1. The document discusses good practices for lawyers when handling cross-examination in court, such as being prepared with evidence, presenting facts clearly, and maintaining a respectful demeanor.
2. It notes that cross-examiners should understand the perspective of the witness being questioned and aim to elicit the truth respectfully.
3. Lawyers are advised to consider how their questions will be perceived and avoid antagonizing witnesses, so as not to undermine the credibility of cross-examination as an important tool in the legal process.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
205 views8 pages
Corpus Juris SL 1
1. The document discusses good practices for lawyers when handling cross-examination in court, such as being prepared with evidence, presenting facts clearly, and maintaining a respectful demeanor.
2. It notes that cross-examiners should understand the perspective of the witness being questioned and aim to elicit the truth respectfully.
3. Lawyers are advised to consider how their questions will be perceived and avoid antagonizing witnesses, so as not to undermine the credibility of cross-examination as an important tool in the legal process.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8
CORPUS JURIS SL
Haris Palpola (LL,B - Hons, OUSL)
Attorney-at-Law Page 1
GOOD LAWYERS. A Good lawyer will have character, and by forecast reach results, if possible, before suit is brought, and if claim is sued will 1. He will not quarrel with a Court, but be so armed with ready proof and law as to convince the Court and jury of his claims. He wins who convinces. 2. He will open up his case with care and great clearness before evidence, and know that his facts may not be. as clear to Court and jurors as to himself, as "All men are eloquent in what they know." 3. He will be frank, just, fair, and reasonable, and win by these methods and his clear proof and presentation of facts and circumstances. How many lawsuits are comprehended? 4. A good lawyer will be a gentleman, and not a loud-spoken boaster of what he can do. He will rather prove what he can do by doing it. Grant's victories and not his reports of them, made him famous. 5. He will wire and 'phone freely, go to the scene of a failure, gather his facts at first hand, and he first, if possible, on the premises in replevins and attachments. Men pay best for superior skill in law matters. 6. He will possess the power to please and return pleasure, as success depends "upon the number he can make himself agreeable to." Past nothing so pleases in business as a fitness and skill in one's chosen profession. These are his storehouses of fortune as a lawyer. 7. He will be alert, well-informed, friendly and convincing in manner, and withal a sincere man in business, by such means attracting clients and insuring confidence. This is the method of Choate, Edmunds, Carter, Harrison, and used by most excellent lawyers. 8. A good lawyer will of course be honest, keeping clients' money apart from his own, remitting promptly, and will be able by using his genius to serve his clients in emergencies; by counsel and Court work, will preserve their rights and estates as a sacred trust, as did Lincoln, Waite, Matthews, Porter, Seward, and Hendricks. Such lawyers and all leaders of the Bar have exemplified integrity in their lives as well as their practice. TACT IN COURT by JUDGE J. W. DONOVAN
CORPUS JURIS SL Haris Palpola (LL,B - Hons, OUSL) Attorney-at-Law Page 2
gg J c gq Crr r6g g r :f6C J ::c C gr rr cu p f6c j j g c u u cj u 5o r crpr c c cu r c f u. rr . r r g cu r c f c z6r .. r5g g f6 ..rp rr cu cc p gr uu r5g u r7 r, u. zr c r r. r g ur r5g _ r5 c r f6c j cu c cc gu .u u p uu. cj r p gr uu . rg g cu c r5g _ r5 c r f6cj f c . u. < rr . f6c. cu u uu J cc uu r g_ : . r . g_ .c. r r u p c. cu g f6 ..rp r _ r5 ccjr cu g cr . f. .u u g u u. j _ r5.j u g J rr u j r cc g_ cuu r5g c p. c fu c ..r _ .r J 6 .r f g_ r . r5g . r5. . 5_r f pr c. p uu r5 . . c g cu uu g c 5_u zr, rjr g c . zz. .c f6cj g f6cj g r cu u. g . r5gu f u. cuu _u. g_ J f6 c p. cu, c fu r5gr c _ cr cuu r5 jcj g r cu u. cj f cu .cc gr cu 5_u, .c gr u .uu c cuu u. Ju r u cuu u f6 p p. cu fc g r .cc r5g. r5 5_r r. c r. r j u cu 5_c _ gf. :<g. :< o u gr rrg CORPUS JURIS SL Haris Palpola (LL,B - Hons, OUSL) Attorney-at-Law Page 3
cu r.j .uu c 5_r uu c , g f6cj r5gu _ gr cuu g . j 5_r gr cu r. (Browne v. Dunn (1893) 6 R. 67, H.L., In general a party is required to challenge in cross examination the evidence of any witness of the opposing party if he wishes to submit to the court that the evidence should not be accepted on that point if a party has decided not to cross examine an a particular important point, he will be in difficulty in submitting that the evidence should be rejected Phipson on The Law of Evidence, 16 th edn, that evidence not challenged or impugned in cross examination can be considered as admitted and is provable against the accused held in Ajith Samarakoon v. Attorney General 2004 (2) SLR 209 the evidence with regard to the age of the victim given by the victim herself and the JMO - who is not a qualified osteologist /anatomist or dental surgeon - could be acted upon as what was not challenged when one had the opportunity to challenge has to be taken as admitted especially so according to the facts and circumstances of the case. Held in Renuka Subasinghe v. Attorney - (2007) 1 Sri LR 224, Odgers Pleading, 13 th ed. P. 261 *********************************************************** ccc:. c: cc ccc:. c: cc ccc:. c: cc ccc:. c: cc c _.c:.D c:O:o. Dc:c c: ccc: oc. cSco...o c_c:o _co.o I00 c:O:o. Dc:c _.:c.D c:,:coc co ccc c. cccc: cc.c c..c:.o. D c:c. _.c:.D ccc:c.o cccc.c. c: co _co Dc:c oc. .O... ccc. oc oc cc..c Dco _c: _o c:c.D.c oc: cc c:,:co.c D.:o cSco...o .c cO:._:co.c cO. O: cco. c._. c coc .OO .c c:cDc:c Dc:c. .D. .Oc c:cDc: co ccc:. cSco...o ...o oc. c:O:o. Dc:c oc. cc cco c_ .c .. O: .cc O.c cc: _c: _o c:c.D. c.. o 08o, ccc: DO. c:Oc c:ccc.o. ccc:.c _c: c:oO. c.c oc c.cc cO.D.c .c:.: .co c:c ccc c cc: ccOc Dc:_ O_c c:cc cc..o c.cco ccc cO..o ccc_ c:c ccc cc ccc c:c ccc cOo .o:co: ccc.. o ccc c cSco...o O.c ccc DOco _. .O. cc cO.D. cc:co. cO. c_ cco _co cc:co.c .o:co oc:.co CORPUS JURIS SL Haris Palpola (LL,B - Hons, OUSL) Attorney-at-Law Page 4
cc:o:cc cO.D. cc DOc.Oo c_coo` c:O:o. oc. ...c ccc:.c _c: c:oO cc_ Dc.c .o:.D. c coc ccc:.c _c: cc c:c cccc: coS 08 c c:,:co.c I0 co ccoc.. cco .D. 1. .Dc cccc c:c.:O ccco Dco cc:o coc coc .Dc cccc c:c.:O cc: .O. cc.o. cc c:c.` 2. co:c:c. 3. Dc:c.. .cc c.o ccco: _.cc .c_coc:c. ._co cc: c:oD. c:c. .O.o O_ cc:o .c _.c:.D .c:_.D Dc:_ cc..o ccc:. _c: c:oO cc: coO cc.o cc occo. cco _:c.c. coco cc:o c :..:ccc ccco.c co:c cO ccOc cccc oc:.co.: ococc..o ...o ccc .o:.c.o. cc cco coS c_o c:c, .coc cc_ cc:oc Oc ccc:.c _c: O. cD_ oc D.:o c.cc.. 00 c: 0 ccoc. cc:cc ccc:.c _c: .S c_. c:c oc ccco. co c: ccco.c. c_. .o:O:c. ccO cc.S ..cc:cc c:ccc.c c.oc c:ccc. Oc: O. c..c cco c.c ccc:.c _c: O. ccco.. c_. .o:O:c cc .co ... c _.c:.D c++ccc. Oc ccc:. _c: c:oO. .o:c:c.. oOc cccoO. .coDOc. c. c:.:cc .o:.D Wijesinghe v. Wijesinghe (1954) 57 NLR 489). .Oco ccc.c Oc ..cc:cc c:ccc.o ccc:.. O:occ cco.c. cc co cc cOc.co cc .c .o:.D. ccOc c _.c:.D cccc.c Dc:c c_ co.o ..:co: Oco. : ccc cc c_ c_co O.c_ oDS cO:o. coc c. c:c:_ co ccc .S coD. coccc:_. c:c..o cc c..c c_ .D. cc Occo.c .cc. ccOc .S ccOco _c: co. . cOccc .cO cSco.c: coc c_co Dc:c.o .D. .S cOo:c:c..o c_ccc .o:c:_.co ...oc cc D c:_. cc cO. .o:c:c D.S ccco ccc_. co.o cc DO ccco cO. .c:ccc. .cZO.. oOc cco. co.o cc.coc: c:o ccc.co c: c:O:c.co .co DO c_ cO. .o:c:c DO.. .Oc cco c_.c ..c c.S. c.c c:O:o. Dc:c oc. .cco Dco _c: _o oc... c. c_oc: O. .cc cc.o c:O:o. c:c:oc_ oc.c. c. oc.c. cc: c.c o:coS c:c .c:.cc ._co CORPUS JURIS SL Haris Palpola (LL,B - Hons, OUSL) Attorney-at-Law Page 5
c_oc: . c:c ccc cc .cc.o ccOc _cc. oc.. co. _:.S. c coc .o:c:_.co c: ccc Scc DO. .o:c:c OD..S ...oc. .coDO cccc cc:oc .o:.D. .O. .cco ccc. ._co c_oco _. cc. o. ccco: ccc: oc. c_oc: _o c.c_oc.. ccc: oc. Matrimonial Causes Act 1937 coc .coc cco _:c c:c. c cc: O_c cc..oO c.c:c:c c..c cco _:c.D A. P. Herbert Dco. c Dco I084 c_ cco _:c Holy Deadlock oS coc. c.cc ccco: ccc: oc. D.Dco. cco _:c ccc cc ccco ccc_. c.. cc cco coc Oco ccco: oc. .coc cco _:7O.. .cco Dc:c. c_oco.o Holy Wedlock ._co Perera v. Mathupali (1968) 71 NLR 461 c_oo`. oOc cc:co:cc. ccOc _.c:.D ccco: oc. co.o cc coc. .cc ccco: oc... c cSco...o .c:O ococ co.o Tennekoon v. Somawathie Perera Alias Tennekoon (1986) 1 Sri LR 90 occ.. .Oc ccco: cccccc:c. co.o ccc:. _c: c:o.S ccccc .o:.D. c Oco cc.c c+cc.. co c:o... ccc: occc ccc: cccc:.co .o c:c:c. cSco...o cD_ oc D.:o c.cc.. ccc:o c_cc: c.S. c coc ccc:. cc: cocc cD_ occc .OoO _cccc: coc c..c c .c .D. oOc cccO:o.. oc.. ccco: ccc. oc:.coO .c:ccc. ccc oc c.o c:c:c. co. _:.S. _:cco.c ._c. .Dc cccc c:c.:O coc c:o_._o __Oc c D. c.oc c:ccc. c. c_co. cc.c: _ccc .o:c: c. c cc: _c.c _c: O. c_ co.o oc,cc.:... c:ccc.oc. ccc:. _c: c:oO. cccc oc:.co c.c cO. c_ co.o. .S c:c:c.. _c.c _c: .S c:c:_cO oc,cc.: ccco.. ccc. cc:c cco _co cccO c Dco ccco. .o:Oc .:DO c_ cc.. c. c:c:_cO oc,cc:o.c c+cc. c:c:c .cOc_. c.c:o ccc .S coD. cco ..c c:c .ooc ccc: occc.c cOcc co ccc.. ccc c:c cc occo. D.. oc,cc.: .O.c cc oc.D c:ccc.o oc c.o.o cOcc.. c. ccc O_.cO.. c.c:o .D. c c_oO c:ccc.o ccco.. ccc. cc:c cco cccO ccco. .o:Oc .co _c.. c.o co ccco.. ccc:c ccoc: cOoc .o:c ccS _:7. .c ccc cco CORPUS JURIS SL Haris Palpola (LL,B - Hons, OUSL) Attorney-at-Law Page 6
_c.. .S:oc. co.o .S c:c:c..o c:cO. co. _c.c O. c_ co.o oc,cc:o. DO.. c:c.coO .Oco D.c ccco. .o:Oc .coc: c:c .coc c c:c ..c .o:O:c ccc.. oc,.: ccco ccc ccco.. Docc:cc:o O: cco.o ccco cc:o coc c. oo: cc.. c coc c_o D. ccc. c:.:co. c.S c:c.:cc ccco.o ccc..c cDcc c.o c:ccc.o. c:ccc .o:D c:c.c c_co oc:.co. .c.c .ccc cc c+cc. c:c:c .cOc, c+ c:cc.c, .cc.c .o c.c cc:o ccc c:Oc c:c co cc occo. D.. oOc oc c.oc: c:c cO. ..c o:c. Ococ:.c c.c .o:cc ccc:.c _c: c:oO. .o:c:c oc:.co Saman Kumara vs. Republic of Sri Lanka (2009) 1 SLR 18 c_oo`. .Ooc: ..:co: c c:c.c .S co D. c:c_.Soc .D oc,cc:o c:.co cO:o.c Occo o..:Sc.o ._co c..c cco oc:.co co c:o .c.c .ccc c+cc.. ...o c+cc. cc.o c:o cc:cc ccco: ccc: oc c.. c: c:_.. c:_.co c:c:c.. cOco.c, cO:c c.:c:o.c c: Occo.:.c ccc c:_c__. .co .coc cO. c..c cco.o oS .ccc co cc.. .S cc:oc .Oc cco .o:c cocc cc:oc coc c:_.S c:c_ co.o O.c cc:. c.c cc: Dco c.o _:c cc:oc.. .S c:c:cOc ccco cc.. oOc c. cc Dco coOc .c:. cocOo. c .c .:. O: .o:c.. Oc oc:.c c. c+cc. c:c:c .cO c_.c cc: c+ c:cc.. c.ccc c_ ccooc oc:.co. c. oc,cc..c ._co .c c.:cco.. cc.cc c..c cco cc. _c: _o cc,:c cc: Oc. *************************************
You wish the Court to hear and listen to you? Then speak with point; be brief, be close, be true, cite well your cases; let them be in point; Not learned, rubbish dark, and out of joint, And be your reasoning clear, and closely made Free from false taste, verbiage and parade. CORPUS JURIS SL