Scribd
Upload
122 views

Rubric For Presentations: Geometry Project: Name: Period: Date

This document provides a rubric for evaluating student presentations on a geometry project. It outlines criteria in five categories: Content, Organization, Delivery, Preparation, and Sources/Background. Each category is scored on a scale of 1 to 4 points, with detailed descriptions of the level of thoroughness, logical organization, preparedness, and research required to meet the standards for Distinguished (4 points), Proficient (3 points), Apprentice (2 points), and Novice (1 point) levels of performance.

Uploaded by

Anthea Clarke
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
122 views

Rubric For Presentations: Geometry Project: Name: Period: Date

This document provides a rubric for evaluating student presentations on a geometry project. It outlines criteria in five categories: Content, Organization, Delivery, Preparation, and Sources/Background. Each category is scored on a scale of 1 to 4 points, with detailed descriptions of the level of thoroughness, logical organization, preparedness, and research required to meet the standards for Distinguished (4 points), Proficient (3 points), Apprentice (2 points), and Novice (1 point) levels of performance.

Uploaded by

Anthea Clarke
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Name: Period: Date:

RubricforPresentations: GeometryProject
Outcome Category Content 20% Distinguished 4Points Thoroughlyand clearlystatesthe mainpointsand precisedetailsthat areaccurately focusedonthe designproject. Clearlyorganized intoalogical sequence. Excellentuseofan outline.Excellent introductionand conclusion. Effectivelyand creativelydelivers theinformationwhile stayingonthetopic andconsideringthe audience.Uses voicevariation Interestingandvivid tohear. Presentationshows detailedpreparation andpracticein deliveryincluding useofvoice, posture,eyecontact, gestures,pacing, anduseofpictures, graphs,computer models,etc. Interestingandvivid. Proficient 3Points Adequatelystates themainpointsand detailsthatare accuratelyfocused onthedesign project. Apprentice 2Points Statesmostofthe mainpointsand detailsthatfocuson thedesignproject. Mayincludesome unnecessary information. Fairevidenceofa logicalsequenceof information.Some useofanoutline. Weakintroduction andconclusion. Novice 1Point Statesfewmain pointsanddetails thatfocusonthe designproject,or informationdoesnot relatetotopic.

Organization 25%

Adequateevidence ofalogicalsequence ofinformation.Good useofanoutline. Satisfactory introductionand conclusion. Adequatelydelivers theinformationwhile stayingonthetopic andconsideringthe audience.Speaks clearlyand confidently.

Minimalornooutline followed.Nological organizationsome digressions.Unclear, confusing.No introductionor conclusion. Littleornoattemptis madetostayonthe topic.Doesnot consideraudience. Difficultto understand.

Delivery 30%

Deliversthe informationbutdoes notstayonthetopic. Littleconsiderationof audience.Uses incomplete sentences.

Preparation 25%

Presentationshows satisfactory preparationaswell aspracticein deliveryincluding useofvoice, posture,eyecontact, gestures,and pacing.Someuseof pictures,graphs, computermodels etc.

Presentationshows somepreparationas wellassome practiceinthe deliveryincluding marginaluseof voice,posture,eye contact,gestures, pacing,andmarginal useofpictures, graphs,computer models,etc.

Presentationis lackinginpreparation andinpracticeofthe deliveryincluding useofvoice,posture, eyecontact, gestures,pacing, andlittleornouseof pictures,graphs, computermodels, etc. Difficulttohear. Appearstense. Fidgetsoften.

Mr.KellisPrinciplesofEngineering RubricforProject.doc

Page1of2

2/19/09 RedMountainHighSchool

Name: Period: Date:

RubricforContent: GeometryProject
Outcome Category Topic 10% Distinguished 4Points Thoroughlyand clearlystatesthe mainpointsand precisedetailsthat areaccurately focusedonthe project. Projectshows detailedpreparation andincludesuseof pictures,graphs, maps,models,etc. Interestingandvivid. Clearlyorganized intoalogical sequence. Excellentuseofan outline.Excellent introductionand conclusion. Includesproper referencestofiveor morepublished sources.The sourcesincludeno morethanthree internetsites,and Wikipediaisnotone ofthesources. Theprojectshows evidencethatthe studenthas researchedbeyond theinformationgiven inclass.Studenthas proventhathis/her workisuniquetothe research. Proficient 3Points Adequatelystates themainpointsand detailsthatare accuratelyfocused ontheproject. Apprentice 2Points Statesmostofthe mainpointsand detailsthatfocuson theproject. May includesome unnecessary information. Presentationshows somepreparation. Marginaluseof pictures,graphs, maps,models,etc. Fairevidenceofa logicalsequenceof information.Some useofanoutline. Weakintroduction andconclusion. Novice 1Point Statesfewmain pointsanddetails thatfocusonthe project,or informationdoesnot relatetotopic.

Preparation 25%

Organization 25%

Projectshows satisfactory preparation.Some useofpictures, graphs,maps, models,etc. Adequateevidence ofalogicalsequence ofinformation.Good useofanoutline. Satisfactory introductionand conclusion. Includesproper referencestothree orfourpublished sources.The sourcesincludeno morethantwo internetsites,and Wikipediaisnotone ofthesources. Workismostlytaken frombasicsources. Mostinformationis cutdirectlyfrom internetorother sourcesandisnot unique.

Presentationis lackinginpreparation withlittleornouseof pictures,graphs, computermodels, etc. Minimalornooutline followed.Nological organizationsome digressions.Unclear, confusing.No introductionor conclusion. Includesno referencedsources.

Sources 15%

Includesproper referencestothree orfewerpublished sources.The sourcesincludeonly internetsites,and Wikipediaisoneof thesources. Minimalworkwas donetoresearchthe topic.Littleevidence theprojectisunique.

Background 25%

Studentdidnot researchbeyondthe classroom.Projectis notunique.

Mr.KellisPrinciplesofEngineering RubricforProject.doc

Page2of2

2/19/09 RedMountainHighSchool

You might also like