Scribd
Upload
32 views

Project 03

The document reports the results of three separate t-tests comparing the means of two samples. Each t-test calculates the means, variances, observations, pooled variance, hypothesized mean difference, t-statistic, and probability values to determine whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis that the means are equal. For all three t-tests, the null hypothesis is not rejected, indicating the mean differences observed could have been due to chance variation between samples rather than a real difference caused by the independent variable.

Uploaded by

John McColly
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
32 views

Project 03

The document reports the results of three separate t-tests comparing the means of two samples. Each t-test calculates the means, variances, observations, pooled variance, hypothesized mean difference, t-statistic, and probability values to determine whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis that the means are equal. For all three t-tests, the null hypothesis is not rejected, indicating the mean differences observed could have been due to chance variation between samples rather than a real difference caused by the independent variable.

Uploaded by

John McColly
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Mean
Variance
Observations
Pooled Variance
Hypothesized Mean Difference
df
t Stat
P(T<=t) one-tail
t Critical one-tail
P(T<=t) two-tail
t Critical two-tail
Do not reject null hypothesis

Variable 1
Variable 2
152.357
140.125
1371.324
1775.554
14.000
8.000
1512.804
0.000
20.000
0.710
0.243
1.725
0.486
2.086

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Mean
Variance
Observations
Pooled Variance
Hypothesized Mean Difference
df
t Stat
P(T<=t) one-tail
t Critical one-tail
P(T<=t) two-tail
t Critical two-tail
Do not Reject Null Hypothesis

Variable 1 Variable 2
1.168 1.22675
0.018052 0.020209
14
8
0.018807
0
20
-0.966598
0.172644
1.724718
0.345289
2.085963

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Mean
Variance
Observations
Pooled Variance
Hypothesized Mean Difference
df
t Stat
P(T<=t) one-tail
t Critical one-tail
P(T<=t) two-tail
t Critical two-tail
Do not reject null Hypothesis

sample 1 sample 2
2.9946
3.560
0.5717
0.840
13.0000
7.000
0.6613
0.0000
18.0000
-1.4831
0.0777
1.7341
0.1554
2.1009

ERA
*ERA+
WHIP
Before
After
Before
After
Before
After
4.32
2.65
97
174
1.313
1.095
3.29
4.6
131
103
1.22
1.465
2.48
3.7
169
130
0.969
1.312
2.97
3.51
154
128
1.175
1.257
2.93
4.35
141
102
1.057
1.306
3.13
3.91
132
112
1.216
1.214
1.93
2.98
213
146
1.082
1.157
2.62
1.87
164
226
1.047
1.008
2.41
175
1.074
4.46
104
1.263
2.85
177
1.143
4.18
116
1.436
3.63
139
1.327
2.05
221
1.03
Average
3.09
3.45
152.36
140.13
1.17
1.23
StdDev
0.8082
0.9077
37.0314
42.1373
0.1344
0.1422
Sample size
14
8
14
8
14
8
Ho: u1-u2=0
H1: u1-u2=/0

1. Roger Clemens performance was not significantly different before or after the alleged dr
2. Roger Clemens performance was not significantly different before or after the alleged d
3. Roger Clemens performance was not significantly different before or after the alleged d
4 Roger Clemens performance was not significantly different before or after the alleged dru
5. There is no evidence to refute McNamee's claims. There is only evidence that Clemons p

or after the alleged drug use.


or after the alleged drug use.
or after the alleged drug use
or after the alleged drug use
dence that Clemons performance did not change during those times. He either did not use drugs or they did no

e drugs or they did not help hos performance.

You might also like