Presented By:-Durga Prasad Ghosh School of Mechanical Engineering K.I.I.T University
Presented By:-Durga Prasad Ghosh School of Mechanical Engineering K.I.I.T University
T University
Introduction
What is MFC
MFC configuration and design Basic components
MFC performers
Advantages of MFC Emerging Opportunities Technological challenges Conclusion References
An increasing need for new energy resources due to concerns over the
However, many limitations and bottlenecks still need to be overcome in order to achieve full scale applications.
The larger the potential difference between donor and acceptor, the larger is the energy gain.
Electrochemically active bacteria in the anode chamber substrate and separate the electrons from the protons.
oxidize the
The electrons travel to the cathode through the external circuit, and the
proton diffuse though the electrolyte and the CEM/PEM.
In single chambered MFC there an increase in power output because the internal ohmic resistance is reduced by avoiding the catholyte.
The undesirable back diffusion of oxygen from the cathode to the anode
and microbial contamination of the cathode are the two major concerns.
less MFC.
In this design anode is at the bottom and cathode at the top, with glass wool and glass beads as separators instead of membranes.
The fuel is continuously supplied to the bottom of the anode and the
effluent passes through the cathode compartment.
Anode
Cathode
Ion exchange membrane Catalyst
Choosing proper material for electrode and CEM is one of the critical
The specific materials for each compartment used in MFCs can affect power density and columbic efficiency.
In cathode compartment, expensive catalysts such as platinum, are generally used to reduce the high over-potential for oxygen reduction
Activation overpotential
Ohmic overpotential
Concentration polarization Transport of charge in electrolyte Membrane resistance The structure of anode Upscalling
Activation overpotential :- either oxidizing a compound at the anode surface or reducing a compound at the bacterial surface requires a certain energy to activate the oxidation reaction. This activation incurs a certain potential loss known as activation overpotential.
Ohmic overpotential :- these are caused by the electrical resistances of the electrodes, electrolyte and the membranes.
Concentration polarization :- this occurs when compounds are oxidized faster at the anode than they can be transported to the surface. Reasons being large oxidative force of anode and high current densities.
Transport of the charge in the electrolyte :- for efficient functioning both protons and electrons need to migrate between the anode and the cathode at highest possible rate. To ensure this turbulent conditions are needed to be introduced.
Membrane resistance :- the membrane should have high selectivity for protons and should be stable in colloidal and nutrient rich environment.
The structure of the anode :- the anode should have adequate surface for growth of biofilm, sufficient conductive surface.
implanted in human body will expand significantly. MFC can provide aid
in this case.
Bio-sensors :- bacteria shows lower metabolic activity when inhibited by toxic compounds. Thus, if a toxic compound diffuses through a
Sediment electricity :- MFC can be used to generate electricity based on potential difference between the sediment and the aqueous phase. Here two anode reaction appear to occur: oxidation of sulphide present in the
Bioremediation :- bacteria such as Geobacter species can not only donate electrons to the anode but can also accept electrons from the cathode if
Nafion can also be easily biofouled, which reduces the level of proton migration.
The achievable power output from MFCs has increased remarkably over the last decade.
Many bottlenecks yet exist, which pose a challenge that will take
multidisciplinary approach and extensive research.
2. Schroder, U., Anodic electron transfer mechanisms in microbial fuel cells and their energy efficiency, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9(21), 2619-2629 (2007).
3. Jang, J. K., Pham, T. H., Chang, I. S., Kang, K. H., Moon, H., Cho, K. S., and Kim, B. H., Construction and operation of a novel mediator- and membrane-less microbial fuel cell, Process Biochem., 39(8), 1007-1012 (2004).
4. You, S. J., Zhao, Q. L., Zhang, J. N., Jiang, J. Q., and Zhao, S. Q., A microbial fuel cell using permanganate as the cathodic electron acceptor, J. Power Sources, 162(2),14091415 (2006).
5. Gil, G. C., Chang, I. S., Kim, B. H., Kim, M., Jang, J. K., Park, H. S., and Kim, H. J., Operational parameters affecting the performance of a mediator-less microbial fuel cell,
THANK YOU