Scribd
Upload
260 views

Filter Approximation Theory: Butterworth, Chebyshev, and Elliptic Filters

This document discusses different types of filter approximations including Butterworth, Chebyshev, Elliptic, and Bessel filters. Butterworth filters have a maximally flat frequency response but a slow cutoff. Chebyshev filters have a sharper cutoff but ripple in the passband. Elliptic filters allow separate control of ripple in the passband and stopband. Bessel filters have a less steep cutoff than Butterworth or Chebyshev to improve transient response at the expense of frequency response. Practical filter design involves using a tool like Matlab to establish a prototype design and checking it meets specifications while minimizing ringing.

Uploaded by

RaghavendraRao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
260 views

Filter Approximation Theory: Butterworth, Chebyshev, and Elliptic Filters

This document discusses different types of filter approximations including Butterworth, Chebyshev, Elliptic, and Bessel filters. Butterworth filters have a maximally flat frequency response but a slow cutoff. Chebyshev filters have a sharper cutoff but ripple in the passband. Elliptic filters allow separate control of ripple in the passband and stopband. Bessel filters have a less steep cutoff than Butterworth or Chebyshev to improve transient response at the expense of frequency response. Practical filter design involves using a tool like Matlab to establish a prototype design and checking it meets specifications while minimizing ringing.

Uploaded by

RaghavendraRao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

Filter Approximation Theory

Butterworth, Chebyshev, and Elliptic


Filters

Approximation Polynomials
Every physically realizable circuit has a transfer function
that is a rational polynomial in s
We want to determine classes of rational polynomials that
approximate the Ideal low-pass filter response (high-pass
band-pass and band-stop filters can be derived from a low pass design)

Four well known approximations are discussed here:


Butterworth: Steven Butterworth,"On the Theory of Filter Amplifiers",
Wireless Engineer (also called Experimental Wireless and the Radio
Engineer), vol. 7, 1930, pp. 536-541

Chebyshev: Pafnuty Lvovich Chebyshev (1821-1894) - Russia


Cyrillic alphabet - Spelled many ways

Elliptic Function: Wilhelm Cauer (1900-1945) - Germany


U.S. patents 1,958,742 (1934), 1,989,545 (1935), 2,048,426 (1936)

Bessel: Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel, 1784 - 1846


4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

Definitions
Let |H()|2 be the approximation to the ideal
low-pass filter response |I()|2
|I()|2
1

/c

Where c is the ideal filter cutoff frequency


(it is normalized to one for convenience)
4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

Definitions - 2
|H()|2 can be written as
H ( )

1
=
1 + 2 F 2 ( )

Where F() is the Characteristic Function which


attempts to approximate:
F()

This cannot be done with a finite order polynomial


provides flexibility for the degree of error in the
passband or stopband.
4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

Filter Specification
|H()|2 must stay within the shaded region
|H()|2
1

Pass band

Stop
band

Transition Region

Note that this is an incomplete specification. The phase


response and transient response are also important and
need to be appropriate for the filter application
4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

Butterworth
F() = n and = 1 and
1
H ( ) =
1 + 2 F 2 ( )
1
2
H ( ) =
1 + 2n
2

|H()|2

Characteristics

Smooth transfer function (no ripple)


Maximally flat and Linear phase (in the pass-band)
Slow cutoff 

4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

Butterworth Continued
Pole locations in the s-plane at: H ( )
2n = -1 or = (-1)(1/2n)

1
=
1 + 2n

n=3

Poles are equally spaced on the unit circle at =k/2n.


H(s) only uses the n poles in the left half plane for stability.
There are no zeros
4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

Butterworth Filter
|H(s)| for n=4

H(s) = 1/( s4 + 2.6131s3 + 3.4142s2 + 2.6131s + 1)


4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

Chebyshev Type 1
H ( )

F() = Tn() so

T1() = and Tn() = 2 Tn() Tn-1()

1
=
1 + 2Tn2 ( )

|H()|2

Characteristics

Controlled equiripple in the pass-band


Sharper cutoff than Butterworth
Non-linear phase (Group delay distortion) 

Chebyshev type 2 moves the ripple into the stop-band


4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

Chebyshev
|H(s)| for n=4, r=1 (Type 1)
Poles lie on an ellipse

H(s) = 0.2457/( s4 + 0.9528s3 + 1.4539s2 + 0.7426s + 0.2756)


4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

10

Elliptic Function
F() = Un() the Jacobian elliptic function
|H()|2

S-Plane

H ( )

1
=
1 + 2U n2 ( )

Poles approximately on an ellipse


Zeros on the j-axis

Characteristics
Separately controlled equiripple in the pass-band and stop-band
Sharper cutoff than Chebyshev (optimal transition band)
Non-linear phase (Group delay distortion) 
4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

11

Elliptic Function
H(s) for n=4, rp=3, rs=50

H(s) = (0.0032s4 + 0.0595s2 + 0.1554)/( s4 + 0.5769s3 + 1.2227s2 + 0.4369s + 0.2195)


4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

12

Bessel Filter
Butterworth and Chebyshev filters with sharp
cutoffs (high order) carry a penalty that is
evident from the positions of their poles in
the s plane. Bringing the poles closer to the
j axis increases their Q, which degrades the
filter's transient response. Overshoot or
ringing at the response edges can result.
The Bessel filter represents a trade-off in the
opposite direction from the Butterworth. The
Bessel's poles lie on a locus further from the
j axis. Transient response is improved, but
at the expense of a less steep cutoff in the
stop-band.

4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

13

Practical Filter Design


Use a tool to establish a prototype design
MatLab is a great choice
See http://doctord.webhop.net/courses/Topics/Matlab/index.htm
for a Matlab tutorial by Dr. Bouzid Aliane; Chapter 5 is on filter design.

Check your design for ringing/overshoot.


If detrimental, increase the filter order and redesign to exceed
the frequency response specifications
Move poles near the j-axis to the left to reduce their Q
Check the resulting filter against your specifications
Moving poles to the left will reduce ringing/overshoot,
but degrade the transition region.

4/24/2004

Filter Approximation Theory

14

You might also like