Scribd
Upload
763 views

General Evaluator Checklist

The General Evaluator provides feedback to all meeting participants who were not otherwise evaluated. This includes the Toastmaster, Table Topics Master, participants, and other Evaluators. The General Evaluator ensures that roles were explained clearly, transitions between speeches were smooth, and topics were appropriate. They also check that evaluations followed the "sandwich" technique of beginning and ending positively while also providing constructive feedback. The goal is to help all participants continue improving while recognizing things the club is doing well.

Uploaded by

Jyiou Yimushi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
763 views

General Evaluator Checklist

The General Evaluator provides feedback to all meeting participants who were not otherwise evaluated. This includes the Toastmaster, Table Topics Master, participants, and other Evaluators. The General Evaluator ensures that roles were explained clearly, transitions between speeches were smooth, and topics were appropriate. They also check that evaluations followed the "sandwich" technique of beginning and ending positively while also providing constructive feedback. The goal is to help all participants continue improving while recognizing things the club is doing well.

Uploaded by

Jyiou Yimushi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

General Evaluator Checklist

The General Evaluator gives feedback to the meeting participants who have not already
been evaluated. Here is the opportunity for the Toastmaster, Table Topics Master, Table
Topics participants, and the Evaluators to receive feedback on how well they did and to
hear suggestions on how to improve. The Timer, Ah ounter, and Grammarian are also
there to help participants see how well they are doing in achieving their goals! call on
them for their reports.
A. "residing #fficer
$id the meeting start on time%
&ere the guests welcomed%
'. Toastmaster
&ere the meeting roles e(plained%
&ere guests given an opportunity to introduce themselves%
$id the introductions include...
a brief biographical sketch%
the ob)ectives of the speech%
the speech title%
&ere the transitions between speeches smooth%
$id the segues between speeches show that the Toastmaster was
listening%
&ill the meeting end on time%
. Table Topics Master
&ere the topics appropriate%
&ere the topics introduced in * minute or less%
&ere any special techni+ues ,e.g., props, gestures- employed%
&ere members called on in the appropriate order ,those with no role, then
smaller roles, then larger roles-%
&ere guests invited to participate%
$. Table Topics "articipants
How has each speaker improved%
&ere any special techni+ues ,rephrase, artful dodge- used%
&hat, in terms of the mechanics of impromptu speaking, can be
improved%
E. Evaluators
&as the book report summary avoided%
&as the .sandwich. techni+ue employed/
$id it begin on a positive note%
&as at least one suggestion for improvement made%
&ere more than 0 suggestions made%
&as encouragement added at the close%
1ust like a speech evaluation, the general evaluation should neither be a whitewash nor
a scathing criticism, but should point out where the club could use some improvement
and what we are doing well.
Adapted from Boston Speech Party checklist

You might also like