HOUSEHOLD DECISIONS

Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in decision making autonomy based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out .


Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in decision making autonomy based on marital status of the respondents .

HOUSEHOLD BUDGETING
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in household budgeting decisions based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out


Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in household budgeting decisions based on marital status of the respondents .









Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
3.165 .082 -.159 48 .874 -.040 .251 -.544 .464
Equal
variances
not
assumed
-.159 42.023 .874 -.040 .251 -.546 .466
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Household
decisions
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
2.871 .097 .512 48 .611 .160 .312 -.468 .788
Equal
variances
not
assumed
.512 45.205 .611 .160 .312 -.469 .789
df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Household
Budgeting
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t



FAMILY SUPPORT

Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in support from family based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out


Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in support from family based on marital status of the respondents .





FINANCIAL POSITION

Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in perceived financial position of the family based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out


Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in perceived financial position based on marital status of the respondents .
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
4.642 .036 .115 48 .909 .040 .347 -.657 .737
Equal
variances
not
assumed
.115 43.162 .909 .040 .347 -.659 .739
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Family
support
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
.161 .690 .556 48 .580 .160 .288 -.418 .738
Equal
variances
not
assumed
.556 47.639 .580 .160 .288 -.418 .738
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Financial
position
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
MOBILITY

Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in mobility based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in mobility of respondents based on marital status of the respondents .


ROLE OF MEN/WOMEN

Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in perceived roles of men and women based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in perceived role of women based on marital status of the respondents .






Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
1.302 .260 -1.968 48 .055 -.680 .345 -1.375 .015
Equal
variances
not
assumed
-1.968 45.951 .055 -.680 .345 -1.375 .015
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Mobility
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
.160 .690 -.265 48 .792 -.080 .302 -.687 .527
Equal
variances
not
assumed
-.265 47.888 .792 -.080 .302 -.687 .527
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Role of
Men/Wome
n
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
Independent Samples Test
WILLINGNESS TO START BUSINESS

Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in the willingness to start a business based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out


Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in the willingness to tart a business based on marital status of the respondents .


LACK OF FORMAL TRAINING
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in the effect of lack of formal training based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in the perceived effect of formal training based on marital status of the respondents .



Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
5.775 .020 1.437 48 .157 .400 .278 -.160 .960
Equal
variances
not
assumed
1.437 40.247 .158 .400 .278 -.162 .962
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
WIllingness
to start
business
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
.403 .529 0.000 48 1.000 0.000 .316 -.636 .636
Equal
variances
not
assumed
0.000 47.947 1.000 0.000 .316 -.636 .636
df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Lack of
formal
training
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t
AWARNESS OF GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in awareness of government programs based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in the awareness of government programs based on marital status of the respondents .


FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in financial assistance from family and banks based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in financial assistance received from banks/family based on marital status of the respondents .




Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
3.155 .082 .256 48 .799 .080 .312 -.547 .707
Equal
variances
not
assumed
.256 43.802 .799 .080 .312 -.549 .709
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Awareness
of
Governmen
t Programs
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
1.758 .191 -1.540 48 .130 -.560 .364 -1.291 .171
Equal
variances
not
assumed
-1.540 46.812 .130 -.560 .364 -1.292 .172
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Financial
Assistance
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference

ABILITY TO MARKET
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in the ability to market products based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in the ability to market ones goods based on marital status of the respondents .


SOCIAL MEDIA AWARENESS
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in social media awareness based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in the awareness of social media as a marketing tool based on marital status of the respondents .



Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
5.483 .023 .341 48 .735 .120 .352 -.588 .828
Equal
variances
not
assumed
.341 44.861 .735 .120 .352 -.589 .829
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Ability to
market
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
.468 .497 1.060 48 .294 .320 .302 -.287 .927
Equal
variances
not
assumed
1.060 46.246 .294 .320 .302 -.287 .927
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Social
Media
Awareness
Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F

SOCIAL MEDIA USE
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in the use of social media use based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in the ability to use social media to promote goods based on marital status of the respondents .


EMPLOYMENT OPTIONS
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in the options of employment available based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in the ability to decide between employment options based on marital status of the respondents .



Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
.399 .530 -.107 48 .915 -.040 .374 -.792 .712
Equal
variances
not
assumed
-.107 47.231 .915 -.040 .374 -.793 .713
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Social
Media use
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
0.000 1.000 0.000 48 1.000 0.000 .365 -.735 .735
Equal
variances
not
assumed
0.000 47.970 1.000 0.000 .365 -.735 .735
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Employmen
t options
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)

FORMAL TRAINING
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in the effect of formal training on the ability to serve customers based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in the belief of that formal training has a positive effect on business operations based on marital status of the respondents .


AWARENESS OF ASSOCIATIONS
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in awareness of associations based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out


Levene's Test for
Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Lower Upper
Awareness
of
Associations
Equal
variances
assumed
.001 .974 .122 48 .903 .040 .327 -.617 .697
Equal
variances
not
assumed
.122 48.000 .903 .040 .327 -.617 .697

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in the awareness of various association based on marital status of the respondents .
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
1.756 .191 -.269 48 .789 -.080 .298 -.679 .519
Equal
variances
not
assumed
-.269 47.489 .789 -.080 .298 -.679 .519
Formal
Training
t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig.


ASSISTANCE FROM ASSOCIATION
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in assistance from associations based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in assistance received from associations based on marital status of the respondents .


STATUS
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in perceived social status based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in perceived status of working women based on marital status of the respondents .


Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
2.133 .151 0.000 48 1.000 0.000 .351 -.706 .706
Equal
variances
not
assumed
0.000 46.341 1.000 0.000 .351 -.707 .707
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Assistance
from
Association
s
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
.007 .932 -.983 48 .330 -.360 .366 -1.096 .376
Equal
variances
not
assumed
-.983 47.983 .330 -.360 .366 -1.096 .376
df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Status
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t


IMPORTANCE OF EDUCATION
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in the realization of importance of education based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out


Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Lower Upper
Importance
of
Education
Equal
variances
assumed
.180 .673 -1.176 48 .245 -.480 .408 -1.301 .341
Equal
variances
not
assumed
-1.176 47.719 .246 -.480 .408 -1.301 .341
Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in the belief that education is important based on marital status of the respondents .


LIFE PURPOSE
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in the effect working has on the purpose of life based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in perceived life purpose based on marital status of the respondents .
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
.001 .974 -2.412 48 .020 -.840 .348 -1.540 -.140
Equal
variances
not
assumed
-2.412 47.125 .020 -.840 .348 -1.541 -.139
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Life
Purpose
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference



ECONOMIC STATUS
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in economic status of family based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in economic status of the family based on marital status of the respondents .


CONFIDENCE
Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in confidence of women based on the marital status of the respondents.
To test the null hypothesis , the independent t-test is carried out

Inference: since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is difference in confidence based on marital status of the respondents .
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
1.066 .307 -.748 48 .458 -.240 .321 -.885 .405
Equal
variances
not
assumed
-.748 47.586 .458 -.240 .321 -.885 .405
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Economic
Status
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Lower Upper
Equal
variances
assumed
.852 .361 -.886 47 .380 -.315 .356 -1.030 .400
Equal
variances
not
assumed
-.888 46.568 .379 -.315 .355 -1.029 .399
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Confidence
Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F