Lesson Study First Lesson
Lesson Study First Lesson
n Process /
Guiding Questions
Evidence
Group charts showing that students found strong textual and pictorial
evidence to support their claim about what occurred in the story.
Evidence such as The rabbit is gone, The bear turned red and was
really angry, convey a developing understanding about locating
strong evidence. We will also have students verbally explain their
thinking, linking the most important pieces of evidence they found to
their claim in their own words.
Exit tickets showing that students are individually able to use evidence
to support their inference; sentences such as I think the rabbit stole
the hat because in the book. shows that students are able to weigh
evidence from a book and use it to support their claim.
Stage 3 Planning
Instruction
Guiding Questions When Designing the Lesson:
What preparation do students need to complete before the lesson takes place? What do
students currently understand about this topic?
What instructional activities and materials will be used in the lesson? What will be the
sequence of the lesson?
What will make this lesson motivating and meaningful to students?
How will the lesson activities make student thinking visible?
In what ways do the lesson activities help students achieve the learning goals?
What kinds of student thinking (including problems and misconceptions) do we anticipate
in response to each element of the lesson? How will we use these to foster movement
from what students currently understand to what we want them to understand?
Lesson Sequence:
Steps/Learning
Activities/Teachers Questions
This column shows the major
events and flow of the lesson.
What are the moves, questions,
or statements that the teacher
may need to make to guide
students guide toward the
stated objective?
Anticipated Student
Responses/Teachers Support
This section describes how students
might respond to a question or task,
including incorrect solutions and places
where students might get stuck.
Here the plan might describe how the
teacher might handle the different
student responses, especially incorrect
Points of Assessment
This column identifies what
the teacher/observers should
look for to determine
understanding (i.e. if a task is
presented to students, how do
we know if students
understand the task? If a
discussion is planned, what
1. Hook Assessment:
Teacher will assess
and activate prior
knowledge by
asking about the
Scholastic News
debates the class
has completed
previously, and
specifically
inquiring about the
latest debate,
(school lunches),
and why one
position was
stronger than the
other.
2.
Connection: Explain
how good readers have to
be like detectives. Ask what
do detectives do? Ask how
readers can do some of the
same things when they
read.
1. Connection Responses:
Students may have trouble
making the connection
between detectives and
readers. If that is the case,
the teacher should help
bridge these ideas. For
example, explaining that in
mysteries there are suspects,
and asking students who
those suspects might be in a
book? (The teacher would be
looking for characters as a
response.) Or, explaining
that real detectives use
clues, like the crime scene or
fingerprints, but in reading
we dont have those things what do we have when we
read? (The teacher would be
looking for students to
respond that we have words,
or descriptions, and pictorial
evidence.)
Teaching Point:
N/A
Today I will teach
you how to work like
a detective as you
read and gather
evidence from the
text to support your
claims.
We will have the
word claim written
on the board with a
list of synonyms that
they will recognize
such as: statement,
idea, conclusion,
prediction. (These
probably are not
direct synonyms but
I think in this context
these words would
2.
Connection
Assessment: The teacher
will specifically be looking
for answers like: looking at
the details or clues,
thinking about the
different suspects or
characters motivations,
analyzing pictures or
illustrations.
N/A
help students
understand what a
claim is)
4.
Book Intro: Today
we are going to read I Want
My Hat Back by Jon Klassen.
The book is about a bear
who is searching for his hat.
When we read, we are going
to use our detective skills to
try to solve the mystery of
who took the bears hat.
When we read, we will need
to put on our detective hats
(ask everyone to put on
their detective hats) and
make sure that we use
evidence in order to solve
the mystery. Evidence can
either come from the words
that we are reading or the
pictures in the book.
5.
During read aloud:
Model using evidence to
support a claim: Hmm.. did
the turtle steal the hat? It
does not look like he did
because he is not wearing a
hat. Maybe he hid it under
the water! I guess there is
no evidence that the hat is
under the water. So I
believe he did not steal the
hat.
6.
After the read aloud:
Ask questions to prompt
students to begin thinking
about their inferences and
how they can support them:
What do you think
happened? Who do you
think stole the Bears
hat? What happened to
the Rabbit? How do you
know? Why do you think
that?
7.
Group work: The
teacher will split students
into into groups of four (predeveloped to prevent
wasting time). Each group
will be given one of two
claims: The bear ate the
rabbit. or The bear did not
eat the rabbit. They will
work together to find
evidence from the book,
and then write their
8.
Share: Groups will
argue for their claim by
presenting their evidence to
the rest of the class.
for evidence.
Observers will take note
of how students go about
completing the task: do
they assign jobs? Does
one student lead the
whole group? Does one
student do all the work?
Are any students
excluded or disengaged?
MATERIALS
I Want My Hat Back book
Chart Paper
Markers
TRANSITION/LOGISTICS
Students will most probably be transitioning from Problem of the Day they will
put their notebooks away and directions will be to have students come sit in
their floor spots on the carpet. When students are ready the lesson will begin
Students will be divided into groups based on desks (there are four desk
clusters so 4 groups)
Students will complete exit tickets at their desks after groups present their
work.