Scribd
Upload
441 views

Different Learning Theories

1. This document compares different learning theories: behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, and humanism. 2. Behaviorism sees learning as changes in observable behavior through conditioning. Cognitivism sees learning as changes in mental structures and processes through assimilation and accommodation. Constructivism views learning as an active, social process where learners construct knowledge. Humanism sees learning as a personal process towards self-actualization through fulfilling innate needs and potentials. 3. The theories differ in their views of the learning process, the role of the learner and teacher, and methods of learning. However, all see learning as an individual process to some degree.

Uploaded by

chapagain_y
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
441 views

Different Learning Theories

1. This document compares different learning theories: behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, and humanism. 2. Behaviorism sees learning as changes in observable behavior through conditioning. Cognitivism sees learning as changes in mental structures and processes through assimilation and accommodation. Constructivism views learning as an active, social process where learners construct knowledge. Humanism sees learning as a personal process towards self-actualization through fulfilling innate needs and potentials. 3. The theories differ in their views of the learning process, the role of the learner and teacher, and methods of learning. However, all see learning as an individual process to some degree.

Uploaded by

chapagain_y
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

d'Vo kfFr l;sfO l;4fGtxaLrsf] t'ngfTds cWoog

Jojxf/jfb
!=
z'jftstf{

J.B. Watson

@=
Skinner,
ljsf;stf{x Pavlov,
Thomdike cflb
#= l;4fGt

Jojxf/
lgdf{0f
(behaviour
shaping)
nfO{
o;n]
d'Vo
l;4fGtsf
kdf
lnG5 .

$= l;sfO
S.R.
aLrsf]
eg]sf] s] xf] < ;xsfo{af6 k|f0fL jf
l;sfsf] Jojxf/df
cfpg] kl/jt{g xf] .

%= l;sfO
s;/L x'G5 <

k'g/fj[lt,
l8n,
cEof;,
k'g{an,
SR connection
k|of;,
e"n,
cjnf]sg, cg'ej
cflbsf] dfWodaf6
x'G5 .

;+1ffgjfb

JolQmut
;fdflhs
lgdf{0fjfb
lgdf{0fjfb
Werhteimer Jean Piaget Lov
Semyonovic
Vygotsky
Kohler,
Koffa,
Lewin,
Brunner
cflb
af}l4s ljsf; jf JolQm :jodn] JolQm :jod\n]
dfgl;s k|lqof cfkm\gf] 1fgsf] cfkm\gf] 1fgsf]
lgdf{0f ug{ ;S5 lgdf{0f ug{ ;S5
(Cognitive
To;df
process) nfO{ jf personal t/
d'Vo l;4fGtsf construct nfO{ ;lqmo ;fdflhs
kdf lnG5 .
o;n]
hf]8 cGt{lqmof
clgjfo{ x'G5 .
lbG5 .
;+1fgfTds 9fFrf
jf ;+/rgf jf
cg'ejxsf]
9fFrfdf cfpg]
kl/jt{g xf] .

s'g} klg j:t',


36gf
jf
ljrf/sf] jif{df
JolQm :jod\n]
atfpg] dfgl;s
;/+/rgf
(mental
schema or
personal
mental
representatio
n) sf] k|lqmof xf]
cyf{t
assimilation
/
accommodat
ion
sf]
k|lqmofaf6
JolQmdf cfpg]
;+1fgfTds
kl/jt{g xf] .
cfTd;fTs/0f
cGt/f{li6o
cg'dfg,
(assimilation
ljZn]if0f, sNkgf, ) / cleof]hg
k|ToIfLs/0f,
(accommoda
af]wIfdtf
sf]
tion)
cflbsf]
k|lqmofaf6 x'G5 .
dfWodaf6 x'G5 .

dfgjtfjfb
Francesco
Petrarca
Maslow,
Kogers,
ERikson

cfTdfoyL{s/0f
(selfactualization
) nfO{ o;n]
d'Vo l;4fGtsf
kdf lnG5 .

cGt{lqmof tyf
;xof]usf]
dfWodaf6
JolQmsf] pRr
txsf] lrGtgsf]
ljsf; xf] .

Selfactualization
sf] k|flKt g}
l;sfO xf] .

;xof]ufTds tyf
cGt{lqmofTds
k|lqmof
jf
scaffolding
sf] dfWodaf6
x'G5 .

pko'Qm
jftfj/0fsf]
lgdf{0f
u/L
JolQmdf ePsf
innate
IfdtfxnfO{
k|:km'l6t
ub}{
cfwf/e"t
cfjZostfx

^= l;sfO
k|lqmof

&= l;sfOdf
s] sf] d'Vo
e"ldsf

*= l;sfsf]
e"ldsf

(= lzIfssf]
e"ldsf

!)= l;sfO
l;4fGtx

(Basic
sf]
needs)
;Daf]wgsf]
cfwf/df x'G5 .
o;n]
l;sfO o;n] creative o;n]
o;n] social o;n]
selfk|lqmofnfO{ habit process sf individual
constructive actualization
constructive process sf process sf
formation
kdf lnG5 .
process sf kdf lnG5
process
sf
kdf lnG5 .
kdf lnG5 .
kdf lnG5 .
;xof]u
k'ga{n / cEof; k|ToIfLs/0f
;+1fgfTds
r'gf}ltx
(scaffolding) (Challanges)
(Reinforcemen (Perception) ;+/rgf
(Schema),
cfTdfoyfsL{s/0f
t and practice)
cfTd;fTs/0f
(Self(assimilation
actualization
) / cleof]hg
kl/dflh{t
)
(accommoda
u|x0f
(Adaptation)
tion) aLrsf]
cGt/lqmof
-Follower
-Problem
-Reflective -Active
-self agent
solver
practitioner partner
of
-Imitator
interaction
-Passive
listener
Best model -Problem
provider
giver
dominant
-guide

zf:qLo ;DaGw
k|Tofjt{g l;4fGt
(Pavlov)
-sfo{k/s ;DaGw
k|Tofjt{g l;4fGt
(skinner)
- d"n / k|oTgsf]
l;sfO
l;4fGt
(Thorndike)

-cGtb[{li6 l;sfO
l;4fGt
(Kohler &
Koffa)
-pTkfbgd"ns
lrGtgsf] l;4fGt
(Werthelmer
)

!!= l;sfO

j}olQms k|lqmof xf] . j}olQms k|lqmof


xf] .
!@= d'Vo ljlw Conditioning
Phenomenol
ogical
experimentat
ion

manager

facilitator
active
partner

JolQmut
;+/rgfjfbL
l;4fGt
(Piaget)

-;fdflhs
;+/rgfjfbL
l;4fGt
(Vygotsky)

j}olQms k|lqmof
xf] .
Adaptation
process

;fdflhs k|lqmof
xf] .
Scaffolding
or dialogic
interaction

-to
assist
each
students
personally in
his journey
towards selfactualization
or
realization.
-r'gf}ltsf]
l;4fGt
(Erikson)
-cfjZostfsf]
l;4fGt
(Maslow)

j}olQms k|lqmof
xf] .
Phenomenol
ogical
analysis

;dfKt

You might also like