Reflection Moire
Reflection Moire
19
x w 2 x
x
Ga r
grating
lo yC ud 20 06
Q'
resulting small errors are eliminated in other ways. The master grating has a hole at its center, and a camera is set up behind the hole, aimed at the plate, and focused on the virtual image of the grating as it is reected in the polished plate. If the camera aperture is small enough so that the depth of focus is large, then the plate itself will also be imaged by the camera lens and appear to have the grating image superimposed on it. A rst exposure is taken with the specimen in its initial state, which here is taken for convenience to be the at unloaded position as shown in the sketch. The grating element at point Q is reected to the camera from point P on the plate, and this grating element appears at the image of point P on the photograph. Angle a describes both the viewing angle and the reection angle for point P in this case of the initially at plate. The plate is then deformed so that it becomes a curved mirror. Point P on the plate has moved to point P9, which, to a reasonable approximation for small deections, is imaged to the same location on the lm as point P. Because of the slope change at P9, grating element Q9 is now superimposed on this same image point in the second exposure. The effect in the image is that the pattern in the doublereected grating has shifted, thereby producing a moire exposure image. pattern at the camRather than analyze the grating shift and the resulting moire era image plane, it is instructive and convenient to calculate the grating shift from Q to Q9 as it appears at the specimen. If ux is the change of slope (]w/]x) at point P as it moves to P9, then the law of reection indicates that the line PQ in the sketch rotates through angle 2ux as it moves to position P9Q9. The apparent relative shift d of the grating between exposures is found to be approximately: d 5 dtana 1 2ux 2 tan a 23:1
The basic experimental setup requires: x a specimen such as a plate with a reective surface xed in a loading frame, x an illuminated at or curved coarse master grating xed at some distance from the plate, x an imaging device set up behind a hole in the grating to record the reected grating.
Procedure: x photograph the reected grating for the initial state of the specimen, x load the specimen, x photograph the reected grating for the nal state of the specimen, x superimpose the photographs or use double exposure.
If p is the pitch of the grating, then the relations used before in our study of moire fringe fringes indicate that there will be produced at the point in question a moire of order N, where N 5 d/p. For the case shown in the sketch, the grating will have shifted in the reected image of point P by three grating lines, so the fringe order at P will be three. The distance d from camera to specimen is ordinarily large compared with plate dimensions. Assume also that the slope of the plate is nowhere very large. In that case, the usual paraxial approximation pertains, and the equation relating slope and fringe order is found by combining results given above, with the result:
As the slope at a point on the plate specimen changes, different portions of the master grating are reected from that point. The reected grating seems to distort and sweep across the image of the specimen as it deforms.
20
ux 5
23:2
Attach no importance to the assumption that the initial state of the plate was at. If it is not at, then the change in slope from initial state to nal state is obtained. Notice that effects of the out-of-plane or in-plane deections from P to P on the apparent relative shift of the grating in the double-exposure photograph are ignored in this analysis. Also, the initial slope and the change of slope are assumed small. While such approximations are appropriate for typical beams or plates subjected to relatively small bending displacements (w ,, d), they may lead to errors for membranes or shells where the displacements or the slopes are large. In that case, more sophisticated analysis is required. The situation is somewhat ana (see Part 22 of this series) in that one logous to that discovered for projection moire is comparing the initial slope of one point with the nal slope of a different point if the point P deviates much from the line OP as the specimen deforms.
If the viewing distance is large relative to plate size, then the slope of the plate fringe order at any point is the moire times the grating pitch divided by twice the viewing distance.
PRACTICAL ISSUES
The error caused by use of the simplied Eq. 23.2 can be ascertained for a given arrangement by the use of the more exact Eq. 23.1 for various points off axis in the eld of view. Practically, one makes d large and uses a lens of long focal length in the camera to enforce paraxiality. Otherwise, a good bit of the error in the paraxial approximation can be eliminated using a grating that is curved to a cylindrical shape. The gratings are just ruled on posterboard, and they are easily mounted on curved rails sawn from plywood. Ligtenberg showed that the optimum radius of curvature of the master grating is about 3.5d. If the slopes are large, then the more exact equation must be used even if the setup is paraxial. For complete analysis of the plate or other object, except where symmetry pertains, the slope in the y-direction uy must also be measured. Independent observation of uy requires that either the specimen or the grating be rotated 908 about the optical z-axis of the system and that a second double-exposure photograph be made. A striking feature of this method is that it provides excellent sensitivity with coarse gratings and with no phase shifting. The grating pitch required for a given arrangement and a specied sensitivity is easily determined from the equations given above. For example, if d is 2 m, and if one fringe is to represent 1023 radian, then the pitch is 4 mm. Such a reference grating can be fabricated by ruling the lines with a pen onto a sheet of posterboard or by using computer graphics and a printer. Good sensitivity can be obtained with rather coarse gratings, and the grating can be simply ruled on posterboard or created with a computer printer.
ENHANCEMENTS
photos tends to be The fringe contrast in all types of double-exposure moire marginal. Nonlinear high-contrast processing is helpful. Fringe visibility can be greatly enhanced using optical spatial ltering as described in Part 15 of this series. The fact that the gratings used are relatively coarse implies that digital imaging patterns can be used to and computer processing of the images to create the moire great advantage. In fact, why print a grating at all? Researchers have used grating images as displayed on a monitor screen as the master grating, an approach that provides excellent control over grating pitch and orientation. Phase shifting by lateral displacement of the master grating can then easily be accomplished with resulting improvement of sensitivity. Of course, the reection technique can be applied to vibrating objects through the use of strobe lighting and/or averaging techniques. The potential for studying whole-eld vibrations of components such as auto body parts by this simple method seems endless. Improvements include: x use of a curved grating, x rotating the specimen or the grating to obtain slopes in both directions, x using a grating image on a computer monitor as the master, x use of digital imaging and computer superposition of the grating photos, x implementing an alternative setup that gives the slope map with only one exposure, x using strobe lighting or averaging techniques to study dynamic problems.
21
that yields An improved but more complex optical system for reection moire a slope change pattern with a single exposure in real time was described by V. Parks in 1987. It is thought provoking that the setup is reminiscent of that used for Michelson interferometry even though optical interference is not involved. A. Asundi, among others, has invented many improvements to both the hardware and the data processing for static and dynamic cases.
WHAT IS NEXT?
It is likely that the next article in this series will begin a discussion of laser speckle phenomena, as was promised earlier. n
22