HWChap 012
HWChap 012
Chapter 12
Accounting for Partnerships
QUESTIONS
1.
2.
Mutual agency means that each partner is an agent of the partnership and can
commit it to contracts that are within the normal scope of its business.
3.
Yes, partners can limit the right of a partner. Such an agreement is binding on
members of the partnership. It is also binding on outsiders who know of the
agreement. However, it is not binding on outsiders who do not know of the
agreement.
4.
No, he does not have this right. A partnership is a voluntary association and
partners have the right to select the people with whom they associate as partners.
5.
If partners agree on the method of sharing incomes, but say nothing of losses, then
any losses are shared in the same manner as income.
6.
The allocation of net income to the partners is reported on the statement of partners'
equity.
7.
Unlimited liability means that the creditors of a partnership have the right to require
each partner to be personally responsible for all debts of the partnership.
8.
9.
George's claim is not valid unless the previously agreed upon method of sharing net
incomes and losses granted George an annual salary allowance of $25,000. Unless
the partnership agreement says otherwise, partners have no claim to a salary
allowance in payment for their services.
12-1
10. No. Kay is still liable to her former partners for her share of the losses.
11. At all times in the accounting history of a partnership (or any organization), assets
must equal liabilities plus equity. When the assets are converted to cash, any gains
or losses are allocated to the capital accounts of the partners; and when creditors'
claims are paid, assets and liabilities are reduced by equal amounts. Therefore,
when the remaining assets are in the form of cash, the amount of cash must equal
the claims (equity) of the partners.
12. The remaining partners should share the decline in their equities in accordance with
their income-and-loss-sharing ratio.
12-2
QUICK STUDIES
Quick Study 12-1 (10 minutes)
a. The partnership will need to pay because it is a merchandising firm.
That is, if the vendor knows nothing to the contrary, the vendor can
assume that Davis has the right, because of mutual agency, to bind the
firm to contracts for the purchase of merchandise.
b. A public accounting firm is not in the merchandising business.
Consequently, because the purchase of merchandise to be sold is not
within the normal scope of the business of this firm, the vendor has no
right to assume Davis is acting as the agent for the partnership. Hence,
the partnership probably will not have to pay.
12-3
Norton
Total
$210,000
$ 30,000
70,000
140,000
70,000
_______
$100,000
140,000
$
0
30,000
20,000
White
$220,000
Blue
$205,000
Total
$600,000
(180,000)
$ 40,000
(180,000)
$ 25,000
(540,000)
$ 60,000
2. a)
Aug. 31 Cash .......................................................................... 5,000
Red, Capital ........................................................
5,000
b)
Aug. 31 White, Capital ...........................................................40,000
Blue, Capital .............................................................25,000
Cash ....................................................................
To distribute remaining cash.
12-4
65,000
5,000
b)
Aug. 31 White, Capital ...........................................................37,500
Blue, Capital .............................................................22,500
Cash ....................................................................
60,000
12-5
EXERCISES
Exercise 12-1 (20 minutes)
a. Recommended Organization: Milan should consider setting up a limited
partnership. Given his real estate expertise he can manage the day-today activities of the partnership and serve as its general partner. He can
raise the necessary capital by admitting limited partners.
Taxation: All partners will pay individual taxes on income distributed to
them, but the partnership entity will not pay income tax.
Advantages: Advantages to Milan will be authority over the partnership
that he will have as general partner and the ease of raising capital.
b. Recommended Organization:
The two doctors should form a
partnership. A general partnership will have the disadvantage of
unlimited liability so they probably want to consider a limited liability
partnership. The partnership can borrow funds from the bank to obtain
the initial needed capital for the business.
Taxation: The owners will pay individual taxes on income earned by the
partnership but the partnership will not be taxed.
Advantages: The advantages of the partnership are ease of formation
and owner authority.
c. Recommended Organization:
Ross, Jenks, and Keim might first
consider organizing their business as a general partnership. However, a
problem for these new graduates is that they do not have funds and with
no past business experience will probably have trouble getting a
business loan. Therefore, instead of a partnership, a better course of
action is probably to incorporate. In this way they might be able to find
investors to contribute capital for stock. They can structure the
financing so that they remain the major stockholders in the company.
Taxation: As a corporation, any income will be subject to corporate
income tax. Any dividends paid to the stockholders will also normally
be taxed, but at a much lower level. Moreover, some lower income
taxpayers could potentially pay little or no dividend tax. Any salaries
that Ross, Jenks, and Keim pay themselves will be a tax-deductible
expense for the business.
Advantages: Several key advantages to the corporate form include its
limited liability and the potential to sell more stock if additional funds
are needed.
12-6
General Partnerships
1. Ease of formation
2. Transferability of ownership
Difficult to transfer
Limited
5. Owners liability
Unlimited
6. Legal status
8. Owners authority
Mutual agency
20,000
60,000
2.
Jan. 1
12-7
25,000
80,000
88,000
90,000
1b. 2011
Oct. 20
57,000
1c. 2011
Dec. 31
32,000
25,000
Dec. 31
2.
Capital account balances
Abbey
Initial investment ................................$ 88,000
Withdrawals ........................................ (32,000)
Share of income* ................................ 54,400
Ending balances .................................$110,400
*Supporting calculations
Abbey
Dames
Net income .................................................................
Salary allowance
Abbey ........................................................................
$30,000
Total salary allowance ...............................................
Balance of income .....................................................
Interest allowances
Abbey (10% on $88,000) ..........................................
8,800
Dames (10% on $90,000)..........................................
$9,000
Total interest allowances...........................................
Balance of income .....................................................
Balance allocated equally
Abbey ........................................................................
15,600
Dames .......................................................................
15,600
Total allocated equally ...............................................
_______
_______
Balance of income .......................................................
Shares of the partners .................................................
$54,400
$24,600
12-8
Dames
$ 90,000
(25,000)
24,600
$ 89,600
Total
$79,000
30,000
49,000
17,800
31,200
31,200
0
54,400
24,600
Plan (2)
Plan (3)
Ellis
Total
$82,500
$165,000
$ 66,000
_______
($75,000/$125,000) x $165,000 .....................
$99,000
99,000
$66,000
$99,000
$165,000
$165,000
$45,000
100,000
Interest allowances
($50,000 x 10%)...........................................
5,000
($75,000 x 10%)...........................................
5,000
7,500
7,500
112,500
52,500
26,250
_______
Balance of income ........................................
_______
$78,750
12-9
52,500
$
2)
Net income....................................................
Salary allowances ........................................
$55,000
Interest allowances
($50,000 x 10%) ..........................................
5,000
($75,000 x 10%) ..........................................
Total salaries and interest ..........................
Balance of income .......................................
Remainder equally
($94,400 - $112,500)/2 ..................................
(9,050)
Balance of income .......................................
______
Shares each partner ....................................
$50,950
Net income....................................................
Salary allowances ........................................
$55,000
Interest allowances
($50,000 x 10%) ..........................................
5,000
($75,000 x 10%) ..........................................
Total salaries and interest ..........................
Balance of income .......................................
Remainder equally
[$(15,700) - $112,500]/2 ................................
(64,100)
Balance of income .......................................
______
Shares of each partner ................................
$ (4,100)
Ellis
Total
$ 45,000
$ 94,400
100,000
7,500
(9,050)
_______
$ 43,450
$ 45,000
7,500
(64,100)
_______
$(11,600)
5,000
7,500
112,500
(18,100)
18,100
$
0
$ (15,700)
100,000
5,000
7,500
112,500
(128,200)
128,200
$
0
12-10
90,000
Cash ...........................................................................90,000
Ash, Capital .........................................................
90,000
2)
Nov. 1
Cash ..........................................................................
125,000
Ash, Capital ........................................................
Elm, Capital .........................................................
Oak, Capital ........................................................
95,250
23,800
5,950
3)
Nov. 1
Cash ..........................................................................60,000
Elm, Capital ...............................................................20,400
Oak, Capital .............................................................. 5,100
Ash, Capital ........................................................
To record admission of Ash.
Supporting computations
$510,000 + $60,000 = $570,000
$570,000 x 15% = $85,500
$60,000 - $85,500 = $(25,500)
$(25,500) x 80% = $(20,400)
$(25,500) x 20% = $(5,100)
12-11
85,500
2.
Jan. 31
3.
Jan. 31
12-12
$116,000
(64,000)
$ 52,000
* Alternative computation
1) $24,000 = $88,000 - Cash from assets sale
(This implies cash from assets sale is $64,000)
2) Loss on sale of assets = Book value of assets - Cash received
= $116,000 - $64,000 = $52,000
b. Loss allocation
Capital balances before
loss liquidation
Allocation of loss
$52,000 x 1/10 .......................
$52,000 x 4/10 .......................
Tuttle
Ritter
Lee
Total
$ 1,200
$11,700
$ 15,100
$ 28,000
(26,000)
$(10,900)
(52,000)
$(24,000)
(5,200)
(20,800)
_______
$ (9,100)
c. Liability to be paid
Each partner should pay the amount of the debit (deficit) balance in his
or her own capital account.
12-13
$116,000
(64,000)
$ 52,000
Ritter
$ 11,700
Lee
$ 15,100
Total
$ 28,000
(20,800)
_______
(9,100)
(26,000)
(10,900)
(52,000)
(24,000)
10,900
$
0
_______
$(24,000)
c. Liability to be paid
As a limited partner, Lee has no personal liability for the $24,000 liability.
Therefore, Tuttle and Ritter must share the loss reflected in Lee's capital
account deficit.
= 40.5%
Soccer LP:
Partner return on equity:
= 11.1%
Football LP:
Partner return on equity:
= 46.6%
12-14
PROBLEM SET A
Problem 12-1A (50 minutes)
1.
Dec. 31 Income Summary .....................................................124,500
Kim Ries, Capital ...............................................
Tere Bax, Capital ...............................................
Josh Thomas, Capital .......................................
41,500
41,500
41,500
2.
Dec. 31
31,125
43,575
49,800
3.
Dec. 31
39,500
36,100
48,900
12-15
Bax
Thomas
Total
$124,500
$28,000
$40,000
101,000
23,500
5,600
6,400
16,000
7,500
2,500
2,500
______
$36,100
______
$48,900
7,500
0
Plan (b)
Salary allowance
Farney = 12 x $3,000 = $36,000
Plan (d)
Interest allowances
Baker = 10% x $21,000 = $ 2,100
Farney = 10% x $31,500 = $ 3,150
Income (Loss)
Sharing Plan
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Year 1
Calculations
Baker
Farney
$(10,800)
$(12,000)
$ 36,000
(32,400)
$ 3,600
$ 36,000
3,150
(29,625)
$ 9,525
12-16
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Calculations
Baker
Farney
$27,000
$30,000
$36,000
$36,000
3,150
Income (Loss)
Sharing Plan
(a)
Year 2
5,400
$41,400
1,875
$41,025
Year 3
Calculations
Baker
Farney
$45,000
$50,000
$36,000
$36,000
3,150
12-17
23,400
$59,400
16,875
$56,025
Calculations
Will
Ron
Barb
Total
(a)
$225,000/3 .............................................................................
$75,000
$75,000
$75,000
$225,000
(b)
90,000
$90,000
$225,000
(c)
Net income............................................................................
Salary allowances ................................................................
$40,000
$30,000
Balance of income ...............................................................
Interest allowances
10% x $183,750 ..................................................................
18,375
10% x $131,250 ..................................................................
13,125
10% x $210,000 ..................................................................
Total interest.........................................................................
Bal. of income ......................................................................
Balance allocated ....................................................
19,167 equally
19,167
Balance of income ...............................................................
Shares of partners .................................................
$77,542 partners
$62,292
*
12-18
$45,000
$225,000
(115,000)
$110,000
21,000
19,167
$85,167
(52,500)
$57,500
(57,500)*
$
0
Total
$
Plus
Investments by owners ............
183,750
131,250
210,000
Net income
Salary allowances .....................
40,000
30,000
45,000
Interest allowances...................
18,375
13,125
21,000
(21,000)
(21,000)
(21,000)
37,375
22,125
45,000
104,500
Total ....................................................
221,125
153,375
255,000
629,500
(17,000)
(24,000)
(32,000)
(73,000)
$ 129,375
$ 223,000
$556,500
525,000
Part 3
Dec. 31
37,375
22,125
45,000
Dec. 31
12-19
17,000
24,000
32,000
69,000
b)
Feb. 1
69,000
c)
Feb. 1
69,000
d)
Feb. 1
e)
Feb. 1
12-20
11,475
19,125
35,000
15,000
b)
Feb. 1
Cash ..........................................................................
Goering, Capital ($19,500* x 3/10) ...........................
Zarcus, Capital ($19,500* x 2/10) ............................
Schmit, Capital ($19,500* x 5/10) ............................
Ford, Capital .......................................................
74,000
5,850
3,900
9,750
93,500
c)
Feb. 1
12-21
1.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Cash ..........................................................................
300,000
Inventory .............................................................
Gain on Sale of Inventory .................................
268,600
31,400
15,700
10,467
5,233
122,750
267,650
2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Cash ..........................................................................
250,000
Loss on Sale of Inventory .......................................18,600
Inventory .............................................................
268,600
18,600
122,750
217,650
12-22
(b)
268,600
108,600
Cash ..........................................................................
Quick, Capital ($46,500 - $54,300) ....................
(c)
(d)
7,800
7,800
122,750
135,450
4.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
268,600
143,600
25,300
122,750
92,650
12-23
PROBLEM SET B
Problem 12-1B (50 minutes)
1.
Dec. 31
45,000
45,000
45,000
2.
Dec. 31
67,500
40,500
27,000
3.
Dec. 31
59,400
44,120
31,480
12-24
Plan (b)
Salary allowance
Black = 12 x $2,000 = $24,000
Plan (d)
Interest allowances
Karto = 10% x $52,000 = $5,200
Black = 10% x $78,000 = $7,800
Income (Loss)
Sharing Plan
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Year 1
Calculations
Karto
Black
$(10,800)
$(13,500)
12-25
$ 24,000
(25,200)
$ (1,200)
$ 24,000
7,800
(27,500)
$ 4,300
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Calculations
Karto
Black
$22,800
$28,500
$24,000
$24,000
7,800
Income (Loss)
Sharing Plan
(a)
Year 2
8,400
$32,400
500
$32,300
Year 3
Calculations
Karto
Black
$56,400
$70,500
$24,000
$24,000
7,800
12-26
42,000
$66,000
28,500
$60,300
Calculations
Cook
Xi
Schwartz
Total
$40,000
$40,000
$120,000
$30,000
$30,000
$120,000
(a)
$120,000/3 ......................................................
$40,000
(b)
(c)
12-27
$15,000
$40,000
$120,000
(75,000)
$ 45,000
12,960
7,200
5,400
______
$33,360
5,400
_______
$52,600
(28,800)
$ 16,200
(16,200)
$
0
Total
$
108,000
60,000
15,000
40,000
12,960
7,200
(20,000)
(20,000)
8,640
7,960
27,200
43,800
Total...................................................... 80,640
115,960
87,200
283,800
Interest allowances.....................
8,640
(9,000)
(19,000)
$ 96,960
(12,000)
$ 75,200
240,000
(40,000)
$243,800
Part 3
Dec. 31
8,640
7,960
27,200
Dec. 31
12-28
9,000
19,000
12,000
b)
Apr. 30
c)
Apr. 30
d)
Apr. 30
e)
Apr. 30
12-29
b)
Apr. 30
c)
Apr. 30
12-30
1.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Cash ..........................................................................
325,000
Equipment ...........................................................
Gain on Sale of Equipment ................................
308,600
16,400
6,560
3,280
6,560
171,300
328,000
2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Cash ..........................................................................
265,000
Loss on Sale of Equipment .....................................43,600
Equipment ...........................................................
308,600
43,600
171,300
268,000
12-31
(c)
(d)
308,600
208,600
Cash ..........................................................................19,940
Soney, Capital ($63,500 - $83,440) ...................
19,940
171,300
122,940
4.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Cash ..........................................................................75,000
Loss on Sale of Equipment .....................................
233,600
Equipment ..........................................................
308,600
233,600
29,940
171,300
78,000
12-32
Serial Problem
SP 12
80,360
2b.
Jan. 1
20,090
3.
Jan. 1
20,090
4.
12-33
Reporting in Action
BTN 12-1
1. The history states that Mike Lazaridis and Douglas Fregin (friends since
grade school) founded Research In Motion (while both were college
students) in 1984. RIM was originally set up as an electronics
consulting business.
2. At least two differences would be immediately apparent between
Research In Motions corporate income statement and a partnership
income statement. First, in a general partnership, income flows
through to the partners to be reported on their individual tax returns.
Therefore, the income statement for a partnership would not show a
line item for income taxes as Research In Motions does in Appendix A.
Second, a corporate income statement shows earnings per share
figures, whereas a partnership income statement would not report
earnings per share given that no stock is outstanding in a partnership.
Other, less obvious, differences also exist.
3. Specifically, the balance sheet for a partnership would not have the
following accounts as reported in the Research In Motions balance
sheet reproduced in Appendix A:
Income taxes payable
Deferred income tax asset & Deferred income tax liability
Capital stockpreferred shares and common shares
Treasury stock
Retained earnings
Additional paid-in capital
We would also expect a separate Capital account to be reported for
each partner in the equity section of the balance sheet.
12-34
Comparative Analysis
BTN 12-2
12-35
Ethics Challenge
BTN 12-3
Orlando
Clark
Total
$ 3,000
$ 3,000
$ 9,000
4,100*
12,300**
24,600***
$15,300
$27,600
**(.30 x 41,000)
***(.60 x 41,000)
41,000
$50,000
Orlando
Clark
Total
$15,000
$30,000
$50,000
(.10 x 50,000)
(.30 x 50,000)
(.60 x 50,000)
3. The ethical concern here is that Clark has proposed a change to the
partnership agreement that appears to be only self-serving. It is true
that Clark is the groups largest producer and, therefore, is entitled to
the largest income. However, Clarks proposal does not recognize that a
good portion of Clarks income is due to the patient referrals by the
other partners. If patients are not referred for surgery, then Clarks
income will assuredly decline. The original agreement gives some
credit through the salary allowance to Maben and Orlando for the
referrals.
A potentially fair compromise would be to study the referral patterns of
Maben and Orlando. Through analysis, a dollar value can be assigned
to the average amount of production generated monthly for Clark
through the referrals from the other partners. Note that this controversy
is not likely to subside until facts are gathered to support the fairest
allocation of the partnership income.
12-36
Communicating in Practice
BTN 12-4
Limited Partnerships
Limited Liability Partnerships
S Corporations
Limited Liability Companies
I. Limited Partnerships
These organizations are identified in its name with the words "Limited
Partnership," or "Ltd.," or "L.P."
A limited partnership has two classes of partners, general and limited. At
least one partner must be a general partner who assumes management
duties and unlimited liability for the debts of the partnership. The limited
partners have no personal liability beyond the amounts they invest in the
partnership.
A limited partnership is managed by the general partner(s). Limited
partners have no active role except as specified in the partnership
agreement.
A limited partnership agreement often specifies unique procedures for
allocating incomes and losses between general and limited partners.
The same basic accounting procedures are used for both limited and
general partnerships.
12-37
Continued
III. S Corporations
Certain corporations with 100 or fewer stockholders can elect to be
treated like a partnership for income tax purposes. These corporations are
called Sub-Chapter S or simply "S" corporations. This distinguishes them
from other corporations, called Sub-Chapter C or simply "C" corporations.
"S" corporations provide stockholders with the same limited liability
feature as "C" corporations.
The advantage to an "S" corporation is it
doesn't pay income taxes. If stockholders work for an "S" corporation,
their salaries are treated as expenses of the corporation.
The remaining income or loss of the corporation is allocated to
stockholders for inclusion on their personal tax returns. Except for "C"
corporations having to account for income tax expenses and liabilities,
the accounting procedures are the same for both "S" and "C"
corporations.
IV. Limited Liability Companies
A new form of business organization is the limited liability company. The
names of these businesses usually include the words "Limited Liability
Company" or an abbreviation such as "LLC" or "LC."
This form of business has certain features like a corporation and others
like a limited partnership. The owners, who are called members, are
protected with the same limited liability feature in corporations. While
limited partners cannot actively participate in the management of a limited
partnership, the members of a limited liability company can assume an
active management role.
A limited liability company usually has a limited life.
For income tax purposes, the IRS usually classifies a limited liability
company as a partnership.
12-38
BTN 12-5
1. The account titles given in the equity section of America First Tax
Exempt Investors, L.P are:
General Partner
Beneficial Unit Certificate Holders
Unallocated deficit of variable interest entities
12-39
Teamwork in Action
BTN 12-6
1.
Income (Loss)
Sharing Plan
Calculations
Baker
Warner
Rice
Total
(a)
$600,000/3 ........................................................
$200,000 $200,000
$200,000
$ 600,000
(b)
$300,000
$300,000
$ 600,000
(c)
(d)
$ 70,000
140,000
$ 600,000
(180,000)
420,000
(420,000)
$
0
$210,000
$ 600,000
$ 30,000
$ 50,000
166,667
_______
$196,667
166,667
_______
$216,667
(100,000)
500,000
(500,000)
$
0
3. Answers will vary by team. One additional income sharing basis would
be to share income based on time worked in the partnership.
12-40
Entrepreneurial Decision
BTN 12-7
12-41
Global Decision
BTN 12-8
1. The company is over 145 years old and was formed as Nokia
Corporation in 1967 with the merger of three Finnish companies.
2. Nokia Corporation was organized under the laws of the Republic of
Finland in 1967 with the merger of Nokia AB, Finnish Rubber Works Ltd,
and Finnish Cable Works Ltd.
3. The companies that are a part of Nokia are:
Nokia Inc
Nokia GmbH
Nokia UK Limited
Nokia TMC Limited
Nokia Telecommunications Ltd
Nokia Finance International B.V.
Nokia Komarom Kft
Nokia India Pvt Ltd
Nokia Italia S.p.A.
Nokia Spain S.A.U.
Nokia Romania SRL
Nokia do Brasil Tecnologia Ltda
000 Nokia
NAVTEQ Corporation
Nokia Siemens Networks B.V.
Nokia Siemens Networks Oy
Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co KG
Nokia Siemens Networks Pvt. Ltd
12-42