Classical Conditioning
Classical Conditioning
Define and contrast the FOUR types of behavioral learning theories (contiguity, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and social learning), giving examples of how each can be used in the classroom.
Sachin Saini
According to the behaviorists, learning can be defined as the relatively permanent change in behavior brought about as a result of experience or practice. Behaviorists recognize that learning is an internal event. However, it is not recognized as learning until it is displayed by overt behavior.
The behavioral learning theory is represented as an S-R paradigm. The organism is treated as a black box. We only know what is going on inside the box by the organisms overt behavior.
Stimulus (S)
Organism
(O)
Response (R)
The feedback loop that connects overt behavior to stimuli that activate the senses has been studied extensively from this perspective.
Notice that the behaviorists are only interested in that aspect of feedback that connects directly to overt behavior. Behaviorists are not interested in the conscious decision of the individual to disrupt, modify, or go against the conditioning process.
Contiguity theory
Classical or respondent conditioning theory Operant or instrumental conditioning theory Social learning theory
Contiguity Theory
Contiguity theory is based on the work of E. R. Guthrie. It proposes that any stimulus and response connected in time and/or space will tend to be associated.
Contiguity Theory
Examples: A baseball player wearing a certain pair of socks on the day he hits three home runs associates wearing the socks and hitting home runs. A student making a good grade on a test after trying a new study technique makes an association between the stimulus of studying and the response of getting a good grade.
Contiguity Theory
Guthries contiguity theory is one foundation for the more cognitivelyoriented learning theory of neural networks.
He began to investigate this phenomena and established the laws of classical conditioning.
Skinner renamed this type of learning "respondent conditioning since in this type of learning, one is responding to an environmental antecedent.
This involuntary behavior is elicited or caused by an antecedent environmental event. For example, if air is blown into your eye, you blink. You have no voluntary or conscious control over whether the blink occurs or not.
That is, when the CS is presented by itself, it elicits or causes the CR (which is the same involuntary response as the UR. The name changes because it is elicited by a different stimulus.
This is written CS elicits > CR.
After repeated presentations, the previously neutral stimulus will elicit the emotional response
Child associates being harassed and school Child begins to feel bad when she thinks of school
Operant Conditioning
The major theorists for the development of operant conditioning are: Edward Thorndike
John Watson B.F. Skinner
Operant Conditioning
Operant conditioning investigates the influence of consequences on subsequent behavior. Operant conditioning investigates the learning of voluntary responses. It was the dominant school in American psychology from the 1930s through the 1950s.
Where classical conditioning illustrates S-->R learning, operant conditioning is often viewed as R->S learning
It is the consequence that follows the response that influences whether the response is likely or unlikely to occur again. The three-term model of operant conditioning (S--> R ->S) incorporates the concept that responses cannot occur without an environmental event (e.g., an antecedent stimulus) preceding it.
Increase Behavior
Add Positive Reinforcement Subtract Negative Reinforcement
Schedules of consequences
Stimuli are presented in the environment according to a schedule of which there are two basic categories:
Continuous
Intermittent
Schedules of consequences
Continuous reinforcement simply means that the behavior is followed by a consequence each time it occurs.
Schedules of consequences
Intermittent schedules are based either on the passage of time OR number of correct responses
Schedules of consequences
The consequence can be delivered based on
Schedules of consequences
This results in an four classes of intermittent schedules. Fixed Interval The first correct response after a set amount of time has passed is reinforced (i.e., a consequence is delivered). The time period required is always the same. Example: Spelling test every Friday.
Schedules of consequences
Variable Interval The first correct response after a set amount of time has passed is reinforced (i.e., a consequence is delivered). After the reinforcement, a new time period (shorter or longer) is set with the average equaling a specific number over a sum total of trials. Example: Pop quiz
Schedules of consequences
Fixed Ratio A reinforcer is given after a specified number of correct responses. This schedule is best for learning a new behavior.
The number of correct responses required for reinforcement remains the same. Example: Ten math problems for homework
Schedules of consequences
Variable Ratio A reinforcer is given after a set number of correct responses. After reinforcement the number of correct responses necessary for reinforcement changes. This schedule is best for maintaining behavior.
Example: A student raises his hand to be called on.
One difficulty with many learning theories is their almost exclusive emphasis on the processes of acquisition of behavior and performance, and their almost total neglect of the content of personality ~Julian Rotter, 1972
Beyond Reinforcement 1
External reinforcement isnt the only way in which behavior is acquired, maintained, or altered We can also learn by observing, reading, or hearing about others behavior
We develop anticipated consequences for our behaviors
Even for behaviors were never engaged in
Our cognitive abilities give us the capability for insight and foresight
Beyond Reinforcement 2
Banduras biggest contribution to learning theory:
New patterns of behavior can be acquired in the absence of external reinforcement We can pay attention to what others do, and repeat their actions
i.e., We learn through observation, rather than through direct reinforcement
2. Retention Processes
(remember the models behavior)
4. Motivational Processes
(if positive reinforcement is potentially available, enact the modeled behavior)
Bandura and other Social Learning Theorists put the person back into personality by stressing the interplay of personal factors, environmental factors, and behavior