Section 5
Section 5
Model, 2011). It is important when considering use of technology to assess students that they are
valid and reliable tools, unbiased and meet the demands of the schooling standards. Technology
assessment tools using various kinds of educational software creates a much faster and more
productive vice in which teachers can record their students achievements in their class.
Technology can facilitate the ongoing effort to assess student learning in ways through websites
such as Conquest, Study Island, and ClassDojo. These websites allow the teachers as well as the
students to know their scores at a faster pace and to know what needs to be changed to be
successful to the best of their ability. There are two types of assessments in which can be tested
through the traditional route as well as technologically; formative and summative. Formative
Assessment is used to monitor students learning and give all stakeholders, students, their parent,
and teachers throughout each lesson used to improve learning and instruction (Formative vs.
Summative). Some examples of this type of assessment on the technology front would be
websites such as Polleverywhere, online practice tests, jeopardy, and SMART board activities
within a lesson. Summative assessments are the more serious and final projects given at the end
of each unit or lesson. Technology wise summative assessment can be given in ways such as tests
administered online, submitting final papers to an online portfolio. This way as soon as the
student submits the assignment they will be able to view their score for the rest of their schooling
careers as well as schools and jobs they apply to later.
Bill Tucker states that, Students today are growing up in a world overflowing with a
variety of high-tech tools, from computers and video games to increasingly sophisticated mobile
devices. And unlike adults, these students don't have to adjust to the information ageit will be
all they've ever known (Tucker, 2009). Thus, proving to those born in prior generations, such as
their teachers that it is indeed a pro when using technology to assess their students learning. A
second pro being that they become more active participants in each classroom setting that
provides technological assessment because it is more on their speed per-say. On the other side
or con of this method of assessing is that technology can have its malfunctions at times as well as
being pricey making it harder for low incomes school to have access to device such as these.
Ultimately I believe that classroom should have a mixture of both traditional as well as
technology based assessment administered throughout the year. Creating a good balance between
the two methods will allow students to be skilled in both. Not to mention teachers will be able to
see them from different lights so as not to just assess them one certain way, diversity in
assessment is key. As for the ISTE Standards, connecting assessment technology to these
standards will make sure that students are able to think critically, problem solve, and be creative
in their schooling and life around them.
References
Formative vs Summative Assessment - Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation Carnegie Mellon University. (n.d.). Retrieved April 10, 2015, from
https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/basics/formative-summative.html
Hussain, A., Azeem, M., Nawaz, S., & Mehmood, A. (2011). Assessment Model: How to Assess
Students' Learning?. International Journal Of Science In Society, 2(4), 85-97.
ISTE Standards For Students. (2007). Retrieved April 10, 2015, from
http://www.iste.org/standards/standards-for-students
ISTE Standards For Teachers. (2007). Retrieved April 10, 2015, from
http://www.iste.org/standards/standards-for-teachers