Scribd
Upload
39 views

Excel Data

The document contains tables and figures related to measuring and analyzing the mechanical properties of a material sample. Table 1 shows measurements of the thickness (T) and width (W) of the sample using calipers and micrometers. Table 2 lists the best estimates and uncertainties for the thickness, width, length and other properties of the sample. Table 3 shows the results of a linear regression analysis performed on microstrain readings taken at different mass loadings, yielding a best estimate and uncertainty for the material's Young's modulus.

Uploaded by

Jesse Bennett
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
39 views

Excel Data

The document contains tables and figures related to measuring and analyzing the mechanical properties of a material sample. Table 1 shows measurements of the thickness (T) and width (W) of the sample using calipers and micrometers. Table 2 lists the best estimates and uncertainties for the thickness, width, length and other properties of the sample. Table 3 shows the results of a linear regression analysis performed on microstrain readings taken at different mass loadings, yielding a best estimate and uncertainty for the material's Young's modulus.

Uploaded by

Jesse Bennett
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Table 1

Mithun
Mithun
Venkata
Venkata
Sample Average
Sample Standard Deviation, S
Instrument Readability, DRmin
S/DRmin

T (Caliper)
[ in ]
0.125
0.126
0.125
0.124
0.1250
0.0008
0.001
0.8

T (Micrometer)
[ in ]
0.1230
0.1230
0.1230
0.1220
0.1228
0.0005
0.0001
5.0

W (Caliper)
[ in ]
0.996
0.994
0.997
0.995
0.9955
0.0013
0.001
1.3

W ( Micrometer)
[ in ]
0.9960
0.9970
0.9960
0.9970
0.9965
0.0006
0.0001
5.8
Table 3

Best
Estimate
W [in]

0.9960

T [in]

0.12388

L [in]

11.000

S [1]

2.075

a [mm/(m*kg)]

713.3

Uncertainty

Confidence
Level

Uncertainty Found
From

0.0011

0.6826

Multiple Measurements

0.00136

0.6826

Multiple Measurements

0.031

0.9974

Half of Smallest
Instrumental Increment

0.010

0.6826

Manufacturer specified
value

1.2

0.6826

Statistical Analysis

Table 4
Quantity

Best
Estimate

95%-Confidence
Level (2s)
Uncertainty

w [m]
T [m]
L [m]
RS

0.02530
0.00315
0.2794
1

0.000054
0.000069
0.0005
0.01

a [mm/(m*kg)]

713.3

2.5

E [GPa]

183.9

8.3

Fractional
Uncertainty

Contribution to
Fractional
Uncertainty in E

0.0021
0.0219
0.0019
0.0100

0.0021
0.0438
0.0019
0.0100

0.0035

0.0035

0.0451

e fit

d^2

-0.4307 0.185502
142.9426 0.888495
286.3159 1.731593
430.4025 1.967006
574.4891 2.217419
733.555 5.978025
574.4891 0.261019
430.4025 0.162006
286.3159 0.099793
142.9426 1.118095
-0.4307 2.046902
16.65586
1.230516

Microstrain Reading meR [mm/m]

Microstrain
Mass m Reading meR
[kg]
[mm/m]
0
0
0.201
142
0.402
285
0.604
429
0.806
573
1.029
736
0.806
575
0.604
430
0.402
286
0.201
144
0
1

1000
800
600
400
200
0

-200

Microstrain Reading meR [mm/m]

1000
800
600
400
200

meFIT= 713.3[mm/(m*kg)]m - .4307[mm/m]

-200
0

0.2

0.4

0.6

Mass, m [kg]

0.8

m/m]

1.2

You might also like