Science in India: Past, Present and Future

R.Vidya
Department of Chemistry
P.Box:1033, Blindern
University of Oslo
Norway
Mail: [email protected]
url: www.folk.uio.no/ravindrv
Essay for MNVIT 401, Science Theory
Autumn 2001

Science in India: Past, Present and Future

R.Vidya
November 18, 2001

If we were to look over the whole world to nd out the country most richly endowed
with all the wealth, power and beauty that nature can bestow - in some parts a very
paradise on earth - I should point to INDIA.

-Max Muller, Orientalist,

in his lecture delivered at University of Cambridge, England, 1882.

Abstract
In this essay I try to analyze the status of science in India in the past, present and
future. As the history of Indian civilization starts more than 5000 years ago, it is
an insurmountable task to list the development of Indian science in a chronological
order. Therefore, I discuss the salient scientic achievements in various times and
its implications on the society and vice versa. In spite of having developed forefront research in Mathematics, Astronomy, Chemistry, Medicine etc., even before
2000B.C, Indian Science has undergone a dull-phase in the past 1000 years. The
possible reasons for this recession such as political, cultural and religious impacts
are outlined. Though India was lagging behind many of the industrialized nations
in the 1950s, it emerged a power to reckon with in the late 20th century. The
in uence of science on the status of life and people's view of the scientists is also
analyzed. Finally I would like to list some of the challenges faced by the Indian
science in the future.

INTRODUCTION
Science as a method of acquiring knowledge, its systemization, interpretation and drawing
conclusions helps man to widen the horizons of understanding. This knowledge helps him
to develop his social, economic and cultural life. Every civilization that has developed
economically and socially has attributed its success to Science and technology. India
is proud to have one of the oldest civilizations in the world, with one sixth of world
population and one third of scientic and technological manpower. In spite of being
culturally and socially- rich, India is not very "rich" in the true sense of the word.
For economy to progress, and life-style to improve, scientic development in India is
imminent. So to shape the future with scientic ideas, clear understanding of the present
is essential. Behind the present lay the long and tangled past out of which the present
has grown. Tracing back the chain of scientic achievements in the past would give hints
1

for futuristic developments. I was just wondering how much past should I have to look
back, for ancient India's scientic achievements date back from time immemorial. In this
essay I have attempted to sketch the scientic developments in India in various points of
time.
Indian pre-history began with the vast Harappan or the Greater Indus Valley civilization which represented a cultural continuum extending from  7000 to 1400 B.C. The
excavations done at Harappa and Mohenja-daro (now in Pakistan), in 1930's by John
Marshall of England, put the age of India's oldest civilization as more than 3000 B.C.
It is interesting to note that at this dawn of India's history, she does not appear as a
puling infant, but already grown up in many ways. She is not oblivious of life's ways
but has made considerable technical progress in the arts and amenities of life. The Indus
valley people not only created things of beauty but also the utilitarian and more typical
emblems of modern civilizations. The high point of this civilization was the mature urban Harappan phase ( 2500-2000 B.C) characterized by well-planned cities, extensive
external trade, manufacture of artistic seals, development of Harappan script.[1, 2] etc.,
Later came the Vedic period. There is reportedly clear evidence of the positions
of some stars at the time of the earliest Vedas which, calculating for the precession of
the equinoxes, dates as early as 8,000 B.C.[3] The period of Indus valley civilizations is a
matter of controversy and whether Vedic period precedes or follows it adds new dimension
to the issue. Therefore I am not going to dwell on the period of the two cultures, instead
[2] is referred to know more about Vedic and puranic science. The cultural, religious,
social, literary, and political life of the people of Vedic period is well documented in
four Vedas which are Rg, Yajur, Sama and Atharvana. The rishis or saints have tried
to answer many of the mysteries of the world through their intuition and experience.
Rg veda is the oldest book whose main contents are composed in 4500 B.C. The oldest
Greek classics Iliad and Odyssey of Homer were written about four to ve hundred years
later.[4] Rg veda was a compilation of 1028 hymns composed by a large number of authors
over many generations.
India's whole culture had been fashioned by geography. Lofty mountains in the north
and the oceans on the other three sides made India into nature's protectorate. At the
same time north-western mountain passes permitted in ow of people and ideas. It has
maintained an unbroken cultural tradition and reinforces it by periodic intellectual inputs from other cultural areas. The unique combination of antiquity, continuity and
unselfconscious interaction with the outside world was/is India's hallmark.
India could not have continued a cultured existence for thousands of years, if she has
not possessed something very vital, enduring and something that was worthwhile. The
search for the sources of India's strength and for her deteriotion is long and intricate.
She fell behind in the march of technique, and Europe which had been backward in many
matters took the lead in technical progress. Behind the technical progress was the spirit
of science and a bubbling life. New techniques gave military strength to the countries
of Europe and it was easy for them to spread out and dominate the East. Why this
should have happened so is more dicult to unravel, for India was not lacking in mental
alertness and technical skill in earlier times.
In order to elucidate ancient India's supremacy in Science, I give some of the samples
in the following.
2

FIELDS OF EXCELLENCE IN ANCIENT INDIA

Mathematics:
One of the most-developed elds of science in ancient India was Mathematics. It
is said that the number system which we call Arabic has originally been developed in
India and introduced in the Persian Gulf by Arab travelers. The important number zero
is also rst introduced by ancient Indian mathematicians.The earliest undoubted occurrence of zero appeared in India in a manuscript of AD 876.[4] The most prominent and
famous mathematicians were Aryabhatta (AD 476), Bhaskara-I (AD600) Sridharacharya
(AD 990), Sripathi (AD 1039-56), Bhaskara -II (AD 1150)., Varahimira, Brahmagupta
and many others. Sripathi wrote a treatise on mathematics (Ganitatika) wherein he
dealt with permutations, combinations, proportions, notional places etc., Bhaskara-II
has written two books on astronomy ( Siddhantha Sironmani and Goladhaya ) and one
in Mathematics (Lilavathi). In the former books he explains the revolution of planets
and in later, the theory of numbers and dierential and integral calculus. Bhaskara-II
describes the properties of zero in his commentary on Aryabhatta's work. The common
feature of the ancient Indian scientists is that they were astronomers-astrologers and
mathematicians.
Astronomy:
The whole history of astronomy has been the result of interplay of two factors, utilitarian and cultural. Whenever cultural areas felt self-assured, they advanced astronomy.
Having secured their place on earth, these cultures sought to be the ones to unravel the
mysteries of the heavens. Therefore there is no wonder that the ancient Indians excelled
in Astronomy. Siddhantas (meaning 'Proven in the end') were the names given to the
astronomical works. Aryabhatta was the earliest of the astronomers, who wrote Aryabhatiya. A notable feature of Aryabhatta's work was his reference to the Earth's spin
about its own axis. Earth rotated by one minute of arc in 4 seconds of time. He also
pointed out that for an eclipse to occur, the moon should be at one of its nodes, ie., at
one of two points where the lunar orbit intercepts the ecliptic. Later, Bhaskara-I and
Bhaskara-II and scores of other astronomers emerged. The Surya Siddhantha, a textbook
on astronomy of ancient India -last compiled in 1000 BC computed the earth's diameter to be 7,840 miles and the distance between earth and moon as 253,000 miles. These
compare to modern measurements respectively as 7,927.7 miles and 252,710 miles.[5] In
Indian scriptures such as the ancient Srimad Bhagavatam, estimated the age of earth as
4,320 million years. Argon-dating undertaken some decades ago put the age of the earth
at 5,000 million years.[5] It is important to note that, throughout the Siddhantic period
instruments and observations played second ddle to computations.[6] The modern astronomy was developed in India by French Jesuits rather than British colonizers.
Medicine:
The two major systems of medicine prevalent in ancient India before the advent
of Unani were Ayurveda and Siddha. The Atharvana Veda which is the last of the four
Vedas, contains mainly details about Ayurveda. While Ayurveda was popular in northern
India, Siddha took its place in Southern India. The Ayurveda texts list about 700 plants,
1900 formulations , animal products from 165 species and a large number of mineral
preparations. Using Ayurvedic concepts, the ancient phycisians were able to perform even
3

plastic surgery. The rst detailed description of surgical replacement of nose is found in
(Sushrutha Samhitha, medicinal treatise written by Sushrutha. The two early methods
practiced in India namely the cheek- ap method and median forehead ap method are
still used by modern surgeons. Tools for performing surgeries, various types of bandages
and ointments were used as were basic procedures for ensuring cleanliness and limiting
contamination. The Siddhar's knowledge of Iatro-chemistry, minerals, metals and plants
was stupendous. This was successfully used by them from time immemorial. Processes
like calcination of mercury minerals, and metals and the preparation of a super salt known
as muppa- animated mercury pills with high potency possessing marvelous properties of
transmuting metals and capable of rejuvenating the entire human system bear ample
testimony to the unparalleled knowledge of the Siddhar's.[7]. Besides the treatment by
medicine, there exist a lot of Siddha works in Tamil on Kaya kalpa (alchemy). It has to be
mentioned that India is a vast country with many dierent cultures and many dierent
languages. Tamil is one such language which is said to be formulated even before Sanskrit
(about 3000 BC). The grammar book of Tamil is Tholkappiam which has been universally
accepted as the oldest grammatical book in the world. One of the literary master-piece
Thirukkural is the second-most translated book in many languages, after the Holy Bible.
In Tamil we can nd many literary works with scientic insights. However for the sake
of brevity, I am not able to eloborate on it further.
Chemistry:
Coloured and wheel-made pottery were found at Harappa. During Harappan period,
copper, lead, silver, gold and alloys like bronze and electrum ( having 20% gold and
80% silver) had been known. But iron was not known in that period. They were quite
good in metallurgy that they knew the know-how of hardening of copper, metal-forging
techniques like eld working, annealing, running-on, revetting etc., The literary landmark
of post-vedic, Buddhist period (500 BC to AD 500), Kautilya Arthasastra (written by
Kautilya, the prime Minister of the Maurya emperor ChandraGupta) denes the duties
of a mining inspector, that he must know the dierent types of copper ores, the ways to
distinguish them, location of the ores etc., Similarly he assigns the duties of gold and salt
inspector also. These facts obviously show that the ancient people were well-versed in
metal-working, iron and steel making, glass, pottery, jewellery-making, dyeing of clothes
and tanning of leather etc.,
Progress in medicine also led to developments in chemistry and chemical technologies.
The manufacture of alkaline substances, medicinal powders, ointments and liquids was
systematized, as were chemical processes relating to the manufacture of glass. Advances
in food processing took place as did the manufacture of personal hygiene products and
beauty aids such as shampoos, deodorizers, perfumes and cosmetics.
Physics:
Though the physical world seen by dierent schools of thought are dierent there
was a commonality - in recognizing both the heterogeneity of natural phenomena and
the search for basic elements in the foundation of nature and the laws which explain
natural phenomena. In order to explain the heterogeneity of nature, ve element theory
Panchapootha was developed. According to this theory, nature consists of Solid, Water,
Gas, Radiance (or re) and Space. The concept of space - Akasa is considered as eternal as
well as non-eternal. It was developed to provide a positive frame of reference for material
4

objects. It is quite similar to the Western thought of all-pervading ether medium. Even
the concept of the atom - the smallest, indivisible particle, has a clear forerunner in the
Sanskrit anu, or tiniest possible particle.[5] Brihath Sathaka operates with the divisions
of the time of the day into 60 kalas of 24 minutes each. The smallest unit of time (3 x
10 8 second) is surprisingly close to the life-spans of certain mesons and hyperons.[8] In
the 14th century Rigveda of the Sun, the speed of light has been calculated as 300,000
metres a second, and the age of the universe is 8.64 billion years. Both gures are fairly
equal to the modern day measurements.[9] Indian Architecture has been a thing of beauty.
Owing to the varied landscape, the Architecture displays a wonderful variety.

DECLINE IN SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY

Though ancient Indians were excelling in many elds, one senses a progressive deteriotion during centuries. As Nehru puts it[10] "The urge to life and endeavors becomes less,
the creative spirit fades away and gives place to the imitative. Where triumphant and
rebellious thought has tried to pierce the mysteries of nature, comes the wordy commentator with his glosses and long explanations. The urge to adventure and the over owing
life which led the distant colonization and transplantation of Indian culture fades away.
And in this place comes narrow orthodoxy which even taboos the crossing of high seas. A
rational spirit of enquiry so evident in earlier times which might have led to the further
growth of science, is replaced by irrationalism and a blind idolatry of the past." It is
quite possible that Indians, when they traveled to other countries were aware of the development of knowledge, acknowledged its value and used it in their contributions. But
when conservatism set in and foreign travel was tabooed by the Brahmans, the isolation
of Indian scientists began. As a consequence of this social restriction on the intellectual
climate there was stagnation of Indian science. The development/non-development in
every society depends on social, political and cultural milieu. The reasons for decline in
scientic activity can be explained as follows:
Political:
The wealth of India was attracting many invaders from all over the world. Frequent
changes in dynasties and Kings with dierent approaches to knowledge prevented institutionalization. Owing to the absence of Institutionalization of education the continuity
and accumulation of knowledge and expertise did not take place. Kings and nobles used
science for purposes of power to control the people. The educated elite who develop
abstract knowledge, use principles and the rationality for their own purposes but for the
common uneducated people, they develop and propagate myths, dogmas, superstitious
beliefs and the mantras to make them conform. As the society was mainly agriculture
based, study of planetary movements and prediction of monsoons became imminent.
This led to development in astronomy which later transformed into astrology. So, making people to abide by was made simpler for the elite.
Social:
Unlike the present society of unending development with unending demand on natural
resources, ancient society was almost stable. Though kings might come and go with
various religious and other beliefs, the basic fabric of the society remained the same;
it was based on agriculture and industry dependent on the use of renewable resources
5

remained largely unaected. According to Al Pacey " The kind of technology which any
society develops must depend on its utility to mobilize labor for relevant skills, and to
encourage innovation." Owing to the fact that, India largely remained an agricultural
society, no new challenges arose to create new knowledge to help solve problems. As the
proverb goes Necessity is the mother of invention, there was no need for innovations,
and so no great technological break through happened. It is said that the harsh winters
in Europe with very short days have led to the invention of electric bulbs, heaters and
other amenities of life. But the mild climate in India made life more comfortable than in
Europe which is one of the reasons for absence of technological advancement. Moreover
the population had a limited growth owing to large child mortality, mortality due to
epidemics and incessant wars. Therefore there was abundance of natural resources but
only limited demand on them. During 10th to 18th century India was using natural
renewable resources with the exception of armament industry. These resources were used
to meet human needs and sustain a social system. During the vedic period the scientic
knowledge was diuse and people in lower strata of life as vegetable-vendors were wellversed in Indian mathematics.[11] However the later practice of casteism became the
most important reason for lack of scientic development and diusion of knowledge.
The practitioners and custodians of science were the Brahmans. They represented the
educated elite and they dominated socially. Varahamira remarked, "What then we are to
say of Brahmans, if he combines with his purity the height of Science". Scientic activity
and knowledge remained a preserve of the elite while arts and crafts remained with
the less privileged groups. As a result, the problems generated by technology were not
attempted by scientists. The widening of scientic knowledge and creation of theoretical
understanding of the problems were hampered by the social practice of casteism. The
education in general and science in particular were the preserves of the higher-caste
people and lower-caste were not given any taste of education. This greatly aected the
scientic progress.
Religious Impact:
Some may think that Indian culture represent essentially the principle of life negation
and not of life armation. Both principles are present in all religions and cultures but in
varying degrees. But Indian culture never emphasized the negation of life. However the
concept of austerity was preached by the prevalent religious systems such as Hinduism,
Buddhism, Jainism and Islam. These religions preached a code of conduct for the use of
materials and introduced the concept of limiting one's needs and practicing austerity as
a virtue. Though kings and nobles led a luxurious and lavish life, the vast masses were
imbued with a philosophy of austerity. Further, in the religious systems attainment of
salvation or Moksha was thought to be the ultimate goal and of individual pursuit. So
individual skills only counted, not the technology.

LACK OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT

The capacity to intervene with nature is based on the technological capacity humans
are able to generate. This capacity also generated dreams to go beyond nature, to soar
higher and to leave a remarkable mark behind. The development/ non-development of
technology needs to be examined in the context of natural environment and the way
6

humans shape the conditions of their existence. The process of diusion of scientic
knowledge is dierent from the process of diusion of technology. The former is either
through oral discourse of through the written text, which may lead to dierent interpretations by dierent proponents. In the case of technology it is through demonstration.
Major innovations in technology can only take place when the technical knowledge is well
developed in a theoretical framework and is applied to improve or change the technology.
It is detrimental to both society and science when the available scientic knowledge is
divorced from technology or when no interaction is between scientists and technologists
or artisans and craftsmen. This is what happened in medieval India due to social and
religious environment prevalent in that period. The basic feature of technological developments in India is based on trial and error and improvement of practices. This is due
to the lack of theoretical development owing to the separation of scientists and scholars
from artists and craftsmen. This was also due to the absence of institutionalization of
empirical experiences into a research system for the development of technology. The
input of scientic knowledge to technical process and application of scientic method
for technology are essential for the development of technology and in turn, the society
itself. On the other hand, during the same period Europe and later Japan had very good
interaction between scientists and craftsmen.
Another interesting and intriguing phenomenon is the lack of large-scale machinery in
the medieval India. Irfan Habib quotes Babur about the abundance of skilled laborers, A
good thing in Hindustan is that it had unnumbered and endless workers of every kind.[12]
Though many of the Islamic, West and even Asian country like China were mechanically
minded, in India, there was little use of machines. Pacey[13] says no report of machines
with gears, pulleys or cranks before 1200 in India. In India the organic view of nature
was more prevalent. The natural forces were thought of God's will or interplay between
dierent Gods. In this scenario, machines could not t into as a form of nature.
There was diusion of knowledge and technology to some extent, that every household
were able to meet their needs like making clothes and its dyeing, preparing food preserves,
making cosmetics, medicines and dietary supplements etc., However, these cannot be
called as new technologies as they were inherited from ancestors, and every civilization
has its own way of meeting such needs.
During AD 1000-1800, India was lacking a methodology for developing innovations
and new technologies and hence it was not able to develop the methodology of invention.
However, Europe was able to develop this by linking scientic knowledge with technologies and creating the necessary institutions to promote this process. This made India to
be dependent which was fully exploited by colonial powers.[11] When people like Savai
Jai Singh tried to unify the base of Science, incorporating new knowledge that was being
produced in Europe then came the colonization. The colonizer reinforced the conservative ethics and religious grouping of the people. It imposed a new scientic system in a
new language, completely marginalizing and delinking the earlier knowledge system with
the new. The educational system introduced by Lord Macaulay had nationally-repressive
system for Indians as a class of clerks, made many to look into Indian history and science
through the western prism.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TRADITIONAL INDIAN

SCIENCE AND MODERN SCIENCE
There is a need to understand and respect the distinction and uniqueness of each
scientic system. There is a room for a dialogue between various systems and a need
to avoid crude and quick equations or the judgment of one system by another. Various
civilizations have evolved sciences, technologies and knowledge systems having their own
individual characteristics and bearing the stamp of the world view and values of the society which gave rise to them. An open minded study of traditional systems of knowledge
is likely to provide us with a valuable starting point in a quest for a holistic approach
not only to Science but also in various other areas of human endeavor.
The essence of modern laboratory method is to isolate any problem from its environment in order to minimize the controllable parameters. In contrast, the traditional
approach attempts to solve problems by taking them in their entirety with all their interlinkages and their complexity. The traditional Indian sciences seem to adopt the holistic
method of looking at the world in its integrity. According to Charaka, science is dependent upon Yukthi - a quality of the intellect that enables it to perceive phenomena
brought into existence by a multiplicity of causes. A feature of many traditional scientic
systems that often puzzles anyone trained in modern science is the apparent constancy
of theories. It appears that in key areas nothing has changed for centuries or millennia.
It is sometimes said that theories have been fossilized because no growth took place after some "dark ages". It has often escaped the observer that there may be a dierent
approach to a scientic endeavor or a dierent way of organizing science which may lead
to a certain "constancy" of the fundamental theories. The ecacy of Indian systems
of medicine captured the interests of elite and modern medical scientic world. Upon
the introduction of Unani and Allopathy, the respect given to the traditional medical
systems declined. Many of the invaluable medicinal scripts written in palm leaves and
bark of the birch tree were destroyed owing to the ignorance of traditional knowledge
system. Even in my family, one of my grandfathers who has been well-versed in Siddha
medicine used palm leaf scripts. But they were buried with him thought to be not useful
any longer. The question of whether Ayurveda is scientic is raised by many in India.
However, prominent physicians now show that Ayurveda is indeed a scientic knowledge
system based on Methodological, Epistemological and Sociological criteria.[14]

INDIAN SCIENCE AT PRESENT

In the nineteenth century there was widespread use of science by the British to further
their commercial and political interests. Indians came into contact with modern science,
when they were assigned the peripheral role of providing cheap labour. Once introduced
to modern science, Indians nally strove to become full- edged members of the international republic of science in their own right. During 1950s in the advanced countries "Big
Science" activities, which grew from the industrial and technological base established by
the World War II, took great leaps forward. The peoples of India and other less developed countries, on the other hand were involved during 1950s with restructuring their
societies after 200 years of colonial rule. And as India had not been involved in wartime
8

science, it had no infrastructure to build science and technology systems. As a result,

India fell behind in the race for big science.
The rst Prime Minister of Independent India, Jawaharlal Nehru had a vision of
science as an integral tool in the task of development. His views had two merits, the rst
was having a humane and peaceful world-view as its fundamental premise, and the second
its strong link to secular and rational thought. He had the viewpoint that the investment
in advanced science and technology was an investment for the future, an attempt to
keep up with the knowledge explosion of the twentieth century, even as the basic tasks
of development were attended to. The Council of Scientic and Industrial Research
(CSIR) was established in 1942, and today it is networking 39 laboratories and more
than 100 universities and eld centres. The Council's research programmes are directed
towards the eective utilization of the country's natural resources and development of
new processes and products for economic progress.
The nation-wide Science and Technology (S & T) infrastructure has grown from Rs.10
million at the time of independence (in the year 1947) to Rs.30 billion, slightly more than
1% of GNP. Now India has the third largest number of scientists and technologists in the
world. There has been a signicant growth in India's capability and accomplishments
in several high technology areas such as nuclear, space, S&T, electronics and defence
research and development. The Government is committed to make S&T an integral part
of the socio-economic development of the country.
Among the developing elds, Atomic Energy is leading. India's power requirement
will be provided by eight nuclear power reactors with a total of 1400 MW generation
capacity. The scientists and the Government now try to obtain 20,000 MW of electricity
in 2020 from atomic energy alone. As the power is essential for industry and in turn, for
economy to ourish a time-bound, result-oriented approach is followed.
After independence from the British, self-reliance in food production was the major
achievement. Most of the countries in the world think that India is a poor country,
unable to feed its people. But it has to be noted that for the past ve years the food
grains such as rice, wheat and other pulses are produced in surplus amount. This was
made possible by the supreme research done in the eld of agriculture. The project
was titled 'Green Revolution' in the 1970's and led by an ecient scientist Dr.M.S.
Swaminathan. Bio-scientists and dierent government agencies are successful in producing high-yielding, disease-resistant hybrid crops. This was the main reason for the success
of Green Revolution. Along with the Green Revolution, the White Revolution (for
diary products) was initiated. Now scientists are trying to attain the achievement made
by Green Revolution in White Revolution too.
The Indian space programme has made signicant strides towards establishing operational systems for national development. The Indian Space Research Organization
(ISRO), under the Department of Space is responsible for research, development and operationlisation of space systems in the areas of satellite communications, remote sensing for
resource survey and management, environmental monitoring, meteorological services etc.,
India is the only developing country to develop its own remote sensing satellite. ISRO
reached its landmark, by launching the rst Geo-Stationary Launch Vehicle (GSLV) in
July,2001. Even though Indian space research is in icted by fund reductions and economic sanctions by the developed countries, it continues to make strides. As the Polar
9

Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) and GSLV soar high in the blue-sky, so do the selfcondence of the people and the pride of the Indian scientists. The development made
by India in defence research is remarkable. India is able to produce indegeniosly many
of the state-of-the art missiles and other armory. In the eld of telecommunication and
Information Technology India made amazing progress. From only 6 Radio stations and
only one TV transmitter in 1947, to more than 200 radio stations and more than 1000
TV transmitters now, is a remarkable progress indeed. With the help of satellites almost
all Indian villages are inter connected with telephones, radios and television networks.
A multi-pronged approach has been evolved for result-oriented research and development with special emphasis on micro-electronics, telematics, high performance computing and software development. Though Bio-technology and Oceanography are not
well-developed earlier, they are now paid due attention with the establishment of separate government organizations for these during 1980's.
There is some criticism in the scientic community that the Government over-spends
for defence research. According to the R & D budget, of the year 1988-89, Defence
research bagged about 27% of total money allocated for research. while agriculture and
alternate energy which are the higher priorities for common man only received 9 and
17% respectively. The political and geographical factors that make government to spend
more for defence research is in some way justied because the national security should
be preserved at any cost.
Though the wisdom of the government and scientists involved in the testing of atom
bomb in 1997 was questioned and is a matter of controversy (which will not be elaborated
here) it has to be emphasized that the Indian science and technology has an upbeat
attitude that economic sanctions could be weathered without much damage. The private
sector, which have contributed almost nothing to S&T research in India and preferred
foreign collaborations, now expressed their full support for indigenous development of
technologies. This is the blessing in disguise for research and development for India.
This has been emphasized by the fact that the technological milestones such as Light
Combat Aircraft (LCA) and GSLV were delayed by the economic sanctions but were
never stopped.
India is excelling in medicinal research also. Many of the diseases like polio, tuberculosis, small pox etc., are completely eradicated. Owing to the low-cost and higher
eciency of the surgeons and physicians, many people in countries like Unite Kingdom
and Germany now like to go to India to get medical treatment. However, it has to be
acknowledged that it is an uphill task to provide the health-care to all people in India.
India being a democratic and secular country can not impose strict population control
measures as some communist countries do. But there is some good news too, that some of
the developed-states in India show stabilization and even declining of population growth.

INDIAN SCIENCE IN THE FUTURE

The most serious challenge facing India's S&T establishments is that of human resources. Several committees have advised the government even 20 years ago that, the
capacity of generating and sustaining technological growth had to be strengthened considerably. Because, the number of people available for such enterprises is very small
10

in relation to the country's high rate of population growth and corresponding social
needs.[15] The quality of new entrants will obviously determine the quality of the organization in the future. More and more talented youngsters opt for software industry, and
less people wish to take up higher education in sciences. Hence the research institutions
face major crunch of qualied personnel.
There are voices of concern saying that Indian science today heavily skewed toward
nuclear, military and space research. In spite of having third largest stock of scientic
and technological personnel in the world, India's S&T had little eect on the daily life
of Indians. One of the major diculties facing is the starvation of research funds for
universities and institutions of higher learning. The result is that the quality of higher
education is also aected. India spends around 1% of its annual GNP for R&D. Though
it is not adequate for a country that plans to develop as a knowledge society and achieve
high rates of growth based on scientic and technological achievements. However, it does
indicate a sizable commitment to S&T. It has to be acknowledged that even in developed
nations there is growing concern that funding allocated for R&D is not sucient.
The Green revolution ensured that scientic innovation spread directly from lab to
land. As the traditional ownership of farming assets are with the farmers themselves, it
was easier for them to accept and employ technological innovation. In contrast, due to
some policies of the government, it was far easier for industrialists to purchase technology
from overseas than to develop their own. Therefore the culture of interaction between the
industry and the research institutions as prevalent in developed countries is almost totally
absent in India. However, the pharmaceutical and drug industry are now developing their
own R&D facilities. Like in US, the mission based approach has led to many success in the
sectors like space and atomic energy. The same method has to be adopted for industrial
research in order to promote it further.
According to Jacob Bronowski[16] "the activity of science is directed to seek the truth
and it is judged by the criterion of being true to facts. We can practice science only if
we value the truth". It is important to have the critical and rational spirit in society
for science to ourish. It bears emphasis that science and scientists fulll their social
responsibility[17] in assisting in the task of expanding the realm of operation of free and
critical enquiry in society.
Article 51-A(h) of the Indian Constitution states that "it shall be the duty of every
citizen of India...to develop the scientic temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and
reform".[18] However, the main challenge facing the scientic community is to make the
people have a scientic temper while they enjoy the fruits of science. There is wide spread
obscruantism and absence of radical thinking even among the educated lot. Therefore it
is the duty of every scientist to propagate a scientic temper, and to popularize science.
It is important to get out of traditional ways of thinking and living. Even though
they were good in the past, have less signicance today. There is no visible limit to the
advance of science, if it is given the chance to advance. The applications of science are
inevitable and unavoidable for all countries and peoples today. But something more that
mere application is necessary. It is the scientic approach, the adventurous yet critical
temper of science, the search for truth and new knowledge, the refusal to accept anything
without testing, the capacity to change previous conclusions in the face of new evidence,
the reliance on observed fact and not on pre-conceived theory, the hard discipline of the
11

mind- all this is necessary not merely the application of science but for life itself and the
solution of its many problems.
Science has dominated the Western world and everyone pays tribute to it. India has
a greater distance to travel and yet there may be fewer major obstacles on the way, for
the essential basis of Indian thought ts in with the scientic temper and approach. It is
based on a fearless search for truth, on the solidarity of man, on the free and cooperative
development of the individual and the species, ever to greater freedom and higher stages
of human growth.
I hope that the Present Prime Minister Mr. Vajpayee's slogan "Victory to the
soldier, Victory to the farmer and Victory to Science (Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan
and Jai Vigyan") will lead India to development in all spheres of life.

CONCLUSION

For science and technology to attain its peak in a society, favorable political, cultural,
social and religious scenario are essential. India remains a interesting case-study for this
concept. When men were free to think and work they were able to excel in many exciting
frontiers of science. But when the social and political milieu of scientist and thinkers
deteriote so do the science. This is the main reason why there was not much scientic
breakthroughs in the last 1000 years. After India became free from the clutches of foreign
rulers, the sociological clutches are also released slowly. So India is making strides to
become self-reliant in every eld of science. However major revamps are needed to make
scientic development as a vector of social development.
Before concluding I would like to quote Jawaharlal Nehru, the rst Prime Minister
of Independent India- "We are citizens of no mean country and we are proud of
the land of our birth, of our people, our culture and tradition. That pride
should not be for a romantized past to which we want to cling. We have a
long way to go and we must hurry, for the time at our disposal is limited and
the pace of the world grows ever swifter".
Acknowledgement Fruitful discussions with Dr.P. Ravindran, Mr.P. Vajeeston and
my group members are kindly acknowledged.

References
[1] O.P. Jaggi, Dawn of Indian Technology, Atma Ram and Sons, Delhi, 1969.
[2] O.P. Jaggi, Dawn of Indian Science, Atma Ram and Sons, Delhi, 1969.
[3] David Frawley, Gods, Sages and Kings - Vedic Secrets of ancient civilization, Motilal
Banardas, Delhi, 1993.
[4] Wazir Hasan Abdi, Glimpses of Mathematics in Medieval India, History of Indian
Science, Technology and Culture, Vol III, part I Oxford University Press, New Delhi,
2000, page 51.

12

[5] http://metasci.tripod.com/oldindia.html by Robert Priddy, Retired Professor of

History of Philosophy at University of Oslo, between 1968 to 1984.
[6] Rajesh Kochhar, Pre-telescopic Astronomy in India, History of Indian Science,
Technology and Culture, Vol III, part I Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2000,
page. 171
[7] Dr.R. Kannan, Siddha - unique system.in http://www.hinduonnet.com/folio/
fo0010/00100440.htm
[8] As quoted by Prof. Robert Priddy of a Western Physicist who was interviewed on
the BBC World Service in the early 1990s.
[9] As quoted by Prof. Robert Priddy of Dr. Subhash Kak of Lousiana State University,
when interviewd in Science in Action, BBC World Service in July 17, 1998.
[10] Jawaharlal Nehru, Discovery of India, Oxford Univery Press, Delhi, 1946.
[11] A. Rahman, A perspective of technology in India, History of Indian Science, Technology and Culture, Vol III, part I Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2000, page
241
[12] Irfan Habib in Technology in Ancient and Medieval India- Edited by A. Roy and
S.K. Bagchi, Sundeep Prakashan, Delni, 1986.
[13] Arnold Pacey, Technology in World civilization, Basil, Blackwell, 1990.
[14] Dr.A.V. Balasubramanian, Scientic basis of Indian systems of medicine,
http://www.hinduonnet.com/folio/fo0010/00100200.
[15] Dhirendra Sharma, India's lopsided science, in Bulletin of the atomic Scientists,
Vol.47, No.4, may 1991
[16] Jacob Bronowski, A Sense of the Future, M.I.T.Press, Cambridge (U.S.A),1977.
[17] T.Jayaraman in http://www.imsc.ernet.in/jayaram/articles/milkb.html
[18] T.Jayaraman in http://www.imsc.ernet.in/jayaram/articles/ /karunaf/karunaf.html

13