Scribd
Upload
6K views

Task 3 Part D - Evaluation Criteria

This document describes a pre- and post-assessment of students' sight word recognition abilities. Teachers assessed students' ability to identify 8 sight words and recorded their performance. Students were then grouped based on their pre-assessment results. After working in their groups, students took a post-assessment where most students improved their sight word recognition abilities. The class proficiency increased from 40% to 76% and individual focus students also showed gains.

Uploaded by

api-242291532
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6K views

Task 3 Part D - Evaluation Criteria

This document describes a pre- and post-assessment of students' sight word recognition abilities. Teachers assessed students' ability to identify 8 sight words and recorded their performance. Students were then grouped based on their pre-assessment results. After working in their groups, students took a post-assessment where most students improved their sight word recognition abilities. The class proficiency increased from 40% to 76% and individual focus students also showed gains.

Uploaded by

api-242291532
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

TASK 3 Part D Evaluation Criteria

Things to look for:


1. Can the student identify the sight words? + (yes)
- (no)
2. If no, is the word omitted or does the student guess?
3. If the student guesses are they using initial letter-sound correspondence to make the
guess?
Example of assessment sheet (student visual):

like

the and
see

we

to

Example of assessment form (teacher visual):


Student #
and

the

like

see

we

to

Pre-assessment:
Key: Bold = 3 focus students

+ = correct

- = omitted / incorrect

Student
#

New Group
Divisions
and

the

like

see

we

to

you

like

you

see

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
like
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+I
+
+
+
+I
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
and

+
+
+
+
+
+
you

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
and
+

+
+
+
go
+
+
+
+

13

the

14

8 (100%)

15

8 (100%)

+
+
+
+
and
+
+
16/25
64.00%

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
24/25
96.00%

+
+
+I
+
+
+
+
+
and
+
22/25
88.00%

+
and
+
+
e
+
+
+
+
18/25
72.00%

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
15/25
60.00%

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
20/25
80.00%

+
the
+
I can
+
+
13/25
52.00%

+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
red
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
24
+
25
RESULTS 20/25
80.00%

1 (12.5%)
0 (0%)
8 (100%)
8 (100%)
5 (62.5%)
7 (87.5%)
7 (87.5%)
8 (100%)
8 (100%)
3 (37%)
6 (75%)
6 (75%)

6 (75%)
8 (100%)
4 (50%)
5 (62.5%)
6 (75%)
4 (50%)
8 (100%)
6 (75%)
8 (100%)
2 (25%)
8 (100%)

Pre-assessment results were analyzed to create new group divisions for workstation groups.
Key: Group divisions based on percentage correct
Emerging (50%)
Intermediate (37.5%)
Intermediate/Proficient (87.5%)
Emerging
Group

Intermediate
Group

Proficient (100%)
Intermediate /
Proficient
Group

Proficient
Group

1) 1

1) 5

1) 3

1) 14

2) 2

2) 11

2) 4

2) 15

3) 10

3) 12

3) 6

3) 16

4) 17

4) 13

4) 7

4) 21

5) 20
6) 24

5) 18
6) 19
7) 22

5) 8
6) 9

5) 23
6) 25

Post-assessment:
Key: Bold = 3 focus students

Student
#

+ = correct

Emerging (50%)

Intermediate (37.5%)

Intermediate/Proficient (87.5%)

Proficient (100%)

and

the

IDK

IDK

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

a
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

13

14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
RESULTS

- = omitted / incorrect

Post Group
Divisions

like

see

we

IDK

3 (50%)

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

and
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
the
+
+
+
+
the
+
+

4 (66.6%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
5 (83.3%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
4 (66.6%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)

6 (100%)

6 (100%)

6 (100%)

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
the
+
20/25
80.00%

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
24/25
96.00%

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
25/25
100.00%

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
24/25
96.00%

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
2325
92.00%

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
22/25
88.00%

6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
5 (83.3%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
3 (50%)
6 (100%)

Pre vs. Post Assessment Results:


CLASS RESULTS
Pre
Post

and
80.00%
80.00%

the
64.00%
96.00%

I
96.00%
100.00%

Student
#

like
88.00%
96.00%

Pre Group
Divisions

see
72.00%
92.00%

Post Group
Divisions

1 (12.5%) 3 (50%)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

0 (0%)
8 (100%)
8 (100%)
5 (62.5%)
7 (87.5%)
7 (87.5%)
8 (100%)
8 (100%)
3 (37%)
6 (75%)
6 (75%)

4 (66.6%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
5 (83.3%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
4 (66.6%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)

13

6 (75%)

6 (100%)

14

8 (100%)

6 (100%)

15

8 (100%) 6 (100%)

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Class
Proficiency

8 (100%)
4 (50%)
5 (62.5%)
6 (75%)
4 (50%)
8 (100%)
6 (75%)
8 (100%)
2 (25%)
8 (100%)
40.00%

6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
5 (83.3%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
3 (50%)
6 (100%)
76.00%

we
60.00%
88.00%

a
80.00%

to
52.00%

WORKSTATION GROUPS RESULTS

Emerging
Group

PreAssessment

PostAssessment

1 (12.5%) 3 (50%)

2
10
17
20
24

0 (0%)
3 (37%)
4 (50%)
4 (50%)
2 (25%)

4 (66.6%)
4 (66.6%)
6 (100%)
5 (83.3%)
3 (50%)

Intermediate
PrePostGroup
Assessment Assessment
5 (62.5%)
5 (83.3%)
5
6 (75%)
6 (100%)
11
6 (75%)
6 (100%)
12

13

6 (75%)

6 (100%)

18
19
22

5 (62.5%)
6 (75%)
6 (75%)

6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)

Proficient
Group
14

PrePostAssessment Assessment
8 (100%)
6 (100%)

15

8 (100%) 6 (100%)

16
21
23
25

8 (100%)
8 (100%)
8 (100%)
8 (100%)

6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)
6 (100%)

FOCUS STUDENT RESULTS

You might also like