CH 09 SM
CH 09 SM
2.
Questions
Brief
Exercises
1, 2
Exercises
Problems
Set A
Problems
Set B
1, 6, 7, 8
1, 6, 7, 8
4, 5, 6, 7, 8
3, 4, 5, 6,
11
2, 3, 4
1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6
1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6
4.
9, 10, 11
5, 6, 10
8, 9
8, 9
5.
12
8, 10
7, 8, 9
8, 9
8, 9
6.
13
9, 10
7, 8
8, 9
8, 9
7.
8, 9
8, 9
8.
14
10
8, 9
8, 9
9.
15
3, 11
10, 11
7, 9
7, 9
16, 17
12
12
10
10
9-1
Description
Difficulty
Level
Time
Allotted (min.)
1A
Simple
20-30
2A
Simple
15-25
3A
Moderate
20-30
4A
Moderate
15-25
5A
Moderate
15-25
6A
Complex
15-25
7A
Complex
15-25
8A
Moderate
35-45
9A
Moderate
35-45
10A
Moderate
15-25
1B
Simple
20-30
2B
Simple
15-25
3B
Moderate
20-30
4B
Moderate
15-25
5B
Moderate
15-25
6B
Complex
15-25
7B
Complex
15-25
8B
Moderate
35-45
9B
Moderate
35-45
10B
Moderate
15-25
9-2
Knowledge
Q9-2
BE9-1
Comprehension
Q9-1
Application
Analysis
Q9-3
BE9-2
E9-1
P9-1A
P9-8A
P9-1B
P9-8B
Q9-8
BE9-3
BE9-4
BE9-5
BE9-6
BE911
E9-2
E9-3
E9-4
BE9-7
E9-5
E9-10
P9-8A
P9-6A
P9-7A
P9-6B
P9-7B
Q9-5
Q9-4
Q9-6
Q9-7
Q9-10
Q9-9
Q9-11
E9-6
Q9-12
BE910
E9-7
E9-8
E9-9
BE9-9
BE910
E9-7
E9-8
P9-8A
P9-8A
P9-9A
P9-8B
P9-9B
BE910
E9-9
P9-8A
Q9-13
7. Demonstrate how
notes receivable are
valued.
8. Determine the entries
to record the
disposition of notes
receivable.
Q9-14
9. Illustrate the
statement
presentation of
receivables.
Q9-15
BE9-11
E9-10
E9-11
P9-9A
P9-9B
Q9-17
BE9-12
Q9-16
Broadening Your
Perspective
BYP9-2
BYP9-3
9-3
P9-1A
P9-2A
P9-3A
P9-4A
P9-5A
P9-1B
P9-2B
P9-3B
P9-4B
P9-5B
P9-9A
P9-8B
P9-9B
P9-6A
P9-6B
P9-8A
P9-9A
P9-8B
P9-9B
BE9-8
Synthesis
Evaluation
BYP9-5
BYP9-6
P9-9A
P9-8B
P9-9B
P9-9A
P9-8B
P9-9B
P9-7A
P9-7B
E9-12
P9-10A
P9-10B
BYP9-1
BYP9-4
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
01. The three major types and classification
follows:
Type
(1) Accounts receivable
(2) Notes receivable
(3) Other receivables
of receivables are as
Classification
Current asset
Current or noncurrent
depending on due date
Current or noncurrent
depending on due date
asset
asset
50
04. Under the direct write-off method, bad debt losses are not estimated
and no allowance account is used. When an account is determined
to be uncollectible, the loss is debited to Bad Debts Expense. The
direct write-off method makes no attempt to match bad debts
expense to sales revenues, or to show the net realizable value of the
receivables in the balance sheet. The disadvantages are that it may
not match expenses with revenue and it does not accurately reflect
the collectible value of the accounts receivable on the balance sheet.
5. The essential features of the allowance method of accounting for
bad debts are:
(1) Uncollectible accounts receivable are estimated in advance, in
order to match the cost of the bad debts against sales in the
same accounting period in which the sale occurred.
(2) Estimated uncollectibles are debited to Bad Debts Expense and
credited to Allowance for Doubtful Accounts through an
adjusting entry at the end of each period.
(3) Actual uncollectibles are debited to Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts and credited to Accounts Receivable at the time a
specific account is written off.0
9-4
7.
8.
4,100
4,100
2,300
9-5
9-6
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
9-8
14,000
3,800
3,800
Cash............................................................................. 10,200
Accounts Receivable ($14,000 $3,800) ..........
10,200
15,000
1,000
4,800
9-9
4,800
7,000
7,000
(b)
(1) Before Write-Off (2) After Write-Off
Accounts receivable
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Net realizable value
$700,000
0054,000
$646,000
$693,000
0047,000
$646,000
7,000
Cash .........................................................................
Accounts Receivable .......................................
7,000
7,000
7,000
72.38
2.62
75.00
72.38
2.62
75.00
9,000
9,000
9,000
9,000
(b)
Apr.
July
(c)
Apr.
July
1
1
1
1
1
1
10,000
10,000
175
10,000
10,000
175
10,000
10,000
9-11
36,000
WENDY COMPANY
Balance Sheet (Partial)
February 28, 2003
Assets
Current assets
Cash
Accounts receivable .......................................... $600,000
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts ..........
36,000
Merchandise inventory ......................................
Prepaid expenses...............................................
Total current assets .................................
9-12
$090,000
564,000
130,000
13,000
$797,000
SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES
EXERCISE 9-1
1.
Jan.
Feb.
2.
6
5
Jan. 10
Feb. 12
Mar. 10
5,000
Cash ...................................................................
Accounts ReceivableWatson................
5,000
5,000
5,000
6,000
100
11,000
6,000
100
EXERCISE 9-2
(a) (1) Dec. 31
(2) Dec. 31
(2) Dec. 31
8,000
8,500
4,000
6,000
9-13
8,000
8,500
4,000
6,000
EXERCISE 9-3
(a)
Accounts Receivable
Amount
$65,000
017,600
008,500
006,400
(b) Mar. 31
%
2
10
30
50
Estimated
Uncollectible
$1,300
01,760
02,550
03,200
$8,810
7,010
8,000
1,100
Accounts ReceivableWorthy................................
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts...................
1,100
Cash .........................................................................
Accounts ReceivableWorthy.........................
1,100
7,010
EXERCISE 9-4
2002
Dec. 31
2003
May 11
June 12
12
9-14
8,000
1,100
1,100
1,100
EXERCISE 9-5
(a) Dec. 15
242.50
7.50
250.00
(b) Apr.
May
Cash ..............................................................
Accounts ReceivableZachos ...........
700.00
Accounts ReceivableZachos...................
Interest Revenue ..................................
[28.8% X ($1,300 $700) x 1/12 ]
14.40
June 1
700.00
14.40
EXERCISE 9-6
One possible reason CN sold its receivables may have been to provide it
with a source of current financing. Other possible reasons include not
wanting to deal with the administration of collecting accounts, the desire to
accelerate cash receipts, or to improve its financial ratios (e.g., receivables
turnover).
9-15
EXERCISE 9-7
Nov.
Dec.
1
1
16
31
18,000
3,600
4,000
331
18,000
3,600
4,000
331
$300
18
13
$331
EXERCISE 9-8
2002
May
Dec. 31
2003
May
10,500
700
Cash .......................................................................
Notes ReceivableJones ..............................
Interest Receivable........................................
Interest Revenue ($10,500 X 10% X 4/12) ....
11,550
9-16
10,500
700
10,500
700
350
EXERCISE 9-9
(a) Nov. 1
4,000
200
(b) Nov. 1
(a) Jan. 15
Feb. 10
15
15,000
4,275
225
4,500
970
30
1,000
4,000
12,000
45
45
(b) Interest Revenue is reported under other revenues and gains. The
Credit Card Expense and Debit Card Expense accounts are usually
categorized as selling expenses.
9-17
EXERCISE 9-11
DROST COMPANY
Balance Sheet (Partial)
October 31, 2003
(In millions)
Assets
Current assets
Accounts receivable ....................................... $2,907
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts........
31
Advances to employees .................................
Notes receivable .............................................
HST recoverable .............................................
Total current assets ..............................
$2,876
5
228
25
$3,134
EXERCISE 9-12
Nike
Receivables Turnover
$8,995.1 $1,569.4 = 5.73 times
365 days 5.73 = 63.7 days
Reebok
$2,899.9 $417.4 = 6.95 times
365 days 6.95 = 52.5 days
Nikes receivable turnover and collection period are not as good as
Reeboks or the industry average. Reeboks ratios are slightly better than
the industry average.
9-18
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS
PROBLEM 9-1A
(a) 1.
2.
50,000
50,000
3.
Cash.................................................................... 2,800,000
Accounts Receivable ................................
2,800,000
4.
90,000
Accounts Receivable.........................................
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts..........
25,000
Cash...................................................................
Accounts Receivable .............................
25,000
5.
90,000
25,000
25,000
(b)
Accounts Receivable
Bal.
(1)
(5)
960,000
3,300,000
25,000
Bal.
1,320,000
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
50,000
2,800,000
90,000
25,000
9-19
(4)
90,000
Bal.
(5)
70,000
25,000
Bal.
5,000
$ 5,000
125,000
$120,000
9-20
PROBLEM 9-2A
(a) $38,000
(b) $63,000 ($2,100,000 X 3%)
The balance in the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts is irrelevant.
(c) $47,400 [($840,000 X 6%) $3,000]
(d) $53,400 [($840,000 X 6%) + $3,000]
(e) The weaknesses of the direct write-off method are two-fold. First, it
does not match expenses with revenues. Second, the accounts
receivable are not stated at their estimated net realizable value at the
balance sheet date.
9-21
PROBLEM 9-3A
(a) Dec. 31
16,050
$25,050
9,000
$16,050
Explanation
2002
Dec. 31
Adjusting entry
Ref.
Debit
Credit
16,050
Balance
16,050
Explanation
Ref.
Balance
Adjusting entry
Debit
Credit
16,050
09,000
25,050
00,1,000
24,050
25,050
1,000
9-22
Balance
Mar.
May
1
1
1
1,000
1,000
Cash ...................................................................
Accounts Receivable ................................
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
(c)
Dec. 31
9-23
12,050
PROBLEM 9-4A
(a)
Accounts Receivable
Amount
$100,000
60,000
50,000
30,000
%
1
5
10
25
Estimated
Uncollectible
$ 1,000
3,000
5,000
7,500
$16,500
6,500
2,000
1,000
Cash ................................................................................
Accounts Receivable...............................................
1,000
6,500
2,000
1,000
1,000
9-24
PROBLEM 9-5A
30,000
37,000
37,000
5,000
Cash ..............................................................................
Accounts Receivable ...........................................
5,000
5,000
5,000
$09,000
30,000
5,000
(37,000)
$ 7,000
9-25
PROBLEM 9-6A
Yr. 1 Balance
Sales
Yr. 2 Balance
Accounts Receivable
8,300,000
28,500,000
Write-offs
Collections
9,500,000
105,000
27,195,000
750,000
285,000
930,000
285,000
285,000
28,500,000
105,000
105,000
27,195,000
9-26
PROBLEM 9-7A
(a)
$36,000
60,000
96,000
32,000
64,000
27,000
91,000
15,000
$76,000
(b)
$24,000
76,000
100,000
Beg. balance
Credit sales
End. balance
Accounts Receivable
24,000
76,000
Write-offs
Collections
38,000
9-27
1,000
61,000
62,000
$38,000
PROBLEM 9-8A
Jan.
Feb.
5
2
12
26
Apr.
5
12
June 2
July
15
Oct. 13
Dec. 31
7,000
7,000
7,800
4,000
4,000
7,930
7,187
4,080
5,000
5,000
No entry required
9-28
7,000
7,000
7,800
4,000
4,000
7,800
130
7,000
187
4,000
80
5,000
5,000
PROBLEM 9-9A
(a) Oct.
7
12
15
31
31
Cash ...................................................................
Notes ReceivableForan .........................
Interest Receivable....................................
($8,000 X 6% X 2/12)
8,080
6,900
8,000
80
6,900
485
8,160
90
9-29
750.00
485
8,000
80
80
90
Explanation
1
1
31
Ref.
Debit
Credit
Balance
8,000
8,000
28,000
20,000
12,000
Credit
Balance
Balance
Accounts Receivable
Date
Oct.
Explanation
Ref.
7
15
31
Debit
6,900
0,485
8,160
06,900
07,385
15,545
Interest Receivable
Date
Oct.
Explanation
1
1
31
31
Ref.
Debit
Credit
Balance
80
80
61.55
160
80
0
90
Balance
90
(c)
TARDIF COMPANY
Balance Sheet (partial)
October 31, 2003
Assets
Current assets
Notes receivable ..........................................................
Accounts receivable ....................................................
Interest receivable .......................................................
Total current assets ...........................................
9-30
$12,000
15,545
90
$27,635
8,080
8,000
80
9-31
PROBLEM 9-10A
(a)
2000
1999
Current ratio
(b)
2000
1999
Receivables
turnover
Collection period
(c) CNs short-term liquidity has deteriorated. The current and acid test
ratios both declined. The receivables turnover is less and the average
collection period is longer.
9-32
PROBLEM 9-1B
(a) 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
2,600,000
40,000
Cash ............................................................
Accounts Receivable .........................
2,300,000
65,000
25,000
Cash ............................................................
Accounts Receivable .........................
25,000
51,200
2,600,000
40,000
2,300,000
65,000
25,000
25,000
(b)
51,200
(c)
Accounts Receivable
Bal. 1,000,000 (2)
40,000
2,300,000
(1)
2,600,000 (3)
(5)
25,000 (4)
65,000
(5)
25,000
Bal. 1,195,000
9-33
71,200
PROBLEM 9-2B
(a) $24,000
(b) $45,000 ($1,500,000 X 3%)
(c) $27,000 [($600,000 X 5%) $3,000]
(d) $32,000 [($600,000 X 5%) + $2,000]
(e) The direct write-off method of reporting bad debts expense is not in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles because
it does not match expenses with the associated revenues. In
addition, the accounts receivable are not stated at their net realizable
value at the balance sheet date.
(f)
9-34
PROBLEM 9-3B
(a) Dec. 31
18,950
800
800
31 Cash..............................................................
Accounts Receivable ..........................
800
(b)
1. Mar. 31
2.
May 31
18,950
800
800
800
Explanation
2002
Dec. 31
Adjusting
Ref.
Debit
Credit
18,950
Balance
18,950
Explanation
Ref.
Debit
Balance
Adjusting
Credit
Balance
18,950
10,000
28,950
800
28,150
28,950
800
(c)
Dec. 31
9-35
2,970
2,970
PROBLEM 9-4B
$2,200
4%
$3,600
5%
$2,000
20,300
5,000
5,000
Cash ...........................................................................
Accounts Receivable..........................................
5,000
$25,000
10%
$2,500
20,300
5,000
5,000
5,000
9-36
PROBLEM 9-5B
1,300,000
41,000
5,200
Cash ..........................................................................
Accounts Receivable .......................................
5,200
1,300,000
41,000
5,200
5,200
$ 150,000
1,300,000
1,450,000
9-37
1,266,000
$ 184,000
$10,000
5,200
41,000
$25,800 Debit
47,880
47,880
Accounts receivable:
Beginning balance ...............................................
Add:
Credit sales ............................................
Deduct: Collections on account ......................... $1,225,000
Write-off of uncollectible accounts ......
41,000
Ending balance ....................................................
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Beginning balance ................................................
Add:
Recovery of account ..............................
Bad debts expense .................................
Deduct: Write-off of uncollectible accounts.......
Ending balance .....................................................
9-38
$ 150,000
1,300,000
1,450,000
1,266,000
$ 184,000
$10,000
5,200
47,880
63,080
41,000
$22,080
PROBLEM 9-6B
Yr. 1 Balance
Sales
Yr. 2 Balance
Accounts Receivable
4,100,000
22,500,000
Write-offs
Collections
4,800,000
150,000
21,650,000
350,000
225,000
425,000
150,000
225,000
150,000
225,000
22,500,000
22,500,000
21,650,000
21,650,000
PROBLEM 9-7B
(a)
Sales
Cost of goods sold
Gross profit on sales
Total sales
Cash sales
Credit sales
(b)
?
66,000
31,000
9-40
1,500
80,000
PROBLEM 9-8B
(a)
Jan.
5
20
Feb. 18
Apr. 20
30
May 25
Aug. 18
23
Sept. 1
18,000
18,000
8,000
18,405
15,400
6,000
8,400
6,000
12,000
9-41
18,000
18,000
8,000
18,000
405
15,000
400
6,000
8,000
400
6,000
12,000
Dec. 31
400
400
9-42
PROBLEM 9-9B
(a)
(b) July 1
5
14
16
31
31
6,120
6,200
679
21
415
4,888
Interest Receivable.......................................
($10,000 X 9% X 1/12)
Interest Revenue ...................................
75
9-43
6,000
120
6,200
700
415
4,800
44
44
75
Explanation
July 1
1
31
Balance
Ref.
Debit
Credit
Balance
6,000
4,800
20,800
14,800
10,000
Credit
Balance
Accounts Receivable
Date
Explanation
Ref.
July 5
16
31
Debit
6,200
415
4,888
6,200
6,615
11,503
Interest Receivable
Date
Explanation
July 1
1
31
31
Balance
Ref.
Debit
Credit
Balance
120
44
164
44
0
75
T
75
Adjusting entry
(d)
OUELLETTE CO.
Balance Sheet (partial)
July 31, 2003
Assets
Current assets
Notes receivable................................................................
Accounts receivable .........................................................
Interest receivable.............................................................
Total current assets ..................................................
9-44
$10,000
11,503
75
$21,578
9-45
PROBLEM 9-10B
(a)
2000
1999
Current ratio
$782,878 $899,684
= 0.9:1
$1,133,906 $1,874,643
= 0.6:1
Acid test
$690,612 $899,684
= 0.8:1
$1,048,279 $1,874,643
= 0.6:1
(b)
2000
1999
Receivables
turnover
$4,210,313 $858,257
= 4.9 x
$4,160,167 $675,706
= 6.2 x
Collection period
(c) Becker Milks short-term liquidity has improved slightly. The current
and acid test ratios both increased. However, the receivables
turnover is lower and the collection period is longer. This could be
the reason the current and acid test ratios look artificially better.
Further investigation is warranted before one should conclude on
Becker Milks liquidity.
9-46
(a)
($ in thousands)
2000
1999
Receivables turnover
$20,844
[$2,294 + $2,494) 2]
= 8.7 x
$21,465
[($2,494 + $7,196) 2]
= 4.4 x
Collection period
(b) The acid test ratio decreased significantly from 1999 to 2000. The
receivables turnover increased substantially, and the average
collection period decreased correspondingly, from 1999 to 2000.
9-47
1999
1998
Current ratio
$95,746 $56,862
= 1.7:1
$113,797 $71,817
= 1.6:1
$37,429 $56,862
= 0.7:1
$31,135 $71,817
= 0.4:1
(b)
($ in thousands)
1999
1998
Receivables
turnover
$302,392
[$29,955 + $30,776) 2]
= 9.9 x
$291,655
[$30,776 + $23,379) 2]
= 10.8 x
Collection period
(c) High Liner Foods does an adequate job of managing its receivables.
However, it appears the managements performance has deteriorated in
1999 compared to the previous year. Its average collection period of 34
days in 1998 and 37 days in 1999 is longer than its credit terms of 7 to
30 days.
(d) The same allowance for doubtful accounts appears reasonable. If there
was a significant difference in credit risk in the separate locations, this
should have been disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
9-48
9-49
(a)
2003
2002
2001
$600,000
$400,000
$ 02,500
3,800
9,600
3,000
0
900
$ 19,800
$ 2,400
3,800
6,400
2,000
0 ,600
$ 15,200
3.5%
3.3%
3.8%
(b)
Average accounts receivable (5%).......
$25,000
$30,000
$20,000
$ 2,000
$ 2,400
$ 1,600
$19,800
2,400
$22,200
$15,200
0 1,600
$16,800
3.7%
4.2%
3.9%
9-50
9-51
9-52
9-53
9-54