Scribd
Upload
29 views

Micro Solution 3 2010

Points should only be awarded for ideas expressed using mathematical models. The grader has discretion since there are multiple correct answers. More general approaches should be rewarded, but using explicit functions is better. The key provides point breakdowns for 5 exam questions: writing supply functions, deriving comparative statics, solving maximization problems, and explaining comparative statics with math references.

Uploaded by

ADITYA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
29 views

Micro Solution 3 2010

Points should only be awarded for ideas expressed using mathematical models. The grader has discretion since there are multiple correct answers. More general approaches should be rewarded, but using explicit functions is better. The key provides point breakdowns for 5 exam questions: writing supply functions, deriving comparative statics, solving maximization problems, and explaining comparative statics with math references.

Uploaded by

ADITYA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

1011A HONORS EXAM SOLUTION KEY

JONATHAN HALL, FOR EDWARD LUDWIG GLAESER

Points should be rewarded only for ideas that are expressed using mathematical models.
There are many correct answers to these questions, so the grader must use her discretion.
More general approaches to the problem should be rewarded, but if the student actually
makes headway using explicit functional forms, thats great.
1. 6 points
3 points for writing down a sensible maximization problem
3 points for solving it correctly and writing down the supply function.
2. 6 points
2 points for seeming to know how to get comparative statics using calculus
1 point for each comparative static derived
3. 6 points
3 points for writing down a sensible maximization problem
3 points for solving it
4. 18 points
8 points for differentiating the FOC correctly and stating the SOC
10 points for explanation with reference to math
5. 24 points
4 points for correct setup of problem
8 points for each correct comparative static
4 points for explanation

You might also like