Site Investigation: Eurocode 7 Investigation & in Situ Testing
Site Investigation: Eurocode 7 Investigation & in Situ Testing
1. Introduction: definition, success factors, objectives 2. SI Stages: codes of practice, standards & Eurocode 7 3. Investigative Methods: desk study, invasive investigation & in situ testing 4. Results: presentation & avoiding surprises
Identification of ground hazards Management of ground risk Providing value for money for the client Provision of relevant, reliable information
Assess the general suitability of the site and its environs Enable economic and safe design Plan best method of construction Design any remedial measures (site clean up) Explore sources of construction materials Establish sites for waste disposal Check existing structures Check for environmental changes arising from the works (wildlife surveys, piezometers) Continues during and even after construction
Proposed structure
Geology
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Planning and re-evaluation of the investigation programme Geology Field investigations including field tests and sampling to required standards Laboratory testing and investigations Geological model
DESIGN
Proposed structure
Geotechnical model
Test results Test results Ground investigation report Design: geotechnical structural Specifications Geotechnical design report Design report (final project)
Reporting
Program for inspection supervision & monitoring Call for bids based on a project
Basic Principle
Any site investigation has to be continued until the ground conditions are known and understood well enough for the civil engineering work to proceed safely Even doubling the cost of the SI will generally add <1% to the project cost After an inadequate SI unforeseen ground conditions can raise project costs by 10%+
Basic Principle
Any site investigation has to be continued until the ground conditions are known and understood well enough for the civil engineering work to proceed safely Even doubling the cost of the SI will generally add <1% to the project cost After an inadequate SI unforeseen ground conditions can raise project costs by 10%+
DESK STUDY
SITE INSPECTION
Phase 1
PRELIMINARY REPORT
SPECIFICATION OF FIELDWORK
COLLECT SAMPLE
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
LABORATORY TESTING
DESK STUDY
SITE INSPECTION
Phase 1
PRELIMINARY REPORT
Planning and reconnaissance stage of project Make an initial assessment of ground conditions; identify geotechnical problems TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FIELD WORK: MAPPING, (as required) TRENCHES AND PITS Project feasibility & site suitability
BOREHOLES AND IN Desk Study COLLECT SAMPLE SITU TESTING Historical records, literature, mapping (geological: solid & superficial, ordnance survey, hazard, UXO), imagery, remote sensing
SPECIFICATION OF FIELDWORK
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
LABORATORY TESTING
Site Walkover Survey Nature, basic soil & rock distribution, topography, access & obstructions, drainage, FACTUAL REPORT ON previous land uses i.e. workings, GROUND buildings INTERPRETATIVE INVESTIGATION REPORT (Revised terrain Check the outcome of the desk study: Ground Truth and ground models)
Site Inspection
Product of walk over survey: Surface features Deposits Water courses Topography
DESK STUDY
SITE INSPECTION
Phase 1
PRELIMINARY REPORT
SPECIFICATION OF FIELDWORK
COLLECT SAMPLE
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
LABORATORY TESTING
DESK STUDY
SITE INSPECTION
Phase 1
PRELIMINARY REPORT
SPECIFICATION OF FIELDWORK
COLLECT SAMPLE
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
LABORATORY TESTING
DESK STUDY
SITE INSPECTION
PRELIMINARY REPORT
SPECIFICATION OF FIELDWORK
Phase 2
COLLECT SAMPLE LABORATORY TESTING
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
DESK STUDY
SITE INSPECTION
PRELIMINARY REPORT
Ground Investigation
SPECIFICATION OF FIELDWORK
Phase 2
COLLECT SAMPLE LABORATORY TESTING
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
DESK STUDY
SITE INSPECTION
PRELIMINARY REPORT
SPECIFICATION OF FIELDWORK
Phase 2
COLLECT SAMPLE LABORATORY TESTING
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
Derrick
Disturbed Hammer Sampler Split barrel sampler Two parts; splits along length 63 kg weight repeatedly falls 76 cm on to top of sampler (similar Dando) Count number of blows to penetrate 30 cm Measure of resistance to penetration (Standard Penetration Test) Samples double bagged Dense sands and weak rocks
Sampling methods & sample types Rotary Coring preferred to Open Holing Rocks Rotary Coring
Intact rock samples preferred to cuttings Coring produces undisturbed samples Laboratory testing: strength, particle size analysis, moisture content Logging easier, Stratigraphic order Open holing: quicker, less skill, useful, accurate rock desc. less important Rotary Open Holing
Spacing: buildings 10-30m apart roads/railways 30-300m apart landslides at least 5 in a row extra holes at all structures Depends on site complexity To a depth that may be significantly affected by construction loading Depth: 1.5 x (foundation width) below the foundation depth plus at least one deeper hole to 10m below foundation level unless rockhead reached. Drill 3 m into rockhead to prove sound rock; in limestone probe 3-10m to locate rock cavities and integrate with geophysics
Drilling costs are an accumulation of: supplying rig to site; setting-up at each hole; cost per metre of hole drilled
supply set -up per m.
700
700 800
50
50 60
22
7 75
Offshore significantly higher: 250k, ~500pm Costs vary with number of in situ tests and instruments deployed.
DESK STUDY
SITE INSPECTION
PRELIMINARY REPORT
SPECIFICATION OF FIELDWORK
Phase 2
COLLECT SAMPLE LABORATORY TESTING
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
Electromagnetic
Surveying (EM)
Induced field interacts with subsurface and induces a second field Second field proportional to subsurface electrical conductivity Produces 1D line or map of subsurface electrical conductivity Sensitive to lithology and moisture content: high EC: clay, basalt, water; whereas sand and limestone have low EC.
Gravity Surveying
Measure variations in Earths gravity field caused by local differences in density of subsurface material 1D profiles of gravity variation or contour maps Identifying cavities or mineshafts
Magnetic Surveying
Measurement of variations in earths total magnetic field Caused by local differences in the magnetisation of subsurface rocks and soils Magnetometer and a magnetic survey to identify mine shafts Caveat; interference: use prohibited near power lines and metal fences Also used for unexploded ordnance (UXO) and archaeological investigations
Comparisons not easy as each method is best applied to only certain ground problems. Rough guide given by approximate coverage for a given fee - 2000 at 2008 prices
Type of survey Microgravity survey Magnetic survey Electromagnetic survey Ground penetrating radar Seismic refraction Seismic tomography Borehole Area 0.25 ha on 5 m grid 1.5 ha on 1 m line spacing 2.0 ha on 2 m line spacing 1.0 ha on 1 m grid 5 soundings by 20 m deep 2-D profile to 40 m depth (between available boreholes) 1 cored hole 20 m deep
The preliminary stage is when the engineering geomorphologist and geologist can have the most significant influence on the project by indicating potential hazards and their consequence on the economy of design, matters of construction and expected performance of the works
Summary
Eurocode 7 Building the conceptual ground model Stages of a Site Investigation: desk studies; reconnaissance mapping; main site work stage pitting, boring, geophysics; laboratory testing; reporting; on-going checks during construction Reading: Site investigation chapters