Scribd
Upload
56 views

Tips For Evaluating Sources

The document provides tips for evaluating sources based on the CRAAP test, which stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. It discusses evaluating sources based on how well they cover the topic, who authored them and their credentials, where the information comes from and whether it can be verified, and whether the purpose is to inform or sway opinion. The tips include checking the depth of coverage on the topic, intended audience, identifying the author and affiliations, listed sources and reputability, language bias, and stated or apparent point of view.

Uploaded by

bgo813
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
56 views

Tips For Evaluating Sources

The document provides tips for evaluating sources based on the CRAAP test, which stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. It discusses evaluating sources based on how well they cover the topic, who authored them and their credentials, where the information comes from and whether it can be verified, and whether the purpose is to inform or sway opinion. The tips include checking the depth of coverage on the topic, intended audience, identifying the author and affiliations, listed sources and reputability, language bias, and stated or apparent point of view.

Uploaded by

bgo813
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Tips for Evaluating Sources (CRAAP) Relevance or Coverage The importance of the information in relation to your topic: 1.

. What is the depth of coverage? Is the informtion provided central to your topic or does the source just touch on your topic? 2. Is the information unique? 3. Who is the intended audience? Basically, is the information at the appropriate level for your research or does it target a different type of audience? 4. Is better information available in another source? Authority Consider the source: 1. Can you tell who wrote it? If the author is not identified who is the sponsor, publisher, or organization behind the information? 2. Are the authors credentials or organizational affiliations listed? 3. Is contact information available? 4. Is the source reputable? Accuracy The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content: 1. Where does the information presented come from? Are the sources listed? 2. Are the sources reputable? 3. Can you verify the information in other sources or from your own knowledge? Corroborate! 4. Does the language or tone seem free of bias or ideologically based arguments? Purpose or Objectivity The reason the information exists: 1. What is the purpose of the information? Inform? Teach? Sway opinion? Sell? Entertain? 2. Can you determine possible bias? If you can are they clearly stated or do they become apparent through a close reading? 3. Does the point of view appear objective? 4. Does the site provide information or does it attempt to debunk other information? (Weighing positive evidence versus negative evidence)

You might also like