QLD Assessment Policy
QLD Assessment Policy
to help approved providers of education and care services to achieve quality learning
outcomes for children who attend the services
to provide accurate and informative records of student achievement, including through the
production of certificates of achievements and statements of results
develops and approves Years 112 syllabuses and curriculum guidelines for the kindergarten
and early years of schooling
develops, marks and administers tests, and reports students test results
provides students with Overall Positions (OPs) and Field Positions (FPs) as a basis for
tertiary entrance (and related tertiary entrance functions).
Australasian Curriculum, Assessment and Certification Authorities (ACACA) 2012, Principles of Assessment F12: An ACACA
paper.
Purposes of assessment
The purposes of assessment are to:
promote, assist and improve learning
inform programs of teaching and learning
provide information for those people students, parents, teachers who need to know
about the progress and achievements of individual students to help them achieve to the best
of their abilities
provide information for the issuing of certificates of achievement
provide information to those people who need to know how well groups of students are
achieving (school authorities, the State Minister for Education, Training and Employment, the
Federal Minister for Education).
It is common practice to label assessment as being formative, diagnostic or summative according
to the major purpose of the assessment.
The major purpose of formative assessment is to help students attain higher levels of
performance. The major purpose of diagnostic assessment is to determine the nature of students
learning and then provide the appropriate feedback or intervention. The major purpose of
3
The definition of syllabus in the Act is that a syllabus includes a statement of content, standards of achievement and
assessment processes.
Assessment instruments
High-quality assessment instruments:
have construct validity (the instruments actually assess what they were designed to assess)
have face validity (they appear to assess what you believe they are intended to assess)
give students clear and definite instructions
are written in language suited to the reading capabilities of the students for whom the
instruments are intended
are clearly presented through appropriate choice of layout, cues, visual design, format and
choice of words
are used under clear, definite and specified conditions that are appropriate for all the students
whose achievements are being assessed
have clear criteria for making judgments about achievements (these criteria are shared with
students before they are assessed)
are used under conditions that allow optimal participation for all
are inclusive of students diverse backgrounds
allow students to demonstrate the breadth and depth of their achievements
only involve the reproduction of gender, socioeconomic, ethnic or other cultural stereotypes if
careful consideration has determined that such reproduction is necessary.
The QCAAs six principles for exit assessment are explained in syllabuses for authority subjects and study area specifications
for authority-registered subjects. Please note that study area specifications are being replaced by subject area syllabuses
from 2015.
See QCAAs Equity statement and Policy on special provisions for school-based assessments in authority and authorityregistered subjects in the AZ of Moderation. The policy is based on the ACACA Guidelines for Assessment Quality and
Equity (1995).
Comparability of standards
When the results of assessment are to be reported publicly, the QCAA advocates social
moderation of teachers judgments as being the best system of ensuring comparability of
standards across Queensland.
In a system of social moderation, groups of teachers meet formally to assure the quality of
assessment instruments and ensure that judgments of standards are comparable from school to
school through a process of negotiation.
For social moderation to work effectively, the following are required:
syllabuses or guidelines that clearly describe the content and achievement standards
contextualised exemplar assessment instruments
samples of student work annotated to explain how they represent different standards
consensus through teacher discussions on the quality of the assessment instruments and the
standards of student work
professional development of teachers
an organisational infrastructure encompassing the QCAA and schools to ensure the above
takes place.
The QCAAs reporting purposes are summarised in the document, P12 Assessment Overview.
Reference list
Assessment Reform Group 2002, Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles, UK.
Australasian Curriculum, Assessment and Certification Authorities (ACACA) 1995, Guidelines for
Assessment Quality and Equity.
2012, Principles of Assessment F12: An ACACA paper.
Council for the Australian Federation 2007, Federalist Paper 2: The Future of Schooling in Australia
(revised edition), Australia.
Education (Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority) Act 2014 (legislation).
Luke, A & Weir, K 2008, Development of a set of principles to guide a P12 syllabus framework,
Queensland Studies Authority (QSA), Brisbane.
McMenimen, M 1986, Formative and Summative Assessment A complementary approach, Discussion
Paper 6, Board of Secondary School Studies, Brisbane.
Matters, G 2004, Growing an Assessment Culture: Issue No 3 Designing Quality Assessment Tasks.
Access Education, Department of Education, Training and the Arts, Brisbane.
2004, Growing an Assessment Culture: Issue No 4 Determining criteria and writing standards
descriptors Access Education, Department of Education, Training and the Arts, Brisbane.
2006, Assessment approaches in Queensland senior science syllabuses, QSA, Brisbane.
2007, Taking a position on standards: Paper prepared for the QCAR project, QSA, Brisbane.
Maxwell, GS 2002, Are core learning outcomes standards? Queensland School Curriculum Council,
Brisbane.
Pitman, JA, OBrien, JE & McCollow, JE 1999, High-Quality Assessment: We are what we believe and do,
Paper presented at the IAEA Conference, Bled, Slovenia, May.
Radford, W (chairman) 1970, Public Examinations for Queensland Secondary School Students,
Queensland Department of Education, Brisbane.
Sadler, DR 1986, ROSBAs Family Connections, Discussion Paper 1, Board of Secondary School Studies,
Brisbane.
1986, The Case for Explicitly Stated Standards, Discussion Paper 2, Board of Secondary School
Studies, Brisbane.
1986, General Principles for Organising Criteria, Discussion Paper 9, Board of Secondary School
Studies, Brisbane.
1986, Defining and Achieving Comparability of Assessment, Discussion Paper 12, Board of Secondary
School Studies, Brisbane.
1987, Specifying and promulgating achievement standards, Oxford Review of Education, 13, pp. 191
209.
2005, Interpretation of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education, Assessment and
Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol 30 No. 2, April, pp. 17594.
Scott, E (chairman) 1978, A review of school-based assessment in Queensland secondary schools, Board
of Secondary School Studies, Brisbane.
Varghese, J 2002, The report of the assessment and reporting taskforce, Education Queensland,
Queensland Government.