appear on the paper. In addition to specific examination practice, students should be advised to read as widely as they can, with a range of reading purposes reflecting those sampled in the paper (retrieving relevant information, getting the gist, understanding detail, etc.). Many of the texts for the Reading paper are drawn from magazines and newspapers, rather than books, and students will benefit from being familiar with these types of text. Specific work on the identification, location and presentation of main ideas would benefit candidates in Parts 1 and 3. Focusing on the sequence of tenses in continuous text and extended noun/pronoun sequences would also be beneficial, particularly in Part 3.

UCLES 2004 0101

DOs and DONTs for FCE PAPER 1 READING make sure that you choose the correct option(s) when you find similar information in different sections of the text in Parts 1 and 4. read and re-read your answers in Parts 1 and 3, and be prepared to change your mind. If you find that none of the choices you have left fits, you may need to think again about the choices you have already made. Always be prepared to go back and check. read through the main text in Part 3 so you have a good idea of what it is about before you look at the extracts and choose any answers. think about the text before and after each gap in Part 3 and try to guess what is missing. pay careful attention to references to places, people and things (pronouns) in the extracts in Part 3. They must refer correctly to the nouns in the text before and after the gap. fill what you think are the easy gaps first in Part 3, and leave the problem areas until last. read through Part 3 after making your choices to check that everything makes sense. Check that linking words, tenses and time references all fit with the choices you have made. prepare for the FCE Reading paper by reading as widely as you can in English, both fiction and non-fiction. remember in your personal reading as well as in the exam, you will not need to know the exact meaning of every word. Use clues like the title or any pictures to help you understand what a text is about, and then try to read for the main idea. Getting into this habit will help you to read quickly and effectively.

DO

DO

DO

DO

DO

DO

DO

DO

DO

DONT

choose an answer just because you see the same word in the text and in the question option (word-spotting). In all parts of the paper, seeing the same (or similar) word in both text and question is no guarantee that you have found the correct answer. forget that in Part 3, introductory adverbs or phrases in the extracts must be connected with the ideas which go before the gap (e.g. However must be preceded by a contrasting idea; Another mistake we made... must be preceded by a previous mistake, etc.). forget that, if a Part 2 multiple-choice question is an incomplete sentence, the whole sentence must match the text, not just the phrase presented as A, B, C or D. The information in these options may be true in itself, but not work with the sentence beginning you are given. choose your answers too quickly in Part 3. Only start to look at the extracts when you have a good idea of what the main text is about.

DONT

DONT

DONT

UCLES 2004 0101

PAPER 2 WRITING Part 1 Task Type and Focus Question 1 Writing a transactional letter (formal/informal) Number of Tasks and Length 1 compulsory task 120-180 words Task Format Candidates are required to deal with input material of up to 250 words, which may include graphic and pictorial material. Texts may include advertisements, letters, postcards, diaries, short articles, etc. A situationally-based writing task specified in no more than 70 words.

Questions 2-4 Writing one of the following: an article a non-transactional informal letter a report a discursive composition a descriptive/narrative short story Question 5 Writing a composition, article, report or an informal letter on a prescribed background reading text

4 tasks from which the candidates choose 1 120-180 words

Question 5 has two options

Marking

All scripts are marked by experienced examiners, who must attend a training and standardisation day before they commence any marking. Examiners award marks according to a General Mark Scheme, which has detailed Performance Bands from 0-5, where Band 3 describes a satisfactory level. Within the bands, examiners place the script more exactly at bottom, mid or top of the band range, e.g. 31, 32, 33. These scores are converted to provide a mark out of 20 for each piece of writing. Examiners also use a Task-specific Mark Scheme for each question. This describes satisfactory Band 3 performance and covers content, organisation, range, register and format, and effect on target reader. Examples of the mark schemes are included in the FCE Past Paper Pack. Examiners work in small teams and are monitored and advised by Team Leaders, who in turn are monitored by the Principal Examiner.

UCLES 2004 0101

Candidate Performance

Part 1, Question 1 For this compulsory question, candidates were asked to write a formal letter to the manager of a swimming pool, giving their opinion about the facilities and service offered and making some suggestions about improvements that could be made. Most candidates found the question accessible and were at ease with the topic. Generally, the letters were well planned in paragraphs, and the five points clearly dealt with. Some candidates found it difficult to maintain a formal level of language throughout, and inappropriately informal phrases and linking words appeared. In terms of task fulfilment, there were points missed by some candidates, which suggested careless reading of the question. Candidates must remember to read the question carefully before they start writing, and make sure that they include all the necessary points; if one or more points are missed, candidates are penalised for this. Some candidates had a poor grasp of the overall scenario, and decided to write letters of complaint, although only points 1 and 2 were negative in tone. Others completely misunderstood the scenario and wrote letters of enquiry. Both approaches were penalised, the latter heavily. A related problem was that some candidates started their letters using an opening sentence they had memorised, but one which was not relevant to the question (I am writing in response to your advertisement published in todays Time newspaper). Again, candidates need to be reminded to read the rubric carefully and establish in their minds the situation they are responding to. The first point was generally dealt with adequately. Some candidates addressed it explicitly (your changing rooms are too crowded) and some by inference (you must build an extension). Some candidates used good introductory phrases suitable for a formal letter (I would like to draw your attention to). The second point was generally dealt with well. Most candidates used a question (so could the pool open earlier?), some tried to use suggest (I would like to suggest opening earlier) and others expanded the point with reasons (for people who want to go to their jobs at 9, the pool opens too late, people like to start the day with a swim). Unfortunately, there were still candidates who got confused and said the pool opened too early. These were penalised. The third point was dealt with appropriately by most candidates, with stronger candidates expanding well (the instructors are helpful and experienced, I am very satisfied). There was however, some confusion between classes and classrooms. Both interpretations were accepted. Most candidates dealt with the fourth point about competitions in a straightforward way. Some expanded with reasons and examples (attract more people to the pool, the winner could get a prize). The final point proved easy for candidates to expand (people want to eat or drink something after a long swim, rest and chat with their friends). The conclusions to the letter were mostly well handled (I would like to congratulate you on your pool, I hope my ideas have been useful), which showed that candidates had been well trained in letter writing.

UCLES 2004 0101

Part 2 The most popular task by far was Question 4, the informal letter, chosen by 74% of candidates. Question 2, the story, was answered by around 18% of candidates and Question 3, the article, was chosen by only 5% of candidates. A minimal number of candidates responded to Question 5, the set text question. Question 2 Candidates produced some reasonable narratives in response to the story prompt. The most usual topics were incidents while out on excursions to the seaside or forest which made the two people (Angela and Mark) laugh e.g., falling over or getting lost. The prompt sentence was often used at the end of the story, and this worked well. Many candidates showed little evidence of range of language, and their compositions would have benefited from the inclusion of some colourful adjectives, adverbs and expressions. A few candidates produced stories which did not feature Mark or Angela. Others failed to address the fact that Mark and Angela laughed at someone or something. These answers were penalised.

Question 3 The stronger candidates who tackled the article question were able to convey a picture of what Greeks like to watch on television these days (reality shows, educational documentaries). Most candidates disapproved of reality shows (young people are watching them instead of doing their homework) and wanted more demanding television (all channels should show more news more sensible programmes). The weaker candidates who tackled this question lacked the necessary vocabulary related to television and did not always address the second part of the question well. Candidates should be advised to think carefully about whether they have the necessary vocabulary to tackle a question before selecting it, since lack of appropriate vocabulary is a big disadvantage. The article was often written as a letter to a magazine. This was not penalised, but did result in some inappropriate introductions and conclusions. Question 4 The majority of candidates chose the fourth question, an informal letter giving advice to a friend. They wrote confidently in informal register, and had a good command of the language of advice. Generally, the letter opened well with expressions of enthusiasm and envy (I wish I were as lucky as you, Lucky you!, I never win in competitions), followed by the candidates advice (and if I were in your shoes, ...if I were you). The motorbike was not a popular choice; most candidates chose the holiday (it will help you to relax after school, have a good time, come to a Greek island and we will have fun). Some expanded the idea, but then ignored the other options and described Greece as a holiday destination. This resulted in quite simple language, and candidates would do well to exploit the topic as much as possible. Those who compared the three options produced a better range of language. A common error was using money in the plural. The use of countable and uncountable words is a good area for students to focus on in their preparation for the FCE exam.

UCLES 2004 0101

10

Questions 5a and 5b It is not possible to make a general comment on these questions as so few candidates answered them (0.3% for Question 5a and 0.1% for Question 5b). RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CANDIDATE PREPARATION As always stated in these reports, candidates must read each question carefully and carry out what is required, including the necessary points and keeping to the task set. Information about the target reader and the reason for writing is given in each question to help the candidate, and this should be borne in mind during classroom preparation. Working with past papers in pairs or groups, where students spend time identifying the reader, the text type, and the important content points, is all useful in planning what to write. It is often very instructive for students to work on a second draft of a homework answer. In this way, the teacher, or fellow students, can make useful suggestions regarding organisation, language, and content omissions. The second draft can then be compared to the first, which is not only instructive regarding weaknesses, but also builds confidence. Students should be encouraged to experiment with a wider range of language in the second draft, for example replacing any repeated words with near synonyms. Classroom brainstorming of relevant adjectives and verbs with similar meanings can be useful preparation immediately prior to a homework assignment. Part 1 Students should be encouraged to make a plan before they start writing, and to think carefully how to organise their ideas and what they can say on each point. It is good to point out to students how a content point can be developed, perhaps by use of obviously contrasting sample answers, where one is only minimally expanded and the other includes good development. Where candidates develop the points, they generally score higher marks. Students should also be encouraged to make sensible use of paragraphing and use a variety of linkers. In class, students could be given a text without paragraphs and asked to suggest paragraphs for it or add appropriate linkers to it. Where students have to write a formal letter to a person they do not know, they need to be trained to produce appropriate and consistently formal language in a suitable tone. In this type of task especially, they need to consider the bigger picture of why they are writing and be sensitive to the type of scenario described. Part 2 Students need training in how to link a story coherently to a given prompt sentence. They should also be instructed to take note of who is referred to in the sentence, so that they can continue from or lead up to the prompt sentence appropriately, whether in the first or third person, and use the same name, if one appears in the question. Students may also need to revise past tenses, especially the irregular forms and perfect tenses. Students may be unfamiliar with articles as a type of writing, and may need to be shown examples written in a suitable style. Work can be done in class on how to organise and present the article, and how to make it lively and interesting for the reader.

UCLES 2004 0101

11

Training for the informal letter of advice should include some awareness-raising of the type of register used, with students being given a variety of informal expressions and linkers and shown how these can be adapted to a variety of contexts. Students also need to be aware which structures are appropriate to the giving of advice in an informal context. There are many ways to incorporate a set text into classroom work, and parts of it can be assigned for homework. Students will benefit from reading on their own, both in terms of new vocabulary and the reinforcement of structures already learnt. Early examination in class of past papers will allow students to practise questions regularly, in relation to different parts of the book.

UCLES 2004 0101

12

DOs and DONTs for FCE PAPER 2 WRITING read the whole question thoroughly and underline important parts. make a plan for each answer, including ALL points. expand the points in Part 1 if you can, using relevant ideas and information. write in paragraphs, whenever appropriate. use a range of vocabulary, even if you are unsure of the correct spelling. check tense endings, plural forms and word order in sentences. check irregular past tenses and question formation. use language that is appropriately formal or informal for the task. choose a Part 2 question that you feel confident you can write about. write clearly, so that the examiner can read your answer.

DO DO DO DO DO DO DO DO DO DO

DONT DONT DONT DONT DONT DONT DONT

misspell key words which appear on the question paper. lift too much language from the question paper. mix formal and informal language. use formal linkers in an informal letter. waste time writing addresses for a letter, as they are not required. answer Question 5 if you havent read one of the books. worry if you run slightly over the 180-word limit.

UCLES 2004 0101

13

PAPER 3 USE OF ENGLISH Part 1 Task Type and Focus Multiple-choice cloze Focus: Vocabulary Number of Questions 15 Task Format A modified cloze text containing 15 gaps and followed by 15 four-option multiple-choice questions. A modified cloze text containing 15 gaps. Discrete questions with a leadin sentence and a gapped response to complete using a given word. A text containing errors. Some lines of the text are correct, other lines contain an extra and unnecessary word which must be identified. A text containing 10 gaps. Each gap corresponds to a word. The stems of the missing words are given beside the text and must be transformed to provide the missing word.

Open cloze Focus: Grammar and vocabulary Key word transformations Focus: Grammar and vocabulary Error correction Focus: Grammar

15

10

15

Word formation Focus: Vocabulary

10

Marking

Candidates write their answers on a separate answer sheet, which is marked according to a mark scheme and then scanned by computer. Questions 1-30 and 41-65 carry one mark each. Questions 31-40 are marked on a scale 0-1-2. The total score is adjusted to give a mark out of 40.

Candidate Performance

Part 1, Questions 1-15: Deserts Multiple-choice Cloze Candidates performed very well in this part of the paper, particularly with Questions 1, 2, 4, 5, 10 and 14. They performed less successfully with Questions 7 and 9. With Question 7, even stronger candidates were tempted by options A and D in substantial numbers. It would seem that this secondary use of know with past tenses, meaning to have seen, heard or experienced something, was not known by most candidates. With Question 9, shelter (A) was a popular answer with the weaker candidates. This answer might of course have been correct with a different verb (provide) and a different context. As regards other common wrong answers, in Question 6, a large proportion of stronger candidates wrongly put option C

UCLES 2004 0101

14

(composed) as the answer. However, this verb refers to the composition of something (how it is made up) and in any case, takes the preposition of rather than by with this meaning. Other common wrong answers were Question 3, option B, Question 8, option C and Question 13, option B. Option B, close, in Question 13 would of course have been correct if followed by to. Part 2, Questions 16-30: Friday the Thirteenth Open Cloze In general, candidates performed least well on this part of the paper, with Questions 16, 18, 20 and 28 proving to be particularly challenging. For Question 16, weaker candidates may have failed to read ahead in the text and spot the contrast between unconcerned and worried. Substantial numbers of such candidates put the as the answer. Similarly, in Question 20, it was a longer, more complex sentence which troubled the weaker candidates, who commonly put on as the answer. With Question 28, only the stronger candidates realised that whose can sometimes be used of things as well as people. Candidates performed best on Questions 17 and 30. Other common wrong answers included from (Question 18), out (Question 23), be (Question 24) and and (Question 29). Part 3, Questions 31-40 Key Word Transformations Candidates coped well with a wide range of grammatical and lexical language points, especially Questions 31 and 36, which the highest percentage of candidates answered correctly. No questions were particularly problematic, although the following observations can be made. In Question 33, a relatively small number of candidates lost marks needlessly, for misspelling the prompt word hardly. Others took it to be an adverb and produced ate hardly her food. A recurrent mistake was failing to transform part of the answer. In Question 34, for example, some weaker candidates did not transform the verb parking, while in 37 some got the phrasal verb element correct, but did not spot the need to transform it into the passive. Misspelling was an issue in Question 35 the most common error was retaining the letter b from the verb, and producing describtion. Part 4, Questions 41-55: Handwriting Error Correction Candidates found this part of the paper very straightforward. They were clearly able to engage well with the topic and anticipate errors both of a grammatical and a lexical nature. Only two questions proved problematic. In Question 46, many candidates, including some stronger candidates, indicated a correct line. Reading the line quickly, it is easy not to see the extra word lot. Candidates should take great care to check that a missing word, in this case a, does not make another word in the line incorrect. Also, candidates should beware of assuming that, because a word can be omitted, it is necessarily wrong. In Question 55, a large number of candidates, including stronger ones, put out as the wrong word. The sentence makes sense without out, but is not actually wrong. Part 5, Questions 56-65: City Markets Word Formation

UCLES 2004 0101

15

Candidates also performed well in Part 5. Only the weakest candidates failed to produce the correct keys for Questions 58, 61, 62 and 64. It was particularly pleasing to see candidates cope well with a question containing a negative prefix (which often prove difficult) and the three plural nouns. Candidates found Questions 60 and 65 quite challenging. As with 65, where selling was a common wrong answer, candidates should beware of producing derived words which are clearly wrong if one considers the grammar and meaning of the text. Candidates should also be careful of misspellings basicly was a common wrong answer for Question 57.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CANDIDATE PREPARATION

In all the text-based parts of the paper, candidates should attempt as far as possible to engage with the whole text. They should keep asking themselves whether their answer makes sense at this point in the text. In Part 3, candidates sometimes lose marks for over-transforming that is, they change elements from the lead-in sentence needlessly and make mistakes in doing so. Alternatively, they introduce new ideas and write a new sentence that is too far in meaning from the lead-in sentence. In view of this, the best way for candidates to approach this part is always to get as close to the meaning of the lead-in sentence as possible. The task is simply to rewrite the lead-in sentence using different words. In Part 4, candidates should be aware that some lines look correct until the following line has been read and understood. It is important not to do the task line by line but to follow the meaning of the text through the sentences. When preparing for Part 4, candidates should be made aware that extra words must definitely be incorrect because they do not fit the sense of the text or they do not fit grammatically. For example, in the sentence I decided to go along to the party the word along is perfectly correct, even though it could be omitted.

UCLES 2004 0101

16

DOs and DONTs for FCE PAPER 3 USE OF ENGLISH make sure in all parts that you put your answer by the correct number on your answer sheet. be sure to write individual letters clearly. be careful to spell the prompt word correctly in your answer for Part 3. read the lines in Part 4 carefully; sometimes a missing word may make another word wrong. make sure that an answer in Part 5 is based on the word at the end of the same line.

DO

DO DO DO

DO

DONT DONT DONT DONT DONT

use a pen to write your answers on the answer sheet. give alternative answers for any question. write more than 5 words in your answer in Part 3. change the prompt word in Part 3 in any way. leave the word which is in capitals in Part 5 unchanged.

UCLES 2004 0101

17

PAPER 4 LISTENING Part 1 Task Type and Focus Multiple choice Understanding gist, main points, detail, function, location, roles and relationships, mood, attitude, intention, feeling or opinion 2 Sentence completion, note completion or blank filling Understanding gist, main points, detail or specific information, or deducing meaning 3 Multiple matching As for Part 1 5 10 Number of Questions 8 Task Format A series of short unrelated extracts, of approximately 30 seconds each, from monologues or exchanges between interacting speakers. The multiple-choice questions have three options. A monologue or text involving interacting speakers and lasting approximately 3 minutes.

A series of short related extracts, of approximately 30 seconds each, from monologues or exchanges between interacting speakers. The multiple-matching questions require selection of the correct option from a list of 6. A monologue or text involving interacting speakers and lasting approximately 3 minutes. The questions require candidates to select between 2 or 3 possible answers, e.g. true/false; yes/no; three-option multiple-choice; which speaker said what, etc.

Selection from 2 or 3 possible answers As for Part 2

Marking

Candidates write their answers on a separate answer sheet, which is marked according to a detailed mark scheme and then scanned by computer. Each question carries one mark. The total score is adjusted to give a mark out of 40. For security reasons, more than one version of the Paper 4 Listening test is made available at each session. As with all other FCE papers, rigorous checks are built into the question paper production process to ensure that all versions of the test are of comparable content and difficulty. In addition, for Paper 4, the marks are adjusted to ensure that there is no advantage or disadvantage to candidates taking one particular version. All texts and tasks were representative of what can be expected in future versions of the paper. In Part 4, three-way matching tasks and two-option tasks, as outlined in the FCE Handbook, may appear in future versions.

UCLES 2004 0101

18

Candidate Performance

Candidates performed well on all versions of the paper. In each version, no one part was significantly more difficult overall than another. This report is based on results from candidates who took version C of the Listening test. Part 1, Questions 1-8 The eight short listening texts in Part 1 provide a range of text types and voices as well as a range of focuses across the eight questions. Candidates did not have too many difficulties with these questions, which are intended to provide a gentle lead-in to the test, although some did prove more challenging than others. The majority of candidates tackled the first two questions well, and Questions 6 and 7 were also well attempted by most candidates. The most challenging questions in this part of the test were Questions 4, 5, and 8. Question 4 was based on a conversation between two friends about a job interview, and tested candidates ability to recognise what feelings were being expressed by one of the speakers. The majority of candidates chose option A, presumably making a false inference from the young mans comment that neither music nor football should be described as hobbies. Option B was also popular, and it may be that many candidates simply guessed the emotion being expressed without relating it to the reason why the young man felt that way. In Question 5, candidates heard a woman talking about a journey from Ireland. The task required careful reading of the options as, although B and C are plausible in the context, they are not actually stated here. Weaker candidates were spread fairly evenly across the three options which can suggest candidates have resorted to guessing. In Question 8, a woman talks about living on her own, and candidates must match one of the multiple-choice statements with what she says. One of the incorrect options, B, was chosen by a high proportion of candidates, especially weaker ones. Perhaps the problem was that the key sentence in the text is not only the very first thing the woman says, but is also immediately negated by her, ...and hated it. The effect might have been for candidates to write this part of her experience off, as she appears to be doing. Part 2, Questions 9-18 This was a sentence-completion task based on an interview with a woman who is responsible for staff in a museum. Candidates often perceive Part 2 as being the most difficult section of the test, but their performance does not necessarily support this view. Certainly, there was a wide range of performance, but candidates in general coped well with the topic and tasks, with stronger candidates performing consistently better than weaker candidates. Of the ten questions, six were answered successfully by the majority of candidates: these were Questions 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 18. A few points are worth noting. Question 10 required an answer in the plural as this is what was heard on the recording. Some candidates lost the mark by writing room manager, and thus failing to fit their answer into the context. A common cause of failure in Question 13 was omitting the word team, leader alone being too general in this context. Question 15, for which the simple answer was orange, had a large number of acceptable alternative answers (such as orange coloured). Finally, Question 18 was straightforward if candidates listened with great concentration, in order to find their way through a number of distracting dates to the one which answered the question.

UCLES 2004 0101

19

Questions 9 and 12 presented problems for weaker candidates, for different reasons. Many were perhaps unaware of the meaning of natural history, and consequently wrote either just history, or national history as their answer to Question 9. And the answer to Question 12, Japanese, was accompanied by the names of other languages: careful and focused listening was needed to identify it as the correct answer this question differentiated well between weaker and stronger candidates. Question 16 was quite poorly answered, even by stronger candidates. This was largely through failure to identify which of the two salary figures mentioned was the one required by the question, but it may also be the case that candidates simply need more practice in listening to more complex numbers. Finally, Question 17 was without a doubt the most demanding question, and it proved to be beyond all but the strongest candidates. Incorrect answers included leisure card, free entrance, day (off) and week (off). It may be that some candidates were unaware of the meaning of off in this context and failed to connect it with do not have to work in the question. Other candidates may not have heard the word weekend, focusing instead on week and day which they have heard earlier in the same sentence. Part 3, Questions 19-23 This was a multiple-matching task based on five short texts in which five different people talk about their favourite teacher. The topic and the texts were credible, and results suggest that candidates were able to relate to them without much difficulty. It is worth noting that the six summary sentences which candidates had to match to the five listening texts fell into two categories. Half were quite broad, general descriptions of a teachers practice ...wouldnt let me miss any classes, ...trained me in useful skills, while the others described one-off, specific examples of the teachers conduct ...allowed me to break a school rule, ...prevented me from making a mistake. The preparation time allowed for candidates to read through the questions could have picked up on this kind of contrast, which has implications for what candidates try to identify as they listen. Perhaps the most significant feature of candidates performance in this part of the test is the contrast between the performance of stronger candidates and that of the weaker ones. In the case of the former, from the first question onwards there is virtually no distraction towards wrong options, whereas weaker candidates were consistently attracted to a spread of options in each question. One explanation of this is clearly the format of the question itself. If you make the wrong choice in the first question, you also lose the potential use of that option in another question. In extreme cases, a couple of incorrect choices can produce a domino effect and result in five wrong answers. Question 19 sets the tone. Strong candidates chose option E, one of the very specific summary sentences mentioned above, whereas the weaker ones also opted in significant numbers for B and D. Question 20 was similar, with only option A tempting a few of the stronger performers away from the correct option, C, but A, D and F featuring substantially in the work of the weaker entrants. This pattern was even more marked in Question 21: again, the stronger candidates confidently and correctly chose A, with a small number preferring B, but the candidates identified as weaker opted in substantial numbers for every single one of the six options, suggesting that at this stage they were losing touch. The pattern in Question 22 was very similar, though less dramatically.

UCLES 2004 0101

20

Question 23 was a little different, in that a significant number of the weaker candidates chose option F, basing their choice on the distracting sentences ...if I didnt like a teacher, I just missed their lessons. But I always went to Miss Fords classes.... All in all, this was a demanding but fair Part 3 of the test, and one whose results clearly exemplified the range of performance among FCE entrants. Part 4, Questions 24-30 This was a three-way multiple-choice task based on an interview with a man who works at an animal hospital. The task was generally successfully attempted, and only two questions stand out from the others as worthy of comment: Question 28, because it was so well answered few candidates had any problems and Question 26 for the opposite reason. It is difficult at first to see why Question 26 was so poorly attempted, even by stronger candidates. The question asked why it was more difficult to rescue the baby seal called Pippa. The text actually contains the words, We were lucky that it wasnt dark, which eliminates option A. There were two factors which may have led to so many making the wrong choice: an unwarranted inference that because Pippa could not be seen, she was necessarily hiding, and a misunderstanding of the word still, used here in its meaning of without motion, but possibly assumed to be the time adverb closely related to the word yet.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CANDIDATE PREPARATION

The Listening test is based on recorded material taken from various authentic contexts and is designed to test a range of listening skills. The test lasts about 40 minutes and contains 30 questions. There are four parts to the test, and a range of text and task types is represented. All instructions, rubrics, repeats and pauses are included on the recording, as is the copying time at the end. Candidates record their answers in one of two ways: in Parts 1, 3 and 4, candidates must choose the appropriate answer from those provided and mark or write the appropriate letter (A, B, C, etc.) on their answer sheet. No part of the wording of the chosen option should be copied onto the answer sheet. In Part 2, candidates must write a word, a number or a short phrase in response to a written prompt, and only the candidates answer should be copied onto the answer sheet.

Part 1 This part of the paper is designed to enable candidates to settle into the Listening test in a relatively gentle way. Unlike the other parts of the paper, they both hear and read the questions. Candidates should be encouraged to use the information contained in the contextualising rubric for each question to help them focus on what they are about to hear and what they are listening for. Some texts may target points of detail in the question, others call for elements of gist understanding. Speakers attitudes, opinions or feelings may also be tested (as in Question 4 above), or the focus may be on the topic, function or main point of what the speakers say. Candidates should listen carefully when the text is repeated, particularly when an option seems to be obviously correct, and is supported by an individual word or phrase used in the text. Careful listening to the surrounding text may reveal shades of meaning not appreciated at first. Additionally, teachers should give students plenty of practice in dealing with the

UCLES 2004 0101

21

range of text types and focuses (page 18), so that candidates are prepared for the varying character and pace of texts in Part 1. Part 2 In Part 2, candidates are required to produce written answers in response to various types of prompt. The task consists of 10 gaps in either a set of notes or a set of sentences. Texts may be either monologues or dialogues and a contextualising rubric sets the scene in terms of speaker(s), topic and context. Candidates should be reminded that questions are chronological, following the order of the information in the text. Adequate time is given for candidates to read the task before they hear the recording, and they should use this time to think about the type of information which is missing and the part of speech which is likely to fit in the gap. In preparing for this part of the test, candidates should be encouraged to practise writing the short answers which are required in a productive task. It is vital that candidates handwriting is legible, especially when writing vowels such as a and o which can be easily confused. The answer to Question 12 in this test was Japanese, and while some alternative spellings were accepted, there were candidates who lost the mark by failing to write the letters a or e unambiguously. It is also important that great care is taken to ensure that an answer fits and makes sense with what comes before and, if relevant, after the gap, and does not repeat information already included in the question stem. Most answers will be a single word, a number or a very short phrase, and candidates should be warned that writing unnecessarily wordy answers will almost certainly lose them marks. It is very unlikely that any answer will need more than four words and more often than not, questions can be answered using fewer. Where keys focus on numerical information, this may be written in number form and need not be written out in words. Occasionally, an answer requires two separate words, separated by and in the box on the question paper. In this case, candidates may write their answers in either order (e.g. drawing, painting or painting, drawing). Candidates are not expected to rephrase what they hear and should therefore focus on writing down the key information as it is heard in the text. They are not asked to reformulate language in note form in note-completion tasks, nor to make grammatical transformations from text to task in sentence-completion tasks. Some minor spelling mistakes are accepted if the meaning of the word is not changed, but the words and phrases tested are limited to those which candidates can reasonably be expected to spell correctly. Whatever the task type (sentence-completion or note-completion), the keys usually focus on concrete items of information such as hotel and orange in Test C, for example. Test C also contains examples of such factual items expressed in short phrases rather than single words: room managers and team leader. Both US and British spellings are accepted. Part 3 In Part 3, the focus is on gist listening skills. Candidates listen to five short texts on a topic which is indicated in the contextualising rubric, and the task is multiple matching. Candidates should be encouraged to think carefully about the context and should use the preparation time to read the options; this will help them to know what it is they are listening for. In Test C, for example, the task focused on the speakers memories of their favourite teachers. Candidates should be encouraged to listen for the meaning of the whole text, and to focus on identifying which teacher is being described in each of the options listed.

UCLES 2004 0101

22

Candidates should be advised to make good use of the repetition of the texts, even if they have answered every question on the first listening. They may find that they need to change more than one answer if they discover a mistake, because one incorrect answer may have a knock-on effect on the other questions. Part 4 Candidates should be prepared to encounter any of the following task types: 3-option multiple choice, 3-way matching and 2-option tasks (TRUE/FALSE, YES/NO), as any of them could appear in any version. They should know that with all the task types, adequate time is given for them to read the questions before they hear the recording. In the multiple-choice task, candidates are given one minute to read through the questions. As in Part 2, the questions follow the order of the text. Each question focuses on one part of the text, and will generally test understanding of that whole section rather than isolated words and phrases. The questions may test points of detail, gist meaning and the understanding of opinions, feelings and attitudes. Candidates should be reminded that all three options in multiple-choice questions will include ideas and information from the text, but only one (the key) will combine with the question prompt to reflect the exact meaning expressed in the text.

UCLES 2004 0101

23

DOs and DONTs for FCE PAPER 4 LISTENING listen to and read the rubric. Make sure you understand what you are listening for and what you have to do. use the time allowed before hearing each recording to read through all the questions carefully, so you are prepared for what you hear. use the information on the question paper to help you follow the listening text. look carefully at what is printed before and after the gap in Part 2 and think about the kind of information that you are listening for. Write only the missing information on the answer sheet. write your answers as clearly as possible in Part 2; if in doubt, use capital letters. check that your idea of what the correct answer is when you first hear the recording is confirmed when you hear it for the second time. remember that any wrong answer you discover in Part 3 when hearing the recording for a second time may affect your other answers. concentrate on understanding in as much depth as possible what speakers say, especially in Parts 1, 3 and 4; dont be distracted by individual words and phrases. answer all the questions even if youre not sure; youve probably understood more than you think. make sure that you copy your answers accurately onto the answer sheet.

DO

DO

DO DO

DO

DO

DO

DO

DO

DO

DONT

rephrase what you hear in Part 2; do write down the figure(s) or word(s) that you hear spoken. complicate an answer in Part 2 by writing extra, irrelevant information. spend too much time on a question you are having difficulty with, as you may miss the next question.

DONT DONT

UCLES 2004 0101

24

PAPER 5 SPEAKING Part 1 Task Type and Focus Short exchanges between each candidate and the Interlocutor Giving personal information; socialising 2 Long turn from each candidate, with a brief response from the other candidate Exchanging personal and factual information; expressing attitudes and opinions; employing discourse functions related to managing a long turn 3 Candidates talk with one another Exchanging information, expressing attitudes and opinions 3 minutes 4 minutes The candidates are in turn given visual prompts (two colour photographs) which they each talk about for approximately 1 minute. They are also asked to comment briefly on each others photographs. Length of Parts 3 minutes Task Format The Interlocutor encourages the candidates to give information about themselves.

The candidates are given visual prompts (photographs, line drawings, diagrams, etc.) which generate discussion through engagement in tasks such as planning, problem solving, decision making, prioritising, speculating, etc. The Interlocutor encourages a discussion of matters related to the theme of Part 3.

Candidates talk with one another and the Interlocutor Exchanging and justifying opinions

4 minutes

Marking

The Speaking tests are conducted by trained examiners, who attend annual co-ordination sessions to ensure that standards are maintained. The Assessor awards marks to each candidate for performance throughout the test according to the four Analytical Criteria (Grammar and Vocabulary, Discourse Management, Pronunciation and Interactive Communication). The Interlocutor awards marks according to the Global Achievement Scale, which assesses the candidates overall effectiveness in tackling the tasks. These scores are converted by computer to provide a mark out of 40.

Candidate Performance

Candidate performance in this administration was consistent with that of December 2003 and historical norms. Feedback from Oral Examiners has been very positive and students, as always, were well prepared for this paper. Candidates who performed less well were those

UCLES 2004 0101

25

who did not listen carefully to the instructions, did not respond fully to questions asked or who dominated the interaction. To perform well, a candidate should answer the task set and therefore should not be afraid to ask for repetition of instructions before embarking on the task. Candidates should be made aware that asking for the instructions to be repeated will not affect their marks in any way, whereas redirection by the examiner once the task has begun may affect their performance. Part 1 This part of the test focuses on areas with which the candidates will be familiar (e.g. personal experiences, work and education, leisure activities, travel and holidays, etc.). It gives the examiners their first impression of the candidates and it is therefore important that the candidates speak naturally and with appropriate detail. One word responses are inadequate and will affect the score for Interactive Communication. Candidates should also be advised not to prepare long responses to questions they feel they may be asked as this often means that they do not answer appropriately. This tactic does not lead to effective Interactive Communication, and is noticed by examiners. Candidates who have not met prior to the test should not feel concerned, as feedback from examiners indicates that this does not affect performance in this or any other part of the test.

Part 2 The tendency in this part of the test is for weaker candidates to focus on the pictures without listening carefully to the task set by the examiner. Simply describing the two pictures often results in the candidate producing a limited range of grammar and vocabulary, and is unlikely to provide enough to talk about for a full minute. Candidates will always be asked to compare, contrast and say... (something specific about the photographs).... They should listen very carefully for the and say... so that they complete the task and are able to continue for the full minute, using a range of language appropriate to this level. Candidates should not feel concerned if the examiner interrupts as this simply means that they have talked for the allotted time. It is important for candidates to start talking as soon as they can in order to make full use of their long turn.

Comments on Released Test Materials Painting and Decorating As can be seen in the sample paper, the first picture shows a group of workmen who are removing graffiti from the walls of buildings in a street, and the second, a woman painting a wall in her living room. Candidates were asked to say why they thought the people were painting the different walls. A strong candidate will have used the pictures as a springboard to answering the task along the following lines: In the top picture I can see some men who are painting the walls because some people have written on them and the street doesnt look very nice. Theres a lady walking past with her two children and shes looking at the men. The men are very busy and are doing a good job. I think its important for them to do this because it makes the town look better. The problem is that some people will probably come and write on the walls again when they have finished. Its a pity. The other picture shows a lady who is painting in her living room. Theres a mirror on the wall and you can see her in the mirror. Shes on a ladder because the walls are high. I think shes painting her walls because she wants to have a change. The walls were white and now shes making them pink. I dont like the colour very much. I think the walls were better when they were white and I dont know why shes doing it! I think shes wasting her time! It should be noted that candidates were not expected to come up with lexis above the level, such as the word

UCLES 2004 0101

26

graffiti. Tasks are not designed to test specific items of vocabulary, and candidates should not tell the examiner that they dont know certain words, but should employ tactics such as paraphrase in order to complete the task. This candidate moved on to the second part of the task and related the question to her own experience. Responses which were restricted to a description merely of what candidates could see in each picture were inadequate. Candidates who did this tended to have problems completing their long turn or ran into difficulties with lexis. Natural World Candidates were given pictures of people spending time in the outdoor world in different and rather dangerous situations. The first showed a man sitting on the edge of a mountain top, above the clouds, with his tent pitched next to him. The second showed a group of people white water rafting. Again, candidates were not only expected to describe the two photographs, but to say why they thought the people had chosen to go to these different places. Candidates who performed well produced answers along the following lines: The first picture shows a man at the top of a mountain. Hes sitting looking at the view which is really beautiful. There are mountains covered with snow so it looks like a cold place. He has been camping because he has a small orange tent next to him. I think he has chosen to go to this place because he likes climbing and maybe he works hard every day and has a very busy life, and so he wants to spend a quiet time on his own. I would really like to see a view like that, but I dont think I would like to go on my own, especially if it was for a long time because then I would feel very lonely and I would miss my friends. In the second picture, there are some people in a boat and it looks very dangerous. There is water everywhere and the boat might turn over. I think they have chosen to go here because they like doing dangerous things because its exciting. They are quite young and maybe its a sports holiday. I think it would be really good to be in that boat and I would like to try it one day but only if I have a good teacher! Again, candidates who failed to move beyond a description of the two photographs performed less well.

Part 3 The aim of this part of the test is for candidates to discuss the task outlined by the examiner as fully as possible, and to work towards a negotiated outcome in the time available. In this part of the test candidates are always invited to do two things. They are required to respond to and give their views on a range of visual prompts, then to come to a negotiated decision. The wording of the rubric is: First talk to each other about.. . Then decide.. . Candidates, presented with the visual stimulus, sometimes fail to hear the first part of the instructions, which is in fact the bulk of the task. Candidates who performed less well were therefore those who made their decisions very early on in the interaction, without first considering and discussing as fully as possible the range of suggestions presented to them and, as a result, ran out of things to say. Candidates should listen carefully for the words, First talk to each other about... and to internalise the task set. As already mentioned in the section on candidate performance, candidates should be made aware that they will not lose marks if they need to ask the examiner to repeat the rubric. To perform well in this part of the test, candidates should be able to take a full and active part in the interaction, making use of the range of visual prompts available, expressing their own views clearly, listening to their partner and developing their partners comments. However, candidates should be aware of the importance of inviting their partner to respond, ensuring that both candidates take an equal part in the development of the interaction. Candidates

UCLES 2004 0101

27

are expected to negotiate an outcome and should not be concerned if they do not agree. Disagreeing in a friendly way can be an effective part of Interactive Communication. However, strong disagreement can undermine their partners confidence and an overbearing candidate may lose marks. Candidates should make full use of the time available, starting promptly and finishing only when the examiner interjects. They should not feel concerned if they are asked to stop as this will probably mean that they have talked for the allotted time. Comments on Released Test Materials Careers Talks Work and jobs is a familiar area for candidates and this task proved popular, candidates generally finding plenty to say. The task required candidates to imagine that the headmaster of a school had invited some people to come and talk about their jobs. Candidates were given seven pictures showing the different people who had been invited: a nurse, engineer, chef, scientist, porter, artist, post office cashier. Candidates were asked to talk about what was good or bad about the different jobs and to decide which three jobs would be most interesting to hear about. As in other tasks, some candidates were tempted to start with the second part of the task, e.g. I think the artist has the most interesting job because... Candidates who did this often performed less well because they came to their final decision without having fully explored the alternatives. Candidates should not have felt concerned if they were unable to make use of the full range of visual prompts but they should have managed to discuss several pictures before making their decision. Candidates should discuss the different ideas offered as fully as possible in the available time and come to a negotiated decision towards the end of their three minutes, rather than making a decision at the outset, which may lead to them running out of things to say. In this case, candidates should have discussed each picture together saying what they thought was good or bad about all the different jobs. For example, with the nurse, candidates could have commented on the positive aspects of helping people and caring for them, seeing someone get better and the negative aspects of long hours, some of the work not being very pleasant and so on. Then, having explored the advantages and disadvantages of all the different jobs in turn, candidates should have attempted to come to a negotiated decision as to which three jobs would be most interesting to hear about. Candidates were not penalised if they ran out of time and failed to come to a final decision.

Part 4 In this part of the test, candidates are given a further opportunity to demonstrate their language ability by engaging in a three-way discussion with their partner and the examiner. It also provides an opportunity for examiners to redress any imbalances in turn-taking that may have occurred in other parts of the test. It is therefore vital that candidates offer more than a minimal response and take the opportunity to initiate discussion as well as answer the examiners questions. Candidates who performed well in this part of the test were those able to develop and illustrate the topic by giving their opinions and talking about the reasons behind them, thus demonstrating a range of vocabulary.

Comments on Released Test Materials Candidates generally performed well and spoke fully on the task Careers Talks. They were able to discuss whether or not they thought it was useful to hear about different peoples jobs and how well they thought schools prepare young people for work. They were also able to talk about the sort of jobs people do in their area. Candidates were then asked to speak more generally about the importance of being happy at work, the difficulties of finding a job and the

UCLES 2004 0101

28

best age to make decisions about the job you want to do in life. They found it harder to talk about some of these issues and sometimes had less to offer. Candidates should be reminded that there is no right or wrong answer and that they are being marked on the language they use, not on how well they justify their opinions. Candidates sometimes feel that the questions sound as if they merit a more sophisticated response than they feel able to give and are therefore reluctant to respond. They should be encouraged that this is not the case and that their contribution will be appropriate if it provides an appropriate response to the question asked. Candidates will find however, that there are certain questions that they are less familiar with or have not considered before, and these questions are likely to result in shorter answers. This is natural in any interaction and will not be penalised. Candidates should therefore try not to be thrown by an unfamiliar question but should give a short confident response and give fuller responses to other questions asked.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CANDIDATE PREPARATION

Candidates are expected to take a full and active part in the test. It is important, therefore, that candidates seek as many opportunities to practise their spoken English as possible, inside and outside the classroom. Exam training can help with nervousness, and candidates certainly benefit from being familiar with the different parts of the test, but this is no substitute for a genuine interest in the language. Candidates who put themselves in a position where they need to use English on a regular basis are likely to perform well. Part 1 For this part of the test, candidates will benefit from finding opportunities to practise talking about themselves (their likes and dislikes, personal/educational history, present circumstances, plans and hopes for the future, etc.). Part 2 Candidates can improve their performance in this part of the test by choosing pairs of thematically linked photographs, practising comparing and contrasting them, and going on to talk about the theme in a more general way. Candidates should time themselves to check that they are able to keep going for a full minute. Without practice, candidates may find it difficult to speak for a full minute in the test. Candidates should attempt photographs with which they may be less familiar, and try to talk for a minute on a question related to the photographs. For example, in the 2003 materials there was a task entitled Speed where candidates were asked to compare a picture of an old woman moving slowly beside a donkey with one showing an urban scene with cars travelling much faster. They were asked to talk about how important they thought it was to travel fast. Candidates should not be put off by unfamiliar topics, but should be able to address the task set, in this case talking about times when it is pleasant to be able to travel slowly, enjoying the peace and quiet and the scenery, and times when it is very necessary to travel at speed, for example in order to get to work on time. As mentioned earlier, candidates are not expected to know lexis beyond the level of FCE, the word donkey in this case, but need to learn strategies for coping when items of vocabulary are unknown. Part 3 The best preparation for this part of the test is for candidates to practise taking part in discussions in small groups, so that all candidates have the opportunity to take the floor. Candidates with a quieter disposition should be encouraged to develop strategies to ensure

UCLES 2004 0101

29

they are able to take their turn. Stronger candidates should be encouraged to invite opinions from others. Suitable thematic areas for discussion can be found in FCE coursebooks and should relate to the candidates own experience rather than more abstract concepts (see the FCE Handbook for a list of topic areas). Part 4 As in Part 3, candidates will benefit from being given as many opportunities as possible to give their opinions on a range of issues, and to expand on their views while inviting opinions from others and responding to them. As with the more challenging questions in the task Career Talks, candidates need to learn to respond confidently, even if answers are short, and should be discouraged from making responses such as I dont know, Im not sure or I havent thought about that.

UCLES 2004 0101

30

DOs and DONTs FOR PAPER 5 SPEAKING familiarise yourself with the focus, function and procedures of all parts of the test. take every opportunity to practise your English in groups and pairs both inside and outside the classroom before the test. listen carefully to instructions given and questions asked throughout the test and focus your answers appropriately. ask for repetition of instructions if you are unclear about what you should do. speak clearly so that both the Assessor and the Interlocutor can hear you. make sure that you talk about the additional and say... task in Part 2, when comparing and contrasting the photographs. respond to your partners contributions and invite your partner to contribute in Parts 3 and 4. make use of opportunities to speak in all parts of the test and give extended contributions where you can.

DO

DO

DO

DO DO DO

DO

DO

DONT

prepare long responses in advance. You are unlikely to answer questions appropriately. try to give your views during your partners long turn. try to dominate your partner or to interrupt him or her in an abrupt way. make frequent pauses and hesitations during the interaction or during your own turn. worry if you disagree with your partner in Parts 3 and 4. As long as you are polite and not overbearing, this is all part of interactive communication. worry about being interrupted by the examiner. For administrative reasons, it is important that tests do not overrun.

DONT DONT DONT

DONT

DONT

UCLES 2004 0101

31

FEEDBACK FORM

FCE Examination Report June 2004 0101

We are interested in hearing your views on how useful this report has been. We would be most grateful if you could briefly answer the following questions and return a photocopy of this page to the following address: University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations Reports Co-ordinator 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU Fax: + 44 1223 460278

1.

Please describe your situation: (e.g. EFL/ESOL teacher, Director of Studies, School Owner, etc.)

2.

Have you prepared candidates for FCE?

YES/NO

3.

Do you plan to prepare candidates for FCE in the future?

YES/NO

4.

How have you used this report? (e.g. to provide feedback to other teachers, for examination practice, etc.)

5.

Which parts of this report did you find most useful?

6.

Which parts are not so useful?

7.

What extra information would you like to see included in this report?

8.

Your name (optional)......................................................................................

Centre/School ...........................................................................................................

Thank you.

UCLES 2004 0101

32