Linear Relationships in Heat Transfer: E. Marín
Linear Relationships in Heat Transfer: E. Marín
E. Marn
Centro de Investigacin en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnologa Avanzada Instituto Politcnico Nacional, Legaria 694, Col. Irrigacin, C.P. 11500, Mxico D.F., Mxico. Email: [email protected]; [email protected] (Received 17 February 2009; accepted 24 April 2009)
Abstract
The use of linear relationships that can appear in heat transfer phenomena is described using a simple physical experimental situation in which the temperature evolution with time in a sample heated with low intensity continuous light is measured. These questions should be included in the introductory physics curricula of science and engineering studies to teach aspects from different branches of physics (for example thermodynamics) and mathematics (ranging from functional analysis to differential equations). Keywords: Conduction heat transfer, Radiation, Convection.
Resumen
El uso de relaciones lineares que pueden aparecer en fenmenos de transferencia de calor es descrito utilizando una situacin experimental sencilla en la cual la evolucin de la temperatura con el tiempo es medida en una muestra calentada con luz de poca intensidad. Estas cuestiones podran ser incluidas en el curriculum de Fsica de carreras de Ciencias e Ingeniera para ensear aspectos de diferentes ramas de la Fsica (por ejemplo de Termodinmica) y de Matemtica (desde anlisis funcional hasta ecuaciones diferenciales). Palabras clave: Transferencia de calor conduccin, Radiacin, Conveccin. PACS: 44.25.+f, 47.20Bp, 44.10.+I; 66.30.Xj; 01.90.+g ISSN 1870-9095
There are several kinds of mathematical functional relationships in science between changing entities called variables, such as the exponential, the parabolic, the trigonometric, etc. One of the most common of them is the linear relationship, where an incremental change in one variable is matched by a proportional variation in the other. We can find several variables that depends linearly to one another, among others the velocity of a body and its displacement in which the former is constant, the applied voltage and the electrical resistance in a metal, the mass and the density of an object, the vapour pressure of a substance and its temperature, the gravitational and the electrostatic force between two charged objects and the inverse of the square of the distance between them, and so on. Linear equations can be written in the form of y=mx+b, in which x is the independent variable, y is the dependent variable, m is the slope, and b is the y-intercept. These equations appear to be straight lines in a xycoordinate graph. Often the use of the logarithmic function allows the linearization of mathematical equations: It is well known that the exponential and the potential functions get linear in a semi-log and in the log-log plot of the dependent versus the independent variable respectively, a fact that is very often used in data processing to obtain typical parameters characterizing these functions. In this way we find, for example, that the logarithm of the Molar
Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. Vol. 3, No. 2, May 2009 243
concentration versus time is a linear graph as well as the plot of the logarithm of the electrostatic force between two charged objects versus the logarithm of the distance between them. But not always it is possible to find a linear relationship between the variables involved in a given problem, what makes sometimes difficult its solution, which must be found often numerically. Although the existence of powerful computational methods allows one today with relative ease to hand non-linear equations, a better physical insight in a studied problem can be obtained by means of analytical expressions, where particular limiting and asymptotic cases could be analyzed and, at the same time, could be easier programmed than complicated equations. Then, the use of linear relationships is always advantageous. Here we will present a typical situation that can be encounter in thermal physics experiments, whose interpretation can involves non-linear equations. We will shown how a carefully analysis of the problem allow one to find the conditions for which these expressions become linear, what can make easier the look for an analytical solution of the problem. Consider that a thin slab of a solid sample of thickness L is heated which a light beam that is uniformly focused onto one of its surfaces. On the opposite side, its
http://www.journal.lapen.org.mx
E. Marn
temperature can be monitored as a function of time, for example with a thermocouple. The variation with time, t, of the heat generated in the sample, Q, due to the absorption of light of incident power Pi (W), is given by [1] (1) Q t = Pi q , where q is a term taking into account the power losses by radiation, convection and conduction. It is well known that any temperature difference within a physical system causes a transfer of heat from the region of higher temperature to the one of lower. This transport process takes place until the system has become uniform temperature throughout. Thus, the parameter q should be some function of the temperatures, Tl and T2, of both the regions involved (we will suppose that T2> T1). It is denoted as the heat flux (units of W) and its form depends on the nature of the transport mechanism, which can be one of the three mentioned above or a coupling of them. The dependence of the heat flux on the temperature is in general non linear, a fact that makes quite difficult calculations using the energy balance equation (1). On the one hand we see that for radiation, i.e. the continuous energy interchange between separated bodies by means of electromagnetic waves, the net rate of heat flow, qrad, radiated by a body surrounded by a medium at a temperature T1 is given by the Stefan-Boltzmann Law [2]
4 qrad = A T2 T14 ,
qcond = kAT .
(4)
The thermal conductivity, k (W/cmK), is expressed as the quantity of heat transmitted per unit time, t, per unit area, A, and per unit temperature gradient T=T/r. Now we are in condition to get back to Eq. (1). If we want to calculate the rise of temperature, T, of the back samples surface we must express the heat term of Eq. (1) as a function of that increase. It is given by the relationship
Q = cVT ,
(5)
where is the density, c is the specific heat and V=AL is the samples volume. Differentiation of Eq. (5) with respect to time and substitution into Eq. (1) leads to:
P q T + i = 0, cV cV t
(6)
(2)
where is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, A is the surface area of the radiating object and is the total emissivity of its surface having absolute temperature T2. On the other hand, it is a well known fact that heat convection takes place by means of macroscopic fluid motion. It can be caused by an external source (forced convection) or by temperature dependent density variations in the fluid (free or natural convection). In general, the mathematical analysis of convective heat transfer is extremely complex [3]. Often problems can be solved only numerically or graphically. But convective heat flow, in its most simple form, i.e. heat transfer from surface of wetted area A and temperature T2, to a fluid with a temperature T1 , for small temperature differences T=T2-T1 is given by the (linear with temperature) Newtons law of cooling,
where q is specified by the sum of the radiation, convection and conduction terms given by Eq. (2), (3) and (4) respectively. But we can see that, whereas sufficiently small convective rates of heat flow can be considered as linearly dependent on temperature difference (see Eq. (3)), the radiation and conduction dependence on the temperature are described by non-linear relationships Eqs. (2) and (4) respectively. This non-linearity makes complicated the analytical solution of the energy conservation law as given by Eq. (6). But fortunately in the most often situations that we can find in daily live and professional practice the involved temperature differences are sufficient small so that, as we will shown later, the solution of Eq. (6) can be obtained in a straightforward way. Typical examples can be found when the sun rays irradiate our bodies, in optical experiments involving low intensity laser beams, in dynamic therapies where tissues are heated using mostly infrared radiation, among others. In these examples the temperature increases due to light absorption followed by light into heat energy conversion are much smaller than the ambient room temperature1. A glance at Eq. (2) shows that if the temperature difference T = T2-T1 is small, then one should expand it as Taylor series around T1 obtaining a linear relationship:
(7)
(3)
-1
The convective heat transfer coefficient, hconv (Wm K ), is a variable function of several parameters of different kinds but independent on T. The third mechanism, called thermal conduction, can be understood in a simple way as a microscopic downtemperature diffusion process of heat within solids and stagnant fluids. The local heat flow-rate in some direction, r, is governed by Fouriers Law [2]
If we compare this equation with Eq. (3) we can conclude that in this case hrad=4T13 can be considered as a radiation heat transfer coefficient. On the other hand, for one-dimensional steady state conduction in extended samples of homogeneous and
1
While absolute temperatures have different values when expressed in different units, temperature differences are always the same. For example, in the discussed physical situation, the absolute temperature, T0, of an object at 300 K (27 0 C) must be compared with the temperature increase of the same object above To of, say, T=20 K = 20 0 C.
244
http://www.journal.lapen.org.mx
isotropic materials and for small temperature gradients, Fouriers law can be integrated in each direction to its potential form. In rectangular coordinates it reads2:
qcond = kA
Here Tl and T2 represent two planar isotherms at positions x1 and x2, respectively. Using an analogy with electrical conduction, and introducing the concept of thermal resistance, RT, Eq. (8) is often denoted as Ohms law for thermal conduction [2]. Comparing with Eq. (3) we see that the parameter hcond has been incorporated in Eq. (8) as the conduction heat transfer coefficient. Then, substituting Eqs. (3), (7) and (8) into Eq. (6) leads to:
P T h + T i = 0 . cL cV t
been only discussed in the past by solving the partial differential heat diffusion equation with the boundary conditions describing the physical problem [6]. In summary, the phenomenological aspects described here suggest the possibility of dealing with them in advanced or introductory physics or engineering courses. Although non-linear phenomena and relationships are very often in physics this article shows one example on how linearization of physical formulas can be very useful in practice and hopefully it will aid to suggest teachers extend this theme to a wider spectrum of phenomena. On the other hand, the here described experimental situation can be also helpful to teach technical questions related to the use of graphical methods such as semi-log plots to handle data, as well as the physics related to the problem, that involves aspects of several branches such as heat, thermodynamics, optics, and of mathematics, namely ordinary differential equations, exponential functions, etc.
(9)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A linear ordinary differential equation with constant coefficients, where the overall heat transfer coefficient is given by:
(10)
This work was partially financially supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologa (CONACyT), Mxico, under Grant Nr. 83289. The author would also like to thank the support received by COFAA and by projects SIP 20080032 and 20090160, both from IPN.
T =
The parameter
Pi t 1 exp( ) . Ah
Lc , 2h
(11)
REFERENCES
[1] Mansanares, A. M., Bento, A. C., Vargas, H. N., Leite, F. and Miranda, L. C., M. Phys. Rev. B 42, 4477-4483 (1990) [2] Landolt-Bornstein, Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology: New Series III, edited by Madelung, O. and White, G. K., 2.3.1.11. Thermal Transport pp. 2-217 (Springer: Berlin, 2005). [3] Marn, E., Caldern, A. and Delgado-Vasallo, O., Eur. J. Phys. 30, 439-445 (2009). [4] This method was first proposed by Bachman et al (Bachmann, R., DiSalvo, Jr., F. J., Geballe, T. H., Greene, R. L., Howard, R. E., King, C. N., Kirsch, H. C., Lee, K. N., Schwall, R. E., Thomas, H. U. and Zubeck; R. B., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 43, 205-209 (1972)) for low-temperature (1 to 35 K) measurements. Hatta (Hatta, I., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 50, 292-294 (1979)) employed for the first time light heating for measurements on small samples in the temperature range around room temperature. Mansanares et al [1] have later developed Hattas approach for simple measurements of C at room temperature. [5] Marn, E, Delgado-Vasallo, O. and Valiente, H., Am. J. Phys. 71, 1032-1036 (2003). [6] Valiente, H., Delgado-Vasallo, O., Galarraga, R, Caldern, A. and Marin, E., Int. J. Thermophys 276, 18591864 (2006).
(12)
is often called the relaxation time. These results have been used before in a technique known as the temperature relaxation method under continuous illumination for the measurement of the specific heat capacity (c) of thin, small solid samples of known thicknesses [4]. It can be calculated from the value which can be obtained by the least squares fit of experimental curves T versus t to equation (11) in the range of measurement times in which the exponential behavior is observed. This range can be determined using semi-log plots in order to avoid uncertainties due to deviations from the theoretical model. In the original variants the sample is supported adiabatically using a poor heat conductor in a reservoir where vacuum is performed in order to neglect heat losses by conduction and convection, so that the linear relationship given by Eq. (7) can be used in a straightforward manner to interpret the results. Experiments analyzing the influence of convection on the results have been also reported recently [5]. To the best of the author knowledge the influence of conduction have
2
245
http://www.journal.lapen.org.mx