Gideon v Wainwright was a 1963 Supreme Court case that established the right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment. Clarence Earl Gideon was accused of burglary in Florida but was denied a lawyer because he could not afford to pay for one. He defended himself at trial and was found guilty. Gideon appealed, arguing that the Sixth Amendment requires states to provide lawyers for indigent defendants. The Supreme Court agreed in a 9-0 decision, ruling that states must provide lawyers in felony criminal cases to protect the fundamental right to counsel.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
192 views
Sample Case Gideon V Wainwright
Gideon v Wainwright was a 1963 Supreme Court case that established the right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment. Clarence Earl Gideon was accused of burglary in Florida but was denied a lawyer because he could not afford to pay for one. He defended himself at trial and was found guilty. Gideon appealed, arguing that the Sixth Amendment requires states to provide lawyers for indigent defendants. The Supreme Court agreed in a 9-0 decision, ruling that states must provide lawyers in felony criminal cases to protect the fundamental right to counsel.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6
case
Gideon v Wainwright. 1963 Year Right to Counsel, Due Process
George Sanchez 2nd period
Issue under consideration, what the case was about
Background
Facts of the case, how the case came to be in
front of the Supreme Court
Burglary occurred at a pool room in Florida
Witnesses claimed to see Clarence Earl Gideon in poolroom that morning Gideon found nearby with a pint of wine and some change- he was arrested Gideon requested a lawyer under the 6th amendment but the judge said he didnt have to provide one unless there were special circumstances
Background continued
Gideon forced to defend himself- found guilty
Filed a writ of habeus corpus with Florida Supreme Court- rejected Handwrites a petition to the US Supreme Court arguing that the 6th amendment requires states to provide lawyers for the indigent (those who cannot afford to pay)
Plaintiffs argument
Supreme Court decision 9-0 in favor of
plaintiff Gideon
Ruled that lawyers
must be provided in felony criminal cases in state courts as well as federal courts because the right to an attorney is a fundamental right. 6th amendment right to counsel
Robert F. Kennedy quote
If an obscure Florida convict named Clarence
Earl Gideon had not sat down in his prison cell to write a letter to the Supreme Court . . . the vast machinery of American law would have gone on functioning undisturbed. But Gideon did write that letter, the Court did look into his case . . . and the whole course of American legal history has been changed."
Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford
December Term, 1856.
Andrew A. Sanchez v. Eloy Mondragon, Warden, Southern N.M. Correction Facility Attorney General of The State of New Mexico, 858 F.2d 1462, 10th Cir. (1988)