This document provides an evaluation checklist for assessing individual and group performance in giving a presentation. It evaluates substance and content of the presentation, style and delivery techniques, ability to answer questions, overall effectiveness, and group preparation. Key areas assessed include having a clear structure, relevant ideas, examples, conclusions, vocabulary, fluency, knowledge, visual aids, cues, intonation, pace, eye contact, body language, audience attention, paraphrasing questions, objectives, communication, cooperation within the group, task completion, use of materials, and leadership. Scores are provided across several categories with a total possible score of 200.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
178 views2 pages
Assess Presentation
This document provides an evaluation checklist for assessing individual and group performance in giving a presentation. It evaluates substance and content of the presentation, style and delivery techniques, ability to answer questions, overall effectiveness, and group preparation. Key areas assessed include having a clear structure, relevant ideas, examples, conclusions, vocabulary, fluency, knowledge, visual aids, cues, intonation, pace, eye contact, body language, audience attention, paraphrasing questions, objectives, communication, cooperation within the group, task completion, use of materials, and leadership. Scores are provided across several categories with a total possible score of 200.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
GIVING A PRESENTATION – EVALUATION CHECKLIST
Assessment Criteria for Individual Performance
(i) Substance/contents: Total marks:
60 Teach e r’ OUT Your speech should hold the audience’s attention and be clearly You s o structured m f a r k Was there a clear introduction to the topic? 6 Were my ideas relevant/important? 6 Was the sequence logical and/or clear to the listener? 6 Did I give examples/did I clearly illustrate my ideas? 6 Was there a logical conclusion to my ‘speech’? 6 Was a wide range of vocabulary used? ( choice of words) 6 Was language well developed with no or minimal errors? 6 Did I speak fluently? 6 Did I reveal knowledge of the subject? 6 Was the poster clear and balanced? (information and visual impact) 6
(ii) Style and technique Total marks:
42 Teach e r’ OUT You s o Delivery and posture (Verbal and non-verbal technique) m f a r k Were my cue cards well designed? 6 Did I use the right intonation? 6 Was my voice clearly audible? 6 Was my ‘speech’ delivered at the right pace? 6 Did I keep eye contact? 6 Was body language adequate? 6 Was the audience silent and paying attention? 6
(iiii) Ability to deal with questions Total marks:
18 Teach e r’ OUT You s o m f a r k Did I paraphrase the question(s)? 6 Was I brief and to the point? 6 Did I deal with the question effectively? (Were doubts cleared?) 6 (iv) General effectiveness Total marks: 20 Teach e r’ OUT You s o m f a r k Were overall objectives achieved? 10 Was I able to communicate thought and emotion? 10
(v) Group work (preparation of the presentation) Total marks:
60 Teach e r’ OUT You s o (All members except the organiser) m f a r k In the group I spoke quietly 6 I helped the organiser do his/her job 6 I waited for my turn 6 I made negotiation easy by making my ideas clear/paraphrasing/… 6 I carried out the assigned tasks in minimum time and efficiently 6 I used English most of the time 6 I planned ahead I brought all needed materials (e.g. song, materials for 6 the poster) I helped design the draft/blueprint of the poster 6 I helped execute the poster 6 All in all, did I act responsibly all along? 6 Did I make sure all instructions were clear? 10 The organiser:
Did I oversee the division of tasks? 10
Did I give the floor in an efficient way? 10 Did I sum up/paraphrase / wrap up when necessary? 10 Did I oversee negotiation / make decisions when needed? 10 Did I do my best (even under difficult conditions…)? 10
(Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965, Volume 4) Imre Lakatos (Ed.), Alan Musgrave (Ed.)-Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge-Cambridge University Pr
Philosophers As Educational Reformers (International Library of The Philosophy of Education Volume 10) - The Influence of Idealism On British Educational Thought PDF
(Studies in Discourse & Grammar) Joanne Scheibman - Point of View and Grammar_ Structural Patterns of Subjectivity in American English Conversation (Studies in Discourse & Grammar)-John Benjamins Publ