0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

Re (Z) Re (Z)

1. The document proves that if a series of complex numbers converges for some z=z0, then it converges uniformly on compact subsets of the region where Re(z) >= Re(z0). 2. It then shows that the series Σan*nz converges for all z where Re(z)>0 by using an alternating series test and the above result. 3. Finally, it proves that the series defines a holomorphic function on the region Re(z)>0.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

Re (Z) Re (Z)

1. The document proves that if a series of complex numbers converges for some z=z0, then it converges uniformly on compact subsets of the region where Re(z) >= Re(z0). 2. It then shows that the series Σan*nz converges for all z where Re(z)>0 by using an alternating series test and the above result. 3. Finally, it proves that the series defines a holomorphic function on the region Re(z)>0.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

1 ____ _ 4M mRe(z) Re(z0) ! 0;m !

1 Hence, the partial sums of PN


n=1 an nz z0 are Cauchy and therefore converge by completeness. Corollary 3. If P1 n=1 an nz converges for some z = z0, then P1 n=1 an nz conveges uniformly on compact subsets of fRe(z) _ Re(z0)g. Proof. Let K _ fRe(z) _ Re(z0)g be compact. Since z 7! Re(z) is continuous, there exists z1 2 K such that Re(z) _ Re(z1) 8z 2 K. Since Re(z1) _ Re(z0), P1 n=1 an nz1 converges. The proof of the preceding lemma shows that we have a uniform bound _____ XN n=m

an nz _____ _ 4M mRe(z) Re(z0) _ 4M mRe(z1) Re(z0) where M depends only on z0. The claim follows immediately from the M-test and completeness. Since the series f(z) = P1
n=1 an nz converges if we take z 2 R>0 (the well-known alternating series), we have by the lemma that P1 n=1 an nz converges 8Re(z) > 0. We now show that this series is holomorphic on the region fRe(z) > 0g. De_ne a sequence of functions (fN)N2N by fN = XN n=1

( 1)n+1 nz It is clear that fN is holomorphic, being the _nite sum of holomorphic functions. Set = fz 2 C : Re(z) > 0g and let K _ be compact. Since the fN are just the partial sums of the series, we have by the corollary to

the lemma that fN ! f uniformly on K. By Weierstrass's theorem, f is holomorphic in . To see that (1 21 z)_(z) = P1
n=1 an nz on fRe(z) > 1g, observe that (1 21 z) XN n=1

1 nz XN
n=1

( 1)n+1 nz = XN
n=1

1 nz 2 XN
n=1

1 (2n)z XN
n=1

( 1)n+1 nz = 2 X
N<n_2N n is even

1 nz Since

You might also like