Performance MGT
Performance MGT
PERFORMANCE
for Rank and
File Personnel
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ORIENTATION OBJECTIVES
Provide an overview on the DSWD Strategic
Performance Management System (DSPMS)
Explain why the shift from semester to
annual performance contracting
Orient on the PMS stages and forms being
used
Familiarize on the 1-5 Rating System
BACKGROUNDER
Joint Reso. 04-2009 or Salary Standardization Law III
prescribes PBIS to measure collective effort of staff to
organizational performance
CSC MC 06-2012 or SPMS aligns organizations goals
and operations of the units to all individuals.
Hence, DSWD separated office targets/performance from
the Official/HOBS leading the office
targets/accomplishments.
Each individual staff has his/her own share of contribution
that links to the achievement of organizational goals.
WHAT IS PMS?
Process by w/c an organization aligns its resources, systems
and employees to strategic objectives and priorities.
A set of processes for establishing a shared understanding of
1. WHAT WILL BE ACHIEVED;
2.
HOW IT WILL BE ACHIEVED; and
3.
MANAGING PEOPLE.
- Civil Service Commission
Framework
COVERAGE/TIMELINE
Why Shift from semester to Annual PMS?
(the Back-story)
For staff to focus on main workload
For IPC of staff to be in synch with the
OPC/IPC of Office/Official and
To simplify submission/processing of PMS
requirements into once a year
DSPMS CYCLE/CALENDAR
January-February
Till end of
Stage 1:
Performan
ce
Planning
Stage 4:
Performan
ce
Rewarding
and
Developm
ent
All year round Planning
Stage 2:
September
Performan
ce
Coaching
&
Monitorin
g
Stage 3:
Performan
ce Review
&
Evaluation
January
(succeeding year)
IPC
Planning tool to indicate
performance targets and
measure of the Official/staff
for the rating period
Identify value added/
leadership /contribution role
provided by the individual in
attaining Office targets
OPC/IPC APPROVING
AUTHORITY OFFICIALS
Official/Ratee
Usec.
Asec.
RD
HOBS
Director
III/ARD/ABD
Recommendi
ng
Approving/Su
perior Rater
Secretary
Cluster Head
Secretary
Secretary
Cluster Head
Secretary
HOBS (Dir. IV)
Supervisor/Assista Director/HOBS
nt Director, if any
Admin and
Technical staff
Immediate
supervisor
(DC/OIC)
Director/HOBS
1 ST STAGE:
PERFORMANCE PLANNING
PERFORMANCE PLANNING
is
the
target
setting
stage
where
deliverables/commitments for the rating period
are planned.
Objectives:
To have a clear/more defined accountabilities.
To serve as a basis for performance review and
evaluation.
IPC FORM
Is a planning tool used to indicate
commitments and measure of performance
of the staff for the rating period
Indicates technical component/staffs
mission critical contribution in the overall
commitment of his/her OBS
Offices/Bureaus/Servic
es
EXECO
M
MANCO
M
Cluster
OBS
(HOBS)
Rank
and File
Cluster
Heads_____________
DirectorAsst. Director
OBS
Targets
Targets for
Direct
Accountabilit
ies (e.g., as
RPM)
Individual
Leadershi
p Roles/
Targets
Targets
Relative
to
Leaders
hip
Assistive
Function
s
Division Chief
Division
Targets
Individual
Supervisory
Targets
Rank and
File
Individual
Roles/ Targets
DSPMS SUPPORT
SAMPLE CASCADING
Employ
Role
Function
ee
[Office] [Mandat [Office Function]
e]
Director Manager Lead Office, Set
directions, Strat
Planning, Policy
decision, Program
management,
monitoring
Chief
Technical Lead Division, Set
supervisi direction, Plan,
on
Program monitor
Technic Focal of Implement program
al Staff program
Technical supervision/inputs:
Report, guidelines, monitor
processes/systems
Prepare Report, Papers,
Guidelines, Business process,
Success/Performance Indicators
When? How
long/soon the output
will be
accomplished?
Number
Percentage
Standard
Timeframe
Rate of
increase/
decrease
Results-oriented
indicator
Expected
completion date
Quantity
e.g. Guidelines/
Report
e.g. Annual
accomplishment
Tim
e issues
1 report captured the status of accomplishments,
Guidelines/
Policy paper
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR/S
(Qn-Ql-T)
Communications/letter [ No. of] memos providing information/ guidance/ reply/ addressing concerns
approved by supervisor [ within set timeline ]
/memorandum
Researches: Concept [ No. of] paper explaining concept/providing stand on
paper, Position paper, issues/proposing/analyzing result of study approved by supervisor [ within set
timeline ]
Research proposal,
Research report
Project proposal,
activity proposal
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR/S
(Qn-Ql-T)
[No. of] TOR describing work and outputs from the service
provider/consultant per guidelines approved by supervisor/cluster head [within
set timeline]
[No. of] signed MOA with the Department and partner approved by supervisor
MOA
[No. of] packaged kit/materials for reference for target recipient before activity
Reference kit
[or within set timeline ]
[No. of] presentation materials capturing the key points of a topic for
Presentation
materials, powerpoint, discussion or information approved by supervisor [ within set timeline ]
audio, video material
[No. of] crafted training module to guide facilitators/trainers on learning
objectives, inputs, methodologies, processing of learnings, key points
Training module
approved by supervisor [ within set timeline ]
[No. of] organized/conducted activity that met its objectives (Training: pax
gained KAS; Orientation: pax informed/advocated on program, topic, etc.;
Activity conduct
General assembly: informed/consulted employees; Other event/activity:
promoted employee welfare, wellness, camaraderie, etc.)
Terms of reference
IPC SUBMISSION
FO/ATTACHED AGENCIES
(AA)
STAGE 2:
PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND
COACHING
STAGE 3:
PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND
EVALUATION
Stage
where
accomplishments
of
performance are evaluated based on indicators
and
commitments
made
during
the
Performance Planning and Commitment stage.
Objectives:
Serves as a basis for HR personnel action e.g.
promotion, development intervention to
improve performance or renewal of contract.
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE
CONTRACT AND REVIEW (IPCR)
is a tool used to rate/assess the targets
committed by the staff during the performance
planning stage for the rating period.
indicates the actual accomplishments, rating
per set performance indicators (quantity,
quality and time)
RATING PERFORMANCE
Ground Rules
1.Basis for the performance assessment is the
approved PC or Adjusted PC (APC), if any, for
the rating period.
2.The 1 to 5 point system shall be used.
3.For key result with as the needs arise (ANA)
targets but no actions was needed for the
RATING
PERFORMANCE :
QUANTITY
RATING PERFORMANCE
Types of Quantity indicator:
Fixed
deliverable/output/target which cannot be
exceeded (e.g. quarter/ sem./ annual report)
Non-Fixed and Quota-based
deliverable/output which can be exceeded
(e.g. service to clients, action to requests)
RATING PERFORMANCE
For Quantity Fixed & ANA
RATING
INDICATORS
5
101%
and
above
accomplished
4
76-100% accomplished
3
51-75% accomplished
2
26-50% accomplished
1
25% and below
RATING PERFORMANCE
For Quantity Non-Fixed/Quota-based
RATING
5
4
3
2
1
INDICATORS
81-100% accomplished
61-80% accomplished
41-60% accomplished
21-40% accomplished
20%
and
below
accomplished
RATING PERFORMANCE
General Formula for Quantity:
% of accomplishment = Total no. of quantity delivered X
100%
Total no. of target
Sample: 4 accomplished out of 5 targeted guidelines
= 4 / 5 X 100
= 80%
=4
RATING
PERFORMANCE :
QUALITY
Outstanding
4
(76-100%)
Very Sat
3
(51-75%)
Satisfactory
2
(26-75%)
1
(25% and
below)
Description
RATING
PERFORMANCE :
TIME
RATING PERFORMANCE
Types of Time indicator:
AVERAGE RATING
Average Rating per key result :
Qn + Ql + Time
3
Final Average Rating:
Get the average rating per key result target
Add all the average ratings
Divide this to the number of items/outputs/ deliverables.
SAMPLE IPCR
Key Result Area/ Program,
Activity, Project/Deliverables
Success/Performance Indicators /
Measures
Actual Accomplishment
Key Result
Remarks /
Coaching
Actual Accomplishment
Qn
Ql
Ave
3.33333
Get the
average
1 database/tracking system;
received, released and
accounted documents; some
dox missing; updated daily
4
ave
e
3. Filing of documents
100% of share on filing system orderly,
systematic, easy to locate updated
every end of the month
ratings
4.66667
3.33333
3.77777
VS
rag
good job
Numerical
PIB Amount
PIB Amount
(9 mos or
more, but less
than 12 mos.)
PIB Amount
(6 mos or more,
but less than 9
mos.)
PBB Amount
Outstanding
4.20-5.00
P 2,500
P 2,000
P 1,500
Very Satisfactory
3.404.19
P 2,000
P1,500
P 1,000
Satisfactory
2.603.39
P 1,500
P 1,000
P 500
Unsatisfactory
1.80-2.59
No PIB
No PIB
No PIB
Poor
1.001.79
No PIB
No PIB
No PIB
Depends on the
OBS rank and
individual rank
based on IPCR
rating; has
different rate
for Best-BetterGood
THANK YOU!
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Loc.101 or 102