Chap 009
Chap 009
Chapter 9
Linking Vision and Change
Learning Objectives
On completion of this chapter you should be able to:
Appreciate how approaches to vision and change differ, depending on the
image held of managing organizational change.
Identify the attributes of what makes a meaningful vision.
Have a good understanding of how the context in which a vision is developed
relates to the meaningfulness of the vision.
Understand different techniques and processes for developing vision.
Articulate why some visions are less effective than others.
Appreciate why some visions may fade over time.
Outline current arguments concerning the relationship of vision to
organizational change.
Chapter Summary
Effective change is often linked to the presence of a well-established vision. Conversely, a
lack of vision is frequently associated with unsuccessful change and organizational
decline. The image one has of managing change influences the role one expects vision to
play in the change process. Vision is often confused with other terms such as mission
statements, goals and values.
Images
Director
Navigator Vision is important but not necessarily able to be achieved because of competing
visions that exist among various organizational parties and stakeholders.
Caretaker Vision is in many ways immaterial to the way change will proceed. Change is
rarely the outcome of visionary actions
Coach
Vision is something that is important and is more likely to emerge through the
facilitation skills of the change leader interacting with his or her followers,
shaping their agendas and desired futures.
Interpreter Vision is the ability to articulate the inner voice of the organization that which is
lived, be it core ideology or values, and that underpins the identity of the
organization.
Nurturer Vision is emergent from the clash of chaotic and unpredictable change forces.
Visions are likely to be temporary and always in the process of being rewritten.
The content of meaningful vision has sparked considerable debate. Some consideration
has been given to attributes, its style, and how it is differentiated from mission and
organizational values. Selected examples of these from the text are:
9-1
9-2
9-3
9-4
9-5
4. Discuss issues of vision content, context, and process in how vision was introduced
and changed at the company. What emerges from this?
For this question students should be able to differentiate between the
characteristics of vision, the relationship vision has with the organizational culture
when it is articulated, and the process through which it is developed and modified.
The different stages of vision from this case study give a variety of insights into
how these three issues affected the vision. Themes center around the following:
Vision Content: Two major components of vision cognitive and affective
highlight the characteristics of vision.
Initially vision at Mentor Graphics was focused on outcomes to build
what customers would buy, or to beat Daisy
Over time this became too abstract and focused neither on change
outcomes nor on motivating staff.
Vision Context: Four generic features that relate to how vision was
introduced and changed at Mentor Graphics are as follows.
Possibility: towards the end of the case study vision was positioned to
encourage more innovative practices, but employees were unable to
relate to the vision and the innovative possibilities it suggested.
Desirability: the need for a new vision came from employees, but it did
not draw on their values and norms.
Actionability: the later visions did not make necessary actions clear.
Articulation: the way vision was communicated did not create a clear
vision of where the organization was headed because it had little to do
with the actual business.
Process of Introducing and Changing Vision: One classification for this
process is outlined in Table 9.7 of the text. This highlights five different methods
for creating vision. Mentor Graphics can be evaluated on each of these.
Telling: management creates the vision and passes it onto the staff
because of this employees lacked a connection to the vision and they
could not identify with it.
Selling: The frequent change in vision would suggest that managementinitiated visions were not sold to the staff if this were the case there
would have been evidence of staff or customer buy-in to the new vision.
Testing: There appears to have been little in the way of testing or
providing feedback channels for new visions. The final stages of change
suggest, however, that some feedback was given and that it was taken
into account, as their initial vision of building things that people would
buy was taken up again.
Consulting: There is little evidence of creative input given by other
staff members in the process of creating change.
Co-creating: As with the previous method, there is little evidence of the
alignment of vision within the organization.
9-6
5. Based on what happened in this company, what are the implications in terms of the
three debates about vision discussed in this chapter (whether vision drives change
or emerges during change, whether vision helps or hinders change, and whether
vision is an attribute of heroic leaders or heroic organizations?)
By using these debates to stimulate discussion, students become aware of the three
key debates that link vision and organizational change. These debates illustrate
how this association influences the process of change. The key issues that emerge
in each of these debates are listed below.
Vision drives change or emerges during change:
Vision appears to have driven change initially, then it seems to have
emerged during change at Mentor Graphics.
It can be assumed that Mentor Graphics became more influenced by
external pressures over time.
It seems that Mentor Graphics employees rely on their vision for
motivation and direction this is more common when vision drives
change rather than vice versa.
Vision helps or hinders change:
Vision was used to help change and enhance organizational
performance creating more focused outcomes for Mentor Graphics.
Later modifications of vision disrupted the ability to make sound
financial judgments and hindered change. It made Mentor Graphics
blindly focus on the future. The existing resources of the company were
overlooked as they were thought to be too conventional.
Vision as an attribute of heroic leaders or heroic organizations:
Langeler was successful in framing and communicating the vision
initially. He became the heroic leader of the organization.
Mentor Graphics was not a heroic organization in the sense that it did
not have an embedded vision that was lasting. It is interesting to note,
however, that the organization reverted to its original vision suggesting
that the inner voice of the organization may have had an influence.
6. Of the six change images outlined in Table 9.1, which images of vision can be
applied to this case study? What lessons emerge from this?
This question can be used to encourage students to work through each of the
images of change and find the applicable points in the case study. The case would
suggest that the director image is most dominant but ask students to look beyond
this. This will increase their understanding of the multiple images that can be
applied to every situation.
9-7
Table Heading
Page
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9-8
251
to
252
253
255
256
257
258
260
TABLE
9.8
9.9
9.10
9.11
9.12
9.13
9.14
9.15
Table Heading
Page
9-9
262
to
263
266
267
267
271
277
278
281
9-10
Video
The Charlie Rose Website
http://www.charlierose.com/home
An interview with Bruce Wasserstein, Chairman and CEO of Lazard, looks at vision and
using vision to promote organizational change. A section of this video could be used to
illustrate a real example of vision used in an organization. Students could discuss their
view of the vision expressed and how it could be modified.
Exercises and Answers
EXERCISE 9.1 (p. 256)
Options/Techniques/Requirements
Format:
Materials:
Table 9.3 Characteristics of Good Vision (p. 255) and Table 9.4 Examples of
2007 Vision Statements (p. 256)
Flip chart/easel and paper for group work
Time Required:
Time for the exercise is approximately 20 minutes once the vision statements have been
collected.
Undergraduate:
Students work best in small groups for assessing vision statements. They can start by
assessing the statements in Table 9.4 and then turn their attention to the vision statements
that they have collected to assess.
MBA/Executive:
Students with professional experience will have more exposure to a variety of vision
statements. The instructor can review one or two examples of vision statements from Table
9.4 in the lecture and then have students work individually or in small groups to complete
the exercise. To extend this exercise, students can be asked to include vision statements
from not-for-profit, charity groups, aid agencies, educational institutions, as well as ones
from their own companies, where appropriate.
9-11
Students may try to judge the value statement by how they feel about the
product or company: they need to be sure that they are assessing the vision, not
the company (although these are linked).
Debriefing
Start the debriefing by introducing two unusual visions statements and have the class as a
group work through the process of assessing the vision statements using the frameworks.
Spend some time on how the approaches to vision and change differ, and how the context
in which a vision is developed can influence the meaningfulness of the vision.
9-12
Options/Techniques/Requirements
Format:
Materials:
Revise Table 9.1 Images of Managing Change and How They Relate to Vision.
Flip chart/easels and paper for group work.
Access to business magazines and/or press articles online.
Time Required:
The longest time will probably be in finding the articles. However, this will vary according
to the expertise the students have in internet searches. Time required for the actual exercise
will vary according to the number of articles that are reviewed. Expect students to take
approximately 15 to 20 minutes per company.
Undergraduate:
Students should have little trouble completing this exercise.
MBA/Executive:
Students should have little trouble completing this exercise.
9-13
Students who have not taken the time to critically analyze articles in the press
may find this exercise challenging. They will be helped by the instructor
analyzing an article on vision and change in class time and working through the
questions.
Students may need to be reminded that assessment of the success or failure of a
change attempt will depend to a certain extend on who is reporting the change,
and the timing of the assessment.
Debriefing
The debriefing takes students through the difficulty of completing a change program when
the process is watched externally and critiqued (often) publicly. The process of change in
an organization affects many aspects of the business and it is important that external
images are monitored (as well as the more obvious internal images). Students should be
encouraged to give examples of what they learned through this exercise, especially in
relation to their views on the relationship or importance of vision to change.
9-14
6. To what extent are the articles similar in perspective? Are there any points of
difference? How would you explain these?
The answer to this question is a compare and contrast response. Students can list the
similarities and differences and then explain.
7. How influential do you think such articles are on the managers who read them?
Given their experience, MBA/Executive students are likely to answer this question with
more sophistication and reasoning than the answers given by undergraduates. Answers
should include comments about: the writers reputation as a business analyst or
commentator; the reputation of the magazine/newspaper and the typical target audience;
what other information is available and if this is of similar opinion to the other
publications, or is it totally different, etc.
Interviewing Followers
Purpose
This exercise is designed for students to gain an understanding of the range of perspectives
employees have on the link between vision and the process of change. The aim is to
broaden students knowledge about the role of vision in producing change, and the
different reactions of recipients of change to vision and vision statements.
Options/Techniques/Requirements
Format:
Materials:
a few vision statements for students to give as examples while interviewing (if
needed) if employees are not sure what a vision statement is.
students should have a copy of the vision statement for the company the
employees work for, as some employees may not know the vision.
Time Required:
The longest time for this exercise will be spent in organising and conducting the
interviews. Each interview, once arranged by the student, will take about 15 to 20 minutes
depending on the level of information the employees have about a change. The time
required after the interviews are completed is approximately 30 minutes, unless the
exercise is to be submitted for formal assessment.
9-15
Undergraduate:
Students may need help in gaining access to employees due to their limited professional
experience. It would be preferable for these students not to try to interview employees in a
company where their contact is through a manager or owner, as the employees may feel
pressured to give the right answer, and be concerned about a lack of confidentiality.
MBA/Executive:
Students with professional experience are likely to have enough contacts to be able to
readily find employees to interview. It may be better for them to approach someone
outside their own company as employees in their own company may feel pressured to give
the right answers.
Depending on the way that the interviews are approached, there could be some
issues of confidentiality where employees are concerned that the information
will be presented to others in the company and this will affect their
employment. Students will need to comply with university ethics regulations
and the instructor should outline these to students.
Students need to make sure that their comments and questions are kept in
everyday language as appropriate for employees (and the industry) they are
interviewing, and not use jargon.
Students may feel that an interview was unsuccessful when an employee didnt
know much about the change situation. The information from this situation is
very useful as it tells a lot about the internal communication system in the
company and the structure of the change. Students should be encouraged to
assess this type of response from What would you expect an employee in this
position to know?
Undergraduate students may find it difficult to gain access to a number of
employees from the one company.
Debriefing
The emphasis in this debrief is on the way the change and vision was seen from the
employees perspective. Students should be encouraged to consider employees (aka the
recipients) when managing change, as employees are the ones that can make or break a
change. Students should be encouraged to think through the implications of vision for
managing organizational change and strategies that they might utilize.
9-16
1. Were they presented with an organizational vision about the change? If so:
What was it?
What effect did it have on them?
Did they participate in developing the vision?
To what extent did the vision motivate them toward engaging in the change?
How central do they think vision is to achieving organizational change?
2. If your interviewees were not presented with an organizational vision, ask them the
following questions:
Would a vision have helped them participate more in the change?
How central do they think vision is to achieving organizational change?
The answers to these questions should reflect thoughtfulness on the part of students in
their reporting of the interview. Any statements made should be supported by examples
and explained.
When you have completed your interviews, compare and contrast your responses. What
general conclusions emerge regarding the relationship between vision and organizational
change from the point of view of your respondents?
Students are required to compare and contrast their responses and then make some
concluding statements.
What do you learn from this exercise?
This will be a personal assessment of what the student learnt, and how they will apply this
to their future approach to change management.
EXERCISE 9.4 ( p.276)
Options/Techniques/Requirements
Format:
Preferably individually.
Materials:
Table 9.13 Vision at Merck (p.277).
Collins, J. C., and Porras, J. I. 1991. Organizational vision and visionary organizations. California Management
Review 34(1): 3052.
9-17
Time Required:
This can be done outside of class as an assignment or in class time. The amount of time
spent will vary depending upon whether individuals have prepared prior to class and then
use the class time to compare and contrast their answers in groups. In the latter situation,
at least 40 minutes will be needed for the group work.
Undergraduate:
Students may have some difficulty in determining the impact of the change in the
organization and this could be helped by the instructor explaining an example in class
time.
MBA/Executive:
Students with professional experience are likely to have enough experience to answer all
the questions without assistance from the instructor.
No real issues.
Debriefing
The debriefing should ask students to give their opinion of the approach to assessing a
vision using the framework of a core ideology and envisioned future. Some examples
could be given in class, and students asked for comments. Ask students to work out a
vision statement for the class that would capture the aspects of this approach.
9-18
Options/Techniques/Requirements
Format:
Materials:
Managing Change Text
Flip chart/easel and paper for group work
Time Required:
Time for the class exercise is approximately 35 minutes for debate preparation and 25
minutes for the actual debate (each speaker is allowed two and a half minutes for their
speech), followed by a debriefing 10-15 minutes.
The research can be completed by the teams over the week prior to class, and those in the
debating reams could be given a further few days to formulate their speeches if there is to
be no class time allowed for this part of the process.
Undergraduate:
Students may require some help in preparing the material for the debate. However there
are usually a number of students who are experienced in public speaking or debating who
will be willing to participate in the debate.
MBA/Executive:
Students with professional experience are usually experienced in expressing their ideas in
a public format. They may work to win the debate by showmanship, rather than by
concentrating on the quality of their information.
9-19
Debriefing
A quick summary on the board of the main points of the debate could be completed at the
finish. The aim is to ensure that all relevant information is covered. If there are any ideas
missing from the class discussion, the instructor can add them and ask students to explain
their importance.
9-20
Circus Oz (A)
Stockton, H. & Phills, J. (2006) Stanford Graduate School of Business
In 2002, Circus Oz was an Australian government-funded traveling circus facing the
prospect of dwindling government financing, and needed to turn elsewhere for money. The
circus general manager was under pressure to hire a director of development who could
secure private funding to keep the operation afloat. Unfortunately, hiring this person at the
market rate would undermine the organizations vision and egalitarian culture, where
every employee made about the same amount of money. This case illustrates the potential
dangers that occur when linking vision and change.
Are the strategic stars aligned for your corporate brand?
Article
Hatch, M.J. & Schultz, M. (2001) Harvard Business Review
While this is a corporate branding article, and not a case, it sheds more light on the
concept of vision, and how vision interacts with image and culture within an organization.
Specifically, gaps between your companys vision and image, or vision and culture, are
common, and the knowledge gleaned from this article can render them avoidable
FNB Metro: Waking up to Change
Ortlepp, K. & Gordon-Brown, C. (2004)
Wits Business School, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
The First National Bank (FNB) used the commonality of shared vision and values to help
break down racial barriers among employees. The next step taken by FNB management
was to try to embed this culture across the business but this was not so successful. This
program was attempted after the company had been through a period of rapid and
extensive change. What could be done to continue to build the vision?
Nokia and MIT's Project Oxygen
Henderson, R. (2004) Harvard Business School
The Nokia case examines the use of vision to change its activities into a new arena.
Management believed the shift was necessary as cell phone and internet technologies were
converging. The company was mobilized to focus its R&D towards this area. The case
explores What are the possible business models? and How can a vision facilitate the
development of a business change?
Classic Case
Bob Galvin and Motorola, Inc. (A)
Case & Teaching Note
Gentile, M. under the direction of Jick, T.D. (1987) Harvard Business School
Paul Galvin founded the Galvin Manufacturing Company 1928 which later became
Motorola. His son, Bob Galvin, became CEO of the company in 1964 after working his
way up the corporate ladder from stock clerk. By the 1980s the company was faced with
an inability to respond quickly to customer needs and lacked the flexibility to adjust to the
rapid changes occurring in the industry. Market competition was placing increased
pressure on the company, and there were internal issues relating to management
(complexity of lines and authority and multiple layers of management). Changes needed to
occur for Motorola to continue to succeed. The case covers the complexity of the changes
that needed to be made and the reticence of senior managers to implement the change,
although they believed change was needed. This is an excellent case examining the
difficulty of implementing change in a large company where the threat to business is
imminent, yet the solution is complicated and requires major investment of time and
money.
9-21
Classic Case
Charlotte Beers at Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide (A)
Case & Teaching Note
Ibarra, H. & Sackley, N. (1995) Harvard Business School
Organizational turnaround of a company is a complex and often-lengthy process involving
business processes and implementation struggles as well as the more important change
of attitudes for both management and employees. Charlotte Beer was the first outsider
CEO in the company and the case takes the student through some of the debates of the
senior managers in the formulation of a vision for the company and the reality of making it
work. The case ends with a description of the decisions faced by Beer in the reorganization of Ogilvy & Mather in the process of change.
Follow-ups to the above classic cases
Bob Galvin and Motorola, Inc. (B)
Case & Teaching Note
Gentile, M. under the direction of Jick, T.D. (1987) Harvard Business School
This case takes a look at the situation through the eyes of Galvin after his speech to the
1983 Officers Meeting. It is a short study on the issue of having others catch the vision
and can be read with the approach of trying to understand how Galvin could have made
the situation clearer to the other managers. This case could be used to have students think
of how Galvin could have communicated in alternate ways to management in order to gain
more support for the changes he saw were necessary. This case can also be used with
Chapter 11 as a stand alone case if enough background information is given.
Bob Galvin and Motorola, Inc. (C)
Case & Teaching Note
Gentile, M. under the direction of Jick, T.D. (1987) Harvard Business School
The implementation of the change occurring at Motorola continues through phases 2 and
3. This case details the reactions of some managers and helps to bring into clearer focus
their reaction as they try to successfully manage their own division and lead their
employees. This is a good multiple perspectives case that can be used to look at change
through the eyes of managers one by one and then as a group. It is important for students
to understand that not all changes in a company will be accepted, supported or understood.
The process through which the company does change is neither mechanical nor
predictable as it involves people, interests and inter-relationships.
Charlotte Beers at Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide (B)
Case & Video Supplement
Ibarra, H. & Sackley, N. (1995) Harvard Business School
The changes at Ogilvy & Mather led by Charlotte Beer involved a massive re-organization
of the company. Two years after the change was initiated, this case reviews the success
of the change and describes what progress has been made by the CEO. This case is a good
follow up for students to read once Case A has been completed. Students should be
encouraged to make a decision on what they think would happen at the end of the first case
and then use Case B to see what actually happened. If the second case is used, it would be
beneficial if time is taken in class to have students understand that the aim is not to
guess what happened after Case A ends. The idea is to see how many different ways a
case can be interpreted, using the information available in the first case to support their
position. It is important to emphasize that what happened at Ogilvy & Mather as described
in Case B may not be the best result possible given the circumstances.
9-22