Scribd
Upload
29 views

Introduction To Cloud Computing With Microsoft Azure

Introduction to Cloud Computing With Microsoft Azure

Uploaded by

Nadikattu Ravikishore
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
29 views

Introduction To Cloud Computing With Microsoft Azure

Introduction to Cloud Computing With Microsoft Azure

Uploaded by

Nadikattu Ravikishore
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 46

Cloud Computing with

Microsoft Azure
Michael Stiefel
www.reliablesoftware.com
[email protected]
http://www.reliablesoftware.com/dasblog/default.aspx
Copyright 2009 Reliable Software, Inc.

Azure's Three Flavors


Azure Operating System (Platform as a Service)
Worker/Web Role, Blobs, Queues, Tables
Azure .NET Services (Software as a Service)
Access Control Service
SQL Azure (SQL Server in the sky)
Workflow Services
Azure Hosted Services (Application as a Service)
Hosted Exchange
Host SharePoint
Copyright 2009 Reliable
Software, Inc.

Cloud Operating System


Abstracts the underlying infrastructure
Manages resources

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Azure Platform
Service management
Compute
Storage
Developer experience
You define rules and provide code
Platform deploys, monitors, and manages your service
according to your rules

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Azure Services Platform

Your Service

Web/ Worker Role


Blobs, Tables, Queues

SQL
Azure

Access
Control

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Live
Services

Dynamic
CRM
Services

Demo: Scalable Architecture


LB

n
Web Role

m
Worker Role

Cloud Storage (blob, table, queue)

Cloud Computing is Utility


Computing
Illusion of Infinite
Computing Resources on
Demand

No up front commitment
Pay for resources as needed

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Three Classes of Vendors


Scalability, Failover, Recovery
Amazon
Google / Force.com
Microsoft

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Utility Computing Scenarios


Outsource Your Infrastructure
Occasional Need for Massive Computation
No Need to Build to Peak Capacity
Cloud-Bursting
Software as a Service
Data Close To Your Customer
Internet Scale

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Economic Conditions
Pricing
Service Level Agreement (SLA)

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Azure Platform Pricing


Compute $0.12 per hour
Storage $0.15 per GB month
Storage Transactions $0.01 per 10K
Bandwidth
$0.1 in per GB
$0.15 out per GB
Within the datacenter is free

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

SQL Azure
Up to 1 GB database $9.99 /month
Up to 10 GB database $99.99 / month
Bandwidth
0.1 in per GB
0.15 out per GB

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

SMB Data Costs


10 GB SQL Database
2 GB a month data in, 4 GB a month data out
$100.77 a month
A SAN can cost from $30-40,000
25 year equivalent
Does not consider the cost of infrastructure employees
or the software licenses.
Copyright 2009 Reliable
Software, Inc.

SMB Compute Costs


$1051 per year for one compute process with no idle
time
$31.53 if you did a storage save every second
$3600 per year 2 TB of disk storage
About $5000 / year
Employee and licensing costs not considered
Copyright 2009 Reliable
Software, Inc.

Announced Azure SLA


Computation: 99.95% up time
SQL Azure: 99.9% up time

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Utility SLA
2007

2008

Goal

Actual

Goal

Actual

Calls Answered Within 30 Seconds

80%

84.64%

80%

85.47%

Average # Service Interruptions Per Customer

1.373

1.027

1.373

1.051

Average # Min Without Power Per Customer

168.69

82.61

168.69

78.55

Service Appointments Met

87.78%

98.52%

88.37% 98.73%

Actual Meters Read "on cycle" vs estimate

93.15%

98.75%

93.15% 99.05%

Complaint Cases Per 1000 Customers

1.496

.974

1.496

Utility Availability: 99.98%


Copyright 2009 Reliable
Software, Inc.

1.080

Compelling Case
SMB Applications
Massive Computation Needs
No Need to Build to Peak Capacity
Cloud Bursting
Software as a Service

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Utility Computing Scenarios


Outsource Your Infrastructure
Occasional Need for Massive Computation
No Need to Build to Peak Capacity
Cloud-Bursting
Software as a Service
Data Close To Your Customer
Internet Scale

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Latency Exists
Speed of light in fiber optic cable: 124,000 miles per
second
A ping Japan from Boston takes 100 ms.
Real number is about 250 ms.
Fetch 10 images for a web site: 1 second
Ignores Latency of the operation

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Bandwidth is Limited
Shannon's Law: C = B log2 (1 + S / N)
Capacity = bit / second
Bandwidth (hertz)
S/N * 5 to double capacity given bandwidth

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Latency is Not Bandwidth


Size of the shovel vs. how fast you can shovel
Infinite shovel capacity(bandwidth) is limited by how
fast one can shovel (latency).

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Great Bandwidth, Poor Latency


Buy a two terabyte disk drive
Put it in a car and drive to New York

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Expensive to Move Data


Computational Power Gets Cheaper Faster than
Network Bandwidth
Cheaper to compute where data is instead of moving it
Distributed Computing Economics Jim Gray

Want data to be close to where your customer is

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Connectivity is Not Always Available


Cell phone
Data Center Outages
Equipment Upgrades
Data redundancy to improve reliability

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Waiting for Data Slows Computation


Partition Your Data to Improve Performance
Partition Your Data to Achieve Internet Scale
Data Naturally Lives In Multiple Places
Distributed Transactions Impede Throughput
Human Interaction

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Relational Databases Scale Up Not Out


Relational Databases scale well on a single node or
cluster
Complexity of relations
Query plans with hundreds of options the query analyzer evaluates at
runtime
Normalization
ACID Transactions

Two Phase Commit guarantees consistency if you have


infinite time
Quick scale up difficult with hardware upgrade
Copyright 2009 Reliable
Software, Inc.

Economics Dictate Scale Out Not Up


Cheap, commodity hardware argues for spreading load
across multiple servers
How do you distribute data among several databases?
How do you achieve consistency?
How do you achieve throughput with distributed
transactions?

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

CAP Theorem

Consistency

Availability

Can Have Any Two

Tolerance to
network
Partitions

Eric Brewer, UC Berkeley, Founder Inktomi


http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~brewer/cs262b-2004/PODC-keynote.pdf

Consistency and Availability


Single site Database
Database Cluster
LDAP
Consistency Availability
Partitioning

Two phase commit


Validate Cache

Consistency and Partitioning


Distributed Database
Distributed Locking
Consistency Availability
Partitioning

Pessimistic Locking
Minority Partitions
Invalid

Availability and Partitioning


Forfeit Consistency
Google BigTable
Amazon Simple DB
Consistency

Availability

Partitioning

Optimistic
Can Denormalize
No ACID transactions
Compensation

Storage in Azure
World of Consistency
SQL Azure
World of Internet Scale (Numbers or Geography)
Blobs, Tables, Queues

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

SQL Data Services


Revised to be SQL Server in the sky
Tables, Stored Procedures, Triggers, Constraints Views, Indices
Uses TDS (Tabular Data Stream) Protocol

Change connection string to get to another SQL Server


No Current Availability

Get Started with SQL Express

Windows Azure Storage


Services
Tables of key/value pairs for highly scalable structured
storage
CRUD operations
No FK relations, Joins, Constraints, Schemas
Partition / Tables / Entities / Properties
Entity has Unique Row Key

Azure Storage Services


Fit well with tens or hundreds of commodity servers
Better mapping with objects than ORM
No integrity constraints
No joined queries
No standards among vendors (lock in)
Will Microsoft have query limits?
Amazon no query longer than 5 seconds
Google no more than 1000 items returned

Car Table
Key

Attribute 1

Attribute 2

Attribute 3

Make: BMW

Color: Grey

Year 2003

Make: Nissan

Color : Red
Yellow

Year: 2005

Plane: Boeing

Color: Blue

Attribute 4
Transmission: Easytronic
Engine: Rolls Royce

Do You Need To Partition Your


Data to Scale?

No Partitioning
Natural Partitioning
Partitioning for Availability

If you have to partition to scale,


how do you decide between
availability and consistency ?

What is the Cost of an


Apology?
Amazon
Airline reservations
Stock Trades
Deposit of a Bank Check
Deleting a photo from Flickr or Facebook

Sometimes the cost is too high


Authentication
SAML tokens expire

Launching a nuclear weapon

Businesses Apologize Anyway


Vendor drops the last crystal vase
Check bounces
Double-entry bookkeeping requires compensation
at least 13th century

Eventually make consistent

State of the Software != State


of the World

Software approximates the state of the world


It makes the best guess possible
Sometimes that is wrong
Other computers might have other opinions
Overturn software myths of the past 25 years.

How consistent?
Business Decision
How much does it cost to get it absolutely right?
Computers can remember their guesses
Can replicate to share guesses
It may be cheaper to forget, and reconcile later

Design For Eventual


Consistency
Identify objects by unique key (partition key / row key)
Objects can move when repartitioning
Cannot assume two objects remain on the same
machine
Data might go offline
Transactions can only apply on per object basis
Different computations might come to different
conclusions
Define message based workflows for ultimate
reconciliation and replication of results

Demos ?

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

Conclusions
Understanding Azure is about understanding
Economics of cost and availability
Need for Scalability
Architectural Implications
Design for Eventual Consistency
Remember the 2 / 10 rule

Copyright 2009 Reliable


Software, Inc.

You might also like