Metode Prorcuna
Metode Prorcuna
sat
Saturated vapor concentration (kgm
-3
)
k
m
Mass transfer coefficient (ms
-1
)
Simple Model
The Evaporation of Volatile Liquids
(Kawamura and Mackay 1987)
Assumes simple mass transfer coefficient
No temperature variation
9 1 3 2 9 7
0048 . 0
d Sc u k
m
u Reference wind speed (ms
-1
)
Sc Laminar Schmidt number (unitless)
d Diameter of puddle (m)
Simple Model
Assumes ideal gas behavior
p
v c
sat
T R
P M
M
c
Molecular weight (kgkmol
-1
)
P
v
Vapor pressure at temperature, T (Pa)
R Universal gas constant = 8,314 (Jkmol
-1
K
-1
)
T
p
Temperature of the puddle (K)
Simple Model
Pros
Requires few chemical
properties available from
MSDS sheets
Vapor pressure and density
at reference temperature
Molecular weight
Not computationally
intensive
Cons
Ignores changes in
puddle temperature
Overly conservative??
Cannot take into account
all ambient conditions
Complex Model
Evaporation from a plane liquid surface into a
turbulent boundary layer (Brighton 1985)
Complex mass transfer coefficient
) , , , , (
0 *
z u d f k
ac m
ac
Diffusivity of material in air-vapor mixture (m
2
s
-1
)
u
*
Friction velocity (ms
-1
)
z
0
Effective surface roughness (m)
Kinematic viscosity of air (m
2
s
-1
)
Complex Model
Solution of E requires energy budget analysis
) +F +F +F +F +F (F
c
=
dt
(t) dT
H E G S
p p pl
p
1
t Time (s)
c
pl
Specific heat capacity (Jkg
-1
K
-1
)
p
Density of the puddle (kgm
-3
)
p
Depth of the puddle (m)
F
S
Shortwave flux (Wm
-2
)
F
u
u
u
C
C Downwind
concentration
(mgm
-3
)
Summary
The simple model will conservatively model
volatile chemicals
Lower wind speeds produce lower evaporation
rate but overall higher downwind concentration
Use of the complex model should be
considered if the chemical properties are
available
during emergency response
for developing very specific EPHA scenarios
Questions?