100% found this document useful (1 vote)
156 views14 pages

Westlaw Document 16 50 59

Uploaded by

api-253200350
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
156 views14 pages

Westlaw Document 16 50 59

Uploaded by

api-253200350
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

Page 1

Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page *
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
/nited State& Di&trit Court, C.D. Cali2ornia.
#n re ZZZZ BEST S3C/R#,#3S L#,#'4,#$N.
No. C56!76("746RSWL (%7).
$t. *6, 1994.
L3W, Di&trit 8udge.
#. #N,R$D/C,#$N
*1 9o0ant& :e2ore t-e Court are t-e Non69anaging
/nder;riter De2endant& (<N9/ De2endant&=) in t-e
ZZZZ Best (<> %e&t=) &euritie& litigation.
FN1
N9/
De2endant& -a0e .o0ed t-e Court 2or &u..ar? @udg.ent
on all lai.& :roug-t again&t t-e.. ,-e .atter a.e up
regularl? 2or -earing on $to:er 17, 1994.
No;, -a0ing are2ull? on&idered all o2 t-e paper&
2iled in &upport o2 and in oppo&ition to N9/ De2endant&A
9otion, t-e Court -ere:? 'R4N,S #N P4R, 4ND
D3N#3S #N P4R, De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar?
8udg.ent.
##. %4CB'R$/ND
/ntil it& &udden ollap&e into :an1rupt? in 8ul?,
19!7, > %e&t ;a& ;idel? on&idered to :e a o.pan? t-at
-ad a-ie0ed tre.endou& 2inanial &ue&&, gro;ing in
@u&t a 2e; ?ear& to one o2 t-e -ig-e&t pro2it .argin pu:li
o.panie& in t-e nation. $n Dee.:er 9, 19!6, 4 %e&t
.ade a pu:li o22ering o2 1,1++,+++ unit& o2 &euritie&
pur&uant to a pro&petu& and ot-er 2iling& ;-i- ;ere
later re0ealed to :e largel? 2raudulent.
> %e&tA& pu:li o22ering ;a& 2ailitated :? a
.anaging under;riter, De2endant Roone? Pae, #n. #t
;a& Roone? PaeA& dut? to negotiate t-e detail& o2 t-e >
%e&t o22ering ;it- > %e&t it&el2, a& ;ell a& to dra2t
nee&&ar? S3C 2iling& a&&oiated ;it- t-e o22ering. #n
addition to it& role a& .anaging under;riter, Roone? Pae
&oliited ot-er &euritie& 2ir.& to partiipate in t-e > %e&t
o22ering a& .e.:er& o2 an under;riting &?ndiate. ,-e&e
ot-er &euritie& 2ir.& pla?ed a le&& ati0e role in t-e >
%e&t o22ering and o.pri&e t-e N9/ De2endant& no;
:e2ore t-e Court.
Pur&uant to a ;ritten <4gree.ent %et;een
/nder;riter&= t-e N9/ De2endant& ga0e Roone? Pae
t-e po;er to at on t-eir :e-al2 2or purpo&e& o2 t-e > %e&t
o22ering. See Cou&e Del., 3D. C, E (. ,-e 4gree.ent
pro0ided t-at Roone? Pae ;ould deter.ine t-e ti.e and
.anner o2 t-e > %e&t pu:li o22ering, ;ould a.end or
&upple.ent t-e S3C regi&tration &tate.ent and pro&petu&
a& nee&&ar?, and ;ould re&er0e 2or it&el2 unit& o2 t-e >
%e&t &to1 o22ering alloated 2or re&ale :? t-e N9/
De2endant&. #n eD-ange, t-e N9/ De2endant& agreed to
pur-a&e a &pei2ied nu.:er o2 > %e&t unit& on t-e
lo&ing date o2 t-e o22ering. ,-e role o2 t-e N9/
De2endant& in t-e > %e&t o22ering (and o2 under;riter& in
general) ;a& to at a& ;-ole&aler& 2or t-e ne; > %e&t
&euritie&, -elping to en&ure a .ar1et 2or t-e o22ering.
W-ile t-e N9/ De2endant& did not partiipate
diretl? in t-e preparation o2 t-e 2raudulent > %e&t
pro&petu&, t-eir na.e& all appeared on t-e 2inal
dou.ent di&&e.inated to t-e pu:li. Plainti22& ontend
t-at t-i& 2at, along ;it- t-e ;ritten 4gree.ent %et;een
/nder;riter& and ot-er dealing& :et;een Roone? Pae, >
%e&t and t-e N9/ De2endant& reate t-e potential 2or
lia:ilit? under 0ariou& &tate and 2ederal au&e& o2 ation.
,-i& lia:ilit? i& &upported, Plainti22& ontend, :? N9/
De2endant&A la1 o2 due diligene in in0e&tigating eit-er >
%e&t, or t-e .anaging under;riter, Roone? Pae.
FN*
Plainti22& allege t-at -ad De2endant& N9/& .ade e0en a
ur&or? inFuir? into eit-er o2 t-e&e entitie&, t-e? ;ould
-a0e uno0ered &eriou& pro:le.& ;it- t-e > %e&t pu:li
&to1 o22ering.
*2 N9/ De2endant& ounter t-at &u..ar? @udg.ent
on t-e &euritie& 2raud lai.& again&t it &-ould :e granted.
,-e? ontend t-at t-e N9/& -ad onl? a pa&&i0e role in
t-e > %e&t o22ering and t-at t-e? -ad not-ing to do ;it-
t-e due diligene in0e&tigation o2 > %e&t or t-e reation
and di&&e.ination o2 an? pu:li &tate.ent& regarding >
%e&t. 9oreo0er, t-e N9/ De2endant& allege t-at t-e?
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page (
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
o.pletel? relied on t-e due diligene in0e&tigation
(allegedl?) per2or.ed :? Roone? Pae, and t-at &u- total
reliane ;a& @u&ti2ied and <u&to.ar? in t-e indu&tr?.=
#n addition, t-e N9/ De2endant& ontend t-at an?
role t-e? -ad in t-e > %e&t o22ering ;a& li.ited to (+ da?&
duration, t-at i&, t-e e22eti0e ti.e 2ra.e o2 t-e ;ritten
4gree.ent %et;een /nder;riter&. Furt-er, t-e? argue
t-at t-e lai.& again&t t-e. &-ould :e di&po&ed o2
:eau&e di&o0er? -a& 2ailed to re0eal t-at an? la&&
repre&entati0e plainti22& -ad an? diret dealing& ;it- t-e
N9/& ;-at&oe0er.
###. D#SC/SS#$N
4. Standard 2or #&&uane o2 Su..ar? 8udg.ent
Su..ar? @udg.ent i& appropriate ;-en t-ere i& no
genuine i&&ue o2 .aterial 2at and t-e .o0ing part? i&
entitled to @udg.ent a& a .atter o2 la;. Fed.R.Ci0.P. "6.
/nder Rule "6, t-e Court .a? entertain .otion& 2or
&u..ar? @udg.ent on an? part o2, or all o2 a part?A&
lai.&. Fed.R.Ci0.P. "6(a), (:). ,-e .o0ing part? :ear&
t-e initial re&pon&i:ilit? o2 identi2?ing t-e a:&ene o2 a
genuine .aterial i&&ue o2 2at. Celotex v. Catrett, 477 /.S.
(17, (*(, 1+6 S.Ct. *"4!, *""( (19!6). Co;e0er, ;-ere
t-e nonG.o0ing part? ;ill :ear t-e :urden o2 proo2 at trial
on a di&po&iti0e i&&ue, t-e .o0ing part? .a? properl?
.o0e 2or &u..ar? @udg.ent :a&ed &olel? on t-e
<pleading&, depo&ition&, an&;er& to interrogatorie&, and
ad.i&&ion& on 2ile.= Id. at (*4, 1+6 S.Ct. at *""( . ,-u&,
on i&&ue& ;-ere it ;ill not -a0e t-e :urden o2 proo2 at
trial, t-e .o0ing part? .a? .eet it& :urden at t-e
&u..ar? @udg.ent &tage &i.pl? :? &-o;ing t-at t-ere i&
an <a:&ene o2 e0idene= to &upport t-e nonG.o0ing
part?A& a&e. Id. at (*", 1+6 S.Ct. at *""4 . ,-e nonG
.o0ing part?, on t-e ot-er -and, i& reFuired :? Rule "6(e)
to go :e?ond t-e pleading& and de&ignate &pei2i 2at&
&-o;ing t-at t-ere i& a genuine i&&ue 2or trial. Id. at (*4,
1+6 S.Ct. at *""(. NonG.o0ing partie& an .eet t-i&
reFuire.ent :? u&e o2 a22ida0it&, depo&ition&, an&;er& to
interrogatorie&, or ad.i&&ion& on 2ile. Id. Co;e0er,
onlu&or? allegation& un&upported :? 2atual data are
in&u22iient to reate a tria:le i&&ue o2 2at &o a& to
prelude i&&uane o2 &u..ar? @udg.ent. Marks v. United
States Dep't of Justice, "7! F.*d *61, *6( (9t- Cir.197!) .
%. Clai.& 4&&erted 4gain&t N9/ De2endant&.
1. Alleged iolations of 1! U.S.C. "" ##k, ##l, and ##o
,-e Fi2t- 4.ended Co.plaint in t-i& a&e
FN(
allege&
t-at t-e N9/ De2endant& 0iolated &etion& 11, 1* and 1"
o2 t-e Seuritie& 4t o2 19((, 1" /.S.C. HH 771, 77l, and
77o re&peti0el?.
FN4
#n 0iolation o2 t-e&e &tatute&,
Plainti22& allege t-at t-e N9/ De2endant& <a&&i&ted in
preparing, 2iling and irulating t-e Dee.:er 9, 19!6 I>
%e&tJ Regi&tration State.ent and Pro&petu& inluded
t-erein.= Co.plaint E 17*. 9oreo0er, Plainti22& ontend
t-at De2endant N9/& ;ere <nee&&ar? partiipant& in t-e
&ale o2 > %e&t &euritie& to t-e in0e&ting pu:li,= t-at t-e?
&old > %e&t &euritie& to t-e pu:li, inluding la&&
.e.:er&, and t-at t-e? 2ailed rea&ona:l? to in0e&tigate
t-eir &ale o2 > %e&t Seuritie&. Co.plaint EE 1!161!(.
a. argu$ent
%1& Section 11' (ia)ilit* for Misstate$ents and +$issions
in t,e -egistration State$ent.
*3 Setion 11 o2 t-e Seuritie& 4t o2 19((, 1"
/.S.C. H 771 i.po&e& lia:ilit? on per&on& in0ol0ed in t-e
preparation and 2iling o2 a regi&tration &tate.ent i2 an?
part o2 t-at &tate.ent ontain& an untrue &tate.ent o2
.aterial 2at or i2 it o.it& a .aterial 2at nee&&ar? to
.a1e t-e regi&tration &tate.ent not .i&leading. 1" /.S.C.
H 771. ,-ere i& no Fue&tion in t-i& a&e t-at t-e > %e&t
regi&tration &tate.ent ontained .aterial
.i&repre&entation& and o.i&&ion&.
Lia:ilit? under Setion 11 i& eDpre&&l? i.po&ed upon
<e0er? under;riter ;it- re&pet to &u- &eurit?.= Id. H
771(a)("). #n order to -old an under;riter lia:le under
Setion 11, -o;e0er, a plainti22 .u&t pro0e t-at t-e &-are&
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page 4
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
pur-a&ed are traea:le to t-e o22ering o0ered :? t-e
o22ending regi&tration &tate.ent. A))e* v. Co$puter
Me$ories, Inc., 6(4 F.Supp. !7+, !74 (N.D.Cal.19!6)
(<ICJourt& -a0e uni2or.l? interpreted &etion 11 a&
reFuiring .ore t-an a &-o;ing t-at a plainti22A& &to1
K.ig-tL -a0e o.e 2ro. t-e rele0ant o22ering.=)M see also
ZZZZ Best Dis$issal +rder at 9(,+9*.
N9/ De2endant& ontend t-at <IdJi&o0er? -a&
onlu&i0el? de.on&trated t-at none o2 t-e plainti22& an
trae t-eir ZZZZ Best &euritie& to t-e Dee.:er 9, 19!6
pu:li o22ering,= and t-at t-ere2ore, &u..ar? @udg.ent
&-ould :e granted on t-e Setion 11 lai.&. #n &upport o2
t-eir argu.ent, N9/ De2endant& ite &e0eral a&e&
re@eting Setion 11 lai.& ;-en plainti22&A 2ail to
adeFuatel? <trae= t-eir pur-a&e o2 &euritie& to a
partiular o22ending &euritie& i&&ue. See In re .lscint, (td
Securities (itigation, 674 F.Supp. (74, (79
(D.9a&&.19!7)M A))e*, 6(4 F.Supp. at !74M Mc/arland v.
Me$orex Corp., 49( F.Supp. 6(1, 64* (N.D.Cal.19!+) . #n
t-e&e a&e&, plainti22&A Setion 11 lai.& 2ailed :eau&e
t-ere ;ere alread? &-are& o2 t-e rele0ant &eurit? :eing
pu:lil? traded ;-en an o22ending regi&tration &tate.ent
;a& i&&ued. ,-ere2ore, &ine t-e plainti22& ould not
onlu&i0el? e&ta:li&- t-at t-eir &-are& ;ere part o2 t-e
ne;, o22ending o22ering, t-eir Setion 11 lai.& -ad to
2ail. See, e.g., A))e*, 6(4 F.Supp. at !74 .
Li1e;i&e, in t-i& a&e N9/ De2endant& lai. t-at >
%e&t &-are& ;ere alread? on t-e open .ar1et at t-e ti.e
o2 t-e Dee.:er 9, 19!6 o22ending > %e&t &euritie&
i&&ue. Plainti22& onede a& .u-. $ppAn at 1" n. **.
Plainti22& retort, -o;e0er, t-at t-e Dee.:er 9, 19!6
o22ering al&o in0ol0ed <;arrant&= 2or 2uture > %e&t &to1
pur-a&e&, ;-i- ;ere not alread? :eing pu:lil?
traded.
FN"
,-e eDi&tene o2 t-e&e ne0 ;arrant& and la&&
repre&entati0e Plainti22&A pur-a&e o2 t-e. i& &u22iient,
Plainti22& ontend, to allo; t-e. to <trae= t-eir
pur-a&e& to t-e Dee.:er 9, 19!6 > %e&t $22ering.
$ppAn at 1".
4 2urt-er i&&ue i& rai&ed in N9/ De2endant&A Repl?.
De2endant& argue t-at a pro0i&ion in Roone? PaeA&
under;riting agree.ent ;it- > %e&t allo;ed it to &ell
<unit&= o2 > %e&t &euritie& (:ot- &to1 and t-e ne;
;arrant&) outside it& apait? a& a repre&entati0e 2or
under;riter de2endant&. See Repl? at 961+M /nder;riting
4gree.ent, Cou&e Del., 3D. D, E *(:). De2endant& lai.
t-at t-i& option 2or Roone? Pae to &ell unit& o0er and
a:o0e t-e 1,1++,+++ at i&&ue in t-e initial > %e&t pu:li
o22ering indiate& t-at Plainti22&A ;arrant& .a? trae :a1
to t-e additional Roone? Pae, <option= unit&,
independent o2 t-e pu:li o22ering and t-e o22ending
regi&tration &tate.ent o0ering it.
*4 De2endant&A argu.ent .u&t 2ail. Regardle&& o2
;-et-er Plainti22&A ;arrant& are traea:le to t-e initial
Dee.:er 9, 19!6 pu:li o22ering or to later <option&=
&old :? Roone? Pae pur&uant to it& > %e&t under;riting
agree.ent, all ;arrant& ;ere i&&ued pur&uant to t-e 2al&e
regi&tration &tate.ent and t-ere2ore an :e <traed= to t-e
o22ending > %e&t o22ering. N9/ De2endant&A 9otion 2or
Su..ar? 8udg.ent on t-e Setion 11 lai.& &-all
t-ere2ore :e D3N#3D.
%1& Section 11%1&' (ia)ilit* for Material Misstate$ents or
+$issions )* Sellers of Securities.
Setion 1*(*) o2 t-e Seuritie& 4t o2 19(( pro0ide&
lia:ilit? 2or <IaJn? per&on ;-o o22er& or &ell& a &eurit? ...
:? .ean& o2 a pro&petu& or oral o..uniation= t-at
ontain& a .i&repre&entation or o.i&&ion o2 .aterial 2at.
1" /.S.C. H ##l . #n general, a de2endant an onl? :e 2ound
lia:le under Setion 1*(*) i2 it ;a& a <&eller= o2 t-e
&eurit? allegedl? &old :? .ean& o2 an o22ending
pro&petu&. ZZZZ Best Dis$issal +rder at 9(,+!4. N9/
De2endant& ontend t-at Plainti22& -a0e 2ailed to &-o; an?
e0idene t-at t-e? <-ad an? dealing&, or tran&ated an?
:u&ine&& of an* kind ;it- an? o2 t-e IN9/&J.= De2A&
9otion at 1!. ,-u&, t-e? argue t-at t-e? annot :e
-arateriNed a& <&eller&= o2 Plainti22&A &euritie& under
Setion 1*(*), and t-at &u..ar? @udg.ent &-ould :e
granted in t-eir 2a0or.
Plainti22& ounter t-at &trit pri0it? i& not reFuired
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page "
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
under Setion 1*(*) and t-at t-e 2at t-at t-e? -a0e not
&-o;n diret dealing& :et;een t-e.&el0e& and t-e N9/&
i& not 2atal to t-eir lai.&. $ppAn at **6*(M see S.C v.
Sea)oard Corp., 677 F.*d 1*!9, 1*9469" (9t- Cir.19!*)
(<,-e .eaning o2 K&ellerL 2or purpo&e& o2 H 1* -a& :een
@udiiall? eDpanded :e?ond t-e per&on ;-o tran&2er& title
to inlude Kpartiipant&A in t-e tran&ation.=). #n 2inter v.
Da,l, 4!6 /.S. 6**, 1+! S.Ct. *+6( (19!!) , t-e Supre.e
Court, in interpreting t-e ;ord <&eller= under related
Setion 1*(1) o2 t-e Seuritie& 4t o2 19((, -eld t-at t-e
ter. i.po&ed lia:ilit? not onl? on t-o&e ;-o pa&& title to
a &eurit?, :ut al&o to per&on& ;-o solicit a purc,ase o2
&euritie& and are .oti0ated, at lea&t in part, :? 2inanial
gain. Id. at 647, 1+! S.Ct. at *+7! . ,-i& de2inition o2
<&eller= ;a& applied :? t-e Nint- Ciruit in Moore v.
3a*port 2ackage .xp., Inc., !!" F.*d "(1, "(6 (9t-
Cir.19!9) to lai.& :roug-t under Setion 1*(*) a& ;ell.
Plainti22& a&&ert t-at i&&ue& o2 2at re.ain a& to
;-et-er or not N9/ De2endant&A <&elling ati0itie&
a&&oiated= ;it- t-e > %e&t o22ering on&tituted
<&oliitation= &u22iient 2or a 2inding o2 lia:ilit? under
Setion 1*(*). #n t-e pre&ent a&e, Plainti22& -a0e alleged
t-at t-e N9/ De2endant&A <&elling ati0itie&= inluded
plaing t-eir na.e on t-e > %e&t pro&petu&, under;riting
**+,+++ o2 t-e 1,1++,+++ unit& in t-e > %e&t pu:li
o22ering, &-aring eDpen&e& 2or ad0erti&e.ent o2 t-e
o22ering, partiipating or :eing in0ited to partiipate in
<road &-o;&= pro.oting t-e > %e&t o22ering, and earning
O1.( .illion in 2ee& 2ro. t-e > %e&t o22ering. See Willen&
Del., S.it- ,r. at (*M Cou&e Del. 3D. C at *(7M Cou&e
Del., 3D. C at *7+. ,-e? allege t-at &u- ati0itie& are
&u22iient to reate an i&&ue o2 2at on ;-et-er t-e N9/
De2endant& 2all ;it-in t-e de2inition o2 <per&on& ;-o
&oliit a pur-a&e o2 &euritie&= &o a& to &u&tain lia:ilit?
under Setion 1*(*). ,-e Court 2ind& t-at Plainti22&A
po&ition &-ould pre0ail.
*5 N9/ De2endant& :a&e t-eir argu.ent t-at t-e?
are not <&oliitor&= on t-e Nint- CiruitA& opinion in
Moore, !!" F.*d at "(1 . ,-ere, t-e Court up-eld t-e
di&.i&&al o2 Setion 1*(*) lai.& again&t aountant and
la;?er de2endant&, 2inding t-at t-e allegation& again&t
t-o&e de2endant& did not a.ount to &oliitation o2
&euritie& pur-a&er& under Setion 1*(*). Id. at "(7. #n
Moore, -o;e0er, <t-e in0e&tor& did not allege t-at t-e
la;?er& or aountant& pla?ed an* role at all in &oliiting
t-e pur-a&e&.= Id. at "(7 (e.p-a&i& added). Rat-er, t-e
di&.i&&al in Moore ;a& :a&ed on t-e CourtA& 2inding t-at
t-e la;?er&A and aountant&A ati0itie& ;ere li.ited &olel?
to t-e per2or.ane o2 pro2e&&ional &er0ie&, and ;ere not
related to t-e diret &oliitation o2 &euritie& pur-a&er&.
Id. at "(7 n. ". #n 2at, t-e Court in Moore did reogniNe a
Setion 1*(*) au&e o2 ation again&t stock)roker
de2endant& :a&ed on allegation& in t-e o.plaint &i.ilar
to t-o&e .ade :? Plainti22& in t-i& a&e. Moore, !!" F.*d
at "(!6(9. Spei2iall?, t-e Court 2ound t-at allegation&
t-at t-e &to1:ro1er& < Kdi&tri:uted &ale& pro.otion data,L
Kreo..ended t-e li.ited partner&-ip intere&t&A and K;ere
a &u:&tantial and .oti0ating 2ore in t-e &ale& toL =
plainti22& ;ere &u22iient to &tate a Setion 1*(*) au&e o2
ation. Id.
W-ile &e0eral ourt& -a0e re@eted t-e i.po&ition o2
Setion 1*(*) lia:ilit? upon under;riter& .erel? :? t-eir
&tatu& a& under;riter&, /oster v. Jesus 4 (a$on
Securities Co., 7"9 F.*d !(!, !4" (11t- Cir.19!")
(re@eting lia:ilit? under old <&u:&tantial 2ator= te&t)M
3lien v. Co$puter Devices, Inc., 6+* F.Supp. !(7, !4+
(S.D.N.P.19!"), a nu.:er o2 ot-er& -a0e 2ound t-at &u-
lia:ilit? does eDi&t ;-en it an :e &-o;n t-at an
under;riter activel* solicits t-e plainti22&A pur-a&e o2 a
&eurit?. 5ile* v. 6ug,es Capita Corp., 746 F.Supp. 1*64,
1*!+6!1 (D.N.8.199+)M In re 5orlds of 5onder Securities
(itigation, 7*1 F.Supp. 114+, 1149 (N.D.Cal.19!9) M
Sc,lueter v. Co7ad, 674 F.Supp. 1("1, 1("6
(C.D.#ll.19!7) (2inding under;riter lia:ilit? under Setion
1*(*) ;it-out diret pri0it? ;-en t-at under;riter
<ati0el? &oliit& &ale&=).
Plainti22& in t-e pre&ent a&e allege a &enario &i.ilar
to t-at 2ound :? t-e Court in Moore to &u&tain a Setion
1*(*) au&e o2 ation again&t &to1:ro1er de2endant&.
,-u&, unli1e t-e &ituation in Moore ;-ere t-e la;?er and
aountant de2endant& ;ere .erel? per2or.ing t-eir
pro2e&&ional role& in &upport o2 ot-er de2endant& atuall?
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page 6
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
&oliiting t-e pur-a&e o2 &euritie&, in t-i& a&e, t-ere are
2at& &upporting a onlu&ion t-at t-e N9/ De2endant&
t-e.&el0e& ;ere engaged in &oliitation o2 > %e&t
&euritie& pur-a&er&, .oti0ated at lea&t in part, :? t-e
pro&pet o2 2inanial gain. See $ppAn at *( n. (4 and
2atual re2erene& ited t-ereinM see also 2inter, 4!6 /.S.
at 646647, 1+! S.Ct. at 1+7!. ,-ere2ore, N9/
De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on t-e
Setion 1*(*) lai.& &-all :e D3N#3D.
FN6
%8& Section 1! and Section 19%a&' (ia)ilit* of Controlling
2ersons.
*6 Plainti22&A neDt 2ederal &euritie& la; lai.& o.e
under Setion 1" o2 t-e Seuritie& 4t o2 19((. 1" /.S.C.
H ##o . Setion 1" i.po&e& &eondar? lia:ilit? on one ;-o
<ontrol&= an? per&on ;-o i& lia:le 2or a pri.ar?
0iolation under eit-er Setion 11 or Setion 1* o2 t-e
Seuritie& 4t o2 19((. N9/ De2endant& &ee1 &u..ar?
@udg.ent on t-e Setion 1" lai.&, arguing t-at Plainti22&
-a0e 2ailed to pro0e t-e eDi&tene o2 a &u22iient
relation&-ip :et;een t-e. and an? <ontrolled= pri.ar?
0iolator&.
Spei2iall?, N9/ De2endant& ite Dur,a$ v. 3ell*,
!1+ F.*d 1"++ (9t- Cir.19!7), 2or t-e propo&ition t-at to
&ueed on a Setion 1" lai., plainti22& .u&t &-o; t-e
eDi&tene o2 a ontrolled relation&-ip, and t-at de2endant&
eDerted <atual po;er or in2luene= o0er t-e allegedl?
ontrolled per&on. Id. at 1"+(6+4M see also C,ristoffel v.
../. 6utton 4 Co., "!! F.*d 66", 66! (9t- Cir.197!) ,
overruled in part on ot,er grounds, 6ollinger v. :itan
Capital Corp., 914 F.*d 1"64, 1"7467" (9t- Cir.199+) ,
cert. denied, 499 /.S. 976 (1991).
For purpo&e& o2 de2ining ontrol under :ot- Setion
1" o2 t-e Seuritie& 4t and Setion *+(a) o2 t-e
3D-ange 4t, 1" /.S.C. H 7!t(a), t-e Nint- Ciruit -a&
adopted t-e de2inition &et 2ort- in 17 C.F.R. H *(+.4+"(2).
<ICJontrol .ean& t-e po&&e&&ion, diret or indiret, o2 t-e
po;er to diret or au&e t-e diretion o2 t-e .anage.ent
and poliie& o2 a per&on ;-et-er t-roug- t-e o;ner&-ip o2
0oting &euritie&, :? ontrat, or ot-er;i&e.= Safe0a*
2ortland .$p. /ed. Credit Union v. 5agner 4 Co., "+1
F.*d 11*+, 11*4 n. 17 (9t- Cir.1974)M see also Mc/arland
v. Me$orex Corp., 49( F.Supp. 6(1, 649 (N.D.Cal.19!+) .
N9/ De2endant& ontend t-at no &u- e0idene o2
ontrol eDi&t& in t-i& a&e to &-o; t-at t-e? atuall?
eDerted po;er or in2luene o0er > %e&t it&el2 or o0er an?
ot-er pri.ar? de2endant in t-i& a&e. Plainti22&A re&pon&e
to t-e 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on t-e Setion 1"
lai.& i& ontained ;it-in a &ingle 2ootnote. ,-e? a&&ert
t-at t-e i&&ue o2 ;-o i& a ontrolling per&on i& <o2ten a
o.pleD 2atual deter.ination,= t-at N9/ De2endant&
ated in onert ;it- t-e lead under;riter, Roone? Pae,
and t-at Roone? PaeA& alleged pri.ar? 0iolation& ;ere
per2or.ed in it& apait? a& N9/ De2endant&A <agent,=
t-ere:? :ringing t-e N9/ De2endant& ;it-in t-e a.:it o2
Setion 1". $ppAn at *4 n. (6.
,-e Court 2ind& Plainti22&A allegation o2 ontrol to :e
in&u22iient to &u&tain t-eir lai.& under Setion 1". Fro.
t-e a&e& di&u&&ing &u- lia:ilit?, it i& lear t-at t-e
<ontrol= onte.plated under Setion 1" .ean& a
&u22iient degree o2 da?GtoGda? operational ontrol,
a.ounting to t-e po;er to ditate anot-er part?A& ondut
or operation&. See 6ollinger v. :itan Capital, 914 F.*d
1"64, 1"7( (9t- Cir.199+) (2inding t-at a &euritie& dealer
i& a <ontrolling per&on= o0er it& regi&tered indi0idual
repre&entati0e&), cert. denied, 499 /.S. 976 (1991)M 5ool
v. :ande$ Co$puters, Inc., !1! F.*d 14((, 144+64* (9t-
Cir.19!7) (orporate o22ier& -arged ;it- t-e da?GtoGda?
operation o2 orporation ;ere ontrolling per&on& o0er
t-at orporation)M In re 2,ilips 2etroleu$ Securities
(itigation, 7(! F.Supp !*", !41 (D.Del.199+) (&u22iient
degree o2 ontrol o0er da?GtoGda? operation& eDeri&ed :?
orporate o22ier& and diretor&)M ;orden, Inc. v. Spoor
;e,rins Ca$p)ell 4 <oung, Inc., 7(" F.Supp. "!7
(S.D.N.P.199+) (ontrolling per&on lia:ilit? 2or &ue&&i0e
parent orporation and &ole &-are-older).
*7 ,-e 2at& in t-i& a&e do not a.ount to a 2inding
t-at N9/ De2endant& <ontrolled= Roone? Pae or an?
ot-er pri.ar? de2endant, e0en a&&u.ing t-e eDi&tene o2
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page 7
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
&o.e <agen?= relation&-ip :et;een t-e.. ,-ere2ore,
N9/ De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on
Plainti22&A Setion 1" Clai.& &-all :e 'R4N,3D.
Li1e;i&e, &u..ar? @udg.ent &-all :e 'R4N,3D on
Plainti22&A <ontrolling per&on= lia:ilit? lai.& under
Setion *+(a) o2 t-e Seuritie& 4t o2 19((.
FN7
1. Section 19%)&=-ule 19)>! iolations
Plainti22& 2urt-er allege t-at De2endant N9/&
0iolated Setion 1+(:) and S3C Rule 1+:6" :? t-eir
partiipation in t-e > %e&t pu:li o22ering. Co.plaint,
Count& ###, 7##, 7###. Spei2iall?, Plainti22& lai. t-at t-e
N9/& <1no;ingl? andQor re1le&&l? i&&ued, au&ed to :e
i&&ued, partiipated in t-e i&&uane o2, or aided and
a:etted=
FN!
t-e pu:li di&&e.ination o2 <0ariou&= 2al&e
and .i&leading dou.ent& regarding t-e > %e&t o22ering.
Co.plaint EE 1!6619(.
a. argu$ent
Rule 1+:6" pronoune& t-e general antiG2raud
pro0i&ion o2 2ederal &euritie& la;. #n order to &ueed on
a lai. under Rule 1+:6", a plainti22 .u&t :e eit-er a
pur-a&er or &eller o2 t-e &euritie& in Fue&tion, ;lue C,ip
Sta$ps v. Manor Drug Stores, 4*1 /.S. 7*(, 9" S.Ct.
1917 (197"), .u&t -a0e ated ;it- &ienter, .rnst 4
.rnst v. 6oc,felder, 4*" /.S. 1!", 96 S.Ct. 1(7" (1976) ,
and t-e ondut o.plained o2 .u&t -a0e :een
<deepti0e.= Santa /e Indus. v. ?reen, 4(+ /.S. 46*, 97
S.Ct. 1*9* (1977).
,-e Nint- Ciruit -a& identi2ied t-ree ele.ent&
nee&&ar? 2or a pri.ar? Rule 1+:6" 0iolationR < K(1)
ondut :? de2endant& pro&ri:ed :? t-e ruleM (*) a
pur-a&e or &ale o2 &euritie& <in onnetion ;it-= &u-
pro&ri:ed ondutM and (() re&ultant da.age& to t-e
plainti22&.L = (evine v. Dia$ant,uset, Inc., 9"+ F.*d 147!,
14!" (9t- Cir.1991) (Fuoting 5ood0ard v. Metro ;ank,
"** F.*d !4, 9( ("t- Cir.197")).
#t i& undi&puted in t-i& a&e t-at N9/ De2endant&
pla?ed little or no diret role in preparing t-e > %e&t
pro&petu&, or o.pleting t-e pri.ar? due diligene
in0e&tigation o2 > %e&t. See Cou&e Del. E 1". #n 2at, it
appear& t-at t-e&e dou.ent& and in0e&tigation& ;ere
&u:&tantiall? o.pleted, i2 at all, )efore t-e N9/
De2endant& ;ere in0ited to partiipate in t-e > %e&t
o22ering. Co;e0er, it i& al&o unonte&ted t-at t-e N9/
De2endant&A na.e& appeared on t-e 2inal pro&petu&.
,-u&, Plainti22& allege t-at t-e N9/ De2endant& are
pri.aril? lia:le under Rule 1+:6" :eau&e t-e? <agreed to
under;rite t-e I> %e&tJ pu:li o22ering and plae t-eir
na.e& on t-e pro&petu& ;it- 2ull 1no;ledge t-at t-e?
;ere in0iting t-e in0e&ting pu:li to rel? on t-e. 2or t-e
&oundne&& o2 t-e pro&petu&.= $ppAn at 17.
Plainti22& a&&ert &e0eral @u&ti2iation& 2or ;-? t-e
N9/ De2endant& an :e -eld lia:le 2or pri.ar?
0iolation& o2 Rule 1+:6". Fir&t, t-e? ontend t-at :?
plaing t-eir na.e on t-e pro&petu&, t-e N9/
De2endant& <on0e?ed t-e lear .e&&age= t-at t-e
repre&entation& ontained t-erein ;ere t-o&e o2 all o2 t-e
under;riter&. $ppAn at 16. Seond, Plainti22& argue t-at a&
a .atter o2 la;, all under;riter& are .ade re&pon&i:le 2or
t-e trut- o2 t-e pro&petu&. See .scott v. ;ar C,ris
Construction Corp., *!( F.Supp. 64(, 697 (S.D.N.P.196!)
(2inding &u- a rule under Setion 11 o2 t-e Seuritie&
4t). ,-ird, Plainti22& a&&ert t-at t-e N9/ De2endant&
-ad a dut? to underta1e t-eir o;n due diligene
in0e&tigation, and ould not (a& t-e? did) rel? &olel? on
t-e in0e&tigation purportedl? done :? t-e .anaging
under;riter, Roone? Pae. Fourt- and 2inall?, Plainti22&
ontend t-at t-e 2raudulent &tate.ent& ontained in t-e
pro&petu& an :e attri:uted to t-e N9/ De2endant&
under t-e dotrine o2 respondet superior, t-at i&, t-at
Roone? Pae ;a& ating a& t-e <repre&entati0e= o2 t-e
N9/ de2endant& and t-at t-ere2ore, it& 2raudulent
&tate.ent& &-ould :e attri:uta:le to t-e..
*8 Plainti22&A 2ir&t argu.ent ;ill pre0ail. ,-e 2at t-at
N9/ De2endant&A na.e& appeared on t-e 2inal > %e&t
pro&petu& de2eat& t-eir argu.ent t-at t-e? &-ould :e
relie0ed 2ro. an? Setion 1+(:)QRule 1+:6" lia:ilit?
:eau&e t-e? <-ad not-ing to do ;it-= preparation o2 t-e
pro&petu&. W-ile it .a? :e true t-e? .ade no
ontri:ution to t-e preparation o2 t-e pro&petu& it&el2, t-e
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page !
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
dou.ent a& it ;a& pu:lil? di&&e.inated -ad t-eir na.e
on it and ga0e no indiation t-at it ;a& not a& .u- t-e
produt o2 t-e N9/ De2endant& a& it ;a& o2 t-e
.anaging under;riter, Roone? Pae.
Ca&e& ited :? t-e N9/ De2endant& are inappo&ite.
,-e&e a&e& re@et lai.& o2 Setion 1+(:)QRule 1+:6"
lia:ilit? 2or de2endant& ;-o&e onl? onnetion ;it- an
allegedl? 2raudulent pro&petu& ;a& t-at t-eir pro2e&&ional
;or1 produt ;a& ontained ;it-in it. See ?ru)er v. 2rice
5ater,ouse, 776 F.Supp. 1+44, 1+46647 (3.D.Pa.1991) M
/ried$an v. Ari7ona 5orld @urseries, 7(+ F.Supp. "*1,
"(( (S.D.N.P.199+), aff'd $e$., 9*7 F.*d "94 (*d
Cir.1991)M In re 5orlds of 5onder Sec. (itig., 7*1 F.Supp.
114+, 114"646 (N.D.Cal.19!9). 9oreo0er, in one o2 t-e&e
a&e&, t-e Court eDpliitl? up-eld lai.& again&t
under;riter de2endant&, &tating t-at a Setion 1+(:) au&e
o2 ation eDi&ted again&t t-e. 2or .i&&tate.ent& in a
pro&petu& and ot-er dou.ent& <;-i- ;ere prepared in
part :? t-e Iunder;riter&J or )ear t-eir na.e&.= 5orlds of
5onder, 7*1 F.Supp. at 1146 . ,-u&, :eau&e t-eir na.e&
appeared on t-e > %e&t pro&petu&, t-e &tate.ent&
ontained t-erein an :e attri:uted to t-e N9/
De2endant&.
N9/ De2endant& 2urt-er argue t-at Plainti22&A
Setion 1+(:)QRule 1+:6" lai.& &-ould 2ail :eau&e t-e?
-a0e not .et t-eir :urden o2 &-o;ing &ienter, t-at i&, <a
.ental &tate e.:raing t-e intent to deei0e, .anipulate
or de2raud= ;-i- i& nee&&ar? to &ueed on a Setion
1+(:)QRule 1+:6" lai.. 6oc,felder, 4*" /.S. at 194 n.
1*. Plainti22& ounter t-at &u- &ienter doe& eDi&t in
N9/ De2endant&A 2ailure to in0e&tigate eit-er Roone?
Pae or > %e&t :e2ore @oining a& under;riter& in t-e >
%e&t pu:li o22ering. ,-i& 2ailure, plainti22& argue <.u&t
:e 0ie;ed a& an eDtre.e departure 2ro. t-e &tandard& o2
ordinar? are t-at, at a .ini.u., on&titute&
re1le&&ne&&.=
FN9
$ppAn at *+.
N9/ De2endant& 2ailure to in0e&tigate Roone? Pae
or > %e&t i& unonte&ted. Co;e0er, ;-et-er a& nonG
.anaging under;riter& t-e? -ad a &u22iient dut? to
in0e&tigate &u- t-at a 2ailure to per2or. t-i& dut? ould
pro0ide t-e reFui&ite &ienter 2or a Setion 1+(:)QRule
1+:6" 0iolation, i& unlear. Plainti22& ite &e0eral a&e&
;-i- &tate, under Setion 11 o2 t-e Seuritie& 4t, t-e
nonG.anaging under;riter& dut? o2 due diligene i& t-e
&a.e a& t-at o2 t-e .anaging under;riter&. See In re
Consu$ers 2o0er Co. Sec. (itig., 1+" F.R.D. "!(, 61*6
1( (3.D.9i-.19!")M .scott v. ;ar C,ris Construction
Corp., *!( F.Supp. 64(, 697 (S.D.N.P.196!) . Fro. t-e&e
a&e&, Plainti22& ontent t-at N9/ De2endant&A 2ailure to
.a1e an? inFuir? into t-e integrit? o2 eit-er > %e&t or
Roone? Pae, i& ground& 2or a 2inding o2 <at lea&t
re1le&&ne&&= to &upport t-e &ienter reFuire.ent Rule
1+:6". #n &upport o2 t-eir ontention, Plainti22& ite 2at&
pointing to t-e 1no;ledge :? N9/ De2endant& o2 t-e
in&ta:ilit? o2 :e&t > %e&t and Roone? Pae.
*9 ,-e Court 2ind& t-at Plainti22& -a0e rai&ed
&u22iient 2at& to ;it-&tand N9/ De2endant&A 9otion 2or
Su..ar? 8udg.ent on t-e Setion 1+(:)Q Rule 1+:6"
lai.&. N9/ De2endant&A o.plete a:diation
re&pon&i:ilit? in in0e&tigating eit-er > %e&t or Roone?
Pae pro0ide& a &u22iient ground on ;-i- to a&&ert a
Rule 1+:6" 0iolation. 4t trial, t-e partie& ;ill -a0e to
pre&ent e0idene a& to ;-et-er it ;a& <at lea&t re1le&&=
2or N9/ De2endant& to rel? entirel? on t-e due diligene
in0e&tigation o2 Roone? Pae. ,-ere2ore, N9/
De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on t-e
Setion 1+(:)QRule 1+:6" 0iolation& &-all :e D3N#3D.
8. Alleged -IC+ iolations
Plainti22& neDt ontend t-at N9/ De2endant&A
ati0itie& in onnetion ;it- t-e &ale o2 > %e&t &euritie&
0iolated 0ariou& pro0i&ion& o2 t-e Ra1eteer #n2luened
and Corrupt $rganiNation& 4t o2 197+ (<R#C$=), 1!
/.S.C. H 196*(a)6(d). Co.plaint, Count& #5, 7##, 7###.
Spei2iall?, Plainti22& allege a pattern o2 ra1eteering
ati0it? <on&i&ting o2 repeated ... .ail 2raud, ;ire 2raud,
2raud in t-e &ale o2 &euritie& IandJ t-e inter&tate
tran&portation o2 &euritie& or .one? o:tained :? 2raud
and .one? laundering.= Co.plaint E 197. #n order to
&u&tain a lai. under R#C$ lai.&, a plainti22 .u&t &-o;
e0idene t-at de2endant& onduted (1) an enterpri&e, (*)
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page 9
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
t-roug- a pattern, (() o2 ra1eteering ati0it?. Sedi$a,
S.2.-.(. v. I$rex Co., 47( /.S. 479, 49769!, 1+" S.Ct.
(*7", (*!" (19!"). N9/ De2endant& ontend t-at t-e?
are entitled to &u..ar? @udg.ent on t-e R#C$ lai.&
:eau&e Plainti22& -a0e 2ailed to &-o; &u22iient e0idene
o2 t-e&e t-ree ele.ent&.
a. clai$ t,at 2laintiffs cannot esta)lis, t,at @MU
Defendants 0ere Apart of an Benterprise.C D
N9/ De2endant&A 2ir&t argue t-at t-e? are entitle to
&u..ar? @udg.ent on t-e R#C$ lai.& :eau&e Plainti22&
annot pro0e t-e eDi&tene o2 a R#C$ <enterpri&e.= De2A&
9otion at *". #ndeed, proo2 o2 an <enterpri&e= i& a
nee&&ar? ele.ent o2 a R#C$ 0iolation. 1! /.S.C. HH
1961(4), 196*. 1! /.S.C. H 1961(4) de2ine& a R#C$
enterpri&e a& inluding <an? union or group& o2
indi0idual& a&&oiated in 2at alt-oug- not a legal entit?.=
#n ot-er to &ueed on a R#C$ lai., a plainti22 .u&t
&-o; t-e &eparate eDi&tene o2 an <enterpri&e,= .ere proo2
o2 related <prediate at&= ;ill not &u22ie, alt-oug- t-e
e0idene &upporting ea- ele.ent ;ill o2ten oale&e.
United States v. :urkette, 4"* /.S. "76, "!(, 11+ S.Ct.
*"*4, *"*! (19!1). 4 R#C$ enterpri&e i& pro0ed :?
&-o;ing e0idene o2 (1) <an ongoing organiNation, 2or.al
or in2or.al= and (*) <e0idene t-at 0ariou& a&&oiate&
2untion a& a ontinuing unit.= Id.
N9/ De2endant& argue t-at t-ere i& no e0idene in
t-i& a&e t-at t-e? e0er 2untioned a& a <ontinuing unit.=
Rat-er, De2endant& argue, t-e? ;ere onl? a&&oiated 2or
t-e purpo&e o2 one pu:li o22ering, ;-i- ter.inated
pur&uant to t-e under;riter agree.ent (+ da?& a2ter it
:egan. 4n eDa.ination o2 t-e 2at& in t-i& a&e, -o;e0er,
re0eal& a &u22iient o..onalit? o2 intere&t and purpo&e
:et;een t-e N9/ De2endant& and Roone? Pae &u- t-at
t-e? .a? properl? :e -arateriNed a& a <R#C$=
enterpri&e.
*10 ,-e <enterpri&e= alleged :? Plainti22& on&i&t& o2
a group o2 under;riter& a&&oiated 2or t-e purpo&e o2
o..itting .ultiple &euritie& and 2raud 0iolation&. 4&
t-i& Court 2ound in it& di&.i&&al order, t-e li2e o2 t-i&
alleged enterpri&e did not on&i&t &olel? o2 a oneG&-ot
pu:li o22ering in Dee.:er, 19!6. Rat-er, it entailed an
ongoing pattern o2 0iolation&, ourring ;it- ea- tainted
&ale o2 > %e&t Seuritie&. ZZZZ Best Dis$issal +rder at
9(,+9(694 (2inding Plainti22&A allegation& to :e &u22iient
to on&titute a <pattern=). ,-e Court 2ind& t-at t-i& pattern
o2 ongoing ati0itie&, tied toget-er :?, inter alia, t-e
4gree.ent %et;een /nder;riter&, i& &u22iient to
e&ta:li&- t-e eDi&tene o2 a R#C$ enterpri&e. See United
States v. ;linder, 1+ F.(d 146!, 147467" (9t- Cir.199()
(2inding an <a&&oiated in 2at= enterpri&e ari&ing out o2
an agree.ent :et;een &euritie& :ro1erage&).
). clai$ t,at plaintiffs cannot esta)lis, t,at @MU
Defendants participated in operation or $anage$ent of
an* Aenterprise.D
N9/ De2endant& neDt ontend t-at Plainti22&A R#C$
lai.& .u&t 2ail :eau&e t-e? -a0e 2ailed to &-o; t-at
De2endant& <partiipated in t-e operation or .anage.ent
o2 t-e enterpri&e it&el2= a& reFuired :? t-e Supre.e
CourtA& dei&ion in -eeves v. .rnst 4 <oung, 4*" /.S.
17+, 6666, 11( S.Ct. 116(, 117( (199(). N9/
De2endant&A interpretation o2 -eeves, -o;e0er, i&
erroneou&. ,-e? ontend t-at &ine Roone? Pae ;a& t-e
sole .anager o2 t-e under;riting &?ndiate, t-ere i& no
;a? t-e?, a& nonG.anaging under;riter&, ould -a0e
0iolated R#C$ :eau&e t-e? ould not -a0e <.anaged=
t-e &?ndiate a& reFuired :? -eeves. 4& Plainti22& point
out, -o;e0er, -eeves doe& not &tand 2or t-e propo&ition
t-at t-ere an :e onl? one entit? partiipating in t-e
.anage.ent o2 a R#C$ &?ndiate. Rat-er, it reFuire& onl?
t-at a per&on -arged ;it- a R#C$ 0iolation -a0e &o.e
part in direting t-e .anage.ent or a22air& o2 t-e
enterpri&e it&el2. -eeves, 11( S.Ct. at 117( (<4n enterpri&e
al&o .ig-t :e KoperatedL or K.anagedL :? ot-er&
Ka&&oiated ;it-L t-e enterpri&e ;-o eDert ontrol o0er
it....=). #n t-i& a&e, Plainti22& -a0e argued and &-o;n t-at
t-e N9/ De2endant& -ad a &u22iient degree o2 in2luene
o0er t-e under;riting &?ndiate,
FN1+
and t-u&, De2endant&A
9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on t-i& :a&i& .u&t 2ail.
c. clai$ t,at plaintiffs' cannot esta)lis, a Apattern of
racketeering activit*D sufficient to support a -IC+
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page 1+
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
violation.
N9/ De2endant&A 2inal argu.ent 2or &u..ar?
@udg.ent on t-e R#C$ lai.& i& :a&ed on t-eir ontention
t-at Plainti22& annot e&ta:li&- a <pattern o2 ra1eteering
ati0it?.= De2A& 9otion at *7. 4 <pattern o2 ra1eteering
ati0it?= reFuire& at lea&t t;o prediate at& o2
ra1eteering ati0it? (i.e. &euritie& 0iolation&) ourring
;it-in a ten ?ear period. 1! /.S.C. H 1961("). #n order to
pro0e a R#C$ 0iolation, a plainti22 .u&t &-o; t-at t-e
prediate at& are related and <t-at t-e? a.ount to or po&e
a t-reat o2 ontinued ri.inal ati0it?.= 6.J., Inc. v.
@ort,0estern ;ell :elep,one Co., 49* /.S. **9, *(9, 1+9
S.Ct. *!9(, *9++ (19!9).
*11 ,-e alleged prediate at& in t-i& a&e are
identi2ied a& N9/ De2endant&A 2raudulent repre&entation&
andQor o.i&&ion& gi0ing ri&e to t-e &ale o2 > %e&t
&euritie&. 4t .o&t, Plainti22&A onede, t-e&e at& ourred
2ro. t-e Dee.:er 6, 19!6 initial pu:li o22er date until
t-e lo&ing o2 t-e la&& period on 8ul? 7, 19!7. See $ppAn
at *6. De2endant& argue, -o;e0er, t-at t-eir partiipation
in t-e > %e&t o22ering ;a& ontained ;it-in a (+6da?
period &pelled out in t-e 4gree.ent %et;een
/nder;riter& and t-u&, annot :e -arateriNed a& a
<pattern o2 ra1eteering= on&tituting a <t-reat o2
ontinued ri.inal ati0it?.=
De2endant& argu.ent, -o;e0er, i& :a&ed on a
.i&on&trution o2 t-e prediate at& upon ;-i-
Plainti22&A R#C$ lai.& are :a&ed. W-ile t-e N9/
De2endant&A <partiipation= .a? -a0e :een li.ited to a
(+6da? duration, t-e prediate at& alleged, i.e. t-e
ongoing pur-a&e o2 > %e&t &euritie&, ontinued ;ell
:e?ond t-i& ti.e period. ,-e&e ongoing prediate at&
&u22iientl? e&ta:li&- a t-reat o2 ontinued ri.inal
ati0it? &o a& to allo; Plainti22& to &ur0i0e a .otion 2or
&u..ar? @udg.ent. See 6.J., Inc., 49* /.S. at *4*64(,
1+9 S.Ct. at *9+* (<W-et-er t-e prediate& pro0ed
e&ta:li&- a t-reat o2 ontinued ra1eteering ati0it?
depend& on t-e &pei2i 2at& o2 ea- a&e.=). ,-ere2ore,
t-i& CourtA& pre0iou& po&ition t-at Plainti22&A <allegation&
are &u22iient to on&titute a KpatternL,= ZZZZ Best
Dis$issal +rder at 9+,+9(, &-all :e &u&tained under t-e
pre&ent .otion 2or &u..ar? @udg.ent. ,-ere2ore, N9/
De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on t-e R#C$
lai.& &-all :e D3N#3D.
E. State Co$$on (a0 Clai$s
Plainti22& -a0e al&o :roug-t lai.& again&t N9/
De2endant& alleging negligent .i&repre&entation and
2raud under Cali2ornia la;. Co.plaint, Count& 5, 7##,
7###. #n partiular, Plainti22& a&&ert t-at N9/ De2endant&
.ade negligent .i&repre&entation& :? partiipating in and
.a1ing repre&entation& o2 2at or .aterial o.i&&ion& o2
2at in <0ariou& dou.ent&= ;-i- <t-e? -ad no
rea&ona:le ground 2or :elie0ing ... to :e true.= Co.plaint
E *+". Plainti22& 2urt-er ontend t-at t-e N9/ De2endant&
engaged in o..on la; 2raud :? partiipating in a our&e
o2 ondut or on&pira? to oneal ad0er&e .aterial
in2or.ation regarding > %e&t in order to .aintain an
arti2iiall? -ig- .ar1et prie 2or > %e&t &euritie&.
a. argu$ent
N9/ De2endant& argue t-at Plainti22&A &tate la;
lai.& o2 2raud and negligent .i&repre&entation .u&t :e
di&.i&&ed :eau&e t-ere i& no proo2 t-at t-e N9/&
partiipated in .a1ing an? 2al&e &tate.ent&, nor i& t-ere
e0idene t-at an? Plainti22& atuall? and @u&ti2ia:l? relied
on t-e allegedl? o22ending dou.ent&.
FN11
4& di&u&&ed
under Setion 1+(:)QRule 1+:6" a:o0e, t-e inlu&ion o2
N9/ De2endant&A na.e& on t-e > %e&t pro&petu&,
;-et-er or not t-e? atuall? partiipated in t-e reation o2
t-at dou.ent, i& &u22iient to attri:ute t-e .i&&tate.ent&
and o.i&&ion& (inluding t-e 2ailure to orret) to t-e
N9/ De2endant&. ,-ere2ore, De2endant& argu.ent 2or
&u..ar? @udg.ent on t-i& :a&i& .u&t 2ail.
*12 4& to N9/ De2endant&A lai. t-at t-ere i& no
proo2 o2 atual and rea&ona:le reliane on t-e pro&petu&,
again, t-i& argu.ent .u&t 2ail. W-ile t-ere i& e0idene in
t-e reord indiating t-at so$e Plainti22& did not rel? on
t-e pro&petu&, Plainti22& ite additional e0idene &-o;ing
t-at &o.e de2endant& did a rel?. Ro&en&tein Dep. at 1+!,
Willen& Del.3D. 461*M Coro;itN Dep. at 1*16**,
Willen& Del. 3D. 4614. ,-ere2ore, N9/ De2endant&A
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page 11
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on Plainti22&A &tate la;
lai.& o2 2raud and negligent .i&repre&entation &-all :e
D3N#3D.
!. California Corporations Code Clai$s
Plainti22& 2inal lai.& again&t t-e N9/ De2endant&
allege 0iolation& o2 Cali2ornia Corporation& Code
Setion& *"4++, *"4+1, *""+4, *""+4.1 and 1"+7.
Co.plaint, EE *146*17, ***6*(1.
a. corporations code clai$s under sections 1!E99 and
1!E91.
,-e Co.plaint allege& t-at N9/ De2endant& are
lia:le 2or 0iolation& o2 Cali2ornia Corporation& Code H
*"4++ and H *"4+1. Setion *"4++ pro0ide& t-at it i&
<unla;2ul ... to .a1e, 2or t-e purpose of inducing t-e
pur-a&e or &ale o2 IaJ &eurit? .. an? &tate.ent= ;-i-
inlude& an untrue &tate.ent o2 .aterial 2at or o.it& to
&tate a .aterial 2at. Li1e;i&e, Setion *"4+1 pro0ide&
t-at it i& <unla;2ul 2or an? per&on to offer or sell a
&eurit? ... :? .ean& o2 an? ;ritten or oral
o..uniation ;-i- inlude& an untrue &tate.ent o2 a
.aterial 2at or o.it& to &tate a .aterial 2at.= N9/
De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent under :ot-
&etion& i& :a&ed on t-eir a&&ertion t-at &trit pri0it?
:et;een a plainti22 and de2endant <&eller&= i& reFuired
under :ot- &etion&, and t-at Cla&& Plainti22& -a0e 2ailed
to pro0e t-at t-e N9/ De2endant& <&old= t-e. > %e&t
&euritie&.
#n t-i& CourtA& 9a? 19, 19!9 di&.i&&al order, it -eld
t-at <&trit pri0it?= i& reFuired under &etion *"4+1, and
t-at under t-at Setion, <onl? atual &eller&, i.e. t-at
tran&2eror& o2 title, an :e -eld lia:le.= ZZZZ Best
Dis$issal +rder at 9(,+9+. Plainti22& onede a& .u-
and do not onte&t t-e 2at t-at t-ere i& no e0idene
&-o;ing t-at an? Plainti22 Cla&& repre&entati0e& pur-a&ed
> %e&t &euritie& diretl? 2ro. an? N9/ De2endant.
,-ere2ore, de&pite Plainti22&A ontention t-at t-e? &-ould
nonet-ele&& :e allo;ed to repre&ent t-o&e la&& .e.:er&
;-o allegedl? ;ere in pri0it? ;it- N9/ De2endant&, t-e
9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent a& to t-e Setion *"4+1
lai.& &-all :e 'R4N,3D.
Contrar? to N9/ De2endant&A a&&ertion, -o;e0er,
Setion *"4++ doe& not -a0e a reFuire.ent o2 &trit
pri0it?. See Mirkin v. 5asser$an, " Cal.4t- 1+!*, 11+4,
*( Cal.Rptr.*d 1+1, 114 (199() (<Nor i& it orret ... t-at
lia:ilit? under &etion& *"4++ and *""++ reFuired pri0it?
o2 ontrat :et;een t-e plainti22 and t-e de2endant&.=). 4&
t-i& Court eDplained in t-e 9a?, 19!9 di&.i&&al order, t-e
<&eller= reFuire.ent under Setion *"4++ i& eFui0alent to
t-e de2inition under Setion 1* o2 t-e Seuritie& 4t o2
19((. ZZZZ Best Dis$issal +rder at 9(,+9+M see also In
re Activision Securities (itigation, 6*1 F.Supp. 41", 4*7
(N.D.Cal.19!") (<ILJia:ilit? under ISetion *"4++J i&
li.ited to t-o&e K&eller&A 2ound lia:le under H 1*(*)). 4&
di&u&&ed supra, lia:ilit? under Setion 1* an :e
i.po&ed :ot- on diret &eller& and on t-o&e ;-o <&oliit=
&ale& o2 a &eurit?. See 2inter v. Da,l, 4!6 /.S. 6**, 647,
1+! S.Ct. *+6(, *+7! (19!!). ,-u&, &ine &trit pri0it? i&
not reFuired under Setion *"4++ and t-i& Court -a&
&u&tained Plainti22&A lai.& under Setion 1*(*), N9/
De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on t-e
Setion *"4++ lai.& &-all li1e;i&e :e D3N#3D.
). corporations code clai$s under Sections 1!!9E and
1!!9E.1
*13 N9/ De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar?
8udg.ent on t-e lai.& again&t t-e. under Setion *""+4
and *""+4.1 i& li1e;i&e :a&ed on an argu.ent t-at t-e&e
&etion& reFuire &trit pri0it? and t-at none eDi&t& in t-i&
a&e. Setion *""+4 i.po&e& lia:ilit? on t-o&e ;-o
<ontrol= pri.ar? 0iolator& o2 Setion *"4+1 (lia:ilit? 2or
t-o&e ;-o o22er to &ell &euritie& u&ing untrue &tate.ent or
o.i&&ion o2 2at). Li1e Setion *"4+1 it&el2, lia:ilit?
under Setion *""+4 reFuire& a &-o;ing o2 strict privit*
:et;een t-e :u?erQplainti22 and t-e ontrolled &eller.
ZZZZ Best Dis$issal +rder at 9(,+9+M In -e Diasonics
Securities (itigation, "99 F.Supp. 447, 4"9
(N.D.Cal.19!4). 4& ;a& true under t-e Setion 1" lai.&
di&u&&ed a:o0e, &u- a relation&-ip -a& not :een &-o;n
in t-i& a&e. ,-ere2ore, &u..ar? @udg.ent in 2a0or o2 t-e
N9/ De2endant& on t-e Setion *""+4 lai.& &-all :e
'R4N,3D.
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page 1*
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
Setion *""+4.1 i.po&e& lia:ilit? on t-o&e ;-o aid
and a:et a pri.ar? Setion *"4+1 0iolation (lia:ilit? 2or
t-o&e ;-o o22er to &ell u&ing untrue &tate.ent& or
o.i&&ion& o2 2at). Plainti22& ontend t-at N9/
De2endant&A under;riting ati0itie& (i.e., pa?ing 2or
pro.otion o2 t-e &ale, plaing t-eir na.e on t-e
pro&petu&, et.) <;ere in&tru.ental in au&ing &ale& o2
t-e > %e&t &euritie&= and <.ateriall? a&&i&ted > %e&tA&
9in1o;A& and Roone? IPaeA&J 0iolation& o2 H *"4+1.=
,-e Court 2ind& t-at e0idene o2 N9/ De2endant&A
ati0itie& in a&&i&ting Roone? Pae in t-e > %e&t pu:li
o22ering i& &u22iient to allo; t-e aiding and a:etting
lai.& under &tate la; to proeed. 4& t-i& Court -a&
pre0iou&l? -eld, t-ere i& no &trit pri0it? reFuire.ent 2or
lia:ilit? under H *""+4.1. In re ZZZZ Best Sec. (itig.,
I199+ ,ran&2er %inderJ Fed.Se.L.Rep. (CCC) E 9",416 at
97,+!* (C.D.Cal.199+). ,-u&, N9/ De2endant& argu.ent
t-at Plainti22& annot <lin1 an? o2 t-e IN9/&J ;it- an? o2
t-eir &ale&,= i& una0ailing. ,-ere2ore, N9/ De2endant&A
9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on t-e aider and a:ettor
lia:ilit? lai.& under Setion *""+4.1 &-all :e D3N#3D.
c. corporations code section 1!9#.
Plainti22&A 2inal lai. under t-e Cali2ornia
Corporation& Code allege& a 0iolation o2 Setion 1"+7.
,-i& &tatute reate& lia:ilit? 2orR
4n? o22ier&, diretor&, e.plo?ee& or agents o2 a
orporation ;-o ... (a) I.Ja1e, i&&ue, deli0er or pu:li&-
an? pro&petu&, report, irular, Iet.J ... re&peting t-e
orporation or it& &-are&, a&&et&, lia:ilitie&, Iet.J ...
;-i- i& 2al&e in an? .aterial re&pet, 1no;ing it to :e
2al&e, or partiipate in t-e .a1ing, i&&uane Iet.J ...
;it- 1no;ledge t-at t-e &a.e i& 2al&e in a .aterial
re&pet.
#n den?ing N9/ De2endant&A .otion to di&.i&& t-e
Setion 1"+7 lai.&, t-i& Court ited allegation& in t-e
o.plaint t-at t-e N9/ De2endant& ;ere <agent&= o2 >
%e&t 2or purpo&e& o2 t-e pu:li $22ering. ZZZZ Best
Dis$issal +rder at 9(,+94. Furt-er, t-e Court 2ound t-at
allegation& o2 &u- agen? <rai&e Fue&tion& o2 2at.= Id. 4t
t-e &u..ar? @udg.ent &tage, t-e di&po&ition o2 t-e&e
lai.& i& no di22erent. N9/ De2endant&A a&&ertion t-at
t-e? annot :e on&idered agent& o2 > %e&t, ;it-out
&-o;ing an a:&ene o2 .aterial 2at on t-i& i&&ue, ;it- not
&u22ie to &upport t-eir .otion 2or &u..ar? @udg.ent.
Celotex v. Catrett, 477 /.S. (17, (*", 1+6 S.Ct. *"4!,
*""4 (19!6). ,-ere2ore, &ine a Fue&tion o2 2at eDi&t& a&
to t-e agen? relation&-ip :et;een N9/ De2endant&, >
%e&t and Roone? Pae, N9/ De2endant&A 9otion 2or
Su..ar? 8udg.ent on t-e Setion 1"+7 lai.& &-all :e
D3N#3D.
#5. R4ND$LPC B. P4C3AS N$,#C3 $F 8$#ND3R.
*14 #ndi0idual De2endant, Randolp- B. Pae -a&
2iled a Notie o2 8oinder in t-e .otion :? nonG.anaging
under;riter& 2or &u..ar? @udg.ent. Pae ;a& t-e
2ounder and ontrolling &-are-older o2 t-e .anaging
under;riter in t-e > %e&t pu:li o22ering, Roone? Pae.
,-e @oinder o2 Pae in t-e N9/ De2endant&A .otion
i& .i&plaed. N9/ De2endant&A .otion 2or &u..ar?
@udg.ent i&, in large part, :a&ed on t-e N9/ De2endant&A
lai. t-at t-eir role in t-e > %e&t pu:li o22ering ;a&
.ini.al, -a0ing relied on t-e .anaging role o2 Roone?
Pae. ,-e 9otion goe& to &o.e lengt- to di&tane t-e
N9/ De2endant& 2ro. Roone? Pae, an entit? ;-i-
t-e? e22eti0el? onede ;a& diretl? in0ol0ed in t-e >
%e&t &euritie& 2raud. ,-ere2ore, t-e 9otion 2or Su..ar?
8udg.ent a& to De2endant, Randolp- B. Pae &-all :e
D3N#3D in it& entiret?.
5. C$NCL/S#$N
N9/ De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent i&
:e 'R4N,3D #N P4R, 4ND D3N#3D #N P4R,.
De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on Plainti22&A
lai.& under Setion 11 and Setion 1*(*) &-all :e
D3N#3D. De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on
Plainti22&A lai.& o2 ontrolling per&on lia:ilit? under
Setion 1" and Setion *+(a) &-all :e 'R4N,3D.
De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent on
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page 1(
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
Plainti22& lai.& under Setion 1+(:)QRule 1+:6" &-all :e
al&o D3N#3D. Li1e;i&e, N9/ De2endant&A 9otion 2or
Su..ar? 8udg.ent on t-e lai.& 2or Rio 0iolation&
&-all :e D3N#3D a& &-all t-e 9otion ;it- re&pet to
Plainti22&A &tate la; lai.& o2 2raud and negligent
.i&repre&entation.
$n De2endant&A 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent
under Plainti22&A Cali2ornia Corporation& Code Clai.&, t-e
9otion &-all :e 'R4N,3D 2or t-e lai.& ari&ing under
Setion& *"4+1, and *""+4 and D3N#3D ;it- re&pet to
Plainti22&A lai.& under Setion& *"4++, *""+4.1 and
1"+7.
4& to t-e atte.pted @oinder :? indi0idual De2endant
Randolp- Pae, t-e 9otion 2or Su..ar? 8udg.ent &-all
:e D3N#3D in it& entiret?, t-e ourt 2inding &u- @oinder
to :e i.proper. De2endant&A State.ent o2 /nontro0erted
Fat& and Conlu&ion& o2 La;, a& a.ended, i& -ere:?
inorporated into t-i& $rder.
#, #S S$ $RD3R3D
FN1. ,-e nonG.anaging under;riter de2endant&
inludeR (1) %ear S Co.pan?, #n.M (*) Cantor,
FitNgerald, S Co., #n.M (() 30an& S Co., #n.M
(4) Rau&-er, Piere, Re2&ne&, #n.M (")
Ro&en1rantN L?on S Ro&&, #n.M (6) Stein:erg S
L?.anM (7) /N Finanial Corp.M and (!) W-ale
Seuritie& Corp. #n t-i& CourtA& order o2 9a? 19,
19!9, addre&&ing 0ariou& De2endant&A .otion& to
di&.i&&, it &tated t-at t-e ter. <nonG.anaging
under;riter&= ;a& :eing u&ed a& a ter. o2
re2erene onl? <2or &a1e o2 lari2iation and not
to i.pute an? ot-er .eaning to it.= In re ZZZZ
Best Securities (itigation, I19!9 ,ran&2er
%inderJ Fed.Se.L.Rep. (CCC) E 94,4!", at
9(,+91 n. 9 (C.D.Cal.19!9) I-ereina2ter ZZZZ
Best Dis$issal +rder J.
FN*. 4t t-e ti.e o2 t-e > %e&t pu:li o22ering,
Roone? Pae ;a& perei0ed a& a trou:led
&euritie& dealer and ;a& under in0e&tigation :?
t-e Seuritie& and 3D-ange Co..i&&ion. $n
No0e.:er 7, 19!7, approDi.atel? one ?ear a2ter
t-e > %e&t o22ering, Roone? Pae ;a& 2ored into
:an1rupt?.
FN(. ,-e Fi2t- 4.ended Con&olidated
Co.plaint ;a& 2iled on Septe.:er *!, 199+ and
no; ontrol& t-i& litigation.
FN4. Count # and t-e 2ir&t lai. o2 Count& 7##
and 7### o2 t-e Fi2t- 4.ended Co.plaint allege
0iolation& o2 &etion& 11 and 1" o2 t-e Seuritie&
4t, 1" /.S.C. HH 771, 77o, ;-ile Count ## and
t-e &eond lai. o2 Count& 7## and 7### allege
0iolation& o2 &etion& 1* and 1" o2 t-e Seuritie&
4t. 1" /.S.C. HH 77B, 77 l.
FN". ,-e Dee.:er 9, 19!6 o22ering on&i&ted,
initiall?, o2 1,1++,+++ <unit&= o2 &euritie&. ,-e&e
unit& on&i&ted o2 t-ree &-are& o2 o..on &to1
(o2 ;-i- t-ere ;ere alread? li1e &-are& :eing
traded pu:lil?) and one ;arrant to pur-a&e one
&-are o2 o..on &to1. ,-e&e ;arrant& ;ere a
ne; i&&ue on t-e pu:li .ar1et.
FN6. Finding t-at t-e ati0itie& Plainti22& allege
are &u22iient to &ur0i0e a .otion 2or &u..ar?
@udg.ent on t-e Setion 1*(*) lai.&, t-e Court
need not addre&& Plainti22&A additional argu.ent
t-at t-e N9/ De2endant&A Setion 1*(*) lia:ilit?
an :e grounded on po&tGdi&tri:ution trading.
FN7. Setion *+ parallel& Setion 1", i.po&ing
<ontrolling per&on= lia:ilit? 2or pri.ar?
0iolation& o2 Setion 1+(:)QRule 1+:6". In re
Atlantic /inancial Manage$ent, Inc., 7!4 F.*d
*9, (( (1&t Cir.19!6), cert. denied, 4!1 /.S.
1+7* (19!7).
FN!. ,o t-e eDtend t-e Co.plaint rai&e& lai.&
or aider and a:ettor lia:ilit? under Setion
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

Page 14
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.), Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
(Cite as: 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.))
1+(:)QRule 1+:6", t-e&e lai.& are preluded :?
t-e Supre.e CourtA& dei&ion in Central ;ank of
Denver, @.A. v. /irst Interstate ;ank of Denver,
et al., "11 /.S. 164, 114 S.Ct. 14(9, 14""
(1994). See $rder o2 4ugu&t 1*, 1994 at 11.
FN9. #n 6ollinger v. :itan Capital, 914 F.*d
1"64 (9t- Cir.199+), cert. denied, 499 /.S. 976
(1991), t-e Nint- Ciruit adopted t-e 2ollo;ing
de2inition o2 re1le&&ne&&R < KIRe1le&& ondut
.a? :e de2ined a& a -ig-l? unrea&ona:le
o.i&&ion, in0ol0ing not .erel? &i.ple, or e0en
ineDu&a:le negligene, :ut an eDtre.e departure
2ro. t-e &tandard& o2 ordinar? are, and ;-i-
pre&ent& a danger o2 .i&leading :u?er& or &eller&
t-at i& eit-er 1no;n to t-e de2endant or i& &o
o:0iou& t-at t-e ator .u&t -a0e :een a;are o2
it.L = Id. at 1"69 (Fuoting Sunstrand Corp. v. Sun
C,e$. Corp., ""( F.*d 1+((, 1+4464" (7t- Cir.)
cert. denied, 4(4 /.S. !7" (1977)).
FN1+. ,-i& in2luene inlude& 2inaning t-e
under;riting e22ort, ontratual delegation o2
aut-orit? to Roone? Pae, and :eing in a po&ition
to <ontrol t-e 2lo; o2 in2or.ation= to potential
> %e&t &euritie& pur-a&er&. See $ppAn at *( n.
(4 and 2atual &oure& ited t-erein.
FN11. 4 lai. or negligent .i&repre&entation
lai. inlude& a reFuire.ent o2 atual and
rea&ona:le reliane. ?arcia v. Superior Court,
*6! Cal.Rptr. 779 (199+).
C.D.Cal.,1994.
#n re >>>> %e&t Seuritie& Litigation
Not Reported in F.Supp., 1994 WL 746649 (C.D.Cal.),
Fed. Se. L. Rep. P 9!,4!", R#C$ %u&.Di&p.'uide !7("
3ND $F D$C/93N,
) *+14 ,-o.&on Reuter&. No Clai. to $rig. /S 'o0. Wor1&.

You might also like