Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
LAB REPORT/SCIENTIFIC PROCESS RUBRIC
Individual Performance Below Standard Approaching Standard At Standard Above Standard
Title Title is completely erroneous,
irrelevant, or missing.
Title of the lab is a general description of the purpose
Title of the lab is descriptive, and representative of the purpose; clearly incorporates the experiments variables
Background Research Material is directly copied rather than put into students own words and/or background sources are cited incorrectly.
A few reputable background sources are used and cited correctly. Material is translated into student's own words. Several reputable background sources were used and cited correctly. Material is translated into student's own words.
Question/ Purpose The purpose of the lab or the question to be answered during the lab is partially identified, and is stated in a somewhat unclear manner. The purpose of the lab or the question to be answered during the lab is identified, but is stated in a somewhat unclear manner.
The purpose of the lab or the question to be answered during the lab is clearly identified and stated.
Hypothesis Hypothesized relationship between the variables and the predicted results has been stated, but appears to be based on flawed logic. Hypothesized relationship between the variables and the predicted results is reasonable based on general knowledge and observations. Hypothesis is written as an Ifthen statement.
Hypothesized relationship between the variables and the predicted results is clear and reasonable based on what has been studied. Hypothesis is written as an Ifthen because statement.
Variables Variables are not described OR the majority lack sufficient detail. Most variables are clearly described with most relevant details. All variables are clearly identified and described with all relevant details (including how the DV will be measured).
Materials Many materials are described inaccurately OR are not described at all. Almost all materials and the setup used in the experiment are clearly and accurately described. All materials and setup used in the experiment are clearly and accurately described.
Experimental Design Experimental design is not relevant to the hypothesis.
Several steps are not outlined AND there is not enough detail to replicate procedures. Experimental design is adequate to test the hypothesis, but leaves some unanswered questions.
All steps are outlined, but there is not enough detail to replicate procedures. Experimental design is a well- constructed test of the stated hypothesis.
Procedures appear to be replicable. Steps are outlined sequentially and are adequately detailed.
Data Data is represented in written form, but no graphs or tables are presented.
No calculations included. Accurate representation of the data in tables and/or graphs. Graphs and tables may be missing a title, labels, or units.
Some calculations missing or inaccurate/unclear. Professional looking and accurate representation of the data in tables and/or graphs using Excel. Graphs and tables are labeled and titled and include units.
Sample calculations with work shown, when applicable.
Conclusion Conclusion includes little information about what was learned from the experiment. Conclusion includes whether the findings supported the hypothesis and what was learned from the experiment. Conclusion includes whether the findings supported the hypothesis, possible sources of error (see below), and answers the purpose question accurately and clearly.
Contains new questions and reflection about the topic and/or suggestions to improve or further build upon this experiment.
Error Analysis There is little or no discussion of errors. Experimental errors and their possible effects are discussed. Experimental errors, their possible effects, and ways to reduce errors are discussed.
Mechanics Many errors in spelling, punctuation and/or grammar in the report Few errors in spelling, punctuation and/or grammar in the report
No errors in spelling, punctuation and/or grammar in the report
Journal/ Notebook Notes rarely taken or of little use. Dated, notes are taken occasionally, but accuracy of notes might be questionable. Clear, accurate, dated notes are taken regularly.
Appearance/ Organization Lab report is handwritten and looks sloppy with cross-outs, multiple erasures and/or tears and creases. Lab report is neatly written or typed, but formatting does not help visually organize the material. Lab report is typed and uses headings and subheadings to visually organize the material. It appears professional.