EBE Heteroscedasticity
EBE Heteroscedasticity
HETEROSCEDASTICITY
One of the assumptions of the classical linear
regression (CLRM) is that the variance of ui, the
error term, is constant, or homoscedastic.
Reasons are many, including:
The presence of outliers in the data
Incorrect functional form of the regression model
Incorrect transformation of data
Mixing observations with different measures of scale
(such as mixing high-income households with lowincome households)
CONSEQUENCES
If heteroscedasticity exists, several consequences
ensue:
The OLS estimators are still unbiased and consistent, yet the
estimators are less efficient, making statistical inference less
reliable (i.e., the estimated t values may not be reliable).
Thus, estimators are not best linear unbiased estimators
(BLUE); they are simply linear unbiased estimators (LUE).
In the presence of heteroscedasticity, the BLUE estimators
are provided by the method of weighted least squares (WLS).
DETECTION OF HETEROSCEDASTICITY
Graph histogram of squared residuals
Graph squared residuals against predicted Y
Whites Test of Heteroscedasticity
Other tests such as Park,
Glejser,
Spearmans rank correlation, and
Goldfeld-Quandt tests of heteroscedasticity
REMEDIAL MEASURES
What should we do if we detect heteroscedasticity?
Use method of Weighted Least Squares (WLS)
Divide each observation by the (heteroscedastic) i and estimate the
transformed model by OLS (yet true variance is rarely known)
If the true error variance is proportional to the square of one of the
regressors, we can divide both sides of the equation by that variable
and run the transformed regression