Interference (Workshop 10) Winston Boon - ID: n9450947 Q (1a) Confidence Interval
Interference (Workshop 10) Winston Boon - ID: n9450947 Q (1a) Confidence Interval
( 2)
N1, 1
t 9 , 0.975
Use ttable find t multiplier using values
t multiplier ( t 9 , 0.975 ) =2.262
s
3
95%CI : x t multiplier
=95 %CI :110.5 2.262
N
10
( 108.354,112.646 )
95 confident that isinterval
Q(1b) Hypothesis Testing
x u0
Calculate t test =
s
N
110.5110
=0.527046
3
10
|t test|<t multiplier=2.262<0.527046
Not enough ev idence for rejecting null hypothesis , thususing MATLAB Pvalue
with 2( 1tcdf ( t , N ) )
P=0.6097
'
Rvalue > =0.6097> 0.05(do n t neglect null hypothesis)
Part (c)
If all measurements come out to be the same,
x =110.5, S=3, =110, Sample 200
t
; given =0.05
N1,1
2 1P ( t <|t test|)
2[ 1tcdf ( t , N ) ]
2[ 1tcdf ( 0.5270,200 ) ]
P=0.0194
Pvalue <=0.0194 <0.05
Reject null hypothesis
Are your results the same as in Part (b)? If not why?
The results changed in part C, as the sample size increases. Larger sample sizes essentially
come with smaller, more accurate confidence intervals and smaller p-values. Larger sample
sizes similarly give accurate answers, thus the results in part b, are more accurate than in Part
(c), because of the samples size, hence why the results differ.