An MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) is not legally binding but records common intent between parties who do not want legal obligations. A contract is legally binding and allows parties to seek legal remedies if breached. For an MOU to be considered a contract, it needs detailed terms like insurance. If an MOU provides a framework to guide collaboration but leaves specifics open, it is not enforceable. Whether an MOU is legally binding depends on offer, acceptance, intent to be bound, and exchange of value. The intent of parties signing determines if it is binding. To ensure it is not binding, an MOU should state the parties do not intend a legal arrangement but will comply with the framework. An MOU can
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
414 views
MOU
An MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) is not legally binding but records common intent between parties who do not want legal obligations. A contract is legally binding and allows parties to seek legal remedies if breached. For an MOU to be considered a contract, it needs detailed terms like insurance. If an MOU provides a framework to guide collaboration but leaves specifics open, it is not enforceable. Whether an MOU is legally binding depends on offer, acceptance, intent to be bound, and exchange of value. The intent of parties signing determines if it is binding. To ensure it is not binding, an MOU should state the parties do not intend a legal arrangement but will comply with the framework. An MOU can
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
MOU : Is it a legal contract? if not, what is it?
A Memorandum of Understanding (or MOU) records the common intent between
parties where they do not wish to assume legally binding obligations. A contract is a legally binding agreement. If a contract is breached, the other party to the contract is entitled to enforce the contract, or seek remedies under it, through the courts. If a document is detailed, imposes conditions and includes important terms (for example, details of insurance or indemnities) it is likely to be considered a contract by the courts even though it is called an MOU. Such documents need to be reviewed by the Legal Office prior to execution. If the document provides a broad framework or set of principles to guide the parties in undertaking a project or collaboration, and leaves the specifics of the project or arrangement for later negotiation between the parties, it is an MOU and is unlikely to be enforceable as a contract. The question of whether or not an MOU is legally binding is a question involving principles of contract law. In general, a document is considered to be binding if there is an offer, acceptance, an intention to be legally bound, and consideration (the exchange of something valuable). The intention of the parties at the time of signing the MOU is important to determining whether or not the document is binding. If the intention of the singning MOU is unclear, but the terms of the MOU are clearly defined and the MOU is supported by consideration, there is a strong presumption at law that they intended to create a legally binding contract, despite the document being called an MOU. If it is the intention of the University that a document be non-binding, the document should provide explicitly that the parties do not intend to enter into a legally binding arrangement, but nevertheless intend to comply with the framework provided by the document. Sometimes an MOU will need to contain some legally binding clauses, despite the intention of the parties for the majority of the document to be non-binding. Clauses which the parties may wish to be legally binding include confidentiality and privacy provisions. Despite expression of this intention, disputes can still arise as to whether other clauses in the MOU are also intended to be legally binding. These disputes can arise from the use of language in the MOU which conveys a binding intention. Use of phrases such as the parties must, the parties will or a party shall tend to convey such an intention. The use of such expressions should be avoided, while expressions such as the parties intend or the objectives of the parties are should be used instead.