How to Do Capacity Planning

It is very common for an IT organization to manage system performance in a reactionary fashion, analyzing and correcting performance problems as users report them. When problems occur, hopefully system administrators have tools necessary to quickly analyze and remedy the situation. In a perfect world, administrators prepare in advance in order to avoid performance bottlenecks altogether, using capacity planning tools to predict in advance how servers should be configured to adequately handle future workloads. The goal of capacity planning is to provide satisfactory service levels to users in a costeffective manner. This paper describes the fundamental steps for performing capacity planning. Real life examples are provided using TeamQuest Performance Software.

About the Author Enterprise Performance Specialist Joe Rich has been active with performance analysis and capacity planning for many years. He is involved with technical support and field activities for open system performance and has been active in high performance computing and midrange Open Systems platforms. About the Author Jon Hill has been working with TeamQuest since its inception in 1991. He currently participates on the product management and marketing teams at TeamQuest, helping to keep the company in touch with industry, market, and competitive trends.

2 of 13

How to Do Capacity Planning

White Paper

Three Steps for Capacity Planning

In this paper we will illustrate three basic steps for capacity planning: 1. Determine Service Level Requirements The first step in the capacity planning process is to categorize the work done by systems and to quantify users expectations for how that work gets done. 2. Analyze Current Capacity Next, the current capacity of the system must be analyzed to determine how it is meeting the needs of the users. 3. Planning for the future Finally, using forecasts of future business activity, future system requirements are determined. Implementing the required changes in system configuration will ensure that sufficient capacity will be available to maintain service levels, even as circumstances change in the future.

Determine Service Level Requirements

We have organized this section as follows: a. The overall process of establishing service level requirements first demands an understanding of workloads. We will explain how you can view system performance in business terms rather than technical ones, using workloads. b. Next, we begin an example, showing workloads on a system running a back-end Oracle database. c. Before setting service levels, you need to determine what unit you will use to measure the incoming work. d. Finally, you establish service level requirements, the promised level that will be provided by the IT organization.

Workloads Explained
From a capacity planning perspective, a computer system processes workloads (which supply the demand) and delivers service to users. During the first step in the capacity planning process, these workloads must be defined and a definition of satisfactory service must be created. A workload is a logical classification of work performed on a computer system. If you consider all the work performed on your systems as pie, a workload can be thought of as some piece of that pie. Workloads can be classified by a wide variety of criteria.
For more information on Capacity Planning, visit
Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Figure 1 Workloads and Service

teamquest.com/capacityplanning

3 of 13

How to Do Capacity Planning who what how is doing the work (particular user or department) type of work is being done (order entry, financial reporting)

White Paper

the work is being done (online inquiries, batch database backups)

It is useful to analyze the work done on systems in terms that make sense from a business perspective, using business-relevant workload definitions. For example, if you analyze performance based on workloads corresponding to business departments, then you can establish service level requirements for each of those departments. Business-relevant workloads are also useful when it comes time to plan for the future. It is much easier to project future work when it is expressed in terms that make business sense. For example, it accounts payable department on a consolidated server than it is to predict the overall increase in transactions for that server. Figure 2 Workloads by Department

An Example Using Workloads TeamQuest Analyzer chart, left, shows 24 hours of CPU utilization on an IBM F50 PowerPC system. The chart is useful, but it provides a birds eye view of performance, at best.

Figure 3 CPU Utilization

For more information on Capacity Planning, visit

Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

teamquest.com/capacityplanning

4 of 13

How to Do Capacity Planning

White Paper In Figure 4, left, the Process Table chart reveals that during the same 24 hour period, 10,642 individual processes ran on this system. All of the utilization information for all of those processes was displayed together in our CPU utilization chart. Wouldnt it be nice if we could show a similar chart, but displayed utilization based on the major functions being formed on this system? Using TeamQuest Performance Software, we can do just that, by going through a process called workload characterization.

Figure 4 Process Table

We will leave the detailed instructions for performing workload characterization to another paper, or you can refer to the TeamQuest Performance Software documentation. In a nutshell, workload characterization requires you to tell TeamQuest Performance Software how to determine what resource utilization goes with which workload. This is done on a per process level, using selection criteria to tell TeamQuest Performance Software how to determine which processes belong to which workloads. Figure 5, left, shows a list of workloads that have been characterized so that the work of each the 10,642 processes is attributed to one of seven workloads. These workloads are defined according to the type of work being done on the system.

If you look carefully you will see six explicitly defined workloads in Figure 5, but we said there were seven. The reason is that there is always an OTHER workload in addition to the explicitly defined workloads. Any resource utilization that does not match the characterization for any of the explicitly defined workloads becomes associated with OTHER. This ensures that no performance Figure 5 Workload Definitions data falls through the cracks simply because it didnt match any of the defined workloads.

For more information on Capacity Planning, visit

Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

teamquest.com/capacityplanning

5 of 13

How to Do Capacity Planning

White Paper In Figure 6, left, pink bars show utilization that did not match the characterization criteria for any of our defined workloads. There is little or no pink in the chart, demonstrating that we have done a good job of explicitly characterizing most of the work done on this server. All we did was define workloads based on the type of work being performed on this server, but notice how much more useful the information is that is provided in our new chart. Workloads can be very powerful.

Figure 6 CPU Utilization by Workload

Determine the Unit of Work

For capacity planning purposes it is useful to associate a unit of work with a workload. This is a measurable quantity of work done, as opposed to the amount of system resources required to accomplish that work. To understand the difference, consider measuring the work done at a fast food restaurant. When deciding on the unit of work, you might consider counting the number of customers served, the weight of the food served, the number of sandwiches served, or the money taken in for the food served. This is as opposed to the resources used to accomplish the work, i.e. the amount of French fries, raw hamburgers or pickle slices used to produce the food served to customers. When talking about IT performance, instead of French fries, raw hamburger or pickle slices, we accomplish work using resources such as disk, I/O channels, CPUs and network connections. Measuring the utilization of these resources is important for capacity planning, but not relevant for determining the amount of work done or the unit of work. Instead, for an online workload, the unit of work may be a transaction. For an interactive or batch workload, the unit of work may be a process. The examples given in this paper use a server running an appointment scheduling application process, so it seems logical to use a calendar request as the unit of work. A calendar request results in an instance of an appointment process being executed.

Establish Service Levels

The next step now is to establish a service level agreement. A service level agreement is an agreement between the service provider and service consumer that defines acceptable service.

For more information on Capacity Planning, visit

Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

teamquest.com/capacityplanning

6 of 13

How to Do Capacity Planning

White Paper

The service level agreement is often defined from the users perspective, typically in terms of response time or throughput. Using workloads often aids in the process of developing service level agreements, because workloads can be used to measure system performance in ways that makes sense to clients/users. In the case of our appointment scheduling application, we might establish service level requirements regarding the number of requests that should be processed within a given period of time, or we might require that each request be processed within a certain time limit. These possibilities are analogous to a fast food restaurant requiring that a certain number of customers should be serviced per hour during the lunch rush, or that each customer should have to wait no longer than three minutes to have his or her order filled. Ideally, service level requirements are ultimately determined by business requirements. Frequently, however, they are based on past experience. Its better to set service level requirements to ensure that you will accomplish your business objectives, but not surprisingly people frequently resort to setting service level requirements like, provide a response time at least as good as is currently experienced, even after we ramp up our business. As long as you know how much the business will ramp up, this sort of service level requirement can work. If you want to base your service level requirements on present actual service levels, then you may want to analyze your current capacity before setting your service levels.

Analyze Current Capacity

There are several steps that should be performed during the analysis of capacity measurement data. a. First, compare the measurements of any items referenced in service level agreements with their objectives. This provides the basic indication of whether the system has adequate capacity. b. Next, check the usage of the various resources of the system (CPU, memory, and I/O devices). This analysis identifies highly used resources that may prove problematic now or in the future. c. Look at the resource utilization for each workload. Ascertain which workloads are the major users of each resource. This helps narrow your attention to only the workloads that are making the greatest demands on system resources. d. Determine where each workload is spending its time by analyzing the components of response time, allowing you to determine which system resources are responsible for the greatest portion of the response time for each workload.

For more information on Capacity Planning, visit

Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

teamquest.com/capacityplanning

7 of 13

How to Do Capacity Planning

White Paper

Measure Service Levels and Compare to Objectives

TeamQuest Predictor includes a tool that can help us check measured service levels against objectives. For example, after building a model of our example system for a three-hour window, 7:00 AM10:00 AM, the display left (Figure 7) shows the response time and throughput of the seven workloads that were active during this time. By looking at the top line of the table, you can tell that the model has been successfully calibrated for our example system, because the total Measured AR% and Modeled AR% are equal. AR stands for Active Resource. An active resource is a resource that is made 100% available once it has been allocated to a waiting process. In this case, the active resource is CPU. Because no changes have been made in the system configuration, modeled response time and throughput for each workload should closely match reality. In our example, the response time means the amount of time required to process a unit of work, which in the case of our application, is an appointment request process. So this report provides us with an appointment request average response time for each of our workloads that we could compare with desired service levels.

Figure 7 Response Time and Throughput

Measure Overall Resource Usage

It is also important to take a look at each resource within your systems to see if any of them are saturated. If you find a resource that is running at 100% utilization, then any workloads using that resource are likely to have poor response time. If your goal is throughput rather than response time, utilization is still very important. If you have two disk controllers, for example, and one is 50% utilized and the other is swamped, then you have an opportunity to improve throughput by spreading the work more evenly between the controllers. The table on the left (Figure 8) shows the various resources comprising our example server. The table shows the overall utilization for each resource. Utilization for the four CPUs are shown together treated as one resource, otherwise each resource is shown separately. Notice that CPU utilization is about 64% over this period of time (7:00 AM - 10:00 AM on January 02). This corresponds with the burst of CPU utilization that was shown earlier in Figures 3 and 6. No resource in the report seems to be saturated at this point, though hdisk2 is getting a lot more of the I/O than either hdisk0 or hdisk1. This might be worthy of attention; future increases in workloads might make evening out the disparity in disk usage worthwhile.
For more information on Capacity Planning, visit
Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Figure 8 Overall Resource Usage

teamquest.com/capacityplanning

8 of 13

How to Do Capacity Planning

White Paper

Measure Resource Usage by Workload

Figure 9, shows the same period again, only now resource utilization is displayed for the APPOINTMENTS workload. Note that this particular workload is using 59% of the CPU resource, nearly all of the 64% utilization that the previous table showed as the total utilization by all workloads. Clearly, the APPOINTMENTS workload is where a capacity planner would want to focus his or her attention, unless it is known that future business needs will increase the amount of work to be done by other workloads on this system. In our example, that is not the case. Ramp-ups in work are expected mainly for the APPOINTMENTS workload. Figure 9 Resource Utilization by Workload The previous charts and tables shave been useful for determining that CPU Utilization is likely to be a determining factor if the amount of work that our system is expected to perform increases in the future. Furthermore, we were able to tell that the APPOINTMENTS workload is the primary user of the CPU resources on this system. This same sort of analysis can work no matter how you choose to set up your workloads. In our example, we chose to treat appointment processes as a workload. Your needs may cause you to set up your workloads to correspond to different business activities, such as a Wholesale Lumber unit vs. Real Estate Development, thus allowing you to analyze performance based on the different requirements of your various business units.

Identify Components of Response Time

Next we will show how to determine what system resources are responsible for the amount of time that is required to process a unit of work. The resources that are responsible for the greatest share of the response time are indicators for where you should concentrate your efforts to optimize performance. Using TeamQuest Predictor we can determine the components of response time on a workload by workload basis, and you can predict what the components will be after a ramp-up in business or a change in system configuration. A components of response time analysis shows the average resource or component usage time for a unit of work. It shows the contribution of each component to the total time required to complete a unit of work.

For more information on Capacity Planning, visit

Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

teamquest.com/capacityplanning

9 of 13

How to Do Capacity Planning

White Paper Figure 10, left, shows the components of response time for the APPOINTMENTS workload. Note that CPU service time comprises the vast majority of the time required to process an appointment. Queuing delay, time spent waiting for a CPU, is responsible for the rest. I/O resources made only a negligible contribution to the total amount of time needed to process each user call.

Figure 10 APPOINTMENTS Components of Response Time The ASMAIN workload, shown in Figure 11, is more balanced. There is no single resource that is the obvious winner in the contest for the capacity planners attention (however, make note of the queue delay for hdisk2.)

Figure 11 ASMAIN Components of Response Time

Plan for the Future

How do you make sure that a year from now your systems wont be overwhelmed and your IT budget over extended? Your best weapon is a capacity plan based on forecasted processing requirements. You need to know the expected amount of incoming work, by workload. Then you can calculate the optimal system configuration for satisfying service levels.

For more information on Capacity Planning, visit

Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

teamquest.com/capacityplanning

10 of 13 How to Do Capacity Planning Follow these steps:

White Paper

a. First, you need to forecast what your organization will require of your IT systems in the future. b. Once you know what to expect in terms of incoming work, you can use TeamQuest Predictor to determine the optimal system configuration for meeting service levels on into the future.

Determine Future Processing Requirements

Systems may be satisfying service levels now, but will they be able to do that while at the same time meeting future organizational needs? Besides service level requirements, the other key input into the capacity planning process is a forecast or plan for the organizations future. Capacity planning is really just a process for determining the optimal way to satisfy business requirements such as forecasted increases in the amount of work to be done, while at the same time meeting service level requirements. Future processing requirements can come from a variety of sources. Input from management may include: Expected growth in the business Requirements for implementing new applications Planned acquisitions or divestitures IT budget limitations Requests for consolidation of IT resources

Additionally, future processing requirements may be identified from trends in historical measurements of incoming work such as orders or transactions.

Plan Future System Configuration

After system capacity requirements for the future are identified, a capacity plan should be developed to prepare for it. The first step in doing this is to create a model of the current configuration. From this starting point, the model can be modified to reflect the future capacity requirements. If the results of the model indicate that the current configuration does not provide sufficient capacity for the future requirements, then the model can be used to evaluate configuration alternatives to find the optimal way to provide sufficient capacity. Our base model in Figure 12 was representative of 300 users generating appointment/calendar requests on our system. From there we have added steps in increments of 30 users until the incoming work has increased by one-half again as much. This ramp-up in work has been added only for the APPOINTMENTS workload, because no such increase was indicated for other workloads when we did our analysis of future processing requirements in the previous section.

Figure 12 Setting Up TeamQuest Predictor

For more information on Capacity Planning, visit

Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

teamquest.com/capacityplanning

11 of 13 How to Do Capacity Planning

White Paper TeamQuest Predictor will predict performance of the current system configuration for each of the steps we have set up. Figure 13 is a chart generated using TeamQuest Predictor showing the predicted response time for each workload. As we can see, the response time starts to elongate after 390 users.

Figure 13 Predicted Response Time

Figure 14 is a chart showing predicted response time using a stack bar chart that also shows the components of response time. Notice the substantial increase in CPU wait time after the number of users reaches 360. It seems that the performance bottleneck is CPU resource.

Figure 14 Predicted Response Time

For more information on Capacity Planning, visit

Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

teamquest.com/capacityplanning

12 of 13 How to Do Capacity Planning

White Paper Figure 15 shows the same stack bar chart, but this time TeamQuest Predictor was told to predict performance if the system involved was changed to a p670 1100Mhz 4-CPU system. Clearly, the newer, faster architecture not only allows us substantial growth, but reduces our overall response time to a more realistic level and still allows us the headroom to experience additional growth if needed.

Figure 15 Predicted Response Time After Upgrade

Capacity Planning Process

In summary, we have shown these basic steps toward developing a capacity plan: 1. Determine service level requirements a. Define workloads b. Determine the unit of work c. Identify service levels for each workload 2. Analyze current system capacity a. Measure service levels and compare to objectives b. Measure overall resource usage c. Measure resource usage by workload d. Identify components of response time 3. Plan for the future a. Determine future processing requirements b. Plan future system configuration By following these steps, you can help to ensure that your organization will be prepared for the future, ensuring that service level requirements will be met using an optimal configuration. You will have the information necessary to purchase only what you need, avoiding over-provisioning while at the same time assuring adequate service.

For more information on Capacity Planning, visit

Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

teamquest.com/capacityplanning

TeamQuest Corporation
www.teamquest.com
Americas
One TeamQuest Way Clear Lake, IA 50428 USA +1 641.357.2700 +1 800.551.8326 [email protected] Follow the TeamQuest Community at:

Europe, Middle East and Africa

Box 1125 405 23 Gothenburg Sweden +46 (0)31 80 95 00 United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 481 424 Germany +49 (0)69 6 77 33 466 France +33 (1)40 90 30 93 [email protected]

Asia Pacific
35/F Central Plaza 18 Harbour Road Wanchai +852 2824 8510 [email protected] Copyright 2010, 2013 TeamQuest Corporation All Rights Reserved
TeamQuest and the TeamQuest logo are registered trademarks in the US, EU, and elsewhere. All other trademarks and service marks are the property of their respective owners. No use of a third-party mark is to be construed to mean such marks owner endorses TeamQuest products or services. The names, places and/or events used in this publication are purely fictitious and are not intended to correspond to any real individual, group, company or event. Any similarity or likeness to any real individual, company or event is purely coincidental and unintentional. NO WARRANTIES OF ANY NATURE ARE EXTENDED BY THE DOCUMENT. Any product and related material disclosed herein are only furnished pursuant and subject to the terms and conditions of a license agreement. The only warranties made, remedies given, and liability accepted by TeamQuest, if any, with respect to the products described in this document are set forth in such license agreement. TeamQuest cannot accept any financial or other responsibility that may be the result of your use of the information in this document or software material, including direct, indirect, special, or consequential damages. You should be very careful to ensure that the use of this information and/or software material complies with the laws, rules, and regulations of the jurisdictions with respect to which it is used. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Revisions may be issued to advise of such changes and/or additions. U.S. Government Rights. All documents, product and related material provided to the U.S. Government are provided and delivered subject to the commercial license rights and restrictions described in the governing license agreement. All rights not expressly granted therein are reserved.