P&G Case: Improving Customer Value Through Process Redesign
P&G Case: Improving Customer Value Through Process Redesign
taken by P&G in relation to distribution channel? Could a mid-sized manufacturer have used this approach?
Key Decisions
CRP Implementatio n
Transmit data daily from retailer to P&G on warehouse product shipments to each store with the help of EDI (Electronic data exchange) Quantity shipped based on shipment information rather than retailer orders Quantities were computed with the objective to provide sufficient safety stock, minimize total logistic cost & eliminating excess inventory at retailers. JIT basis shipment of products on the basis of retailers actual sales data . Improve consistency and overall service levels by integrating many separate systems that did not work well together across functions and product sectors. Automated existing processes & provide flexibility to meet needs of different sectors & functions Common database for product pricing and product specifications with the vision of Simplify, Standardize , then Mechanize Change from high-low pricing to Value Pricing. Encouraging CRP adoption by providing benefits to retailers. Reduced the number of pricing changes at P&G from 55 per day to 1 per day in around 2 years of time Timely, accurate , paperless information flow between Supplier, Distributor, retailer and consumer Change from brand to category management helped in standardizing product lines.
OSB Changes
Pricing Restructure
ECR System
High ($459 in 1987 and $1746 in 1993 spent for cost of restructuring)
Low
Conclusion: The capabilities of mid-sized companies as compares to P&G dont seem adequate to implement this approach.
KPI 4%
10%
KPI
Channel Partners
Areas of Improvement Increased availability of P&G products due to reduced stock outs. Customers Reduced fluctuations in prices ; reduced dissonance
KPI
Areas of Improvement
Improvement in order quality, shipset quality and reduction in order entry errors, reduction in order cycle time Reduction in price and promotion changes per day Channel Partners Constant procurement costs for retailers, elimination of forward buying by retailers
KPI
Order Quality: 35% Change 55 : 1 p.d
Areas of Improvement Increase in brand loyalty as promotions reduced, reduced customer dissonance
KPI
Customers
Channel Relationship
Retailer determined order quantities & timing, Inefficient operations (LTL shipments, stock outs) Forward buying behaviour by retailers (buying for profit) led to artificial demand creation
Pricing Strategy
Multitude of promotional programs by P&G Large variable promotional discounts & allowances led to forward buying by retailers Excess capacity build up for meeting uncertain demand variations Inefficient use of capacity Organization structure based on brand management approach Brand managers had complete product responsibility
Product Strategy Focus on individual brands High product variations or large no. of SKUs Conflict between same branded products for resources
Industrywide Standardisation
Ensuring reliability, uptime, recovery & high-availability of CRM-related data and systems deployed globally to guarantee business continuity at all times Simplified CRM application and data architecture to allow integration of new global operations, customers and network alliances in the future
Metrics
Carefully define & track metrics for value additions through CRM engagements
Thank You.
Questions?